The voice is world class, he was robbed at the Cardiff singer. He should have won the Main Prize at Cardiff - they sacrificed voice over glitz & glamour.He is totally ALL voice - it's all in his voice - not a showy performance like many others. Superb.
algunas personas dicen q tiene la vos engolada, pero yo me pregunto, acaso es posible q engolando pegue esas notas con tanta facilidad? en definitiva es un fenómeno xq tiene un timbre de vos de bajo pero un registro barítonal...bueno creo q solo el tiempo dirá si sigue siendo un fenómeno o será uno mas de las estrellas fugaces q hemos tenido en nuestro tiempo...
Yo no lo escuchó engolado... Yo escucho una voz que de forma natural es redonda y oscura. Es un Capricho de la naturaleza; son facultades brutales. Muchos barítonos oscurecen intencionalmente su voz casi hasta sonar como un bajo con agudos... Este no es el caso; este es colosal por sortilegio divino.
Leggendo i commenti sotto questo video mi sto chiedendo, ma per quale ragione nessuno parla dell’intonazione giusta, della bellezza interpretativa e della vocalità quella vera verdiana ?!… no comment il vecchio
@@АльошаПопович-ъ6с 1 per me Rucinski è un tenore. 2 sovente i tecnici del suono lo stanno aiutando con microfoni 🎤 🎙️ per dare del volume e colore brunito alla sua voce tenorile. 3 per voi giovani è difficilissimo di fare la differenza tra una vocalità gonfiata , scurita artificialmente com’è il caso di Rucinski e la voce lirica vera , questa è un tristissima realtà. Tutto dipende dell’impostazione della voce e la preparazione del pubblico nella materia . Da anni i tenori stanno cantando il repertorio del baritono drammatico e i baritoni rossiniani stanno interpretando il repertorio del Basso vero . I microfoni 🎤 🎙️ che esistono in quasi tutti teatri del mondo hanno trasformato la vera arte lirica in pop moderno, questo è un fatto tristissimo. Parlando di Rucinski , Lei si immagina questo bravo ragazzo di interpretare il grande repertorio accanto ai Tenori tipo Vinay, Salazar e compagnia?!… Per me Rucinski è un tenore . Ciao il vecchio
It was an amazing instrument seven years ago, but he has worked out the kinks since then. It is now much clearer, and the top is better integrated. IMHO.
@@ceriellis1090 I'm not hearing the squillo produced by the great singers of the past this is a live recording not a studio one, I'm not hearing the ring I hear in Bastianini, Warren, Ruffo, Merrill etc. Being successful these days is not contingent on the use of squillo etc as most of the modern audience don't know what it is imho. It's a warm rich voice but does not sound like a verdi baritone to me.
@@jezamania Aye it's much easier to sell a fat rich voice to an audience I agree though I think that sitting on the other side of a recording and nitpicking a wonderful voice is just so pointless, especially since you're already removed from the experience
@@ceriellis1090 lack of squillo is not nitpicking...every singing voice should have squillo in it, certain voices types like verdi baritones and heldentenors simply have more.
@Daniel Bouhadana really old recordings like grammaphones have a lot of distortion but one can still hear squillo as it is a specific quality of sound. The recordings both audio and visual from the 50's onwards are more reflective of greater squillo production imho.
Bastianinni and Ruffo are the top off Baritons, Hvorostovsky as wonderfull as he was (LOVE him) IS far FAAAAAR behind. And now about Amartuvshin': he has years ahead to prove his finest as singer and complete artist, BUT: the quality of the voice is AS GOOD AS IT GETS. Its like mixing Bastianinni's and Warren's voices. It's UNBELIEVABLE!!!
@@ДенисПетров-т4ю I acknowledge the fact that Amaturvsin has an illustrious career ahead of him... But opera isn't what it used to be anymore. Even the best artists we have today do not come close to those of the past. Yes, his timbre is exceptional, but compare his performance to a titan's like! Bastianini and you will feel a noticeable diffefence.
