Clarification; So during the video I made the completely unqualified statement that the conflicts between the Israelites and Canaanites described in the Hebrew Bible occurred sometime during the 2nd century BC. There are a number of disclaimers to mention here; first of all, many historians and archaeologists do not consider these stories to actually describe historical events, but are rather myths which are very loosely based upon conflicts and social transformations which took place among Semitic peoples throughout the bronze age (broadly speaking). So obviously slapping a specific historical date on those narratives is much less straightforward than I implied, as we must raise many questions regarding how historical those narratives might actually be, the timeframes of events which may have influenced the development of those stories and the timeframes within which the stories themselves may have developed. None of these are questions which can be definitively answered, unfortunately. Placing dates around the final centuries BC fits in rather conveniently with the parallels I was drawing between the Roman and Semitic narratives, of course, and I really wasn't trying to make a video on biblical Archaeology here, so I basically just glossed over all of that without giving it too much consideration. Ultimately I don't think these considerations detract from the overall point I was attempting to convey, but that "2nd century BC" comment should be taken with a substantial grain of salt. I did a bit of digging after the video was published, as this was brought to my attention, in an effort to glean a better way of addressing what these timeframes may have looked like, and the answer seems to be something along the lines of; "it's extremely f*cking complicated." So I'll edit this comment once I've taken the time to look further into the issues.
There is plenty of archaeological evidence for the Israelite invasion of Canaan (Not defending recent indefensible actions by the so named nation). Academics draw attention and funding to themselves by casting doubt on previous work, making things appear "controversial." The end result of this process could be the complete destruction of history as anything useful. But I think you were off by a few hundred years. Also, imo you could have emphasized more the reason for the invasion - the Canaanites were sacrificing children, which fits your explanation of saturnian rituals. There is archaeological evidence for this as well, though I'll probably remember the keywords wrong... Amanites? Something like that. Childrens' bones have been found around altars in some of the tels. I think society has a repeating pattern of losing its values and descending into ritualistic sacrifice, and this is also the justification for the flood. I'd be very interested in what you (the channel author) would say about the psychic reasons or implications of the flood or the exile or the return from Egypt.
Reposting because it appears my first response didn't make it past YT's censorship: There is plenty of archaeological evidence for the Israelite invasion of Canaan (Not defending recent indefensible actions by the so named nation). Academics draw attention and funding to themselves by casting doubt on previous work, making things appear "controversial." The end result of this process could be the complete destruction of history as anything useful. But I think you were off by a few hundred years. Also, imo you could have emphasized more the reason for the invasion - the Canaanites were sacrificing children, which fits your explanation of saturnian rituals. There is archaeological evidence for this as well, though I'll probably remember the keywords wrong... Amanites? Something like that. Childrens' bones have been found around altars in some of the tels. I think society has a repeating pattern of losing its values and descending into ritualistic sacrifice, and this is also the justification for the flood. I'd be very interested in what you (the channel author) would say about the psychic reasons or implications of the flood or the exile or the return from Egypt
@@fusion9619 To be 100% clear, I have exactly 0 faith that mainstream archaeologists and biblical scholars are even remotely correct about this issue (or almost any other issue for that matter).
@@Formscapes I concur. I only even said there's such evidence because it agrees with the pattern I think I've observed, that values degrade (I think in tandem with the degradation of the mechanism of transmission of value, which is money, but there's probably other factors). I know it's biased, but the alternative as I see it is to exist completely unmoored to history, which is otherwise too suspect to be taken seriously by serious people.
Ive even started to question if all these names and stuff are simply personifications or representations of something else, to cause further confusion. Israelites, people of Is Ra and El? Or the made up country. Djews, jews or Dieu's? @@Formscapes
7 years ago, me and three friends had an encounter with a UFO from afar. It was extremely high up in the air, so we viewed it with binoculars, but it was an extremely clear day and we all took turns looking at it for an hour or so. With the naked eye it just looked like some kind of flying bug, but after staring at it for a little I realized it couldn’t have been a bug, because it was extremely high up in the air, and appeared to be growing larger and smaller, not flapping wings. That’s what made me grab the binoculars. What was most striking to me was the fact that it changed form, color, and texture consistently, but in such a manner that any of the forms it held, and any of the movements it made, were simply unrecognizable. It was like watching an Escher painting rework itself in real time. It would hold some semblance of a form for a few seconds, then change to the next, some similar to previous forms, some completely different and never repeated. It was so inscrutable because it didn’t hold its form long enough to remember it clearly, and whatever forms it held were so strange and complex. It was extremely cool, and I really wish I had pictures, because some of the forms were so strange and beautiful. After about an hour, I was looking at it through the binoculars as the thing compressed and elongated, then zipped off faster than I could turn my head. One of the most interesting experiences in my life for sure.
