Draupadi Vastraharan|Ashish Patil and Rutuja junnarkar 

Same here..

Me too

Still she is insulted by fools now. Ghor kaliyug.

@@santoshjha394 even fool is small word

@@santoshjha394 Insulted by sonyputra coronabhakts.👍

ikr...the judges get upset when they do Indian classical performance more than once, but all they time they do stupid western moves and the judges love it? its getting pretty boring now...i want our cultural dances back

सही है। हर डांस और सिगिंग रियलिटी शो में हमेशा वेस्टर्न को ही प्राथमिकता क्यों देते हैं?

yess

Please vote this week. First cry se 50 & Sony liv app se 50 = Total 100 votes can be done from one number... please forward it to the maximum.....your support much needed... specially for our Indian dance form to win. Ganpati Bappa Morya 🙏🙏🙏🙏

This time all India should support Ashish and Rutuja ...let's bring the lost glory of our culture back...we all have power to do that..... Instead of ignore we should fight for it.

YeAh exactly ❤️

Any idea about which song the flute intro for Draupadi was from?

B

Ur right

Yes tears rolled down..... Very heart touching

Duryodhan isn’t the biggest villain of all time - what is this judge saying. He is a complex character. The Pandavas were definitely not saints either. His dramatic statement is prob based on no critical thinking .

Really .....

7

Don't worry sister .krishna hai na Jai shree krishna ,🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Because every girl is a Draupadi

@@dharshikabk1839 only if she learns shastra vidya (english mein martial arts)

The sad reality is men do it and not that it happens with women. The sad thing is they do it.

True.

Me too

Golden heart😉

I m also

Literally crying

Me too

Barobar aahe sir tumcha👌

Jay shree radhe krishna❤

We should call bhagwan everytime... Jai shree radhe Krishna ❤️...

