Тёмный

Edenvale Avro Arrow Feb 2020 

CDNGeographer
Подписаться 316
Просмотров 83 тыс.
50% 1

This video is a tour of the Avro Arrow Replica that is located at the Edenvale Aerodrome on Sunday, February 16, 2020.
The Avro Arrow Replica was built by volunteers at the former Toronto Aerospace Museum.
It is now on permanent display at the Edenvale Aerodrome, in Edenvale Ontario.
Please visit the Avro Arrow group on Facebook for more information on the Arrow and Canadian Aerospace. / avroarrow
An for a fun "what if" video about the Arrow go here: • AVRO Arrow vs MIg-31 (...

Опубликовано:

 

15 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 147   
@alanarmstrong2323
@alanarmstrong2323 3 года назад
I don't care if the darn thing flyes and that it did ,it represented Canada's finest work !!!!
@ignorthepain
@ignorthepain 3 года назад
A turning point from wealth to the nothing we have become. Nope they just stole the engine design.
@mirskym
@mirskym 3 года назад
My family helped build this at the Toronto Aerospace museum. The kids, my wife and I each put in a rivet.
@Fireguy97
@Fireguy97 3 года назад
The Arrow is one of Canada's greatest achievements and one of Canada's saddest disappointments.
@m.e.345
@m.e.345 Год назад
..and now the Toronto Aerospace museum is no more.. and so is the De Havilland factory that used to be next to it.
@rollydoucet8909
@rollydoucet8909 3 года назад
Proud times in Canada's history, It proved what we were capable of. I'm glad I got to see it fly (I was twelve or thirteen at the time)
@liangxu
@liangxu Год назад
It seems like Canadian are only capable of selling whatsoever British left for them with very cheap price, like selling 50.01% stake in the Bombardier C-Series to Airbus for C$1.00...
@thisbusinessofmusic1276
@thisbusinessofmusic1276 4 года назад
My Dad worked on the originals at Avro.
@class2instructor32
@class2instructor32 3 года назад
Hey neat my grandfather did too, him and a colleague worked on the nose wheel steering system
@zacharywindover9840
@zacharywindover9840 3 года назад
@@class2instructor32 that sounds amazing. That would have been a lifetime experience, whether the plane ever went into full scale production or not it was a magnificent piece of technology for its time.
@class2instructor32
@class2instructor32 3 года назад
@@zacharywindover9840 He always talked about the aircrafts abilitys and how Diefenbaker set Canada on a path of reliance on American Aircraft companies.
@5t0n3d-G4m3r
@5t0n3d-G4m3r 3 года назад
my respects to him on his work!!! its a shame our all knowing gov decided to sell out to USA and scrap one of our greatest national achievements..........
@zaptor1514
@zaptor1514 3 года назад
My dad worked on them too at Malton plant. I have his tools and tool box with the AVRO tag 🏷 on the handle.
@paulkpelley7273
@paulkpelley7273 3 года назад
Great tribute to Canadian ingenuity.....just happy it has finally found a permanent home,so all Canadians can go and see it..like the original,it is indeed beautiful....a work of art.
@jayclifford8284
@jayclifford8284 3 года назад
if i was in charge of this tour,o wouldn't gotten a guy who knew stuff about the jet and kicked out all the little kids and the person who's cell phone keeps going off. this rivals the telephone as one of our greatest technological achievements, and this tour makes it as exciting as cloud watching. having said all that, i would still sign up to see it!
@zacharywindover9840
@zacharywindover9840 3 года назад
Yea his voice sounded like my computer studies teacher’s voice from high school, like he wanted to kill himself, it was so monotone. Would be something interesting to listen to though if it didn’t put you to sleep.
@genekoesling
@genekoesling 20 дней назад
My first thought when he spoke was "this guy's not a public speaker" but the more I listened the more I thought "he clearly knows more about public speaking than he does about the Avro Arrow."
@kevinlee92265
@kevinlee92265 3 года назад
So great to see this wonderful Arrow model has found a new home. My wish is this one is permanent. I had the great fortune volunteering to help build this at the start of the project for just a short time. The inner right wing was my assignment but life happened and couldn't help for longer than a few weeks. So many great people involved in the project and it was a such an honour to be involved.
@richrumble
@richrumble 3 года назад
I just happened across this video. My grandfather was a technician developing the Iroquois engine. I live 20 minutes away from Edenvale. I can’t wait to see the model. Thank-you!
@motorv8N
@motorv8N 3 года назад
Incredible effort recreating this model at full scale. Forever Canada's lost opportunity.
@KSCPMark6742
@KSCPMark6742 3 года назад
Reading some of these comments shows that the US is not alone in having people disconnected from reality, spouting iron clad opinions about things they know very little. The Arrow was a highly specialized aircraft, no the mission pods doesn't change that fact, no other nations had any interest in purchasing it, all the other major powers had mach 2 interceptors in the works. The prototypes were essentially handbuilt with substantial differences between them, there was no pool of spares available to keep them flying. No, it was not a US plot because they felt threathened. No, it was not the greatest plane ever built. No, one of them is not sitting in a barn somewhere, ready to defend Canada. Yes, Canadian aircraft industry took a big hit, but this project would have been a millstone around the neck of the country had it not been stopped completely and irrevocably. Diefenbaker made the right call, history has proven that. I was a docent at TAM for several years, even made a few small parts of that replica, and we sure had to deal with some opinionated peope regarding the Arrow.
8 месяцев назад
Spoken like a true conservative
@bidi5002
@bidi5002 3 года назад
it nice that they found a home for it I was a Volunteer at the Toronto Aerospace Museum i help built this full scale replica of the Arrow!!!
