I completely relate to the description of the Dance of Shiva during my own awakening experience, despite knowing nothing about Hinduism at the time ^_^
Swami Vivekananda’s energy and conscious still pervades the world, inspiring youth like me. He held my hand when I felt lost finding myself in this cosmos ❤️
Why is a need to have one's kundalini aroused when one could have such vigour, vitality, charm and glow at the age of 90 without it. Truly marvelous to hear Dr Karan Singh. Thanks for bringing this to us, dear Raja !!
Look at the glow ( noor) on Dr. Karan ji’s face, no blemish. Look at Rajaji’s face, look at Sadhguru’s face, even his hands, no wrinkles even after age of 60. These are the signs what sorts of chemicals reactions the body is generating (no anxieties or fear). I find it easier to recognize these faces these days.
Although I study occultism and ritual magick mainly in the Kemetic realms, I keep on coming back to you Raja and also the teachings of "YOGA" I remember watching your first show I watched on RU-vid entitled Shiva, with this graceful teacher and now see you again. I am under the firm belief that exploring your consciousness should not be dogmatic. I believe that all of these teachings are all related to each other because they flow from the Divine. It is like Dr. Singh and you discussed, the Divine comes in many forms and the being dogmatic is a form of being egoistic (my interpretation) in a way. I think it holds people back, much like Dr. Singh mentioned the 5 parts to release. I also believe that ALL of these teachings come into one simple but not easy idea; alchemy. The combining all of the elements and "chemicals" within you, in the way that the "tree of life" and the "flower of life" and sacred geometry does. Being the SUN and recognising the divinity in you. I appreciate the kind hearted and warm spirited conversations you have with many great teachers and this makes you a great teacher yourself. My love goes out to you and may you keep sharing this light that radiates out from you.
Interfaith so important I think, to retain authenticity & meaning & ritual of each....can see how this could prevent or diminish watering down or diluting substance of spirituality & faithfulness. BlesSINGS & AbunDANCE All¹...if we faithfully use scaffolding of each faith in its most original form...then like Bruce Lee, all can be melted, merged to be fitting of particular time & space per se...
@@rajadasworld oh, the gap in between fighting...like in Ouspensky Tarot major 14 card says roughly 'the rainbow water stream flows in what direction between silver & gold cup we do not know'...
Can anyone please state here the name of the Englishman who was a First World War pilot, came to India as a professor of English after the war and ended up becoming a Hindu monk? I couldn't catch the name, and couldn't find anything relevant through google either. Thanks.
sometimes a famous guru is catched with a woman having sex with her.and this guru has good science and he can teach interesting good spiritual things but majority of people leave him because they say that he is contaminated. now my question is what should we do in this situation ?can watching his spiritual videos affect our spirit badly or we can continue to learn good things from his speeches and his videos without affecting our spirit badly?
Wisdom is without personality; sometimes, it comes through saints and sometimes sinners. You have to become the Hamsa or the Swan and be your own Guru to discern between milk and water or between truth, wisdom and knowledge and the dramas of Maya and living life as a human being.
"tolerance is an ugly word. to tolerate means, you have already humiliated the other person. you are already higher, holier, more understanding. the people who talk about tolerance are the most intolerant people. i never tolerate. either i accept, or i simply forget all about the person. he has the right to be himself, i have the right to be myself - there is no need for any tolerance. just look at the word 'tolerance' - there is hostility in it! already you have accepted, that there is no possibility of friendship, no possibility of being together, lovingly. tolerance simply means, somehow, live and let them live... it is not a beautiful word! it is certainly ugly! there is no need for tolerance if there is no hostility. it is simply to cover up hostility. i dont tolerate anybody, because i am not hostile in the first place. for example, jesus says 'love your enemies', but that means, first you have to create enemies, otherwise how are you going to love enemies? I accept their right to be themself, i am not tolerating. i will criticise him if i feel it is wrong, it is out of compassion and love that i will criticise him, because i am concerned about him. tolerance simply means 'go to hell, we dont bother'. there are different sets of values, different idealogies, and i love the freedom for myself and for them! they may be against me, that does not make any difference. i will fight for their freedom too! just the way i will fight for my freedom. but i will not tolerate, i will criticise them. either someday he has to accept me, or someday i have to accept him. tolerance means that we have decided that now there is no possibility for any bridge."
Not true. Tolerance is a beautiful word as it implies that you remove your ego and prejudices before engaging with someone. Swami Vikenanda used it correctly.
