I can think of several different ways they could have done this with none of them being they were launched. What do most of the population care about? Money! -Hey kid, you wanna star in a simulation of launching into space in the dildo rocket? You can film it and put it on your channel and we’ll also set you up with several sponsors to set you and your family up for the rest of your lives? Here’s a check for 5 million dollars to start with, but you’re gonna have to all sign a NDA first. Humanity has been destroyed because instead of few being cowards most are now and most will choose to be a rich slave of offered the chance.
Howdy, I couldn’t seem to tag you. Check the message I left you so that I can send you these “rocket” pics and discuss the “star” that was in the sky last night . Let’s see if this huge thing is there tonight
They never lie, they are asked if the earth is flar and their answer is always, no is not it is round. And in fact it's round, even on the flat earth map. What we call earth, our world contained by Antarctica, is round.
Please someone tell me what are the stars or constellations that can be seen all 365 nights in a year, because globe believers argue that we see different stars throughout the year claiming that earth is going around the sun.
@@Almighty_Flat_Earth while true that the locations of the stars change throughout the year, it's also observable that their patterns remain the same, which wouldn't be the case if somehow the Heliocentric model did manage to be true, however to answer as to what they are? Well, possibly just lights? water vibrating at high frequency? (it has been proven that at the right frequency water starts to glow) and given there is water up there who's to say.
I wonder how they account for the g- force at 1k mph and their faces aren't warped back into their seats and they can still talk with almost no vibration in their voice. Freaking amazing a *sarcasm*
@@KenSilvers Is that your best fantasy flying space glob proof? Get with your school of choice and show us a globe demonstration scaled down in a VACUUM chamber with water on your pearoid rock complete with grabbity and gradient of atmos adjacent to said vacuum, then we'll have something to debate... And Since grabbity is such a weak force compared to the electric and magnetic forces it should be easy, right? Bu bu but muh CGI computer model predicts e'ry thang... Except it doesn't! We don't have to beLIEve your rockefeller funded evolutionary space religion. Make school tell the truth, zealot. Show some proof.
Was looking for this exact comment. I am very familiar with editing and it legitimately looks like the earth was keyframed to curve as the camera moved. Did not look natural at all.
Interesting how we can send a phallic symbol that high and it returns to the same spot over a pear in a vacuum that's moving hundreds of times faster than a bullet.
Exactly if you look at the iss live footage they are above 1 million feet and it looks like earth is moving pretty fast , so why doesnt it move at lower altitudes, witch should be faster .my theory is theres only movement in earths orbit so sun and moon orbit the earth
funny how the earth changes from being slightly curved horizon looking through 4 windows (2 of those windows showing same curved horizon) to a shot through 2 windows showing it as flat. Then shows a slight curve through one window and pans down making the horizon bend (convex) more and more as the camera pans down. This just proves it was the trickery of a fish eye lens.
I think they do the bending of the horizon to get us to claim they used a fisheye lens when they were up there but unreality they never left the ground other than the zero G plane footage for the floating scenes.
@@DITRH Def, agreed. They had us going i think for a good while with the fish eye bit. Alas I think when you correctly spotted that they are/were launching inflatables it really upset the apple cart over in deception creation land.
You should have clipped the shots outside of the window of the capsule just before it landed, the earth was "curved" just as much as it was in space and they were just a few feet off the ground. Obviously the windows or type of camera used caused the curvature
@@DITRH isnt the 0 gravity they claim to be in while in space just supposed to be them free falling around the Earth like the ISS? And that there still is 90% of the gravity of Earths surface. So if it is real it's just them going up high and descending like the 0 gravity vomit comit planes. So they maybe get a min or so of zero gravity and that's the reason they cant show a full non stop unedited clip
Please someone tell me what are the stars or constellations that can be seen all 365 nights in a year, because globe believers argue that we see different stars throughout the year claiming that earth is going around the sun.
Interesting how thw Disney castle shows the rocket go in an arch, falling to the ground. ALSO, the castle itself looks like a rocket launching pad we often see.