@donaldteed35
@donaldteed35 3 года назад
You can also research all of the other high speed aircraft that were being designed at the same time. Two by North American, and one by the British were also cancelled. XF-108 Rapier, XB-70 Valkyrie cancelled in 1959 like the Avro Arrow and the BAC TSR-2 which was cancelled in 1965. It's a shame we Canadians are taught this conspiracy that we had the only aircraft design capable of these high performance specs and the bad American cousins were so jealous of it they had to shut it down. Also research 2 high speed airliners under development in the U.S. (announced by Kennedy) with billions thrown at the US companies: Boeing 2707 and Lockheed L-2000. They were also cancelled. Sometimes physics, metallurgy and economics kick the concepts to the dust bin. The survivors were the Concorde (much slower than the U.S. requirements given by Kennedy), and the SR-71, which is made of heavy titanium to deal with the heat, and has gaps in the body so there is room for metal to expand. The Avro Arrow was a great accomplishment for Canada, and Avro Canada's demise a great loss for Canadian aerospace development, but the other parts of the story are just anti-American sentiment (a core part of the Canadian identity).
@guywerry6614
@guywerry6614 3 года назад
I still think this is about the best fighter jet ever designed.
@arnelarsen4073
@arnelarsen4073 3 года назад
Imagine taking this design and bringing it up to today’s technology
@sandervanderkammen9230
@sandervanderkammen9230 3 года назад
An embarrassing failure like the TSR2
@elricofarmer1561
@elricofarmer1561 3 года назад
Plane is beautiful, but dude is NOT a public speaker! The stories behind the plane and why it was actually cancelled seem like an Area 51 movie. Would be cool to see a "stealth" version of this beast!
@callmenortnortin467
@callmenortnortin467 3 года назад
The "dude" is doing quite well with his speaking considering the competition he has to contend with while staying on subject. Should I assume that you are a public speaker and naturally, having such a skill, you would do better?
@rb1164
@rb1164 3 года назад
Beautiful plane !!!
8 месяцев назад
It's amazing they called it a fighter interceptor when it's huge size was more like an F111 OR A B25 BOMBER
@palco22
@palco22 3 года назад
.........and still mind boggling today ! That was and still is one impressive piece aircraft ! To even think it would be hard to beat even by today's jets is out of this world !
@mjv1967
@mjv1967 3 года назад
The Arrow is a HUGE plane. Very role specific. Twice as long as an F35/F18
@misterysmithers8566
@misterysmithers8566 3 года назад
Also faster and flies longer as well, still today.
@nospamevereh
@nospamevereh 3 года назад
One unmentioned byproducts of this cancellation is that many of the brains behind the Arrow were "collected" by Nasa and others to be pivotal players in the Apollo missions. For engineers at the time it was much more fun to work on fighters than rockets. I have seen sketches of a Mach 3 less boxy follow on version, it looked decades ahead of its time. Sad day of cancellation for Deif to go hide in a bunker. A loss to days past, current times and the future of Canadian aviation.
@davidbeaumont4455
@davidbeaumont4455 Год назад
My dad worked on this program at Orenda in the late fifties and my mom in the office also. They went to work one morning and the doors were locked. It was over. My dad was so upset about this for years after.
@canuckle7shucks
@canuckle7shucks Год назад
My Father worked at Orenda as well, he was a draftsman. He worked on the Iroquois engine, specifically the turbine engine blades. He was also devastated, everyone there was very excited about their contributions.
@mode1charlie170
@mode1charlie170 3 года назад
What a beautiful aircraft!..
@canadiantimberwolf1
@canadiantimberwolf1 3 года назад
Nicely done Mike.
@CDNGeographer
@CDNGeographer 3 года назад
Here are some excerpts from the recent Palmiro Campagna book: The Avro Arrow, For the record”. ====> “It is readily apparent that the cost of the Arrow was not the driving factor in the cancellation.” The book is about 270 page long so it is best for you to read the whole book to get the competent picture. The following quotes are to wet your appetite for more... Summary points: The book is NOT the personal opinion of the author. Everything in the book he is quoting from official government documents. The book starts off with Campagna explaining how he was able to find so many secret documents about the Arrow which at first, there seemed to be a only a small file folder of information available in the National Archives of Canada. For example, he would look for specific reference to other DND/NORAD projects such as documents pertaining to American Air Defence from 1946 to 1961. He also explains part of the process of using access to information requests to obtain documents. Recent “Arrow model” at Canadian Air and Space Museum in Ottawa” is not an Arrow model. The whole shape is wrong. It is just a generic delta shape. Some images are shown. Arrow was NOT cancelled due to high costs. Please see documents in his book about this. Highly unlikely that an Arrow as saved. Jet Engines and air frames are NOT universally compatible. An airframe must be designed for its intended engine. If the engine design is changed/replaced, then the design for the air frame must also change to take into account any size and weight difference. RCAF proposed three different engines for the Arrow. This meant that the Arrow airframe had to be changed each time. This caused delays and increased costs in development. Note item “B” below: Quote from page 90: “ The Chiefs of Staff in February 1957 reported to the Government that, while the technical development of the aircraft was continuing satisfactorily, the programme had been slipping in time and increasing in cost … Increased costs were due to the following: A. Astra has required more electrical power and cooling than planned. B. Adjustments to design of the aircraft for these two engines [J75 and Iroquois] has consumed more time and cost than estimated. C. Iroquois engine development has been so satisfactory that it will shift into a phase of higher expenditure than expected. D. CF-100 Aircraft production rate has been stretched out at the factory, which throws overhead on the CF-105. E. Substantial increases have occurred in wage rates and costs of materials…. On 7 February 1957 the Government approved the continuation of the development programme, limited to 8 aircraft, at a cost of $216 million” Was the Arrow that good? Starting quote on Page 30 “When Aviation Week reports on the fighter's rollout, in October 1957, the magazine called it ‘a serious contender for the top military aircraft of the next several years’. High praise indeed , for the non-U.S. aircraft, given that the XB-58 supersonic bomber was in flight test and that new aircraft in the works including the A-5 Vigilante and the F-4 Phantom … But the Arrow was extraordinary … [the] CF-105 was a different kettle of fish entirely … [It was] extraordinary, and more so, given that the industry that produced it was less than a decade old when the prototype contract was issued in march 1955…. the performance requirements meant that almost everything on the airplane had to be invented. 