Emma Watson & Daniel Radcliffe REACT TO Harry Potter HBO MAX Series Adaptation! 

She's not my favorite author but I found the Harry Potter books at a really dark time of my life and it really helped me get through it so those books had a big impact on me regardless of how of feel of Rowlings opinions, because they're just that, opinions and everyong can have their own opinions without an angry mob showing up.

@@gabblebabbles2017 to be fair, jk didnt express an opinion, she stated facts, its the transgender peeps that have this opinion about themselves, which is fine

@@SoSimonSays she stated an opinion as are you right now. I don't agree with her views but I can still like her creation. Hell Narnia was what started my love for fantasy and books and I'm an athiest. You can enjoy stuff seperate to how you feel on it's creator. And not everything needs to be an argument all the time.

J K Rowling is the reason, that millions of kids learned to read. Millions of kids who would normally have played computer games or hung out on the streets at an early age in just about every country in the world.. She is worthy of every accolade the British Royals or government could ever bestow upon her. All Emma and Daniel ever did, was to act out whatever was in the script. They did a good job of course but they got paid millions for their acting roles. What has either of them done since the Potter series? Nothing of any consequence and that will continue for the rest of their lives. JK Rowling is still moving forward and I am so happy that Rowling has now stated that the HBO series will be better without Emma and Daniel. Watson and Radcliffe will forever be associated with the Harry Potter series, which is great that they cannot forget and nor will anyone else, that all they have is because of JK Rowling.

@@gabblebabbles2017 CS Lewis once said If you look for truth, you may find comfort in the end; if you look for comfort you will not get either comfort or truth only soft soap and wishful thinking to begin, and in the end, despair. There is only 2 genders and you cant switch. else you are living a delusional lie/life which leads to despair.

Said Lucas when signing over Star Wars to Disney.

Lucas did the opposite of what she is doing. I have a feeling like she doesn't want to miss out on royalties which may add up to more than getting bought out (whether the new series is good or bad). @@shanecarravello2922

I hope she won't let people ruin the books, butshe allowed Cursed Child which is so bad. Bella L

You're right and the actors also are also free to not want to work with her.

@@thelestrangelair haha that's also true

The only way Joann would allow HBO to reboot it was if she were at the helm, because (I absolutely guarantee you) the ONLY intention for rebooting the series was to infuse it with Woke, Marxist ideology.

Exactly! 👏👏👏

Well said

Bc of what she did. Plus she want really on set that much emma said in a interview "she wasn't really on set much. It was more like she was a on and off visitor."

@@anonymous_ginger what she did doesn't change the fact that this is her work. And being on set doesn't equal being involved. She gave most of the input before the actual filming began, when creative changes were being discussed.

Well said!!

Or each chapter or two of its a short one can be an episode!

the later books are 20 hours but Id still watch that movie fr

I think the season will have a different ammount of Episodes

Yes.

Omg yes. When deathly hallows part 1 then wait a whole another year for part 2. Soo much money spent on the movies. They made box-office shut down. People were going crazy over it. We love you gang.

Yes when harry potter ended i felt really empty. I grew up with that show me and my family and friends literaly went to watch every movie that came in the cinema. Ill never forget it. I rewatched it again this month and im feeling empty again 😂

@@niro6492 oh yes. I was in tears when closing credits came on. 👏👏👏 made us all want to be wizards and witches.

Yeah I definitely agree. I was the same age as Harry when the first book came out 😅

@@kerimanasilasila174 Wait till you see how hollow you feel when they infuse this series with everything woke.

I agree with you. There’s so much chance for backstories

@@greg5892 But, the globalists have to destroy all our icons (Indiana Jones, Star Wars, Star Trek, Ghostbusters, James Bond, Lord of the Rings, Marvel, DC, etc. etc. ad infinitum, ad nauseam).

They Did good job playing these characters but they weren’t true to books characters they made Hermione Granger perfect who made no mistakes they stole lines and great moments from Ron Weasley give it to her they made him look stupid there’s another side of Harry is characte that they didn’t show in movies and there are a lot of characters that didn’t screen time that they deserved

They don't need to live up to the movie trio, they just need to live up to the book trio. They could actually portray the trio accurately in areas that the movie version failed to do.

