Elegant way to find the Perimeter of a right triangle | (step-by-step explanation) |

Подписаться 413 тыс.

Просмотров 131 тыс.

50% 1

Learn how to find the Perimeter of a right triangle when two sides are unknown. One side of the triangle is 89. Important Geometry and Algebra skills are also explained: Pythagorean theorem; algebraic skills. Step-by-step tutorial by PreMath.com
Today I will teach you tips and tricks to solve the given olympiad math question in a simple and easy way. Learn how to prepare for Math Olympiad fast!
Step-by-step tutorial by PreMath.com
• Elegant way to find th...
Elegant way to find the Perimeter of a right triangle | (step-by-step explanation) | #math #maths
Olympiad Mathematical Question! | Learn Tips how to solve Olympiad Question without hassle and anxiety!
#FindThePerimeter #Perimeter #Algebra #GeometryMath #PythagoreanTheorem #MathOlympiad #CongruentTriangles #ThalesTheorem #RightTriangle #RightTriangles #SimilarTriangles
#PreMath #PreMath.com #MathOlympics #HowToThinkOutsideTheBox #ThinkOutsideTheBox #HowToThinkOutsideTheBox? #FillInTheBoxes #GeometryMath #Geometry #RightTriangles
#OlympiadMathematicalQuestion #HowToSolveOlympiadQuestion #MathOlympiadQuestion #MathOlympiadQuestions #OlympiadQuestion #Olympiad #AlgebraReview #Algebra #Mathematics #Math #Maths #MathOlympiad #HarvardAdmissionQuestion
#MathOlympiadPreparation #LearntipstosolveOlympiadMathQuestionfast #OlympiadMathematicsCompetition #MathOlympics #CollegeEntranceExam
#blackpenredpen #MathOlympiadTraining #Olympiad Question #GeometrySkills #GeometryFormulas #Angles #Height #ComplementaryAngles #TwoTangentTheorem
#MathematicalOlympiad #OlympiadMathematics #CompetitiveExams #CompetitiveExam
#IsoscelesTriangles
How to solve Olympiad Mathematical Question
How to prepare for Math Olympiad
How to Solve Olympiad Question
How to Solve international math olympiad questions
international math olympiad questions and solutions
international math olympiad questions and answers
olympiad mathematics competition
blackpenredpen
math olympics
olympiad exam
olympiad exam sample papers
math olympiad sample questions
math olympiada
British Math Olympiad
olympics math
olympics mathematics
olympics math activities
olympics math competition
Math Olympiad Training
How to win the International Math Olympiad | Po-Shen Loh and Lex Fridman
Po-Shen Loh and Lex Fridman
Number Theory
There is a ridiculously easy way to solve this Olympiad qualifier problem
This U.S. Olympiad Coach Has a Unique Approach to Math
The Map of Mathematics
mathcounts
math at work
Pre Math
Olympiad Mathematics
Two Methods to Solve System of Exponential of Equations
Olympiad Question
Find Area of the Shaded Triangle in a Rectangle
Geometry
Geometry math
Geometry skills
Right triangles
imo
Competitive Exams
Competitive Exam
Find the length m
Pythagorean Theorem
Right triangles
Similar triangles
Congruent Triangles
Exterior angle theorem
Isosceles triangles
coolmath
my maths
mathpapa
mymaths
cymath
sumdog
multiplication
ixl math
deltamath
reflex math
math genie
math way
math for fun
Subscribe Now as the ultimate shots of Math doses are on their way to fill your minds with the knowledge and wisdom once again.

Опубликовано:

14 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 214

@yuusufliibaan1380 Год назад

❤❤❤ thanks 💯🙏 keep going my dear teacher ❤️

@PreMath Год назад

Thank you, I will ❤️ You are awesome. Keep it up 👍

@gandelve 11 месяцев назад

The important extra information which is not emphasised is the requirement that sides must be positive integers. If sides can be any positive real number, there are an infinity of answers.

@krishnaagarwal5163 10 месяцев назад

You are correct. If the sides can be any positive real number, there are infinite answers

@gregorywildie37 10 месяцев назад

So the answer provided is not actually the answer to the question as actually posed. An answer but not the answer

@lintelle2382 10 месяцев назад

I was thinking the same thing!