2 Author Bill Sweetman. Now in the same online article Sweetman asks, “would it have worked” 3. For the answer, he turns to the words of the late aviation guru and fellow of the Royal Aeronautical Society Bill Gunston, who was technical editor of Flight in the 1950s, a magazine that also carried an article hailing the engineering advances of the Arrow. Calling him a “shrewd reader of programs” he states that Gunston believed it would have worked. This was certainly being proven by the Flight testing. Continuing on top of page 31: In his book from 1976, Bill Gunston noted the following: In 1958, when the first CF-105 flew, it was by a wide margin the most advanced fighter in the world. In its airframe, avionics, weapons and - by no means least -- flight performance it set standards which nothing else actually built in the West could rival until today’s F-14 and F-15 (except for Kelly Johnston’s Blackbird YF-12A, which is not so much a fighter as a research aircraft). 4 These are extraordinary statements by an expert. Bill Sweetman’s online article referred to the American F-4 Phantom. Some have argued that this plane, which went into service in the early sixties, was far superior to the Arrow, yet Sweetman notes that it was the Arrow that was extraordinary. It must be remembered that the Arrow and the Phantom were designed for different purposes: The Arrow for interception of incoming high-altitude bombers but with a weapons bay that could be configured for other missions, including reconnaissance, and the Phantom which was as multi role fighter. Did the RCAF want the aircraft produced here in Canada to give Canada an advantage. Yes. Start of quote on Page 36. “ The RCAF noted that an acceptable means for comparing engines was to look at the thrust produced per pound of engine weight. Initially designated the the PS13, the Iroqoius was rated at 20,000 pounds per thrust. This exceeded the ratings of the J75 and the RB.106 by more than 50%. The RCAF decided this engine would likely be the only one available in time to provide the power necessary for the Arrow to achieve all of its performance requirements. Later numbers would quote 19,50 pounds dry thrust and 25,6000 pounds with afterburner and a weight of 4,8000 pounds. Given the engines advanced state of design, the RCAF also noted that there was no advantage to procuring another engine offshore and building it under licence. Of particular note is the comment in a memo dated February 25, 1955, which stated, “The advantages of expending this money and effort in Canada rather than in another country places the PS13 engine in a very favourable light. 12 This is interesting given that when the fate of the Arrow was being discussed years later one of the arguments put forward to defend the cancellation of the program was that it made better sense to purchase a complete aircraft offshore, an argument that completely ignored the advantage of keeping the development in Canada.” End of quote on page 37.
@CDNGeographer
@CDNGeographer 3 года назад
The rest of the book goes into detail about the Amererican military’s opinion of the Arrow and the possible purchasing of the Arrow, with the Arrow then to be based in Canada and maintained and flown by RCAF personnel. Regarding whether Canada was receiving correct and valid intelligence data from the United States: Quote from page 71: “ “In this document, it is clear that the discussions of the Canadian government and military regarding the fate of the Arrow were based on intelligence from the United States regarding the nature of the threat, and promised implementation of Bomarc, for which the United States had agreed to pay two thirds of the cost. Further supporting the contention that termination was based on the changing military threat and not affordability of the Arrow are the “Top Secret Minutes of the Canada-United States ministerial Committee on Joint Defence,” which was held at Montebello, July 12 and 13, 1960, just after the meeting between Diefenbaker and Eisenhower. The following is noted on the Arrow termination: ‘Mr. Green [Howard Green, Canadian Secretary of State for external affairs] stated they [The Canadians] were told two years ago that the manned bomber was on its way out and that is why they cancelled the Arrow. Now they have to go back and say that both are needed. Mr. Fleming [Donald M. Fleming, Canadian Minister of Finance ] referred to the fact that they tried to interest the Americans in buying the Arrow at the Paris Conference but had been turned down flat by Mr. McElroy. Mr. Pearkes said we did not cancel the CF-105 because there was no bomber threat but because there was a lesser threat and we got the Bomarc in lieu of more airplanes to look after this. Now he said perhaps the expectation of two years ago that the bomber threat was lessening has not been fulfilled. At the same time he said we expected the Bomarc to cover the whole country. These had been reduced, and therefore some more protection to the western part must be made in those areas which were to be protected by Bomarc. It wasn’t fair, he said, for Canada to fill this western gap which had been created by the Americans all by themselves. 32 (emphasis added. In the above exchange it is clear that the Arrow was cancelled on the basis of incorrect intelligence data received from the United States and NOT on the basis of cost per se. “ During our discussion over the weekend Palmiro Campagna said that since Canada cancelled the Arrow (with its conventional Hughes Fire Control System) this meant that if war did happen, the Bomarc missiles would spread radioactive fallout over vast areas of Canada. Was this really the best option for Canada? USAF secretly covers Canada after Arrow is cancelled: Quote from page 72: “With the scaling back of the Bomarc program, Pearkes realized that there was no defence for Canada in the West. This is odd, since in 1967 he confided to his biographer that he did have an alternative plan for the defence of Canada. The details were first known in Requiem and in part reiterated here as they are germane to the discussion. Pearkes: I took the chances. We were defenceless against the high-power bomber where we had the old CF-100. It couldn’t compete with the modern Russian bombers. We had no supersonic fighters but the Americans emphasized the fact that they had lots of them. Now … one thing I had to face was, if you scrap the Arrow you’ve got nothing. What will you do? Will you buy American aircraft to fill this gap? … Or, say here, you can rely on America aircraft, not having bought them, but by putting your pride in your pocket and saying, here, we will give you facilities [to] American fighter squadrons to come and be stationed in Canada, so that they can get the advantage there, or, if not actually stationed in there, when the situation deteriorates they can come to Canada, so that they can move forward and operate from Canadian airfields …. And I had the assurance that the Americans at this time had lots of fighters. That was when I was talking to [the] Undersecretary of Defense. I flew out from Washington to Colorado Springs the first time I went to see NORAD. On that aircraft he told me, “We have lots of fighters.” [Pearkes