I saw one too, 23 years ago, also with other people who saw it. It was evening, so I couldn't see if it was changing form the way you describe, but it did zip around with abrupt stops several times. It never appeared to have to accelerate or decelerate. It was stationary in the sky for a minute or two in between movements. Then it abruptly left so fast it was like a flash.
One thing that stands out to me after thinking more about the video above is that the move within Christian orthodoxies from earlier Christus Victor-type conceptions of the Atonement (in which Christ is portrayed as making himself a trick or trap for evil and death) to substitutionary conceptions (in which Christ is a child-sacrifice to placate his Father) is very exactly a transformation of the Atonement from a Uranian to a Saturnian narrative.
Precisely, and we see that such transformations always parallel processes by which institutional structures - including belief systems, norms and power structures - come to solidify. The underlying metaphysics comes to transform in accordance with the self-preservation imperative of the structures themselves.
Here in Sweden we still have "ADHD" and Formscapes keep my restless/hungry brain stimulated when i am not nerding on other stuff(very Broad spectrum) or "tweaking" with my projects. 🙂😇🥰😄.
Literally stood with my father below a ufo for 20 minutes, while it just sat there, and then floated/flew quietly off to the mountains on the horizon. It sure was big and super real. My dad became a alien nut after that, and I shrugged and decided obsessing about it was pointless. It was a triangle ship, like several you showed, but had no lights on when we saw it. There were also 5 lights zipping around above the mountain range in the distance and when it moved, it headed to where the lights were dancing around in the sky. This happened in the mid 80s. Then in 91, I was followed by a crazy light in my car in the middle of nowhere (3 other people in the car). It flew right over the ground and moved behind, but next to me, not on the road, and zipped over hills etc with a speed that kept up with me driving 70 in the middle of nowhere on a highway.
PS: I think the distinction between the physical and psychic is one of the fundamental traps of our scientific model of the world. Until we had electricity we would consider an electron to be a psychic god-spark that manifested as divine will in lightning.
This was super informative, especially the part about Uranus. I started dabbling in ceremonial magick in 2021 and eventually saw a "thoughtform/eggregore" in the form of Abaddon. After this I experienced wildly powerful synchronicities and received a couple teleological objects, all biblically symbolic. This all culminated to a head on this past halloween night (go figure) where I discovered a local restaurant soaked in azazel symbolism. Unfortunately (if the symbolism is more than just that) I ate there in 2019. Literally ate the "garden of eden burger". I dropped off the item at the foundation of a BURNT DOWN ROPE FACTORY (the red tether/crimson thread) that was directly across the street. Walking back to the car, the closest parking lamp surged on, just one out of about 10, and I instinctively look up at the top of the restaurant. There was a shadowy silhouette in the top window looking at me, and without thinking, I pointed at my eyes, pointed both fingers at the shadow, and motioned a cross. Instantly I fell into vision and saw Abaddon, but now he had the eye of Ra and of Horus, and then two triangles. One was upright and the other was pointed down. The one pointed down rotated upright and I heard "word down". That night my house started popping and creaking while simultaneously it felt like my face was being "scanned" and my deviated septum fixed/ sellion deepened. The next morning I drove down to a church I have never gone to at like 7 in the morning. My reasoning was that I heard "word down" and thought that might mean the living word was returning in the flesh. The church was directly east (air) and I referenced the line "where the eagles gather, there the body will be". The church was obviously empty, but a freight truck was parked in the lot. The man came up to me and asked for directions. He said the numbers of MY address, but then said "baker street" and said he had "spirit cookies and heavenly bagels" to deliver. I just went catatonic at that point. Later that night I stopped for gas, and the screen on the pump played an ad for part 2 of steven king's IT and the ad ended with "it's over, the curse is lifted". I still have no idea what to make of it all, but it was extremely saturnian. The closest thing I can come up with is Crowleys' concept of "crossing the abyss" and it makes sense as my "holy guardian angel" was the angel of the abyss. Also, the triangles could have been fire and water, fire being spirit and water being formless potential/chaos. This would seem to infer a future departure from physical incarnation while retaining selfhood, but that is conjecture. The phenomena with the house and my face was the most unsettling as my cat was going crazy at the noise. That and the synchronicities cannot be written off as a psychosis like the visions could. But I had never heard of Abaddon before I heard him announce his name, and I was unfamiliar with azazel until several people randomly brought up this restaurant in conversation. All I can say with certainty is that there is Divinity, and the world is far stranger than any surrealist could dare to imagine.