@michalswiderski507 10 месяцев назад

yes now I got it - as was concluding that there are infinite number of solution as it depends on angle c which can be any between >o

@costakapsalis7667 9 месяцев назад

The confusion would have been avoided if it was stated from the start that all sides are positive integers.

@pratapkarishma 9 месяцев назад

We need not find the values of a and c seperately, as the question is 'What is the perimeter? ' Perimeter is a + b + c we have got the value of a + c = 7921, just add a (89) to this to get the perimeter. ( a + c ) + b = a + b + c = 7921 + 89 = 8010, which is the answer you got by finding the values of a and c.

@taxidude 7 месяцев назад

Sorry but without any 2nd side or an angle , there are an infinite number of triangles.

@DdDd-ss3ms 10 месяцев назад

With the given information there are endless solutions. When a nears 0 , c nears 89+ . When a nears endles, c nears endles

@FirstLast-n5b 9 месяцев назад

Not really - sides have to be positive integers and there is only one solution.

@Arqade38 6 месяцев назад

It's not, Since it's already stated that the side lengths must be positive integers.

@lnmukund6152 6 месяцев назад

Find out 89^2=7921, decide the no into 2 consecutive nos 89^2=3960+3961, as per vedics,89^2= 3960^2+3961^2 implies all the 3 are sides, area is dead easy Mukund

@marcellosangiorgio2134 10 месяцев назад

It is arbitrary to say that, if xy = zt, then x=z andy=t. As a matter of fact, there are infinite triangles having a side = 89

@FirstLast-n5b 9 месяцев назад

It is easy enough to prove your statement - just give us as least one more solution.

@pablomonroy332 9 месяцев назад

yes there are, but the sides must be integer numbers, and the only solution to that is the one that is shown on the vid.

@patrickcorliss8878 9 месяцев назад

0:56 “Keep in your mind that the side lengths must be a positive integer”, See diagram: Sides ∈ Z+

@jakelabete7412 Год назад

This problem is incorrectly posed. If you move the point C either left or right the sides 'a' and 'c' will change and with them the perimeter. The problem is still solvable by making an additional assumption, which you actually do when you assign the values.

@patrickcorliss8878 9 месяцев назад

0:56 “Keep in your mind that the side lengths must be a positive integer”, See diagram: Sides ∈ Z+

@davek6415 11 месяцев назад

This solution only works if you assume all values are integers, which was not given as a condition. Introduce fractions, and there are an infinite number of possible solutions.

@wes9627 11 месяцев назад

Z^+ was given.

@raymondarata6549 10 месяцев назад

3-4-5, 5-12-13 and 7-24-25 are the three smallest Pythagorean triples where the the smallest side is listed first. There appears to be a pattern. That is c = b+1. The hypotenuse is one larger than the longer leg. Using a = 89, b, c = b+1, the Pythagorean Theorem and some algebra, you get b = 3960 and c = 3961. P = sum of three sides = 8010.

@success762 8 месяцев назад

6.8.10 not like that

@ybodoN Год назад

For any odd number n greater than 1, there is a Pythagorean triple (n, m, m + 1) where m = ½ (n² − 1). When n is a prime number, there is no other Pythagorean triple than this one and the perimeter is n² + n.

@ybodoN Год назад

@@pluisjenijn to be exact, the funny property is n² + m² = (m + 1)² like (21, 220, 221) (201, 20200, 20201) (2001, 2002000, 2002001)

@sail2byzantium Год назад

This is very good to know. For our PreMath problem above, are we just limited to Pythagorean triples? Or could PreMath's solution apply to all right triangles if missing two side lengths? Thank you!

@Ctrl_Alt_Sup Год назад

I arrived at the same result because for any prime number b, the second scenario always leads to a=0. Only one solution is therefore possible for the perimeter p with c=(b²+1)/2 and a=(b²-1)/2 p = a+b+c = (b²-1)/2+b+(b²+1)/2 = (b²-1+2b+b²+1)/2 = (2b²+2b)/2 = b²+b We can deduce that for each prime number b, there exists a Pythagorean triplet (a, b, c) of non-zero natural integers verifying the Pythagorean relation a²+b²=c² with c=(b²+1)/2 and a=(b²-1)/2!