pounds the table with each word for emphasis] We were sitting together like this talking. He said to me, and we can’t quote this [his voice goes soft here]. If I was you. I wouldn't put all that money into that aircraft. If you don’t want to buy aircraft from us you may rest assured that we have lots of them [emphasis in voice here] which we can use to help in the defence of the North America continent if a crisis comes.” That’s what convinced me more than anything else. So I said, let us make full arrangements for these American fighter squadrons to come in, to practice from our airfields. Let them store equipment and aircraft if they want to at places such as Cold lake and various other points all across Canada, and they came there and then carried out training exercises, moving a squadron up at short notice to one of these airfields. Now, that was how I filled in this defence gap during those times. He [name of another author that is not clear on the tapes] doesn’t bring that out and I don’t know how he would have known about that … 33 (emphasis added). “ Further down on page 74: “In the end, a deal was struck, but it seems that the promises made quickly evaporated. Looking back with hindsight, some questions come to mind: Where were those adjacent American interceptors that were to handle the undefended parts of Canada? And had the United States reneged on the deal once the Arrow was fully out of the picture and the only thing left was to purchase American aircraft after all? Pearkes was not asked these questions.” Quote from page 75: “ the issue of missile capability was, however, broached in Cabinet Records of July 15, 1960, note that:
@CDNGeographer
@CDNGeographer 3 года назад
The U.S. were now re-emphasizing the bomber because in their own experience missiles had not developed to the extent expected and presumably the U.S.S.R. was running into similar problems in its missile program. In fact it was said in Montebello that only 5 U.S. I.C.B.M.s were operational. This is quite a different figure from that which the prime minister had been given in Washington in June . 34 (emphasis added) Until that point, the received wisdom was that the bomber threat was diminishing, missiles were just beyond the horizon, and a missile gap had been created; and yet a scant four to five months after termination of the Arrow, the situation was completely reversed. If nothing else, this scenario illustrates the extreme importance in getting intelligence estimates as right as can be, and in trying to obtain information from more than one source. It is clear the prime minister himself had been given poor information, and it seems bizarre that the United States did not know how many operational ICBMs they themselves had. If that was the case, how could they know what the Soviets had? At this same meeting, a question was raised regarding whether the defence of North America was to be assumed by the United States in the absence of Canadian interceptors. This was the exact scenario that the Minister of National Defence had in mind. However, he failed to raise it at this meeting. What was noted at the meeting was that the CF-100 was gradually being retired because of its age, and that by 1962 there would be none left in service. According to the Cabinet notes: The CF-100 was incapable of policing Canadian skies against intrusions from aircraft similar to the U-2. The F101b would fulfil this policing role… Without them there would be no Canadian surveillance of Canadian air space … it was made clear that acquiring the F101b would require a great deal of explanation in Canada. This would be difficult if not impossible to do successfully. 35” What an Aircraft can do that a missile cannot: Quote from page 76: Policing the skies against intruders like the U-2 was exactly what the Arrow was designed to do, given its speed and altitude capability. As noted by Group Captain E.H. Evans, in a memo dated December 4, 1958, in wartime, over and above defending against bombers, the Arrow would also be able to target reconnaissance aircraft. In peacetime, the Arrow would expose violations of airspace and take the necessary counter measures. In addition, the interceptor would bring to bear human judgement regarding countermeasures. Implied in the latter statement is the recognition that, since aircraft are piloted by humans, human judgement could be used to protect against accidentally downing an aircraft that had, for example, merely strayed off course. This was not a role that could be fulfilled by a missile that, once launched, could not be called back if a mistake had been made.” Air Defence Staff said we in fact do need fighters to defend Canada Quote from page 76: “ But what did the chief of air staff think about the need for manned aircraft? In the records of the Cabinet Defence Committee meeting on February 5 ,1959, just prior to cancellation, the following one appears: “In reply to a question whether interceptors would be needed, as well as Bomarc, the Chief of air staff said it was his opinion that they would be. He was thinking in terms of 100 to 115 aircraft, which would provide the necessary fighter for backup. Where would they be obtained was the big question, if the development of the Arrow were discontinued.” 36 So, while Campbell maintained aircraft were necessary, there were no other aircraft equal to or superior to the Arrow at that time. The opinion of Hugh Campbell, Chief of Air Staff was completely ignored. But Pearkes had been willing to listen to the Americans on the need for missiles and forego aircraft altogether until, of course the America perspective changed. Diefenbaker speaks to Cabinet: Quote on Page 77: Almost a full year after the cancellation of the Arrow, on February 6, 1960, Diefenbaker spoke to Cabinet. The official notes for the meeting are extremely interesting: The Prime Minister said that a committee of the ministers who were members of the Cabinet Defence Committee plus Messrs. Churchill, Harkness, Nolan, and Maclean should meet to consider the proposal [to obtain F-101bs] and make recommendations. If the committee reported that security demanded the acquisition of these aircraft, then that would be the decision. To purchase them, however, would cause great difficulties. It would place him and the ministers in impossible positions. On the other hand, failure to re-equip would be bad for the moral[e] of the R.C.A.F. He thought the public had been convinced of the wisdom to the government’s decision to cancel the Arrow. To obtain other aircraft now in the face of statements that the threat of the manned bomber was diminishing and that the day of the interceptor would soon be over would be most embarrassing unless a reasonable explanation could be given.... He had been against cancelling the Arrow but had been persuaded otherwise… During the brief discussion it was said that, even though a logical, reasoned case might be made for obtaining the F101bs, such a decision could not be explained to the Public. The repercussions of telling CINCNORAD that Canada was not prepared to re-equip the CF-100 squadrons would be too great. 38 (emphasis added). In this statement, it is readily apparent that the cost of the Arrow was not the driving factor in the cancellation.”