The fact that they even put a 2 second clip of him getting all emotional and crying about his experience , with high school drama class level acting is hilarious 😂
Ruse-A ruse isn't just any lie. A ruse involves a more elaborate process of deception than merely making a false claim, although making a false claim might be part of a ruse. For example, a heartbroken young man might sob, "She only pretended to love me!
So you think that if you jump in the air you'll fly off in the opposite direction the Earth is spinning lol? That is not at all how it works. You are tethered to the earth by gravity in the same way you would be if you jumped in the air, there is no difference. Of course you will drift based on various factors but these rockets are designed specifically to land back at a specific point, it's not going to be thousands of miles away when you are launching directly up.
You have stumbled into the real world. Hang around for a while and take a look around. Don't let your Matrix programming scare you into opposing away. This is your Red Pill moment. What will you do with it. Watch these documentaries and then you will know. ru-vid.com/group/PLEzivhxtxgbs6LE7kquTB_ve1QCG_bOpu
I just heard about this space x mission called dear moon. Supposed to launch this coming year. You'll never guess who one of the crew is. It's the everyday astronaut Tim Dodd. 😂 Hilarious!
When capsule hit the Earth back, there was a lot sand fly , even at free fall this much sand would not fly. Looking that flying sand no one will stay alive
That's exactly how I feel knowing how stupid a person has to be to believe the earth is flat. There's not a single argument that can't be countered by logic.
So the only time we get a camera up to the window.....we see the Earth morphing and changing shape right before our very eyes. Amazing. But............when the camera is looking around inside the capsule, we see the horizon out there at eye level and FLAT. Hmm.................Imagine that.
Bro people like this actually exist. Bro just ‘counted the number of edits’ in an attempt to debunk an entire space project with clear edits to build anticipation, not to evade the raw footage 😂 just because you are deluded doesn’t mean the rest of us are.
Have you heard about the space x moon mission that's going to launch next year? It's called dear moon and the everyday astronaut will be on it. This ought to be good for several laughs!
Ya this is rather silly and contrasting of them to do, because when Shatner and Wally Funk went up several months back they even clearly stated to everyone that they weren't high enough to ever see any cruvature.
No one looked outside when they went up, and all of them had a window seat. My guess is that the windows where greenskreens not showing anything at the moment when they sat there. Coreolis? Straight up, and straight down?? In 15 min the speed of sound is a long distant. Thunder or explosions are seconds away. Before landing..-We are at mountain heights, and the earth was still curved! ha ha!!
@@twocyclediesel1280 Who is right? This one.. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ouOYAlcvwOQ.html Or this one ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HQNCLbkBZpg.html Can´t have both!
@@DITRH Yeah that flame was as fake as fake can be, looked like a 150$ propane welding torch. And the acting was atrocious, over the top and a total cringefest. When you start watching these productions with new eyes , it all becomes obvious. The fakery is written all over it. And Ditrh made it even more obvious.
@@DITRH Why don't they just include a few well known 'flat earthers' to be involved in the exercise? That way they would be confirmed as being honest. Yeah right. ;-/
I live near the blue origin facility outside of el paso tx. The first time ‘new shepherd’ was supposed to launch, everyone and their mother in el paso was going to go sit off the highway about 20 miles from the site to watch it. The whole city was abuzz… then the announcement came day before launch that no one was allowed to go watch it, even far far off the highway 😂. And naturally after the ‘first time’ it’s old news and nobody cares to go all the way out there. If one wanted to launch nothing to nowhere, but say they did… Given a choice of anywhere on earth… white sands is where you’d go to do it. (Ps that’s why they ‘tested’ the first nuke out there’ no one to see there was No explosion lol. There is nothing x nothing out there… no one to verify anything and if you did try to go out there through mountain passes long range cameras would spot your heat signature looong before and alert the authorities to come scoop you up.
How long before RU-vid remove the 'link in description' feature, in fact, how long before they remove EVERYTHING and just rebrand it Mr Beast Tube? Ha ha, nice one Dave
Wait i thought we lost the technology according to NASA...They better make copies of theie blue prints and send them to NASA SO NASA can finally go to the moon for real.