And there are girls who idolizes people like Karan who ordered disrobing of Droupdi. तस्मिन्न उपरते शब्दे राधेयः करॊधमूर्छितः परगृह्य रुचिरं बाहुम इदं वचनम अब्रवीत 27 दृश्यन्ते वै विकर्णे हि वैकृतानि बहून्य अपि तज्जस तस्य विनाशाय यथाग्निर अरणि परजः 28 एते न किं चिद अप्य आहुश चॊद्यमानापि कृष्णया धर्मेण विजितां मन्ये मन्यन्ते दरुपदात्मजाम 29 तवं तु केवलबाल्येन धार्तराष्ट्र विदीर्यसे यद बरवीषि सभामध्ये बालः सथविर भाषितम 30 न च धर्मं यथातत्त्वं वेत्सि दुर्यॊधनावर यद बरवीषि जितां कृष्णाम अजितेति सुमन्दधीः 31 कथं हय अविजितां कृष्णां मन्यसे धृतराष्ट्रज यदा सभायां सर्वस्वं नयस्तवान पाण्डवाग्रजः 32 अभ्यन्तरा च सर्वस्वे दरौपदी भरतर्षभ एवं धर्मजितां कृष्णां मन्यसे न जितां कथम 33 कीर्तिता दरौपदी वाचा अनुज्ञाता च पाण्डवैः भवत्य अविजिता केन हेतुनैषा मता तव 34 मन्यसे वा सभाम एताम आनीताम एकवाससम अधर्मेणेति तत्रापि शृणु मे वाक्यम उत्तरम 35 एकॊ भर्ता सत्रिया देवैर विहितः कुरुनन्दन इयं तव अनेकवशगा बन्धकीति विनिश्चिता 36 अस्याः सभाम आनयनं न चित्रम इति मे मतिः एकाम्बर धरत्वं वाप्य अथ वापि विवस्त्रता 37 यच चैषां दरविणं किं चिद या चैषा ये च पाण्डवाः सौबलेनेह तत सर्वं धर्मेण विजितं वसु 38 दुःशासन सुबालॊ ऽयं विकर्णः पराज्ञवादिकः पाण्डवानां च वासांसि दरौपद्याश चाप्य उपाहर 39 तच छरुत्वा पाण्डवाः सर्वे सवानि वासांसि भारत अवकीर्यॊत्तरीयाणि सभायां समुपाविशत 40 ततॊ दुःशासनॊ राजन दरौपद्या वसनं बलात सभामध्ये समाक्षिप्य वयपक्रष्टुं परचक्रमे And at that sound, the son of Radha, deprived of his senses by anger, waving his well-shaped arms, said these words,--'O Vikarna, many opposite and inconsistent conditions are noticeable in this assembly. Like fire produced from a faggot, consuming the faggot itself, this thy ire will consume thee. These personages here, though urged by Krishna, have not uttered a word. They all regard the daughter of Drupada to have been properly won. Thou alone, O son of Dhritarashtra in consequence of thy immature years, art bursting with wrath, for though but a boy thou speakest in the assembly as if thou wert old. O younger brother of Duryodhana, thou dost not know what morality truly is, for thou sayest like a fool that this Krishna who hath been (justly) won as not won at all. O son of Dhritarashtra, how dost thou regard Krishna as not won, when the eldest of the Pandavas before this assembly staked all his possessions? O bull of the Bharata race, Draupadi is included in all the possessions (of Yudhishthira). Therefore, why regardest thou Krishna who hath been justly won as not won? Draupadi had been mentioned (by Suvala) and approved of as a stake by the Pandavas. For what reason then dost thou yet regard her as not won? Or, if thou thinkest that bringing her hither attired in a single piece of cloth, is an action of impropriety, listen to certain excellent reasons I will give. O son of the Kuru race, the gods have ordained only one husband for one woman. This Draupadi, however, hath many husbands. Therefore, certain it is that she is an unchaste woman. To bring her, therefore, into this assembly attired though she be in one piece of cloth--even to uncover her is not at all an act that may cause surprise. Whatever wealth the Pandavas had--she herself and these Pandavas themselves,--have all been justly won by the son of Suvala. O Dussasana, this Vikarna speaking words of (apparent) wisdom is but a boy. Take off the robes of the Pandava as also the attire of Draupadi. Hearing these words the Pandavas, O Bharata, took of their upper garments and throwing them down sat in that assembly. Then Dussasana, O king, forcibly seizing Draupadi's attire before the eyes of all, began to drag it off her person" Son of Radha is karna. Droupdi was also called Krishna. Vikarna is the youngest brother of Duryodhana who showed dissent regarding the whole event but was shut down by karna. And what followed

@@rahulkaith4679 you are right.