Yeah I grew up watching Harry Potter and reading it even though most if not everything was made before I was even born and nobody can deny that will compare the original to the reboot and I would love to see more about the marauders they are like my favorite characters

Agreed.

exactly, I never liked Shakespeare yet he is was an amazing writer, I loved the way his books have been portrayed by some amazing Actors and dare I say Actresses are we allowed to make a difference between the two now? Any way, Harry Potter would never have existed and filled our lives with such joy and angst if she hadn't penned it. She managed to get the right publisher, get WB interested, otherwise it would just be a book we read and talked about years later. Thats what the cast seem to forget thank you JK I am famous because of your book not HEY I am not interested in playing that role any more because of the comment you said one day. They owe it to her, and ought to honour her, with her we wouldnt even know Daniel, Emma and Rupert existed.

Im Tottally agree whit you! It seems like immature thoughts rule them! And also a great ingratitude!!

Facts!

Exactly

Facts!

how are they part of the world? .. the original books had another font, the rerelease books had yet another font, and then came the movies introducing the tune and another castle design for the first 2 films btw... the series should definitely change all about the appearance of the world, otherwise it's absolutely redundant .. they want to imagine harry potter new, how about some imagination?

They could change them but it would be unnecessary extra work and wouldn't add anything.

The castle design and layout changed constantly in the movies

facts. rowling didnt do anything wrong, just gave her opinion like any other person on the internet.

@@kashkinn Agreed

@@kashkinn It was also an objectively correct opinion. "People who menstruate" are biologically women. Whether trans people identify with that or not is irrelevant to the fundamental truth. Allowing them the freedom to identify and present as whatever they want if it helps with their mental health by more closely matching their self-perception is fair enough, but if they can't understand that they're not actually what they claim to be (which many trans people are more than happy to recognise) then they are just delusional and we shouldn't abandon fundamental truth to cater to them; doing so would be like telling an anorexic person that they are actually morbidly obese and they're doing the right thing for their health by trying to lose weight.

Absolutely, these people are absurd with the level of fake moral superiority. You don't get to just shut people out because you disagree about something that isn't how the world works, at the same time they have no issue raking in millions on a cult of image and working with all kinds of sexual predators in Hollywood, quaint. Also, I read that original comment she made and it wasn't hateful it just explains how she doesn't understand it, and honestly as a European neither do I. It seems to me Americans are mixing up personality and biology and it's creepy. Also, from my perspective, the fact you have to pretend to see them as the opposite sex even if you don't isn't really conducive to anything and is a kind of thought police ( I personally would always use someone's preferred gender, but being forced to do it is a different matter). She did not call for any violence or hate or anything, and I support their rights to neutral spaces, and to express themselves and live however they want to, I just don't understand it and don't see why people have to pretend to protect their feelings when I and most non-American women feel that people like Dylan Mulvaney are making a caricature of women (guess our feelings don't matter, get back in the kitchen). I also find it creepy how in the land of oversexualized everything so many girls don't feel like women and many of the public men who become women become the same sex doll. As a woman myself that's the part I find fascinating and overlooked.

@@zmajoljupkatldr

I disliked the last 5 movies so I agree.

@@thelestrangelair what? xd. lit the best ones?. Lit when voldemorts moment beggins, the moment when the movies/books makes sense

She's horribly transphobic. I'd rather watch it knowing someone inclusive and kind was involved instead

​@@Beankean307 Ah yes, lets make a series without the books creator

@@angelorafael8103 yeah? I don't see an issue? Surely supporting the trans community is more important

@@Beankean307 no harry potter is more important

@@joshuahewitt4020 you really need to sort your priorities

Agreed. I read the books first and did not like the movies after the first 3. Bella L

I get what you’re saying but not wanting to work with somebody because you disagree with them, I think, is perfectly within their right

@@SenkingFar Not wanting to work with someone (to whom you owe your wealthy lifestyle and famous career) just because you disagree with ONE SINGLE THING is absolute insanity. If they said, “We hated every minute of working with her, as she was verbally abusive and treated us cruelly,” then I would understand. But, to love her all your life and owe everything in your life to her, then turn around and say, “I disagree with her opinion on this one tiny, insignificant matter,” is the highest form of narcissistic arrogance.

@@AdmoreMethod to be honest, even if they did get famous off the series, it is in my opinion that they do not owe anybody anything. They are their own people and at the end of the day their opinions continue for nothing more or less than everybody else. Then again, you can feel free to disagree.