@xxdenicarxx8018
@xxdenicarxx8018 3 года назад
@@CDNGeographer even in 2021 we still rely on american to defend ourself if someone invade us
@dasboot5903
@dasboot5903 3 года назад
ARROW >>>>>> I love you so much with all of my heart !!!! :o))
@PM-ij2dx
@PM-ij2dx 3 года назад
They found an Iroquois engine in store in the UK MOD inventory, It is now in Ontario Canada and I hope it will be reassembled and tested one day. search youtube for more on this..
@thomasmartin5106
@thomasmartin5106 3 года назад
My dad was a foreman in final assembly, when this project was scrapped a part of my dad died.
@freddymax5256
@freddymax5256 Год назад
My wife’s uncle worked on these engines. He said they were many applications for there use including a version to power the generators on Canada’s railway engines. He said politics were involved and another supplier won the contract.
@sandyjohnson4182
@sandyjohnson4182 3 года назад
This is the only full scale model of the Arrow which I know of, probably the only one in existence. Didn't even know this existed until I came across this video on You Tube. Now that I know of it I'll go and see it once this pandemic dies down to where we can do such things again. As a boy, I had a model of the Arrow, but left it behind when I moved away from home in Nova Scotia for a job in Ontario in the mid 1960s and it probably was eventually thrown out. This full scale model is well done and gives a sense of how far advanced the Arrow was over anything which other countries produced at the time. My personal opinion is that the US saw it as a threat to their military-industrial production and moved to discourage Canada from producing and selling it to other nations because they could not compete with it at that time. There is the possibility that the same design could be flying still, with upgraded electronics of course. In speed it would still be competitive with planes such as the F-18 and some of the fastest Russian military aircraft, and with upgrades it would no doubt be even faster than the original version. Most of those who had worked on the project ended up employed with US aerospace companies. My wife's uncle worked at Dowty in Ajax which made some of the parts. You may have noticed their name on the landing gear. Britain developed an aircraft in the mid 1960s, 10 years later than the Arrow, which had similar characteristics, even very similar appearance, but it too was abandoned due to a change of government. No point crying over spilt milk as they say, but it is good that there is actually a full-scale model in existence which can at least help people understand those times. Having grown up in the continuously interesting 1950s and 60s which culminated in the moon landings, I sometimes feel that we've lost momentum and even lost ground in many ways, and I don't mean in technology but in purpose for living and motivation for improvement. More historical information on A. V. Roe and the Arrow project would increase interest for visitors to Edenvale.
@rocket3man
@rocket3man 3 года назад
Like the TSR2 in the UK, unfortunately technological development rapidly advances causing strategic development changes. The Avro was a good story at the time and really good to see this replica.
@chuckforget2854
@chuckforget2854 3 года назад
A beautiful bird
@frankdwyer7051
@frankdwyer7051 3 года назад
I've often wondered what it would cost to make a fully functional reproduction of the aircraft, with the engines. Would be great for Canadian Pride.
@jasonthorpe4313
@jasonthorpe4313 3 года назад
Those Canadians and THAT Canada, do NOT exist anymore..
@victorinoiilubang2539
@victorinoiilubang2539 3 года назад
Amazing aircraft..pure ingenuity.
@cahg3871
@cahg3871 3 года назад
Deiffenbakers biggest debacle-cancelling the greatest plane ever made to date.
@nathanblades3395
@nathanblades3395 3 года назад
The US was afraid we would compeat with them
@tbwpiper189
@tbwpiper189 3 года назад
Understanding the extreme size of the aircraft for it's day, it's rather interesting that the Orenda engine was not adopted anywhere either. It had extra power over the Pratts and GE's at the time.
@rusawgraphics1668
@rusawgraphics1668 3 года назад
I went there back in August, she's still a beauty, even if she's only a replica. Maybe one day we'll get to see her successors fly.
@jamesschultz9486
@jamesschultz9486 3 года назад
Awesome to see it as a model!
@ronaldetherington480
@ronaldetherington480 3 года назад
Beautiful!! they put her back together(she's really RL206, parts thereof, never flew) I have photographs when she was on display at Keele and Sheppard, Toronto museum(now ice rink) nice job guys!! Oh, that wasn't Pearson. That was Diefenbaker who caved in to the Americans in the process throwing 15000 people out of work. The engineers ignored his 'destroy everything' order and hid the various blueprints for later fabrication. The cockpit and landing gear are RL206. I put $2. in the fund jar for the rebuild so I have more than a sentimental interest.
@avro206
@avro206 3 года назад
so thats where it ended up!! Awesome. Needs a viewing paltform about 20 feet up to get a better look at this beauty
@michaelcorrigan7448
@michaelcorrigan7448 3 года назад
My dad Joe Corrigan was a crew chief on the iroqous engine .He didn't talk much about but when he did sure had some interesting stories.
