If we define"wet" as a sensation that we get when a liquid comes in contact with us, then yes, *water is wet* to us. If we define "wet" as "made of liquid or moisture", then water is definitely wet because it is made of liquid and in this sense, all liquids are wet because they all made of liquids
Water is wet, but Fire is not dry. When you burn organic material, like wood or wax, all the hydrogens are converted into water, H20. If you burn glucose, fully half of the volume of the gases produced is water vapor
@@swaggysimp1847 WELL DONT BELIVE EVERYTHING YOU READ IN THE INTERNET GOOGLE ALSO SAID ID DIE IN TWO DAYS A MONTH AGO AND IM STILL HERE Cap lock that I cannot be bothered to fix 😕
Water isn’t wet if you add different properties into it then the added things would be wet. To humans and to anything coming in contact with water then yes it is wet. Then again that is only because we came in contact with it. Water on it’s on is not wet, but the moment you add something in it and or in it then yes it would be wet. And by google water itself is not wet. Therefore water ISN’T wet.
Wet doesn’t naturally occur. Wet is an adjective developed within the human mind as a convenience to describe some that has water on it. Something can’t be naturally wet because without humans the describing word “wet” would not exist. And Without the human logic or convenience of that word. Water isn’t wet. So to every other species water doesn’t exist and so doesn’t the term “wet.” So every other species of animal, alien life form, anything other than human disagree with you’re logic. In conclusion the thing we all know as water isn’t naturally wet. In addition to my conclusion, without the human brain the concept or study of water, the word wet and even water itself doesn’t exist outside the human mind.
My friend and I had this debate in gym, and I didn't talk to her for nearly three days... It was worth it, though. Also, we both agreed that water WASN'T wet, but she was trying to continue the debate (she believed she could make a grand argument, WHICH SHE DID). She didn't tell me until after we started talking again, though. 😅
Water is wet, in the sense of being a liquid which flows easily, because its viscosity is low, which is because its molecules are rather loosely joiner together.
If we define "wet" as a sensation that we get when a liquid comes in contact with us, then yes, water is wet to us. If we define "wet" as "made of liquid or moisture", then water is definitely wet because it is made of liquid, and in this sense, all liquids are wet because they are all made of liquids. In short yes water is WET
Water is not wet, it can make things wet but it's not wet on it's own, for something to have the capability to become wet it also has to have the capability to be dry; like a towel a towel can be weted, and if you let it sit it will become dry over time or if you blow-dry it; if you take water and try to "dry it" it will not work, so we can prove and conclude it can't be dried (no, evaporation doesn't count as "drying water"). Water can not be dried so therefore it can not be wet.
My opinion Water isn't wet. Like, in that case ice is wet too. But is ice actually wet? You can't just casually pour a glass of water into a swimming pool and be like, ":D Dude! I bet the water is feeling wet!" :> I give weird examples. Wet is a sensation that you feel when YOU touch the water. Not when water touches water-
I do not believe water is wet because first things is; we say something is wet when it contacts a solid however water itself isn't solid. And the second thing is we might use "wet" with when any kinds of liquid contacting a solid but we also use it with water so wet also means water + solid = wet solid, but water + water = water and that means it's not wet.
Water is not wet since if we add like salt water then the salt become wet, but notcthe water since water is making things wet by touching it. But when it touch itself, it just add the water together. So water cannot be wet
"Fr the question is is water wet, why are you bringing fire and air to this, what did fire and air ever do to you?" My mind immediately: Water, earth, fire, air. Long ago the f-
“Water isn't wet. Wetness is a description of our experience of water; what happens to us when we come into contact with water in such a way that it impinges on our state of being. We, or our possessions, 'get wet'.” -google
H2O - 2 Hydrogen 1 Oxygen Neither are wet, if waters properties are not wet, then how’s water wet 😭 (anything replied under here that involves the comment will be considered part of a calm debate, not an argument 🤜🤜) Edit: *replied
This is my opinion but water is not wet, Wet is when a liquid comes in contact with something like a towel or your hair when you wash your hair your hair becomes wet because it came in contact with water with a liquid
Air isnt wet or dry, fire isnt wet or dry if you add fire on fire it cant become wet or dry because its just fire therefore water isnt wet or dry. Something can only become wet when water touches it, right. But, it has to be a solid also it has to have minerals other than water. Water cant become wet tho because adding water onto water cant make it wet just like adding fire on fire doesn't make it dry. Fire is fire it's self same as water. Man Idk....🤔🤨
water isnt wet. It makes solids wet. Mixing two liquids wouldnt make the other liquid "wet". If you were underwater, you're not wet yet until you go out to the surface then you'll realize you had gotten wet. Therefore, water isnt wet. AND IF ANYONE TELLS YOU OTHERWISE, THEY ARE WRONG😭
This question plagues me like on one hand if we look at fire nothing is on fire but fire is on things but with water like what it you make oobleck white is a water type substance which doesn't get people wet ig that it depends on how much water there is?