@@AdmoreMethodit wouldn’t be so bad if what they say they disagreed with was actually what JK said. However she is not remotely transphobic.

lol Daniel and Emma are also allowed to have an opinion. The same way Rowling is allowed to have an opinion. And yes, they're also allowed to not have the desire to work with her, regardless if it's because of one single thing or many things.

That’s not what everyone’s up in arms about. What fans are worried about is how the Marxists have purposely ruined every other iconic series and character that We The People held dear. Mark my words… that’s the ONLY reason they’re rebooting this series… …to ruin it.

And they left Dobby out of so many books!

these new people who are gonna play in the series are never gonna be known for playing that said character. those are and always will be in the movies we have today. If someone new plays Harry Potter, he will never be known for playing Harry Potter. Same goes for Ron, Hermione, Dumbledore, Snape, Ginny, Sirius, Remus, Voldemort, Fred, George and every other character we know. These people are the characters of the Harry Potter series. Whether you like it or not. These people are taking a huge risk. They will no doubt get more hate than positive response and they sure as heck won't be as famous as the people playing the movies today

@@LevonMSF Why not just give it a chance? I felt like they really messed up some characters (Cho and Ginna esspecially) and some movies could have been a lot better (4,6,7) and more faithful to the source material. Its possible to appreciate two adaptations at the same time

I just hope it doesn't become too modern' as it were. I hope it remains true and it would be wonderful.

The actors don’t give a rat’s crap about the fans. They only care about their careers… and, if they want to continue to woke in Hollywood, then they need to say what they’re told to say.

The only thing that will doom the reboot is if they gender or racial swap the characters in order to be woke.

​@@AdmoreMethodthis! I love how many well written female characters there are in the books! I don't need them to give us a female Harry Potter, I want characters like Ginny, for example, to get their full personality and development from the books

Ginny was a b

Do you believe "gravity" exist?

@@mgrdraco3857 And pray tell what does that question have to do with anything?

@@rogaldorn3525 I just want to be sure... Now poeple believe the earth is flat. They have 2737 genders... Man can be little girls... So maybe I miss the part where the gravity didn't exist anymore... And I can fly... 😂

@@mgrdraco3857 once again I am missing the part where this has to do with the conversation

sure, if i say that my opinion is that we should return slavery (it's NOT, just to be clear), then you should absolutely respect that right?

let me play ronald weasly, i'll make the interaction with hermione better than him. trust me.

New actor for Ron please. so we see real romance with Ron and Emma, if Emma returned. Not sure what that would like, but maybe a younger version of Viggo Mortensen. Let me play Ron, I look like a young Viggo!

Its easy to praise something which has no competition. Lets see if they respect the books this time.

@@aarengraves9962 where do you get those insanely good quotes from?

They really struck gold with the child actors for the movies.

New actor for Ron please. so we see real romance with Ron and Emma, if Emma returned. Not sure what that would like, but maybe a younger version of Viggo Mortensen. Let me play Ron, o look like a young Viggo!

Preach 🙌🏽

Exactly. But the problem with the woke mob is that they have to complain all the time. They are never satisfied.

Yeah. The only reason she insisted on being in control was to keep all the woke, Marxist propaganda sh!t out of it - cuz, that’s the ONLY reason Hollywood wanted to reboot it - to RUIN it, like they ruin every other iconic story and character that We The People hold dear.

Right?!

And that's exactly what I do :) And also in my country I can download movies without paying for them, so there - problem solved lmao xD

I agree with you Rowling should not be kicked of the show, but she still is transphobic. it does not matter how polite she is in saying that your identity is wrong.

​@@cheddar950 She's not transohobic, you've just been brainwashed into believing literally anything that strays outside the woke hive mind is transohobic. There are problems with the way the trans community is pushing for rights because they actively hurt other people. JK Rowling supports trans rights that don't hurt other people and is against the rights they want that hurt other people.

Preach!!🙌🏽

exactly people are too soft these days so what if she has diff views about diff things?

@@cheddar950 See, that’s the thing. She never said anyone’s identity is wrong. The fact you said that makes it clear you never read what she said. She said biological females deserve safe spaces in the forms of restrooms and female shelters. Women who are the victims of sexual assault shouldn’t be forced to share intimate spaces with biological males, regardless of how they identify. Same-sex spaces have nothing to do with anyone’s gender identity. Sex and gender are not the same thing. Sex is a biological fact; gender is a social construct.