@brianbrusseau3233
@brianbrusseau3233 3 года назад
The exhibitor mentioned that three thousand employees had lost their jobs. The actual number with sub contractors is fourteen thousand.
@vanillagorilla8236
@vanillagorilla8236 3 года назад
Day after my birthday last year, looks like it was made for 2021. Way ahead of it's time.
@paulhudson8321
@paulhudson8321 3 года назад
In November 2020 we stopped at the airport to eat at the restaurant there. Not knowing that the Avro was there on display. The hanger wasn’t open to see the plane and I definitely want to return to see it. By the way the restaurant at the airport was a great place to eat great food.
@KOZMOGRAFX
@KOZMOGRAFX 3 года назад
So great to see that the model is back on display. Imagine if those birds were not scrapped, but instead were locked away and then released to live on as testaments to the skill and ambitions required. No, instead, they were literally obliterated, after all of that effort and expense... what a travesty. :(
@jamesmills1500
@jamesmills1500 3 года назад
If you look closely at the pictures of the Arrow's being dismantled RL206 is missing. It was the only Arrow that had the iroquois engine installed. Anyone who was in Orangeville or Fort Drum NY were woken up in the middle of the night to a super sonic boom, RL206 was never seen again. So yes one did escape the chopping block.
@stewsretroreviews
@stewsretroreviews Год назад
What a shame this was scrapped, had a lot of potential, just like our TSR2 in the UK. Why did they have to scrap both planes entirely? 😔
@rkkristalovich653
@rkkristalovich653 Год назад
Man ,wouldn't it be something if the Ministry of Defense decided to restart the project with some upgrades!!!
@fergyjenkins6353
@fergyjenkins6353 3 года назад
I worked at Orenda
@craigrobertson5030
@craigrobertson5030 3 года назад
The Lancaster mentioned... FM-104?
@renewableenergyhomes
@renewableenergyhomes 3 года назад
This was not a bomber as he said but a fighter aircraft. This is a scaled down replica. Original size replica used in the Avro mini-series can be seen at Reynold's Museum in Wetaskiwin, Alberta.
@dougwebb7792
@dougwebb7792 Год назад
Actually, the Arrow was an interceptor. It was designed to be really fast, have a long range, remain aloft for longer periods of time and in the case of the Arrow handle the cold, have 2 engines. Its purpose was to fly as fast as possible to be able to shoot down Soviet bombers coming over the artic circle before they could reach their targets. It also had the ability to carry heavier missiles and even bombs if so equipped to do so. Could the Arrow serve in the capacity of a fighter? Yes, but that's not what it was designed to do. A fighter plane is different than an interceptor. It's smaller, more maneuverable, less range, less time in the air. It's meant for dog fighting, aerial combat, etc. The Arrow was 80' long with a wing span of 50 feet. A big target. For comparison, the F35 is 50' long with a wingspan of only 35'. (But for the record, I love the Arrow, as sad of tale that it is, it is a stunningly beautiful aircraft, especially for its time. And it was twice as fast as an F35 and had those two incredibly powerful engines. Two is always better than one, especially if you're flying in the artic.)
@windowcreek1798
@windowcreek1798 3 года назад
Rumor is that one was saved and flown away. Today it is said it survives in an underground space in Kingston ON. Just a rumor. Cool.
@Kevlar67476
@Kevlar67476 3 года назад
The Elusive Arrow, in her native habitat. A Museum.
@georgemckenzie181
@georgemckenzie181 3 года назад
What the problem was that when they went threw the sound barrier that had to fly it differently
@romeoramos6650
@romeoramos6650 3 года назад
This should be in Ottawa, museum.
@lelandlewis7207
@lelandlewis7207 3 года назад
As I remember from reading and watching documentaries on the Arrow, the reason they were all destroyed was that Dief signed an agreement that Canada would not develop a standalone weapons system like the Arrow again, but would buy from the US or other NATO countries, leaving the warplane industry to the Americans. It basically ruined the future of our aerospace industry other than some passenger planes and making components for the US. I have the original Xeroxed copy of the Arrow plans that were kept in the "Diefenbunker". Someone who worked there saw the tube in the trash when they de-commissioned it and found the plans inside, so took it home and I purchased it through a friend a few years back.
@cdnrednck
@cdnrednck Год назад
can the public stop in and see
@rudybegonia2544
@rudybegonia2544 3 года назад
All the staff went south and one plane disappeared to the U.S. [alledgedly ]
@jeffpollard7304
@jeffpollard7304 3 года назад
Where are all the MASKS?????
@madcatpoop
@madcatpoop 3 года назад
We could have been one of the leaders in fighter jet construction. And who knows maybe even commercial passenger jets.
@drewthompson7457
@drewthompson7457 Год назад
Avro Canada did build and fly N.America's first jet airliners, a couple of weeks after the Comet. It too was canned by the government, and cut up in 1956. I have wondered what Avros' 4th aircraft would have been.
@ADAPTATION7
@ADAPTATION7 3 года назад
That's great that they were able to reproduce a mock-up. But umm, the speaker could be better
@52templar
@52templar 3 года назад
I dont know if there is some pilots of this airplane still alive. Could be interesting to have a pilot look.
@raynus1160
@raynus1160 3 года назад
All four have passed on.
@TheNightlessFall
@TheNightlessFall 3 года назад
welp.. if some how they chose to make the Arrow Avrow but the modern project called Avro Supeur Arrow or something like that, it would be super cool.. but for now i hope theywill choose the SAAB Gripen. It's better the this fucking expensive F35..
