@@shelby255 I don’t have any medical complications that require regular or detailed checks, my watch measures my heart rate somewhat accurately and that’s about all I need
@@Arkanius1984 True, it definitely has similarities. But I've never heard an Apple ad with sound design/music like this. The overall visual and audio direction feels much more "sci-fi" than Apple would aim for
Complete health checkup is an overstatement. The ECG read is only one line, a standard ECG gives you 12 lines. Based on one line of ecg the one thing it could do is read for irregular rhythms. This device doesn't solve any real personal health problems. It is just a maximum amount of health sensors they could fit in a small form factor.
or u could just appreciate that someone started something new that could be revolutionary down the line?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
@@nikolojoi isn't man, in oue hospitals we have every device in small form factor all in one too, except forr a thing or two, but all bemo did was marketing
@@ayushyadav-bm2to yeah that’s the point lol, “in hospitals.” The whole point is you can do it from home. Form factor in this context isn’t an issue for hospitals, it’s the convenience of having a reliable system from home
@@nikolojo the revolution you should appreciate started with smart watches. there are already plenty of health scanners in the market. this is not new nor revolutionary. All you need to convince sheep into being a fanatic of a product is to make a cool ad and they jump on it.
I'm certainly not in the target group for this ad, but I wanna keep rewatching this out of pure admiration. Being completely honest, this might be the best artwork of an advertisement I've ever watched.
Fancy and could be an intriguing device if we recognize likely significant limitations. I would be interested in testing it out. A single 1 lead ECG is the most basic assessment you can do. When you go to a doctor's office, they perform a 12 lead which is the standard. Most arrhythmias will not be detected by this. Detecting atrial fibrillation, tachycardia, and bradycardia nonetheless could be beneficial and would be the only thing a non-medical person could interpret. Overall I see upside to this despite being very, very limited. Infrared temperature assessment is typically inferior to direct contact analysis. Usually is accurate to within 1 to 2 degrees. But there is a large difference between 100.4F and 98.4F. Would highly doubt this has quality auscultation with the stethoscope feature, and without medical training it could lead to inaccurate self-diagnosis (which often leads to incorrect self-treatment). The pulse oximeter seems like it could be fairly accurate. Bottom line, seems like this could be practical in specific scenarios, appreciating limited diagnostic utility. The form factor looks nice. Will likely be very pricey (edit: website says will be $250). No doctor/advanced practitioner is gonna look at this data and make a medical decision based on it.
Can I have a version of this that doesn't sync everything with an app? Or an agreement that the data can only used for my protected medical needs and not for other business reasons like training AI?
Not sure whether they’ve been granted FDA approval but that’s a critical detail as well as the ability to manufacture the devices at-scale with sufficient yield.
Digital stethoscope is really what people need to be a doctor at home environment. With thermo and blood oxygen meter in one device is a way to recognize actual respiratory symptoms that require a call to a doctor.
I hope it does a better job than thermo telling me my child has 42/43 c temp, my doctor was a bit shocked over the result so now I have a dedicated ear thermometer
Most of the time, the inaccuracy is due to incorrect use. It works quite well for me if you stick to certain things. But still not suitable for a child in my opinion. Totally ok for adults as a basic check.
@@christoph2079 are you a sales person or what? My child has a chronic illness so i had to check temperature regularly, i didn't want to bother him to much at night with a anal thermometer so i was one of the first person to preorder the thermometer. Tried for 4 days and then i had enough and returned it. Is this answer enough for u to understand that this gimmick products are very inaccurate and should be not used for serious issues?
For those trolling with, why not a smartband ? In this day and age, accuracy is one thing that’s missing in many of the smart gadgets which aims at just having features just for the sake of having it. Hope it helps.
Another 3 star product … the key factor is the accuracy and Ad doesn’t highlihgt it so probably is the average… the day an AI sensor could detect insulin level with not invasive test, we will be the first to test it.
$250 for a device with $100 worth of different sensors bundled into one and a “send to your doctor” feature that no doctor would use. Hilarious they even advertise that; any doctor’s office would (and should) take new readings while you’re in their office.
Ah, dont know if thats just an accident or not, but having a name similar to that of a cute robot character from adventure time cartoon is a lovely touch
The most disappointing this is that BeamO doesn't look like Bimo (from Adventure time) That would be a cool android health partner. Nevertheless, putting my nostalgic childhood aside, great work!
I dont even need to watch the video...its withings so its going to be great. I've had a withings wifi scale for almost 15 years and it still works as if new. I don't think i have any other piece of tech that is even near that old and still functioning.
The ad is much better than the usability of this product. These sensors are already present in many wearables like Garmin sport watches and they aren't a reliable indicator of common diseases or irregularities. These measurements won't lead to any diagnosis for 99% of the users. That's that.
Heart rate + SpO2: cheap pulse oximeter Auscultation: stethoscope (best done by GP) Temperature: thermometer (oral or laser) ECG: better done by GP, 1 lead only detects a few arrhythmias Recording: paper and pen What about Blood pressure? A patient usually wouldn’t know what sounds normal or not A patient usually wouldn’t know what ECG is normal or not You only need a simple email to show your doctor your info Most people already have a thermometer and maybe a blood pressure cuff anyways. How is this revolutionary?
![[EN] BeamO - The world’s first multiscope](/img/logo.svg){kind=logo}