Why should the earth rotate under him? Newton's third law of motion (known for 300 years, used by engineers all the time, you experience it all the time in your everyday life): Every object keeps its state of motion (so doesn't change speed or direction) unless it is affected by a force. That "trash can" moved together with earth's surface when it was on the ground and then kept on moving with that speed when it left the ground. So it moves together with earth's surface. For the exact same reason why your body keeps on moving together with an airplane when you jump inside of an airplane and land in the same place. - can you disprove Newton's law, so have you any example against it? (good luck and congratulations to the Nobel prize) - if you cannot disprove it: What should slow down the trash can after it has left the ground?
Thank god, I thought I was the only one who thought this was fake. Good to see other like minded people. I mean c’mon have people never heard of green screen ? The amount of people in there comments that believe this is scary.
Pretty sure the fish eye effect is just fodder for us. So so doubtful that a youtube star and a bunch old rich people put themselves inside a penis shaped metal can and lit a match. Far more likely (I would think..) they paid for the expensive yet exclusive ‘rights’ to lie about it.
I was wondering how the moon is locked in Earth's gravity being over 200,000 Miles away but the people in the international space station are weightless at 200 Miles from the earth. What am I missing?
(yes, I have seen that the comment is old)At the altitude of the ISS gravity is only 13% weaker than down here. But is not fixed there with a propulsion that pushes up from underneath. So it is falling. And so the astronauts in it are falling. They are weightless for the same reason why the Dude perfect guy is weightless here. "Weigtlessness" doesn't mean, that there is no gravity, instead it means that no other force than gravity affects you. Astronauts don't start to float around weightless in their spacecraft when they reach space. Instead they start to float when the rocket stops the engine and the spacecraft begins to coast/fall/move only by its momentum. The reason why the ISS or satellites don't fall straight down is, that they were accelerated sideways by a rocket to such a high speed, that they "fall around the earth" forever. We call that "orbit". Watch this: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ALRdYPMpqQs.html
Next time Dave, if its a UK guy your debating, run it by me first! Lol. (This is linked to my previous Shawn Twatwood comment incase anyone is wondering what I'm on about🙂). I can give you the true UK heads up. Peace ✌️ ❤️
Where do you got this nonsense from that an astronaut has to handle 9G? Oh, in training maybe? For extreme unplanned situation? Just look things up, they receive 3 G. You also have that in a roller coaster. And you can calculate it, look at the numbers about this flight. Also in orbital rockets you don't accelerate with more. Oh, oK, maybe orbital rockets have higher forces on re-entry. But this is not an orbital rocket.
Please someone tell me what are the stars or constellations that can be seen all 365 nights in a year, because globe believers argue that we see different stars throughout the year claiming that earth is going around the sun.
If you take a picture at the same time and direction late at night every month or so then you'll see the stars change position. For best results point along the ecliptic.
You got to love this s*** what goes up comes back down no matter how high you go isn't that funny the way that works so let's say this is true they go straight up all the sudden they call it space but the rockets falling back to Earth and all the sudden they free float while they're free-flowing sounds like a parabolic flight to me
@@DITRH clearly you don’t know what a normal looking go pro looks like lmao, there was no other lens attached to the go pro, I have a go pro and it’s super obvious when there’s a fish eye lens on the go pro as it bulges out more than usual. In the video it’s almost completely flat, like a normal go pro, no fish eye lens. Hate to break it to you, but this video is as real as it gets, the earth is a globe💀
“Hate to break it to you lmao” Love this convincing argument! Also, please learn how gravity works. If you think it isn’t real, then there’s no way to explain why we fall down. Or Cavendish.
I thought the footage was sus… they got famous of faking their trick shots and faking their reactions. And it would look flat from outer space… that’s how your eye sight works…
You know what's funny about this? Their videos of "trick shots" are fake as well. Not ALL of them. But A LOT of them are. 😕 So THIS makes sense... Earth is FLAT!