@ybodoN Год назад

@@sail2byzantium since the _sides_ ∈ ℤ⁺ (as shown in the upper right corner of the video) we are limited to Pythagorean triples. But there could be multiple solutions: when b = 33 the solutions are (33, 44, 55), (33, 56, 65),, (33, 180, 183) and (33, 544, 545).

@waheisel 10 месяцев назад

@@sail2byzantium Hello, when PreMath states the solutions are limited to those triangles with sides that are integers he is indeed limiting the answers to Pythagorean triples. And as @ybodoN alertly points out, if the given side is an odd prime number greater than 1 there will be one and only one Pythagorean triple solution.

@Ctrl_Alt_Sup Год назад

b=89 is a prime number In fact for any prime number b, the second scenario always leads to a=0. Also there is only one possible solution: c=(b²+1)/2 and a=(b²-1)/2 And a perimeter p = a+b+c = (b²-1)/2+b+(b²+1)/2 = (b²-1+2b+b²+1)/2 = (2b²+2b)/2 = b²+b We check it with b=89, p=89²+89=7921+1=8010 We can deduce the following property... For each prime number b, there exists a Pythagorean triplet (a, b, c) of non-zero natural integers satisfying the Pythagorean relation a²+b²=c² with c=(b²+1)/2 and a=(b² -1)/2

@_Udo_Hammermeister 11 месяцев назад

Your formula is great. If b=3 than c=5 and a=4 . Fits best !

@douglasmiller1233 9 месяцев назад

"Also there is only one possible solution" FALSE. There is only one possible solution IN INTEGERS, but there are infinitely many non-integer solutions: a = 15, b = 89, c = sqrt(8146) = 90.255193756..., and P = 194.255193756... is a solution; a = 200, b = 89, c = sqrt(47921) = 218.9086567..., and P = 507.9086567... is another solution; etc.

@Ctrl_Alt_Sup 9 месяцев назад

@@douglasmiller1233 We are looking for sides belonging to Z+. In fact we are looking for a Pythagorean triple, and therefore only integers.

@Roy-tf7fe Год назад

Nothing need be prime, and the given value can be an irrational square root (for example) and so long as the number whose square root is taken is factorable, you will have a solution for every possible combination of the factors (BASED ON the factors, not the factors directly). And the given one, of course, with the two unknown sides being a single unit apart (for purists who will be apoplectic realizing I mean "one times a number" to be considered a prime factorization). So if the known value is the square root of 255, 1*255, 3*85, 5*51, and 15*17 will all generate solutions. (By the way, that last fact is why one uses a single pair of primes generating an encryption solution: using several gives the codebreaker several possible solutions.)) For example, from my last: 3*85. (85+3)/2 and (85-3)/2 are the two sides.

@Submanca 9 месяцев назад

You don`t need to know what c and a equal. All you need is what c+a is equal to. You add b and you have the perimiter.

@walterbrown8694 9 месяцев назад

Your solution is only one of an infinite number of solutions. Side a could be 89, and we would have a right triangle with 2 45 degree angles. If I choose a value of 2 X 89 = 178 for c, then my right triangle would be a 30 60 90 right triangle. If you were one of my grade school math students, I would assign the following homework question for you: "How many angles and/or side lengths are required to uniquely specify any polygon ?"

@patrickcorliss8878 9 месяцев назад

0:56 “Keep in your mind that the side lengths must be a positive integer”, See diagram: Sides ∈ Z+

@longchen8174 11 месяцев назад

畢氏數(Pythagorean triple)有通解(General solutions) ： (b,(b²-1/2),(b²+1)/2),當b為奇數(odd)，或(2b,b²-1,b²+1)

@peterkovak7801 9 месяцев назад

Mathematical 'magic' was used here, because, in fact, as long as you don't have one more side or one more angle (except of the right one, of course), you have an infinite number of solutions.

@pablomonroy332 9 месяцев назад

actually no, the prob says integer numbers on the sides, that narrow it down to only 1 solution.