Same!!! Do you know when it’ll be released?? Also where can I watch Harry Potter 😅 (Srry for asking too many questions I’m just so excited )

@@_valmond_ It will be released sometime in 2025 or 2026, and It’ll be airing on HBO Max.

LOL, really? You're joking right....right?

Every book fan likes to see a new Harry Potter tv show. Because we all know we didn't saw everything we needed on the screen. But of course movie fans doesn't like very much

@@eclipture exactly! The real fans who’ve actually read the books DO want this.!

Just watch them make it so the kids get to choose their own house. Make your own uniforms, and maybe even allow a dementor to identify as a house elf!

Preach!!! 🙌🏽

​@@eclipture I am book fan but original actors are embedded in the minds of those who grew up along movies and books. Recasting is a no go for me

I will say All of Daniel’s other movies he’s done and Rupert’s characters in other shows are great tbh it just takes more people to go watch them and actually open up to it like they did for Harry Potter

Guns Akimbo and Now You See Me 2 were pretty great tbh

Exactly

They spare nothing these days.

I love that too, made me more confident in the adaption.

They will make each book into one full tv season.

@@RebekkaHay Unless the first season bombs.

"His eyes are as green as a fresh pickled toad!" Harry's Valentines song from Ginny in the Chamber of Secrets, though that song was removed because in the movies, Harry has blue eyes.

Yep.

*Cedric

In the books, Luna did not appear at all before the Order of the Phoenix either.

@@ApacheMagic yea I’ve read the books now and realise that, but still I would like to see them before that time

lol you do realise that people are ALSO allowed to have an opinion about her opinion right? xD that is what freedom of speech means, like how is it hard to understand? xD

@@m.7877 They can have an opinion. The fact is that is having profound consequences which are very nasty and are much more grave than whatever comment she might have made. I certainly would not like to live the rest of my life in some kind of imprisionment just because I said some facts, just like a certain famous cientist who was sentenced by the church.

It's probably hard for you to understand that transgender women are actually women. Just try to get more informed next time . See I love how many fans decided to still like jk books and stuff even tho we don't agree at all with her( basically she generalize in a negative way a topic that should be discussed more deeply. and a right knowledge in sociology and psychology should also be taken in count ). But I hate how some stupid fan, in order to defend her, forcibly changed to a negative and transphobic opinion on such delicate topic like this, that regard one of the most discriminated minorities( just see the horrible situation only in the USA) the people I hate the most are those who never cared about Harry Potter, but suddenly started to defend Jk just to spread more hate, instead of shutting up. This people in my opinion should open their fucking mind, and stop generalize the act of one trans person on a whole category of people, just like JK did. Because that is totally stupid (and this isn't even an opinion but fact).

if people like you do their research this wouldn’t be a problem

@@InspirationalWingedUnico-gf7vy Care to elaborate?

@@pyramusk3264 a biological sex doesn't automatically define you to that gender. If someone can't define their gender to their bilogical sex and starts their treatment to become women or men, they become women or men. That's what it is. Gender always existed nowdays we are just systematizing this knowledge. this is the result of research done not only on our population but also on past populations, on the psychological systems that affect transgender people in studies of decades in the modern-post-modern era

@@francescociccone1732 I'm not talking about gender roles. I'm talking about biological sex. You're either one or the other. But nice try.

Ryt sis

I’m certain that’s their goal.

Let's be real... this adaptation will probably be like the Star Wars sequels, the Amazon LOTR show, etc: loosely based on the original IP but with all of the unique character stripped out and replaced with what is politically trendy

YESSS I feel like i missed out on so much because Harry Potter was released when I wasn’t even born yet and it just made me feel like that I was born in the wrong generation 😭 but hopefully the new one will be just as good as the old one!

Also, I loved the cast of the films - but they did really wait till they found actors they really saw in the parts - I don't imagine they'll be less careful now. I'm sure they'll get great actors and we'll get used to them. The WORST thing that can happen is they'll suck - and then people might now watch. On the other hand it might be great. At least we have a chance to see it made the way it should have been. AND families will have 10 years of show that they can sit down together to watch. I like that.