The rocket hit something above it when it came to a halt. Firmament? Is it possible that they’re taking people there and calling it “space?” I’ve noticed the horizon appeared flat all the way up until he grabbed the fisheye lens camera for that one shot to show the “round” earth.
They're small cameras they carry are most definitely something akin to a gopro which is on average a 16-24mm lens, not quite a "fish eye" lens but not a 50mm which delivers a more accurate representation of what we see. Obviously the camera crew isn't using any big fancy cameras because of weight/danger of them being slung around in violent conditions. I don't know why I even try though, you guys might not the smartest people on the planet but you certainly know how to twist words and misconstrue statements in a way that sounds ideal to your theory.
No, the rocket hit nothing. It stops the engine and the capsule is released from the rocket, at only about 60 km. That maybe looks like it hits something. But it keeps on going up because of its momentum, and then reaches a maximum of 107 km before it falls back down. Totally normal behaviour, when you for example throw something straight up. Have you even looked in the uncut footage, the numbers, did some research? No, of course not. There is no firmament. Where should it be? When I look up then there is nothing.
If they were TRULY IN SPACE and were weightless and floating then WHY wasn't THE SPACE CRAFT also have weightlessness and FLOAT ALSO? Selective buoyancy? Haha... DUH.... Oh... did the cupula have rockets to propel it down in order to reenter the atmosphere? It's so dumb!
@@BHAMAAydan We always get insulted every time by people that take other people's word as truth since they haven't gone there (space) or did any experiments themselves, when there's no answer to explain space phenomena, they Ad hom us, No answers...like its like a vacuum but not really, it's just no pressure, and in space its +200 degrees in the the sun's light and -200 in the shade but since the particles are far apart you don't freeze or burn up, and gravity can pull down some gases but not helium hydrogen, argon, water vapor, clouds, smoke, ect. Or propulsion using pressurized air or any other thing in a vacuum, when we know we experiment and witness a motionless feather hanging in front of a powered fan inside a vacuum chamber. I guess there are different Laws of physics up there. But keep on with the ad hom's to avoid explaining what can't be explained, we are not stupid... There are professors engineers pilots and even a few astroNOTs that have come forward, many of them to their detriment (it ended their careers by speaking out). Please research this b4 you inssult the next person. Good luck friend.
@@BHAMAAydan Friend, It's nothing more than a Zero G plane that ascends on a parabolic flight to a certain height and then descends at the rate equal to 9.8 m/sec which is the avg falling rate of most any objects, thus giving the occupants a free floating experience for a short time until either the plane levels out(Zero G plane) or in this case (a supposed rocket tube or it's cupola) the parachutes are deployed and slows down it's falling back to earth. There is no "space" involved. What I was getting at, which you seem to fail to grasp, is that if the rocket was in space and out of the supposed pull of gravity causing the occupants to float, it would therefore also cause the craft to float also\, but it didn't....naturally because then it would be descending, obviously. Now do you understand that it is a trick of falling at a certain rate and not that of space? Even your boy Neil Degrass says they are not in space. They go up...they control the fall. Simple...It is just like the Zero G plane. Like I said
@@OzziljianSpace means "outside the atmosphere", who claims that it has to do with gravity? Have you even looked in the formula for gravity? Have you never heard about how Newton saw the connection between an apple falling down, a cannonball that is shot, and the moon orbiting the earth, all because of the same force? Yes, this was just a high zero g flight. So? Who claims anything else? Gravity at the altitude of the ISS (400 km) is only 13% weaker than down hear. the ISS in der free fall, so astronauts are weightless inside if them. But like all satellites it was accelerated sideways by a rocket to such a high speed that it falls sideways around the earth, without getting closer to the ground. That is how orbit works. This rocket doesn't go into orbit but just straight up. And it reached 107 km before it fell down. And as the most used definition for the beginning of space is 100 km, they were in space. Of course the 100 km is an arbitrary definition. The atmosphere becomes thinner fluently, you cannot say where it ends, but it doesn't matter. There is nothing special about space
It's so stupid really, there are no cameras on the outside of the ship to show you the footage on the way up and on the way down. So fake it hurts , but their magic is lost on us we can see behind the vail.