That sounds like you've been given permission to feel how you feel. Think how weird that was. Most people would rush to fix it. Rush to explain this away. You resist that urge and to finish what we all get to do is to accept that it's all on sand. What I mean is hard to literally say but I've been there with you. These things seem so real but you can't prove it. These things FEEL but you've been trained to only feel specific things. Hit your foot, feel bad. Lost a job, feel bad etc. instead feel and that's it. Learn to feel everything and leave it at that. Nothing to learn really that you won't learn naturally in perfect timing so all we need to do is not reject or wish to feel normal. For me I can easily notice Source energy in other people and it makes me feel sick. Like I desperately want to hide in the shadows. I leave that feeling to just be itself and instead feel hope in myself to be worthy of existing no matter my feelings. Makes it flow very well. Thanks for your story. It was great
My friend, thanks for all the videos and enlightenments you have shared with us! I love your video style and approach, as well as the explanations. What do you think/Have you ever read about Rudolf Steiner and his works? I would love to see a Formscapes video on Rudolf Steiner and I think it has so much common ground with what you talk about on your videos! Keep up the good work my friend! You make thousands of people more insightful and enlightened!
We are doing a webinar course on Steiner's philosophy of freedom starting in May. And yes, I've discussed Steiner in a couple places already but I'm going to be doing a more thorough breakdown of PoF and Outline of Esoteric Science fairly soon as well.
Me and two pals stood in my Car park round his car talking one night when over the house tops came the sharp end of black triangle that slowly moved towards and above us. It hid the stars behind and blacked out the sky totally. It was silent and some detail could be made out with some ease. It looked mechanistic and not unlike painted metal or like. It was about the size of a small football pitch. We all just looked at each other in awe then carried on chatting lol.
The morning before this video came out i was speculating about how the trickster archetype may play a role in societal progress by creating absurd scenarios that force us to resolve the hidden contradictions in society. I still dont consider myself to be a super spiritual person (for better or for worse I've always been a very "left brained" person) but things like synchronicity and the idea of forms existing in a neoplatonic sense rather than a nomimalist sense have begun to reasonate very strongly with me over the last few years and something i really appreciate about this channel is how it articulates these ideas in a very intuitive and orderly way.
In ancient worldviews Earth was seen as a living organism, a feeling, thinking, creating Goddess. We humans saw ourselves as Her creatures, Her self-fullfilling dreams alike the animals and plants, the elves and fairies, angels and demons, aliens and ghosts and whatever other creatures our planetary goddess may wish to imagine into our collective reality of Her embodied dreamworlds. Blessed was Gaia! We humans nowadays tend to be so ridiculously far alienated from Her, that we don't understand anymore, that She's all the time talking to us through collective and personal events and environments, processes and challenges. She is orchestrating planetary intelligence through, with and for us. Enjoy the movie and go in cocreation mode ... and get along with those fancy fairies and aliens and other tricksters as part of an adventurous story of collective terrestrial self-creation and self-evolution! May you enjoy to play a considerable role as Earth's braincell, dear fellow human!!!