@patrickcorliss8878 9 месяцев назад

0:56 “Keep in your mind that the side lengths must be a positive integer”, See diagram: Sides ∈ Z+

@chrisbonney7563 Год назад

Surely there are many possible solutions

@BruceArnold318 Год назад

He said they are integers.

@ybodoN Год назад

Since 89 is a prime number, there is only one solution 🧐

@gayatrithanvi8901 Год назад

As they are positive integers and the number(89 Square) is PRIME having only one solution THERE IS ONLY ONE SOLUTION YOU FOOL

@MrPaulc222 Год назад

@@BruceArnold318 Ah, I missed that bit too. I was scratching my head thinking that the number of solutions is infinite.

@abefroman7393 Год назад

There’s only one….and stop calling me Shirley😂

@stephenlesliebrown5959 9 месяцев назад

Since the Triangle Inequality includes degenerate triangles it could be argued that a=0 does give an acceptable second answer for perimeter of 89+89+0=178.

@rogerdadd636 9 месяцев назад

Surely there are many integer possibilities for a and c. You just need to push the point opposite the 89 length and a and c will change whilst 89 remains the same. I think this is a possible solution but not THE solution as it cannot be defined.

@kennethstevenson976 8 месяцев назад

It looked like a 30, 60, 90 triangle so I took the given shortest side and formed three sides in the ratio of 1, 2, and root three. This produced sides of 89, 178, and 89 root 3. This checks with the Pythagorean Triple 7921 + 23763 = 31684.

@robertstuart6645 9 месяцев назад

When using the (89)(89) choice, the simultaneous equations can be solved in the same manner as with the (7921)(1) choice, namely by addition to eliminate "a".

@GetMeThere1 9 месяцев назад

When all are integers, a^2 = c^2 - b^2 c= (a^2 + 1)/2, b = c-1. Works for a=3, b=4, c=5; works for a=5, b=12, c=13. But it doesn't work for a=4. Works for a=21, b=220, c=221. I'm guessing it works for any a except if a itself is a square. Nope, a=9, b=40, c=41 works. I guess it works only when a is odd. Works for a=25, b=312, c=313.

@hemendraparikh7645 Год назад

Something does not make sense. Can you not move the point C to the right keeping given side length at fixed 89 and thus change the sum of other two sides? By moving the point c anywhere on the line you would still keep the side length 'b' constant at 89 but change the perimeter of the triangle.

@simpleman283 Год назад

Go to 1:00 it shows him making a circle around the Z+. It means the side lengths can only be whole numbers.

@MrEndubsar Год назад

Doubt this, what will happen if on the drawing BC is reduced by8 units? You do not have th angles of the BAC and ACB?

@philippedelaveau528 10 месяцев назад

If moves along the line BC, it’is obvious that the perimeter varies from zero to infinite. It should be specified that the solution is a set of Pythagorion numbers

@patrickcorliss8878 9 месяцев назад

0:56 “Keep in your mind that the side lengths must be a positive integer”, See diagram: Sides ∈ Z+

@Stevarino1020 9 месяцев назад

You don't have enough info to calculate a and c . You either have to know 2 of the 3 sides or know the angle of one of the non right angle sides- you have neither. The side described would be a sliver and not look at all like the triangle drawn. So you can randomly find an infinite number of right triangles with one side of 89 units.

@nickcellino1503 8 месяцев назад

At 1:00 of the video he does state the sides are positive integers. Otherwise it would be impossible to solve the problem. In the diagram it would have been better to state this in words rather than stating "sides E Z+". Also the the perimeter question is meaningless. It would have been better to just ask for the lengths of the other two sides.

@dimuthdarshaka7985 Год назад

Solutions may not be full filled Pythagoras values Please check this sir.

@nickcellino1503 10 месяцев назад

He does say the side lengths must be a positive integer. Otherwise, there would be an infinite number of answers. Also, the diagram does show Sides E Z+ although that's a clumsy way to indicate the sides are positive numbers greater than 0. I would have written, "The sides are integers".

@patrickcorliss8878 9 месяцев назад

In the diagram: Sides ∈ Z+ is clumsy math talk for "sides are elements of the set of positive integers"

@JSSTyger Год назад

I'm definitely coming back to this to give it a try.

@jamesraymond1158 9 месяцев назад

the title page is misleading because it fails to say that the sides are integers.