And there are girls who idolizes people like Karan who ordered disrobing of Droupdi. तस्मिन्न उपरते शब्दे राधेयः करॊधमूर्छितः परगृह्य रुचिरं बाहुम इदं वचनम अब्रवीत 27 दृश्यन्ते वै विकर्णे हि वैकृतानि बहून्य अपि तज्जस तस्य विनाशाय यथाग्निर अरणि परजः 28 एते न किं चिद अप्य आहुश चॊद्यमानापि कृष्णया धर्मेण विजितां मन्ये मन्यन्ते दरुपदात्मजाम 29 तवं तु केवलबाल्येन धार्तराष्ट्र विदीर्यसे यद बरवीषि सभामध्ये बालः सथविर भाषितम 30 न च धर्मं यथातत्त्वं वेत्सि दुर्यॊधनावर यद बरवीषि जितां कृष्णाम अजितेति सुमन्दधीः 31 कथं हय अविजितां कृष्णां मन्यसे धृतराष्ट्रज यदा सभायां सर्वस्वं नयस्तवान पाण्डवाग्रजः 32 अभ्यन्तरा च सर्वस्वे दरौपदी भरतर्षभ एवं धर्मजितां कृष्णां मन्यसे न जितां कथम 33 कीर्तिता दरौपदी वाचा अनुज्ञाता च पाण्डवैः भवत्य अविजिता केन हेतुनैषा मता तव 34 मन्यसे वा सभाम एताम आनीताम एकवाससम अधर्मेणेति तत्रापि शृणु मे वाक्यम उत्तरम 35 एकॊ भर्ता सत्रिया देवैर विहितः कुरुनन्दन इयं तव अनेकवशगा बन्धकीति विनिश्चिता 36 अस्याः सभाम आनयनं न चित्रम इति मे मतिः एकाम्बर धरत्वं वाप्य अथ वापि विवस्त्रता 37 यच चैषां दरविणं किं चिद या चैषा ये च पाण्डवाः सौबलेनेह तत सर्वं धर्मेण विजितं वसु 38 दुःशासन सुबालॊ ऽयं विकर्णः पराज्ञवादिकः पाण्डवानां च वासांसि दरौपद्याश चाप्य उपाहर 39 तच छरुत्वा पाण्डवाः सर्वे सवानि वासांसि भारत अवकीर्यॊत्तरीयाणि सभायां समुपाविशत 40 ततॊ दुःशासनॊ राजन दरौपद्या वसनं बलात सभामध्ये समाक्षिप्य वयपक्रष्टुं परचक्रमे And at that sound, the son of Radha, deprived of his senses by anger, waving his well-shaped arms, said these words,--'O Vikarna, many opposite and inconsistent conditions are noticeable in this assembly. Like fire produced from a faggot, consuming the faggot itself, this thy ire will consume thee. These personages here, though urged by Krishna, have not uttered a word. They all regard the daughter of Drupada to have been properly won. Thou alone, O son of Dhritarashtra in consequence of thy immature years, art bursting with wrath, for though but a boy thou speakest in the assembly as if thou wert old. O younger brother of Duryodhana, thou dost not know what morality truly is, for thou sayest like a fool that this Krishna who hath been (justly) won as not won at all. O son of Dhritarashtra, how dost thou regard Krishna as not won, when the eldest of the Pandavas before this assembly staked all his possessions? O bull of the Bharata race, Draupadi is included in all the possessions (of Yudhishthira). Therefore, why regardest thou Krishna who hath been justly won as not won? Draupadi had been mentioned (by Suvala) and approved of as a stake by the Pandavas. For what reason then dost thou yet regard her as not won? Or, if thou thinkest that bringing her hither attired in a single piece of cloth, is an action of impropriety, listen to certain excellent reasons I will give. O son of the Kuru race, the gods have ordained only one husband for one woman. This Draupadi, however, hath many husbands. Therefore, certain it is that she is an unchaste woman. To bring her, therefore, into this assembly attired though she be in one piece of cloth--even to uncover her is not at all an act that may cause surprise. Whatever wealth the Pandavas had--she herself and these Pandavas themselves,--have all been justly won by the son of Suvala. O Dussasana, this Vikarna speaking words of (apparent) wisdom is but a boy. Take off the robes of the Pandava as also the attire of Draupadi. Hearing these words the Pandavas, O Bharata, took of their upper garments and throwing them down sat in that assembly. Then Dussasana, O king, forcibly seizing Draupadi's attire before the eyes of all, began to drag it off her person" Son of Radha is karna. Droupdi was also called Krishna. Vikarna is the youngest brother of Duryodhana who showed dissent regarding the whole event but was shut down by karna. And what followed

I agree with you. Sometimes everything is present, only dance is missing.

@@Madhura1818 yes bro I agree with u😊 I too like Mahabharata and ramayan.. I am a big fan of that 😊🙏 jai shree Krishna 🙏😊

yes

True

@@Madhura1818 whole bollywood dance industry explained in one sentence.

U r right

Tum mare nhi

@@catismylife681 Han thoda sa, ab theek hu! Thank you.

Exactly me too Mayank🌈😻

Mayank Pratap WOW ...perfectly described , with Correct Words

😂😂😂😂

I know right!

Where is the irony. Shakti in real life is a true gentleman.

Are you serious!??? Shakti Kapoor is an actor... In real life, he is a true gentleman... Marrying Padmini Kholapure's sister and still they are beautiful couple together which is rare in Bollywood...!!!

Jisne sbse jada vastraharan kiye h😂😂

Exactly

nytr ky

Yes exactly ❤️🙄

तुम्ही दोघे जणू एक दुजेके लिए बने हो