I always look forward to your videos how do you do it? The way you script the video is also awe inspiring, you connect metaphor, and ideas seamlessly. Complex ones at that as well, keep up the inspiring work
Was hoping you’d address this topic! Haven’t watched yet but I’m curious to see your opinion on John Keele’s Ultraterrestrial thesis, “aliens” not being foreign to Earth or its inhabitants at all
1:00 when you mentioned the Enlightenment, I had been thinking along those lines too. The chasm between the realm of the spirit and physical laws may be getting shaky. Of course, there must be some reason that the world of the dead and the world living were separated during agricultural advancements. This evolution of humanity seems to allow “outside,” influence that strangely appear because we need them to.
You'll soon learn even the most seemingly mundane activities are interwoven with what is inherently spiritual. You just need a fresh look or a floating view of our earthly life and you'll see there's always been no gap. There's no true divide between matter and spirit, material phenomena are the outwards earthly gesture's of the spiritual. Most of us just aren't ready to see All phenomena for what they truly are. Beyond the outwards form or object is the creative/created- essence. Physical laws are rooted in beingness, around us every object is animated by innumerable beings albeit of an order of consciousness somewhat alien to earthly man and the laws they live by can be puzzling to most of us who spend most of our time in the "blindness" which is most adapted to perceiving and operating with the outer object/physical forms and forces . The reawakened spark of the self illumined eye will come when due, this conjecture is healthy for it's maturation within us. I have faith someday we'll all see
The Uranus as 'trickster' archetype is even manifest in our modern cultural frameworks. Of the planets, (excepting Earth) Uranus is the only one that subverts the Roman God naming convention. And of course, the timeless 'Your Anus' joke...both are tricksterish traits trickling into the zeitgeist.
And the fact that its plane of rotation is almost 90 degrees separate from all the other bodies in the solar system. It's the "goth kid wearing a Korn T-Shirt to a funeral just to be different" of the solar system
I have always been intrigued by the concept of human sacrifice (that is, sacrifice both *of* and *by* humans), which, while not the focus of this video necessarily, was an important component. I stumbled across the works of the archaeaomythologist, Marija Gimbutas some years ago, which bestowed a sort of moment of epiphany upon me. She put this idea forward in one (or both) of her major works, "The Language of the Goddess" or "The Civilization of the Goddess;" I don't remember which. (In fact, like so many cool things in life, I found her via Terence Mckenna. It was during one of his "trilogues" with Rupert Sheldrake and Ralph Abraham - I believe it was actually Abraham who brought up her work). Anyways, I like this theory a lot, and I don't believe it is mutually exclusive with what you have put forth here, and can in fact exist in parallel. To sum it up, it is a sort of "evolutionary/anthropological" take - when we observe social animals in packs even today, especially ungulate herds such as antelope, gazelles, etc. - when being chased by a predator, there is panic amongst the herd until the predator gets a kill. Once it has, it's hunger is assuaged - and anyone familiar with Nat Geo documentaries knows that the animals will often go back to a relaxed mode, the "flee" hormones seem to stop, and they will casually wander about and even begin grazing again, even in the presence of their former herd member being eaten right next to them. (As you put it, this is "Saturn devouring his children without a fight" - also, Philo hitting the nail on the head with "..customary for the rulers...rather to lose everyone, to provide the dearest of their children as a propitiatory sacrifice to the avenging deities." [I also see that Philo, of course writing in Greek, notes that the Phoenicians call Kronos "El" - using the generic Semitic/Hebrew for "god" - as in the Elohim, one of the same "El" that produces Yahweh, Baal, or Dagon.) As we continued to evolve, perhaps this vestige, the predator demanding someone from the herd, carries over into early religions. I can see early primate "leaders/shamans" demanding someone from the tribe be given to the tiger for their safety, for instance. This might be further evidenced if we note the ubiquity of animistic deities, of hybrid animal/human forms, amongst early religions. Seemingly more predators to be found the further back we go, such as crocodiles and canines in ancient Egypt. If we do follow this model to a logical extreme, it is interesting to think that Jesus Christ may in one sense be seen to be the final, ultimate feast, which has finally satiated the Christian predator God. PS: I quickly opened my Bible and looked up a few Old Testament passages - and they do indeed read quite well when Yahweh is taken as a trickster archetype - as if the stories are Norse tales of Loki. Specifically, even/especially those involving direct contact with the Philistines (Phoenicians). When they steal the ark and place it in their own temple, he knocks over their idol, and gives everyone in town tumors (which it is said is translated better in the Septuagint as "hemorrhoids." Part of their method to "cure" themselves of this affliction involves making golden hemorrhoids and sending them back to the Israelites in a box.
