Тёмный

Elliott Carter - String Quartet No. 4 (1986) [with score] 

Contemporary Classical
Подписаться 19 тыс.
Просмотров 7 тыс.
50% 1

"A preoccupation with giving each member of the performing group its own musical identity characterizes my String Quartet No. 4; thus mirroring the democratic attitude in which each member of a society maintains his or her own identity while cooperating in a common effort - a concept that dominates all my recent work. In this quartet, more than in others of my scores, a spirit of cooperation prevails. Each player’s part has its own musical materials and expressive character, and each participates in its own way in the four-part ensemble. While there are many changes of mood and speed and frequent pauses, the work is in one long, constantly changing movement. In the background, however, there is a suggestion of the traditional four-movement plan of the classical string quartet - Appassionato, Scherzando, Lendo, Presto.
String Quartet No. 4 is dedicated to the Composers String Quartet, who commissioned the score as one of a consortium made up of two others - the Sequoia and Thouvenel Quartets - that was financed in part by the National Endowment for the Arts. The score was composed during part of 1985-86 in New York City, Waccabuc, and at the American Academy in Rome. The Composers Quartet gave its premiere at Festival Miami on September 17, 1986." (Elliott Carter)
1. Appassionato
2. Scherzando (stesso tempo)
3. Lento (stesso tempo)
4. Presto

Опубликовано:

 