@user-ib4mi5eq7u 9 месяцев назад

There are infinite solutions for this question due the given information.

@alster724 Год назад

Obviously, the larger value is more acceptable here. Very easy

@manojkantsamal4945 8 месяцев назад

Respected Sir 🙏, I like the way of your answering

@misterenter-iz7rz Год назад

89^2=(c-a)(c+a), 89 is prime, 89^2=1×89^2 89×89 89^2×1, thus c-a=1, c+a=89^2, 2a+1=89^2, a=3960, c=3961, therefore the perimeter is 89+3960+3961=8010😊

@PreMath Год назад

Excellent! Thanks for sharing! Cheers! You are awesome. Keep it up 👍

@BalakrishnaPerala Год назад

no need to solve for a,c values.. we already got c+a=89^2 ; we need perimeter (c+a)+b = 89^2+89 = 8010

@HappyFamilyOnline Год назад

Amazing 👍 Thanks for sharing 😊

@GaryBricaultLive 9 месяцев назад

Probably could solve this much easier using trig to find side BC using arctan(). And then Pythagorean theorem to find side AC.

@northdallashs1 9 месяцев назад

So...arctan(89/BC) =

@glennchartrand5411 9 месяцев назад

Perimeter is greater than 178 If "a" was zero then "c "would be 89. Any value for "a" would increase "c" So ....the perimeter is 89+ (>89) + (>0) or >178

@레드우드-q9q 9 месяцев назад

Line BC=89 line AC= 89*2^(1/2) is also an answer!

@ittoopkannath6747 8 месяцев назад

If the angle at A changes without changing the length of AB, will the answer be the same?

@k.ervede8811 Год назад

You forgot to mention your condition that only whole numbers apply. If not, 7921 can also be divided by any other number less than 7921 to produce a fraction, e.g. 7921=(100)(79.21). In that case c=89.605 and a=10.395. The circumference is then 189. This problem therefore gives an infinite number of answers. (You also don't have to calculate a and c separately. If you know that (a+c) is a value, you can add the known value b.)

@phredflypogger4425 10 месяцев назад

I'm no math guru but I it seems to me that there are infinite answers depending on the position of point "C" relative to "B".

@pablomonroy332 9 месяцев назад

the sides must be integer numbers..theres only 1 solution.

@SrisailamNavuluri 6 месяцев назад

If the hypotenuse of the right triangle is 89 what is the perimeter and it's area?

@jonchester9033 Год назад

Elegant way of solving the problem, but can a hypotenuse of 3961 be correct? It doesn't seem reasonable. That would make angle A about 88.7 degrees. BTW, love your videos. I try to solve several each day. (with your wonderful help, of course).

@ybodoN Год назад

As long as the angle A is less than 90°, we have a triangle, no matter how long is the hypotenuse 🤓

@fschorn 11 месяцев назад

So, if you were asked to find the perimeter of the right triangle with limited information, like we have, you could do as the video did. It finds one possible perimeter. But if there are other values to the base, different hypotenuses will also result, leading to different perimeters. If the sides are integers (positive) there are many solutions. If the integer requirement is lifted, we have an infinite number of bases, hypotenuses and perimeters!

@samehhassan9066 8 месяцев назад

There are an infinite number of solutions to this problem depending on the slope of the hypotenuse

@olivierjosephdeloris8153 Год назад

C'est une possibilité, ça pourrait aussi être une infinité d'autres solutions, non ?

@ybodoN Год назад

Comme le plus petit des trois nombres est premier, il n'y a qu'un seul triplet pythagoricien possible ! 😉

@olivierjosephdeloris8153 Год назад

@@ybodoN admettons pour l'exemple avec un triangle particulier, mais je ne vois pas ce qui empêche d'avoir la base et l'hypoténuse de longueur quelconque

@ybodoN Год назад

@@olivierjosephdeloris8153 on a un angle droit et les trois côtés doivent correspondre à des entiers naturels, ce qui implique un triplet pythagoricien. Quand le plus petit des trois nombres est impair, une des solutions est (n, m, m + 1) où m + 1 = ½ (n² + 1). Quand n est premier, c'est la seule solution.