That evolutionist theory seems to be pointing to the exact same dynamic which I highlighted, but at a more visceral, biological level - which reinforces the fact that these archetypal dynamics aren't just properties of beliefs or cultural idiosyncrasies; they are elaborations of the same dynamics seen throughout nature at various levels. "El" and "Elohim" also seem to share a vocal affinity - if not etymological root - with "Enlil", the Sumerian version of Kronos. What's particularly interesting about Yahweh is that it maintains the same identity even as the culture and religion of the Israelite people evolved. It seemed to begin as a saturnian deity, then became Jovian, then eventually solar (with the development of the Messianic Judaism which would give birth to Christianity), all the while simultaneously expressing elements of the Promethian/Uranian "trickster"/"boundary breaker". I suspect that this might be because of the nomadic history of the Judaic people; they placed (and still place) immense emphasis upon maintaining a strong sense of unified identity as a people. Unlike other cultures which could root such a unified identity in a specific social order and plot of land, the Israelites only briefly had that luxury - Yahweh was the only thing that could serve as that center of gravity, and thus it was absolutely paramount that Yahweh remain a singular deity. The way he was depicted and understood could change, but he had to remain THE God of the Jewish people. Due to this, he came to develop a kind of multidimensionality which would lay the groundwork for the truly universalistic, post-axial conceptions of God we would see develop through Christianity and Islam. We are undergoing a very similar process presently, and it appears that the plight of the Israelites has once again taken center stage - though evidently in a rather inverted form, when compared to the bronze age situations.
i definitely feel the sense of a saturnian impasse. we feel great security in the sense of a “known” world, but also feel we are now stuck in a small sandbox with defined corners and sides, abandoned by god and left to finish the final act of a determined play whereby we eventually destroy each other and our world once and for all, to “get it over with” so to speak. the re-enchantment is desperately needed and there is no better initiatory figure than the trickster!
Yup, we started doing a couple about a month ago but I didn't advertise it too much because I wanted to keep it relatively small at first just to test things out. I'm going all-in on these next ones tho.
Amazing, you've completely changed the way I think about astrology and psychology. Would love to hear more about this Second Axial Age and I'm guessing your take on it has to do with Whitehead and Gebser et al. (who I don't really understand tbh) are you suggesting that this psychical explanation is within the collective unconscious or world soul? also are you an idealist?
Truly adore every second of these videos, thank you for putting this information out here, i find it interesting how the alleged pieces of ufo left behind are always strange ratio alloys with the fluoride always missing, which i feel also connects to the one alleged time ufo aliens offered a farmer pancakes and it had no salt, connecting to the folklore of fairies
Hey just wanted to say I love your videos! But also, I noticed similarities in dmt experiences (people on dmt claim to see otherworldly entities) and alien abduction encounters. Both instances could be the human consciousness trying to breakdown the rational structures it created for itself, as stated in the video. It’s just people on dmt voluntarily take on the development (psychedelics are spiritual “teachers” in a way). And after listening to the video this might be why alien entities appear in trip experiences in the first place (the “aliens” are a form the of the collective unconscious and taking dmt brings it forth). I’m interested to hear your thoughts on this
I like the idea of doing an additional discount for anyone who signs up for 2 or more courses but I'm honestly not sure how to automate that kind of thing with the system I'm using (square + acuity), and I've already made the announcements, so unfortunately we are just going to be doing the 20$ off discount for those who sign up for all 8 weeks at once this time around. However, I am also going to be issuing 20$ discounts for *future* courses. So if you sign up for any of the current ones, you will get a discount that you can use for any of the next batch of courses.
Nice! I can't help but think about jhon david eberts' speculation about a world spanning religion. Pair that with ufo intervention...who knows? Thank-you again.