Water isn't wet it makes things wet but it self isn't. Like if you pour water on water you would just get more water but if you pour water on something that becomes wet not the water. Which is why we have water proof stuff to make stuff not wet from water which it self isn't wet.
Water is wet because it has two hydrogen atoms and at a normal temperature and pressure it is a gas but gasses (like air) or oxygen have moisture so therefor water is wet due to moisture in gasses
To everyone who says water is not wet you are wrong. The definition of wetness is when something touch a liquid even if it's another liquid. Now water made out of atoms so by the definition a single atom of water is not wet but if it touch another atom of water than it's wet. The thing that just anger me the most about the audio besides being stupid is that they compare fire and water while fire is an energy and water is a material. (If you learned physics you know what I am talking about)
Im genuinely confused why this is a debate... Wet is a state of an object- not all liquid makes objects wet, if you went to a pool and got out of it, you are wet. If it rains the rain itself isnt wet but the ground is gonna be wet. And the fire is hot thing is falls- not all fire produce heat that causes it to be hot, the air is just air.
Everybody including me is talking about water being wet however guys, I've got an actualy question: what language do people who are born deaf think with???
@@MintSam I don't really think that it's possible unless someone teaches you the sign language because like, even at sign language the movements you do with your hands mean a word / something in real life, if we say that the person is actually just equaling the words or the objects they see with sign language (by comparing and etc. things) so that they can think with sign language, you can't actually just straight up learn or understand that without thinking, whether you do it with realizing or not, that's how brain, learning and acting works. And since you can't just think without knowing anything it's not really possible. Therefore I believe that people are born knowing one language already
@@Nice-fz8up it's not that they are born with knowing one language already, they slowly learn it as they grow up just like how we slowly learn the language we speak by hearing and seeing the people around us as we grow up. A person who's born deaf wouldn't know what it's like hearing smt so not hearing stuff would be the norm for them, naturally people around them will use a certain way to communicate with them and as they grow up they can pick up on that just like how we learn to speak, they will learn to communicate with other people using that specific way, if that makes sense?? Like, what i'm trying to say is, not hearing anything would be a norm for them and I don't they would have to think about what the words sound like, I think they have their own way of interpreting it? So when a deaf person is thinking about smt, I don't think they would necessarily need some kinda sound or language to do it, they will think how they talk and communicate except they will be doing in their mind. It can also be in pictures instead of words/language, like a slideshow or smt like that. Like yk those super old black and white movies without any sounds? Kinda like that, they don't have any sound but we know exactly what's going on just by how the people are acting.
@@MintSam What your saying makes sense too so I think I get where you are coming from but what I actually mean to say is that how can anybody actually think without a language? Thinking is something that is abstract. I mean, when a chair actually comes to your mind, it isn't the real chair that is there, it's just your imagination. So when you are thinking about something there needs to be a value for that thing in your mind for you to be able to think about it. Whether it's a word or a picture. And when I say learning the sign language or any language at all, you need to value a word to identify what your seeing phisically. Like, just imagine someone seeing a picture/ looking of a door. But since words aren't anything physical, you can't actually say nor identify what a door is in your mind therefore you can't actually compare it to anything else and you can't learn. For example, let's go with the door again. Imagine that you see a blue door that has white straps on it. And then there's another door you see, a brown classic one. Someone's talking there with someone else and doing the same hand movements when talking about door but since your deaf you can't hear that they are talking about door. To learn that the movement that person is doing means door, you'd need to think like; that thing I see (the first door) has the same shape as the other thing (the second door) and that person is doing the same thing near both of them so these two things I see (doors) might be the same thing and they equal to that hand movement of that person. No matter how much you try to find another way of learning, you need to do comparison. And to do that you need to know a word about it. Don't get it wrong, the language I'm talking about doesn't have to be the kinds of words we use, it can also be a language made from pictures but it actually comes out to the same thing since the alphabet we use to think and to write are also just pictures that we gave meaning to them to communicate with each other. Oop- I didn't mean this to be so long 😅 Also I can of course be wrong but that's what I think.
@@Nice-fz8up What you're saying makes complete sense too! But like I mentioned before, they might have their own way of interpreting it? Idk tbh, i'm just assuming they do cuz there has to be some way for them, otherwise they wouldn't be able to communicate with people. Now this is making me want to actually do some research on it 😂
I was gonna say water isn't wet, but since Lucifer said it isn't water is wet. Lucifer can never be right. So yeah *wet* is a *feeling* and we get that feeling when we touch water. Now we get a soft feeling if we touch a soft petal of a soft flower, but if we touch a rock we can feel that it is hard, because it is. So we can only feel something that is true and name it, therefore water is wet