@jackpatriquin6636
@jackpatriquin6636 3 года назад
WOW great project and very well done. Beautiful airplane Reading the comments mom taught me if you haven't got anything good to say shut up. Just saying. Hope to see it someday
@judeasselin78
@judeasselin78 3 года назад
It's always break my heart even in 2021 thinking that Canada would built his own interceptor and not depend to other country. Even worse to see that the Soviets built the Mig25 Foxbat with technology stolen from Avro. Look at the striking similarities in the look and performance of the two planes. When you're born for a bun...
@drdecker1
@drdecker1 3 года назад
Should be a lesson for Canadian history. They could of kept it for Canada's use. Seeing that they had it already built. The use of it may have also changed the allies views down the road. If not Canada would also not have depended on any other country for military purposes.
@alexzielinski2754
@alexzielinski2754 3 года назад
To bad the government screwed us Canadians ! The greatest jet built, ahead of its time! We people lost the best, the politicians threw us under the bus! shame, shame, will never forget this mess. a terrible time for all this loss! Grandpaw, Oles.
@ianturpin9180
@ianturpin9180 3 года назад
With the trs2 our two countries had the best planes never to progress past the research stage.
@CDNGeographer
@CDNGeographer 3 года назад
And for fun... ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fKXDrcFRKyY.html
@rokcetscientist4693
@rokcetscientist4693 3 года назад
Shame that that tour guide is so darn long-winded and monotonous, doesn't seem to know anything at all about the Arrow's armament and capabilties and flatly ignores a young lady with her hand up to ask a question.
@wartmcbeighn
@wartmcbeighn 3 года назад
at best... .would be projected armament...since it never got to the stage of carrying anything
@sbg911
@sbg911 Год назад
Gee it was a big plane, wasn't it?
7 месяцев назад
Interceptor??? It's the size of a B1B lancer lol
@mychael.kostiuk
@mychael.kostiuk 6 месяцев назад
It was big because it was was built to RCAF specifications. It needed to carry a lot of weapons and needed to fly far and needed to fly fast and needed to fly high. It need to have a big radar. Canadian Air Force doctrine was different than American Air Force doctrine, which had many more airplanes than Canada could afford to build. Therefore an aircraft that was an interceptor built to Canadian specifications had to stay on station for longer periods of time than comparable American fighters would have to. And that's why it was built bigger.
@Chuggiek
@Chuggiek 3 года назад
The plane didn't bomb anything, but he did. Whatta bore.
@kirkrobb4194
@kirkrobb4194 3 года назад
now, how about another movie, or a series....why not?
@CDNGeographer
@CDNGeographer 3 года назад
Avro Arrow First Flight 40th Anniversary 1998 . ___This is a VHS camera recording (totally unedited, and without titles) of the 40th Anniversary celebrations of the First Flight of the Avro Arrow which was held at the Constellation Hotel in Toronto on March 21, 1998. The event starts with a display of Avro Arrow artifacts, and then the event moves into a ballroom for a formal dinner with speeches. Many key members of the team that built and flew the Avro Arrow are present including test pilot Janusz Zurakowski, and Engineer Jim Floyd. Hear the truth from those who were there. Listen to Floyd talk about who is the best source on the Arrow. And hear about Jim Floyd's negotiations to fly 3 completed Avro Arrows to England after the Arrow program was terminated in Canada. This is probably the only full length video that was made of this event. Michael Kostiuk in Ottawa ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-kjTFQW0OnF8.html
@maryrafuse3851
@maryrafuse3851 3 года назад
The Arrow was an interceptor not a fighter. It was role specific designed to protect our sovereignty over our vast territory. Very fast and able to carry heavy weapons and a large fuel load. Until another Arrow type is built and utilized Canada will show the world great vulnerability. In these dangerous times when Russia is undermining the Western World showing our vulnerability is foolish and very dangerous. We need to smarten up very quickly. It makes no sense to use fighters for the role of the interceptor! Building an Arrow type should be a national priority.
@Huskycomicowner
@Huskycomicowner 3 года назад
Wow
@joemoz7977
@joemoz7977 Год назад
Seems that this project as well as our TSR2 both were scuppered due to political pressure by the US. Both amazing planes that we never got to see enter service. Credit to the people who painstakingly made this replica. Incidentally, some unfair comments about the tour guide - how easy is it to carry on explaining about the aircraft when people and their kids are constantly talking loudly?!!
@Oldbmwr100rs
@Oldbmwr100rs Год назад
The TSR2 was overbudget and behind in development, and was cancelled by the labour government. The same Labour government who destroyed Britain's motorcycle, aircraft and auto industries. Don't blame the Americans right off. We also had plenty of our own programs cancelled and scrapped, the Northrop flying wing was very much one of them.
@davidrobins4025
@davidrobins4025 3 года назад
Distracting sound in the background spoiled the video.
@superzentredi
@superzentredi 3 года назад
Make Canada Great Again
@mihai69stoian
@mihai69stoian 3 года назад
I like wenn they come with kids and start making big noise!!!
@xXLtDudeXx
@xXLtDudeXx 3 года назад
Biggest most expensive model ever?
@markplain2555
@markplain2555 3 года назад
This is Canada's biggest conspiracy theory or fallacy story. The truth is that the Avro Arrow flies to this day but it is called a MiG25. . The CIA discovered that the KGB had totally infiltrated the Avro Arrow development and realised that the Soviets were actually building the Avro themselves. Hence the Canadian program had to be stopped immediately. The Soviets built their Avro with a few modifications (2 tales for example), but it was built. In 1976 a Soviet pilot defected to Japan in a MiG25. The captured MiG25 was stripped down and to their horror, the US intelligence found that, to the tiniest details, the Avro had in deed been copied. The Soviets even used the same bolt spacing from the original drawings. . Now the USA was faced with the reality that a VERY high performance aircraft was now in service, by their enemy. The Americans then went about having to develop an aircraft that could outperform the Avro/MiG 25 in every way...... the F15 was born. . As for the story on how the Avro programme was stopped, you can imagine, no one (at the time) wanted to talk about how the Avro program was totally infiltrated by the KGB. I'm sure patriotic Canadians will feel insulted, and as a Canadian myself, all I can say is, sorry for the insult.