@olivierjosephdeloris8153 Год назад

@@ybodoNd'accord, en effet la contrainte des nombres entiers, ça change tout. Le Z+ m'avait échappé

@luigiferrario5595 11 месяцев назад

Un triangolo rettangolo con i lati : a - b - c (ipotenusa !) Conoscendo soltanto il valore di un solo lato a a = 3-5-7-9-11-13-15-fino all’infinito ! Come calcolare i lati : b e L’ ipotenusa : c ? a = 5 ; b = 12 ; c = 13 Prova : 5^2+12^2 =13^2 25 +144 = 169 Come calcolare : b e c ? Con a = 3-5-7-11-13 numero primo (una soluzione) Con a = 9-15 ( multiplo di 3) almeno due soluzioni ! a=9 ; b=40 ; c=41 9^2 + 40^2 = 41^2 81 + 1600 = 1681 Altra soluzione : a=9 ; b=12 ; c=15 9^2 + 12^2 =15^2 81 + 144 = 225 Pazzesco ! Con a = 33 (11x3) Esistono… 4 soluzioni ! 33^2+44^2 = 55^2 33^2+56^2 = 65^2 33^2+180^2=183^2 33^2+544^2=545^2 Potete spiegare perché ?

@walter71342 11 месяцев назад

AC can be any value that is greater than or equal to AB! Why did you assume that BC could not be zero? BC can be any postive value from 0 to infinity!

@alikartal8426 10 месяцев назад

Figuring out c+a = 7921 is enough to answer the question. It is not necessary to add c+a and c-a. Just add 89 to 7921 and you find the answer. Why bother calculating c and a individually? Besides, this problem has multiple solutions unless the length of the known side is not a prime number, and infinite solutions if c and/or a are not integers.

@pablomonroy332 9 месяцев назад

yhea but the problem says integer numbers...so...

@christosmarouchos7118 Год назад

A triangle can NOT be described/defined by one angle and one side. The given answer is correct but is one of many. I can not see the point of even attempting to solve it!!!

@ybodoN Год назад

There is an important detail in the upper right corner of the video: _sides_ ∈ ℤ⁺ 🧐

@lnmukund6152 6 месяцев назад

U are all read the prob carefully, sides are real nos, always dont try to pick up mistakes only, u fit 4 only that, develop positive attitude first, give suggestions like me better Mukundsir

@yalchingedikgedik8007 Год назад

That’s very nice Thanks Sir Thanks PreMath ❤❤❤❤❤

@PreMath Год назад

Always welcome You are awesome. Keep it up 👍

@ThomasJ-fo6kk Год назад

Aren't there infinite perimeters?

@ra15899550 10 месяцев назад

Yes, there are infinite solutions to the perimeter because of lack of information.

@pablomonroy332 9 месяцев назад

@@ra15899550 theres only 1 solution, the prob says the sides must be integer numbers, i had the same concern but thats the correct answer.

@MegaSuperEnrique Год назад

As long as you eliminate a=0, P=89+a+c=89+7921 didn't really need to solve for the 2 sides.

@dawon7750 Год назад

But side “a” couldn’t be equal to zero! It must have a value other than zero. If side “a” is zero, then the figure could not anymore be a triangle!

@MegaSuperEnrique Год назад

@@dawon7750pls watch video before commenting. 7:00

@harrydowning2675 9 месяцев назад

Well, that is one answer of many.

@曹賢坤 10 месяцев назад

一個方程式（畢氏定理）兩個未知數，故有無窮盡的解。需再加一條件，例如邊長是整數方可解出另二邊長，此視頻就是這樣設定的。

@soniamariadasilveira7003 Год назад

I loved this question!

@PreMath Год назад

❤️ Thanks for your feedback! Cheers! 😀 You are awesome. Keep it up 👍

@dannuttle9005 5 месяцев назад

Yes but what if the hypotenuse is a gorilla. This is overlooked more often than we realize.

@potterteksmith7548 7 месяцев назад

Seems that this is 'A" solution but not 'THE' solution because there are infinite valid solutions based on the scant data provided. Am I missing something hare?