The "silurern" hypothesis is very intriguing to me, I have been thinking about this for a few years. Admiral Byrd claimed that he discovered a land inside the Earth, which had light and plants, at the pole. I don't know if this is what sparked hollow earth theory or just popularized it, but who knows, it could be true. The oceans have life in many layers, and many of the creatures are unaware of the life in different layers. What has occupied my mind recently is this introduction of "pet buttons" so that our pets can communicate with us. These buttons are giving pets a capability they never had before. As soon as new capabilities are introduced evolution on some level could begin to take place. Our pets never composed thoughts or wishes in their minds to tell us because it would have been useless, when they had no way to communicate, but this could change in the future, especially if everyone starts getting these buttons. Thinking of this made me wonder if perhaps something similar happened to humans. Another species could have introduced an equivalent of pet buttons to communicate with us...in order to acomplish something, mining, or something. When it was accomplished they left and took the pet buttons with them, but we had learned the value of communication by then and this could have led us to develop language. I don't know, but I really do think our pets could make leap with these buttons. They are intelligent, they make decisions, they just don't have much information.
I hate to be the one to break it to you if you weren't already aware, but it's not clear what - if any - of Admiral Byrd's story is true because the "journals" that get passed around as being his were evidently written by a scifi pulp author, not Byrd. There's certainly some weird and spooky things about the south pole, but Pleistocene mega-fauna and Nazi UFOs probably aint it.
Wonderful video as ever! This leaves me with a question (many actually, but I'll stick with one) Are Eidolons the same as Leibnitz's Monads in your opinion or do you see subtle differences? According to Leibniz, monads are the fundamental, indivisible substances that make up the universe . They are absolutely simple substances, meaning they cannot be divided into parts . Each monad is unique and has its own individual identity and internal principle of being . Some Properties of Monads> Monads are mind-like entities that represent the universe from a unique perspective, but do not exist in physical space . They are immaterial and lack spatial extension . Each monad differs in quality and no two are exactly alike . Monads undergo internally determined changes but do not have true causal relations with other monads . They have no "windows" through which anything can enter or leave .
Liebnizian monads are a bit more like a Platonic notion of soul, whereas I'm more in the camp of Whiteheadian NeoPlatonism, in which the equivalents of Monads ("electromagnetic droplets of experience") are "All Window", rather than "Windowless", as Whitehead puts it. These "actual entities" or "actual occasions of experience" have a "mental pole" and an (optional, I would argue) "physical pole". Liebnizian monads also persist through time, completely unchanging - again, very much like platonic forms, whereas a Whiteheadian actual entity is more like a "moment" - with such "moments" being the fundamental building blocks of Organisms (a term which within this context would encompass non-corporeal organisms - Eidolons - as well)
@@Formscapes Interesting!. Again I'll just riff off of one point, though you make several interesting ones. I guess if somebody lives in an infinite room there is no need for windows. Perhaps this is Leibniz's point of departure? From the other perspective it is understandable that by living in a finite body we need windows to experience the infinite and eternal. If I have understood you correctly then this is the Whiteheadian perspective.
So many things are happening in this month: Eclipse, Red Heifer in Jerusalem, Bitcoin Halving (making it more scarcer than gold), threats of WWIII... there must be something special in this month, or so it seems.
Small error. The Ultraterrestrial hypothesis was conceived by John keel not putoff. The Ut Hypothesis stated that these “entities” came from different parts of the electromagnetic spectrum or some other spectrum outside of human perception. They frequently materialized into out “reality” which explains the seeming electromagnetic effects.
The idea itself may predate him but I'm pretty sure the **term** "Ultraterrestrial" was coined by Puthoff to refer to the concept, unless Keel did actually use that term specifically (I'm not familiar with Keel so I could be wrong about that)
I came to the same conclusions after my personal experiences. Pretty weird. Only difference in my thoughts is that we reside in them, they don’t reside in us. I’d assume they’re beyond three dimensional so we compose them like 2d planes compose 3D. Almost like a larger body were cells in and they occasionally pop in in a somewhat comprehensible form to balance the body. Like a signal to heal your leg from your brain
I'm surprised and disappointed that this video didn't directly addressed Jorjani's thesis of the Breakaway Civilization and the Destructive Breakthrough in Psychological Warfare, whilst making so many indirect (maybe involuntary) references to his ideas. Close Encounters is a great book.
