@@jony_tough I get you, but Ai art have some positives too. I must admit, in this case thiccwithaq is a victim, his art is the most used in NSFW models on R34.
@@Markus_Bern If you can't see positives in Ai art then Im sorry for you. There is a lot things, like more creativity for untalented in drawing people, more copyright-free illustrations for beginners writers, and even more inspiration for artist that can thing of something but cant picture it. It just resolve a lot of problems, but create a ton of new problems. Like training ai on copyright art or creating fake nsfw based on celebrities.
@Markus_Bern The point is that the art is nice, I'd like to see more of it. Without the help of another commenter, I wouldnt have discovered where it came from and whose art it was actually based on. I now do. It's still beneficial. Not all of the art MHM uses AI as well. I've recognized some art on here from artists I follow - still no link. She did it in the past. She should do it again.
@@domosapien I only partially agree with you. It's good that you recognized the nickname of the artist whose style this picture is based on. But I fundamentally disagree that such AI pics should be called “art”. Too loud for an ordinary picture made by a computer based on someone else's style. I understand that living people can inherit or even copy other people’s styles, but even so they invest time, effort and inspiration into this, and AI pictures are dead and soulless. And this also takes money and clients from the original artists, because why pay a person for work if a soulless machine will do something similar in 5 minutes and maybe even for free.