@rusosure7 9 месяцев назад

I'm not a 'smart' man, but as I don't see explicitly where the sides & perimeter have to be all INTEGERS, then I'm postulating this triangle to be isosceles with the perimeter being ~ 303.8650070512055 But what do I know? I probably missed something.

@Channel_98.6 9 месяцев назад

Why do you assume (a+c) and (a-c) are integers?

@pablomonroy332 9 месяцев назад

because a must be a integer and also c, so....

@windy7259 Год назад

Similar using for side b à prime number, à good idea for fun.

@walter71342 11 месяцев назад

The Perimeter is any value that is equal to or greater than 89!

@sandytanner9333 7 месяцев назад

No need to find each side separately We know that one of the sides is 89 and the sum of the other two sides is 89^2

@gc1924 Год назад

Il y a une infinité de valeurs de a et c, ainsi pour le périmètre

@BruceArnold318 Год назад

I thought so too but he said they are integers.

@ybodoN Год назад

Comme le plus petit des trois nombres est premier, il n'y a qu'un seul triplet pythagoricien possible ! 😉

@gc1924 Год назад

@@BruceArnold318merci, je ne suis pas très bon en anglais, je n'avais pas saisi

@gc1924 Год назад

@@ybodoNje ne comprend pas vraiment bien l'anglais et je n'avais saisi : appartient à Z. Merci pour votre réponse

@AnthonyPierreLucien Год назад

Je reste d'accord avec vous: il y a une infinité de solutions.

@mickaelb.3931 2 месяца назад

Et si on augmente l'angle BAC ? A sera toujours de 89 mais les deux autres côtés auront augmenté...

@ozkhar2755 Год назад

thank you

@WaiWai-qv4wv Год назад

Okay Very thanks

@lucianesilvamarques 11 месяцев назад

This is just another one of those mathematical exercises that serve only as a mathematical curiosity but without any practical use. like something that exists just to make teachers horny in the classroom but we will never see an engineer having to solve a similar problem in their work.

@darbyl3872 10 месяцев назад

So math lessons should be limited to what an engineer might see? What if he has poor eyesight? Mr. Magoo's Math 😂

@RajivKumar-ev2gr Год назад

Will this solution satisfy Pythagorean solution.

@pietergeerkens6324 Год назад

Yes. 3961^2 - 3960^2 factors as (3961- 3960) * (3961+3960) = 1 * 89^2. Google "Euclid's gnomon".

@grolfe3210 10 месяцев назад

So you just guessed it really! You have not actually found an answer just two whole numbers that fit Pythagorean theorem. Equally a could be 89 and so c 125.8.

@JLvatron Год назад

Wow! I used trigonometry, but that got me nowhere. Great solution!

@manojkantsamal4945 8 месяцев назад

P=89, b=3960, h=3961, May be

@KilsonWurakavi Год назад

What is the 5 term of sequence given -8,-3,2,7,_,_,22

@pablomonroy332 9 месяцев назад

@gelbkehlchen 9 месяцев назад

The 3rd Binomial formula was the key, very good.

@MegaSuperEnrique Год назад

Would have been easier to plug into c-a=1, so a=c-1

@PreMath Год назад

Thanks for your feedback! Cheers! 😀

@raywilson353 11 месяцев назад

Once again you assume interger values for the sides. If you take as a guess one of the sides is length 1 you will NOT get you calculated value of the perimeter. You are doing a disservice to mathematics by posting these solutions as it appears to the unsuspecting that this is the only possible result!

@cyrangan9088 11 месяцев назад

Assume the lengths are positive integers.

@patrickcorliss8878 9 месяцев назад

0:56 “Keep in your mind that the side lengths must be a positive integer”, See diagram: Sides ∈ Z+

@fl338 Год назад

I am confused Assume side a =1 then side c = square root of 7922 this gives a different Perimeter Assume side a =1oo then side c = square root of 17922 this gives a different Perimeter

@patrickcorliss8878 9 месяцев назад

0:56 “Keep in your mind that the side lengths must be a positive integer”, See diagram: Sides ∈ Z+

@Ctrl_Alt_Sup Год назад

Simple steps... but a magnificent sequence!

@MohammedAhmed-ws3ho 11 месяцев назад

116, 145

@sail2byzantium Год назад

That was amazing. I wouldn't have thought you could do it with TWO missing triangle sides. One, yes. But not two. Well, I stand corrected. Very memorable.