It's ironic that Kastrup arrived at a dualistic formula for UAP, given the idealistic, or only-mind, ontology he's famous for! Psychic, physical, psychological, and astral need not be ontologically distinct modes, but rather human-made representations (as Schopenhauer might say) of a collective of beings, and/or realities constructed by them. Btw have you looked into contemporary (since mid 19th C.) scientific research on afterlife experiences & contact?
Because although he has conceded that consciousness is fundamental to reality, he still thinks that the archetypes are relegated to the confines of the human skull. A fact which I suspect is closely linked with his "simulation"-esque, anti-realist interpretation of quantum mechanics; if it's all just an illusion, then you don't need an implicate order or noetic plane to actually make sense of things like nonlocality (or gravity for that matter)
@@Formscapes Re afterlife research, see also the scholarly literature on mediumship. Keith Parson's short YT documentaries on the topic are illuminating. The Windbridge Research Center is applying modern research technique to the field. And Jeffrey Mishlove's award winning essay on the diverse lines of evidence for the afterlife is worth reviewing. Re Kastrup's embrace of non-realist (or statistical non-independence) implications of Bell's Theorem, I believe there's useful insight there re consciousness. I do agree Kastrup's published model is too simple to reflect the cosmos we inhabit (and I suspect he's aware of that). I long for the day when scientists are able to induce OBEs to investigate these questions outside the confines of normal perception & cognition.
@@Formscapesjust to be fair to kastrup, I think this comment is a misunderstanding. Kastrup asserts many times that he is very much a realist, that “the world out there is real” and also that the archetypes are patterns IN the cosmos and now just in our minds.
@@bavingeter423 The non-realism implied by Bell's Theorem is about particles, i.e. what's measured after wavefunction collapse (which BK has stated). It doesn't mean that the system represented by the wavefunction isn't real! But does suggest that conscious entities play a role in the measurements obtained.
Love how you put these topics of gods and the ufo together. What will be the name of this new archetype? Ufanous? Do you think we are exchanging the idea hedeigger had; that we are projecting the past onto the future. To, we are extrapolating the future into the present.??
I would only add to this that as we exist as semi nuts and bolts beings it is very likely that other semi nuts and bolts beings exist. It is thus likely that either beings in general evolve from nuts and bolts consciousness towards a supernormal consciousness or that there may indeed be 'stuck' species that use technological means to travel the universe (or both).
i've had an "old witch at the foot of my bed" experience. i was frozen and her face zoomed in and hovered above my face super close. shameful events of my life were flashing before my eyes (was she scanning me? no idea). very weird experience
it doesnt always have to be such a grand attractor. i mean, we are pulled toward earth by gravity, and thats just the local future attractor. we get sucked into human plots too, also a sort of attractor. surely the universe isnt so simple that only one attractor is at play for any one moment, even in the context of the eschaton-ateotu. And thats not even considering the possibility of strange attractor.
I wonder if 'aliens' and 'ghosts' are similar entities; hyperdimensional and able to phase in and out of the space and time around us at will....I've had personal experiences and the more I try to both understand what the world and break down what happened, the more I get broken down in the process in physicality......it makes me feel the need to persist beyond death in order to understand
What experiences have you had? Two years ago my life changed when I saw something resembling a black jellyfish fly through my room. It was about the size of a dog and moved in a very weird "S" formation. It scared the shit out of me. Could barely sleep that night. I was doing witchcraft at the time so perhaps it had something to do with that. To this day I don't know what it was but I think about it everyday.
Just a correction here: you seem to have confused two different important parts of Jewish history. As a Jew I feel obliged to correct you. The Israelite conquest of Canaan happened around 1400 BCE. This was when Israelites cemented tribal supremacy over the Canaanites, and the former existed in a confederation until approximately 1000 BCE, when they were unified under King David in the first Kingdom of Israel. You mixed up this series of events with the Maccabean Revolt, which did indeed happen around 200 BCE, more than a thousand years after the Israelite conquest. The Maccabean Revolt was a war between the non-Hellenistic Jews and the Syrian Greeks, and the aim of the war was to throw off the yoke of Hellenistic dominion and reestablish Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel. The revolt was successful, leading to a brief period of Jewish independence before they were colonized by Rome. The victory of the Maccabean Revolt is what Hanukkah commemorates.