I like the idea of the other prequel and spin off stories - Rowling has told us that she knew much more than ever made it into the films - but I think just like with GOT the right move is first doing the books right (and thank god their already completed > . < ) the moving on to other parts of the world and the other stories she already knows and then filling in stories for other parts of the world she knows. I love the fact that merch might include more of the Hogwarts library books... maybe someday a comprehensive A History of Hogwarts *____* But first - it really needed to be properly telling the central stories that started our whole vision into that world. And nothing has to be "downplaying" the original films. Everyone knows film adaptations aren't faithful - the question is always whether they are faithful in spirit and whether things were changed for time, cost, or politics. That is what fans fight about. And everyone knows the single thing book fans were most upset about during the WHOLE of the film series ...was the thousands of times and ways the films departed from the BOOKS.

The stupid complaint about fat people being set up as evil in Harry Potter is - well stupid. Who're the evilest people? Dursley's or Death Eaters? Even Umbridge isn't as Evil as Mr. Malfoy would have been if he'd been there. And forget about Voldemort. Meanwhile the skinny goodies Dumbledore, McGonegal, the heroic trio, . . . Mrs. Weasley, The FAT Friar, on the lower end at "pudgey" we've got Neville, ... I don't know who all else - I for one, didn't read the story that way. I read it as if I lived in the real world and knew that 1) I was reading about a specific part of a fictional larger world. 2) Though it was fiction, it seemed to operate similarly to the real world. Substitute science+technology for magic and you're not far off. And in the real world ... wait for it .... good and evil come in all shapes, sizes, guises and every other thing you can think of. ANYone can be good or evil, smart or criminally stupid. Reading the stories or seeing the films it doesn't seem like there's a statement about fatness either way. The only thing that tripped me up was reading it in the 2000s as I did - It caught my attention that they were being so blatant in their abuse. Rowling wrote what Harry thought - but he was 11 - 17, a boy, not exactly trained socially AT ALL, and had reason to think of his cousin and uncle in the vilest terms his immaturity saw. Also - it's never even implied that Harry/ Rowling thinks that the Dursley men are evil BECAUSE they're fat or proven evil BECAUSE they're fat - they are fat and they are MEAN and SELFISH and that is why they are evil. This one drives me a little nuts.

true the actors were pretty but they didn't really match with the books imo

Ginny was never particularly pretty. And there was nothing wrong with the actress portraying her.

I would not blame the actress. for me, she was perfectly casted and had so much potential. however, the writers messed up by making her non-verbal - the love between harry and her felt so awkward because they haven't even spoken before. would be something the series could do better, but don't blame the actress. and lets not forget: ginny is still a weasley :)

She is not misguided in her opinions though. The people who get 'mad', are not the' fans'.

You clearly didn't read the books, there is no way they would be doing thr same thing. The books had so much in them the movies didn't cover.

@@sourceactivation2176 Firstly, you’re wrong. I read the books, so don’t make assumptions out of nothing. Secondly, yes, they got things they haven’t covered, but that doesn’t mean they will cover it now. Also, I personally think it still might be better to use another topic they have covered even less, something that isn’t to much of in the book at all.

The books are so much better then the movies. They changed so much in the movies and left parts out that I was excited to see in the movie and they left it out. I thought most of the movies were a let down compared to the books.

@@isisaphrodite3585 true

@@Asili089 If they're going to do a new adaptation, a TV show is definitely the way to go, not a new movie. Yes, they could include stuff they excluded from the original movies, but they'd still be leaving a lot of important stuff out. There's just no way to include it all in a 2 (or even 2.5) hour movie. So I agree that even though new movies could be different, it would still be the same thing in that it would leave out so many important details.

I just know that if they do that anyone complaining will get called racist, as if people to this day don't complain about Harry not having book accurate eyes (which there was an actually understandable reason for). If they say they're going to stick to the books then they need to stick to them as much as realistically possible

Are you dumb😂

Well said. To use their own words:’not everything is for you.’ They should follow their own advice.

True. They would make him a trans instead. Or a female.

If cleopatra can be black why not harry potter 😂

@@niro6492 that series is going to be a disaster

I....Higley doubt that would happen, especially because it is very likely that they'll find someone who matches the appearance and characteristics of book version in order to make it stay true to the original. Just like they did to the movies.

@@lunathepurpledragon5843 I am glad to see someone else agrees with me

They will

That’s the only reason they’re rebooting all of our most-loved series and characters - to utterly ruin them and leave us with nothing. It’s a Marxist form of destroying history by rewriting it.

Bro what are you on about, how on earth would they make it “woke”.

They will make it LIKE THE BOOK you iddioot

You know they will lol