@esunisen3862 Год назад

Only because it's in Z+ In R there is an infinity of solutions.

@sail2byzantium Год назад

@@esunisen3862 I have no idea whatsoever as to what you just said. Thanks?

@simpleman283 Год назад

@@sail2byzantium Esunisen was trying to tell you Z+ is the little twist PreMath put on this puzzle. Go to 1:00 it shows him making a circle around the Z+. It means the side lengths can only be whole numbers. The clickbait picture only shows a right triangle with on side being 89. The true answers are infinite. You CAN NOT solve a triangle with only 2 pieces of information. One known angle of 90 deg. & one side measurement of 89 is not enough information. You always need at least 3 pieces of info to solve. PreMath gives the 3rd piece as (each side must be a whole number). It is kinda trichery, but it is a good math lesson..

@davidcoorey423 Год назад

@@simpleman283 Thanks for clarifying this point! I thought there surely can be no unique solution with only two pieces of information, but was then befuddled when he managed to produce an answer. Trickery, indeed! :)

@kamalpoursani 10 месяцев назад

In real the problem has infinity answers

@antoniosanchezbriones9459 9 месяцев назад

anybody can see that given only the length of one side the problem has infinite solutions

@moeezzey3424 9 месяцев назад

But c^2=a^2 + b^2 Does not add up

@frosinabrahja1792 11 месяцев назад

208 ÷2

@SANKUJ 11 месяцев назад

There can be numerous triangles with this information??? AC side can be anything more than 89? No?

@MrGarzen 10 месяцев назад

There are many solutions The only limit is the possible maximum length that side c can take to remain a orthogonal triangle So my friend it seems to me you are out fishing Something is wrong with your geometry

@rachidrachid-bq3ej Год назад

There are many solutions for a and b

@ybodoN Год назад

... but only one where a, b and c are integers 😉

@e1woqf Год назад

That's what I thought as well when I saw the thumbnail. But in the video itself he added a second condition: a,b,c are positve integers. Therefore only one solution exists.

@michaelmateshvili5582 3 месяца назад

If side is not 89 , but 88 , the solution is different ! Sides are 88 , 105 and 137 . I think this problem is for high IQ people and not for standart people who beleive in everithing , even in politicians 😊 because in this triangle if one side is 89 , the other sides are 105,5 and 138,02625 .

@JimS-fs4ub Год назад

a = 8, b = 15, c = 17 perimeter = 40; OR a = 8, b = 6, c = 10 perimeter = 24. This proves the fallacy of this video.

@davidurman5595 10 месяцев назад

You’re quite mistaken. What you’ve shown is that there are some whole numbers (such as 8) that belong to more than one Pythagorean triple. But that doesn’t mean it’s true of EVERY whole number. Some whole numbers (including all odd primes, such as 89) belong to only one such triple.

@rajendraameta7993 8 месяцев назад

89 is prime number given, so the solution became possible

@juancarlosurruty2321 10 месяцев назад

Tudo errado, isso tem infinitas soluções , mas a solução proposta não é uma delas. Essa solução e inconsistente com o torema de Pitágoras.

@stevegreen2432 5 месяцев назад

Excuse my rudness --= without additional information it is not possible to derive ANY answer. It all depends on knowing one more side or one more angle. C can be ANYWHERE--thus there is nomanswer possible with ithe info given. Total BS

@donaldbritt2210 10 месяцев назад

this is bogus. There are an infinite number of solutions unless you know 2 sides or 2 angles. Imagine an 89 inch line that intersects an infinite line line at a right angle. From the top of that line, you can place another line down to the long line at any angle > 0 and < 90 so that the circumference is 178.00001 to just under infinity

@pablomonroy332 9 месяцев назад

actually theres only one whit the given information...is not that hard to see, 178.00001 is not an integer so...isnot a solution to the problem.

@slordmo2263 9 месяцев назад

I suppose 'math majors' will love this, but for the rest of us, it's a lesson in futile thinking. Hmm....has anyone done the trig to figure out how 'small' the opposite angle is?? NOT an integer, I presume..... hahaha....glad I never got this problem on an exam....