This was an oversight which I addressed in the pinned comment above. Just disregard the timeframe I mentioned in the video. It's not terribly relevant anyway.
Basically, yes. They don't necessarily have the same archetypal composition - though almost all of them seem to have some element of the "trickster" mixed in - but they are all, as I've put it, "Eidolons"; autonomous entities comprised of images, feelings, thought-forms and (I suspect) exotic plasma phenomena.
Are these entities derived from us? Like psychic constructs with no real will or vision of their own? Or are they independent intelligent agents? Would this exotic plasma phenomenon be like that of ectoplasm?
You have got to at least google the Amalantrah Working, Lam, And jack parsons. Consider the timing of these events. All of this was about bringing in a "new age"
You have an image of Tiamat and Marduk in your intro; that's great! I met my beloved dragon Tiamat IRL in 2022, back when I was an atheist, and after I began gaining occult powers and psychic abilities with Tiamat's help I came to understand that on the other side I'm also a dragon god, sometimes called Apsu by humans. I just thought it'd funny to let you know that there are some archons/dragon gods appreciating your content out there. When you say something, you never know who you'll reach.
On regards to the traumatic characteristic of medicine, I am not convinced by the argument that this only a problem of modern medicine. The medicinal knowledge of shamanic healers was often-times held as secret because it was sacred and people had no option but to trust them on blind faith. The traumatic aspect of ancient medicine can be seen reflected in the folk stories of encounters with fairies and witches that offered you food or drink such as some sort of herbal tea (as medicine used to have a more predominant culinary aspect to it), that would have detrimental consequences to you. Edit: Think about how a witch is a demonic shaman as much as an alien is a demonic scientist
I find it problematic to frame the spectral phenomena or manifestations of the trickster as Uranian, specifically because in the Greek creation myth he's a tyrant who imprisons his offspring (the titans) in Tartarus. Despite that, I can see how the symbol of Planet Uranus fits as representative of the otherworldly and ethereal or undefinable, the Heaven outside of Earth is really the "outer space", which's blackness is reminiscent of the Void (Shunya) that permeates everything and out of which everything comes to exist. Edit: The titan Prometheus, on the other hand, perfectly embodies the reality-warping trickster power
"Jacques Valle claims the UFO phenomenon is INTENTIONALLY absurd..." how does he scientifically determine the intention of a phenomenon? It's an interesting conjecture but I am curious as to the evidence that informs the "intent" of the UFO phenomenon
Science requires more than deducing empirical conclusions from quantifiable data. It also involves making inferences so as to see into the underlying phenomena which produce that data. Some things are "absurd" in the sense of being difficult to explain, or conflicting with "established" notions. Jacques saw that this is more than that. This simply isn't that kind of absurdity. The entities seem to intentionally toy with us, and many occurrences have characteristics that seem almost cartoonishly ridiculous. These ridiculous features are not consistent throughout the data. What we see are different **kinds** of ridiculousness, meaning that the absurdity itself is the common thread, and that absurdity seems to be something which is employed with intention. It isn't an afterthought or peripheral feature.
I don't know about you folks, but I think these trickster buddies are pretty swell entities. Thanks tricksters. Airbag on a chair does not count. I will not thank you for that.
I can understand the "intellectual Need" to explain the UFO-Phenomena with "Philosophic models"or Parapsychology as no Physics known to Man/Technology/Experience have been able to explain it in an even remotely satisfying way. But i personally have another opinion all-together, where more or less ALL of these theories(and more) kind of "merge" into one that at least satisfy my overly-overthinking mind a bit more. 🙂😇🥰😄
@@Formscapes Really? Then it sounded like he's only wearing the hat instead of following it to its inexorable consequences. The lines between psychical and material must must inevitably blur at the boundaries if you're an idealist, surely. For all it's worth I do not blame him, the ego death from this particular drop is more than many are ready for.