@petersmith-cg3ry
@petersmith-cg3ry 3 года назад
Find someone who really KNOWS the aircraft. Or can speak with more passion It was a marvel of engineering Check out the Concorde. It’s all Canada
@philthompson3500
@philthompson3500 3 года назад
Still one of the originals is missing.............
@robmacisaac9011
@robmacisaac9011 3 года назад
Wish they woulda shut that kid up
@RV_There_Yet
@RV_There_Yet 3 года назад
Just another time the Canadian government buckled to US pressure. This aircraft was far superior to anything worldwide, and way ahead of its time. The F-101 Voodoo we ended up with wasn’t half as good as the Arrow. Interesting fact ..... after much research, only 5 are actually documented as being destroyed. What happened to #6?
@christophergill3140
@christophergill3140 3 года назад
on paper it was able to go in to orbit
@trkdigital5685
@trkdigital5685 3 года назад
my dad was directly involved with this program and before he died he told me the REAL reasons the program was crushed and showed me a copy of the letter written to dieffenbakers' office from a certain member of the US government .... even AV didnt know the truth till much later...
@gullybull5568
@gullybull5568 3 года назад
Canadas Shame. We Failed.
@johnwattdotca
@johnwattdotca Год назад
Losing the Arrow was a good thing, far better than Americans coming over to take over for their own security.
@kennethmorrison7689
@kennethmorrison7689 Год назад
Duhh! That's exactly what happened: they took over!!
@johnwattdotca
@johnwattdotca Год назад
@@kennethmorrison7689 Ontario is the only province in Canada where the internet is both owned and secured by Americans in the United States. Look where Ottawa is.
@kennethmorrison7689
@kennethmorrison7689 Год назад
Ottawa is located inside the White House.
@phangross8769
@phangross8769 3 года назад
Canadian government should remake arrow plane
@trevormurphy7041
@trevormurphy7041 3 года назад
One of Canada's worst mistakes the plane would still be flying today and that is fact only if politics wasn't involved we're not even allowed to develop nothing because we signed that agreement with the United States we can't
@sjaakbenard7723
@sjaakbenard7723 Год назад
Some tremendously annoying kids in the back. Bad that those parents don't raise their kids when someone is telling them something to be quieter. I used to not have to get it into my head to be so nasty when someone is telling something.😒
@user-xm2rf2qf8i
@user-xm2rf2qf8i Год назад
Демиан
@noelrichard1210
@noelrichard1210 3 года назад
Where did that volunteer got his information. He should look at the historical facts of the ARROW. When you listen to him, it's clear it sounds boring. The reality, is when the Liberal lost the election at the time, the new government with the influence of the US President visiting, decided to cancel the Arrow, that gave the black friday in 1959. Avro tried to same one element of the project the Oranda Iroquoi turbine engine, the French was interested to use it for their own fighters. But since the new governement said no even it they had the opportunity to get some money back of this investment, they choose to scrap the whole project. Now the CF-105 Arrow was a fighter interceptor, not a bomber like this volunteer said a few times. That plane was ahead of this time for a second generation fighter in the new jet age. It had fly by wire controls, internal weapons bay for a 1950's fighter, and the Iroquoi engine that was the supercruise engine of the time. and not only that, they solved the riddle of delta wings many years before the birth of the Concord. Just imagine if they had left the project get to completion, The Canadian Aerospace industry would be in the top leading manufacturer then, and now (today). But no because of the stupidity of the governement of the time, all the best brains of the industries left to work in that states. Just imagine the same thing happened in recent years with Bombardier giving for free the C-Series to Airbus. And now in 2021, we are still waiting to choose for the tye of fighters to replace the CF-18, And the answer by the gocernement was to by second hand F/A-18 from Australia Air Force. That we could say we are a complete joke to the world. And at the current price many of the world fighters are sold, we can't even afford to buy these. The best option would be to build our own version or buy still a 4.5 generation fighter and forget any 5th gen fighter and don't even think for a 6th gen fighter.
@alex35agm
@alex35agm 3 года назад
At the time this plane was so much more advanced than any else,which is why the Americans forced the Canadian govt to scrap it.The only piece of one of the original planes is a nose cone which is in the Ottawa Air Museum.
@user-xm2rf2qf8i
@user-xm2rf2qf8i Год назад
Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина Украина
@user-xm2rf2qf8i
@user-xm2rf2qf8i Год назад
Албания
@user-xm2rf2qf8i
@user-xm2rf2qf8i Год назад
Лаос
Далее
Guided tour around a Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk!
20:41
Просмотров 331 тыс.
This Jet Was BETRAYED by Canada! -  The Avro Arrow
26:52
You'll fall in love with the Dyke Delta
10:28
Просмотров 1,2 млн
Rare Colorized Photos Inside the Hindenburg
8:44
Просмотров 1,3 млн
CF-105 Avro Arrow Wind Tunnel Testing
17:58
Просмотров 14 тыс.
The Super Arrow
9:35
Просмотров 3,2 тыс.
The Lost AVRO Arrow Iroquois
10:28
Просмотров 108 тыс.
F-4 Phantom | Behind the Wings
6:53
Просмотров 385 тыс.