7 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 39   
@machida5114
@machida5114 3 года назад
His five string quartets are a great achievement in the history of contemporary music.
@rive0000
@rive0000 2 года назад
so good...
@stueystuey1962
@stueystuey1962 Год назад
Not necessary imo to qualify the achievement with "contemporary." In the line from Beethoven to Brahms, Schoenberg to Webern, to EC. Great achievement in the history of music. Absolutely.
@LandOfDeez
@LandOfDeez 3 года назад
Imagine sightreading this
@stueystuey1962
@stueystuey1962 3 года назад
I dunno. Not all that many notes per measure. 🙄
@LandOfDeez
@LandOfDeez 3 года назад
@@stueystuey1962 well, also all the counting, intonation and coordination between the 4 instruments
@klangschatten5610
@klangschatten5610 3 года назад
Thank you for this marvelous upload! Great description as always.
@ContemporaryClassical
@ContemporaryClassical 3 года назад
I've always loved the third quartet, but I think the reason I didn't admire this one was simply that I didn't know it. The best reason for making a score video is to get to know a piece.
@UtsyoChakraborty
@UtsyoChakraborty 3 года назад
There we are! ...and thus the cycle.
@ContemporaryClassical
@ContemporaryClassical 3 года назад
ru-vid.com/group/PL8hVc6VvPyKLfjPBidWh3jGYaAKVyec3h So glad to fill that gap!
@mindbodylightsound10
@mindbodylightsound10 3 года назад
Oh I remember this one. It's really good
@popmushee
@popmushee 9 месяцев назад
For me, his music peaked at the cello sonata, but I appreciate his life-long obsession with the all-interval tetrachords. It is a Carter signature sound.
@pepinlothair2013
@pepinlothair2013 2 года назад
beautiful use of ninths
@stueystuey1962
@stueystuey1962 Год назад
Is that what that is? That first cluster chord is the most I'll defined resolution ever. A couple minutes in there's a skip in the CD. For sure 100%.
@stueystuey1962
@stueystuey1962 3 года назад
Perhaps the greatest composer to ever live. Certainly right there with Bach, Beethoven and Schoenberg.
@plekkchand
@plekkchand Год назад
Perhaps the most hyperbolic praise ever. Certainly an example of self-display and intellectual bravado.
@stueystuey1962
@stueystuey1962 Год назад
@@plekkchand It is only hperbolic if I am exaggerating beyond the norm. I am not. No exaggeration, no qualification. Intellectual bravado? Absolutely. Having the courage to name a composer as a GOAT 100 years before others catch on. Not a problem.
@emilianoturazzi
@emilianoturazzi 10 месяцев назад
@@stueystuey1962 according to the simpy fact that even in past century you had several greater composers (Ives, Cage, Feldman, Lucier speaking only of american composers) you exaggerated just a bit. That's your taste but that's not a critical evaluation. He wasn't an innovator (Beethoven) nor an aesthetical prodigy (Bach), just a good stylist.
@stueystuey1962
@stueystuey1962 Месяц назад
​@emilianoturazzi oh hell no; Carter is an innovator to the max. Cage is great. Feldman is annoying af. I do not know Lucier. Ives is interesting but nowhere near the master that is Elliott Carter. I stand by my praise.
@georgeowen2553
@georgeowen2553 Год назад
I am so interested in how a quartet would actually practise and rehearse this for the first time, let alone record it so accurately. A click track, maybe? Or playing from the score at all times?
@emilianoturazzi
@emilianoturazzi 10 месяцев назад
it is basically an ordinary string quartet: no click track. everyone studies his/her part at home then they reharse together approaching it like a classical quartet (that' actually what it is). Click tracks are used only for music with fixed media or in order to get sycronisation in case the musician can't see each other and the music requires high syncronisation (Haas wrote a quartet that has to be performed in perfect dark, it is written in a way that facilitates memorization and doens't need stright syncronisation, so the musicians don't need any click even if they can't see each other). Mind that visual signals are very important on chamber music and that in quartets usaully the first violin acts as a conductor (it can happen that other musician take that role, it depends both on musical personality and musical needs - it can vary during the same piece)
@HuskySansVergogne
@HuskySansVergogne 2 года назад
I feel like that's the type of shit the audio team on Dead Space 1 will trhow at you when fighting Necromorphs
@Scriabin_fan
@Scriabin_fan 7 месяцев назад
I genuinely don’t understand what’s happening here. Someone please save me from my ignorance.
@ContemporaryClassical
@ContemporaryClassical 7 месяцев назад
To start with I'd suggest following one instrument at a time, after Carter's own description of them each having their own musical identity.
@PJGRAND
@PJGRAND 3 года назад
the Crazy Chicken string quartet LOL
@muslit
@muslit Год назад
The counterpoint produces zero harmony.
@emilianoturazzi
@emilianoturazzi 10 месяцев назад
that's not it purpose. often harmony produces zero counterpoint and so? it's not its main focus.
@muslit
@muslit 10 месяцев назад
Harmony never does produce counterpoint. The point it is, as in the counterpoint of Bach, one hears the harmony at the same time. In fact, the counterpoint adheres to the harmony. The same in Carter. But in Carter, the counterpoints are so independent, especially in the quartets, that the resultant harmony is negligible, flat, important only in that consonance is avoided. In the first measure alone, nine notes of the chromatic scale are rapidly produced. The writing adheres to the full chromatic spectrum, which, to my ears, is akin to sounding a constant C major, the complete opposite of the former, but the same effect - dull.@@emilianoturazzi
@lkh0120
@lkh0120 3 года назад
Schoenberg's 'string trio' is much better than this... or.. listen the Isang Yun's chamber works... or rather, boulez's orderly work sounds more musical... No matter what profound thoughts are in that work... as long as it's not musically heard, it's just a scam. For the same reason I don't appreciate Ferneyhough's works
@MicheleoTuTo
@MicheleoTuTo 3 года назад
Wow. And you are... who?
@stueystuey1962
@stueystuey1962 3 года назад
I am me. I rank Carter with Schoenberg. The String Trio of Schoenberg, like anything Schoenberg does is genius. That said Sch's cycle of Quartet's is more important both collectively and singularly than the late and somewhat eccentric trio. Though few really mean it, I place Carter in the same league as Sch, both are first rank genius' along with Bach and Beethoven. Certainly other listeners might want to include one or two other composers. For me Carter is in the pantheon regardless the other composers selected. I happen to like Isang Yun but he is not of this type of genius. As for Boulez there are select works in a few sub genres where he is top rank; his overall corpus can not hold up against either Carter or Sch.
@MicheleoTuTo
@MicheleoTuTo 3 года назад
@@stueystuey1962 and how do we care?
@stueystuey1962
@stueystuey1962 3 года назад
You come across as otiose and obnoxious. In the first few editions of Rolling Stone Record Review David Bowies Hunky Dory received 2 out of 5 stars. Peter Travers was wrong. One of the greatest rock albums of all time. Having an opinion is a good thing in the YT setting - it allows for productive, even joyful exchange of ideas in the advancement of culture. Your sort of reverse "who cares what others thinks stance" is more pugnacious than endearing and you are trolling when there is no need. Enjoy yourself bruh. Go to RiteAid and get a $2.50 triple scoop cone of Carnation ice cream.
@polystrophicmusic
@polystrophicmusic 2 года назад
While I disagree with you about the 4th Qt I do understand your point. It's an issue with Contemporary Music that the time it takes to fully appreciate and understand it does raise some questions. How much should or must a listener have to invest in a work? It took me 6 months to understand the 2nd Qt but I was young and ambitious then. If, with a considerable amount of experience with classical music, it takes months to get inside a work, it does make one think.
Далее
The Uncompromising Elliott Carter
53:01
Просмотров 22 тыс.
Elliott Carter - Triple Duo (1983) (with score)
19:12
Benjamin Britten / Complete String Quartets Vol.3
29:19
Alfred Schnittke - String Quartet No. 2
22:02
Просмотров 15 тыс.
Elliott CARTER : 2nd String Quartet - Quatuor Pollock
25:35