I don't know why we don't just buy the game and do it all ourselves the way it should be done. He couldn't even be bothered to get the number of american WW2 soldiers right, so that title was clickbait. There were way more soldiers in reality. We put up with a lot because of sheer laziness.
It was awesome at 10:44 when you scrolled over to find that one contingent of WWII soldiers just raining fire down a hill into an endless horde, so badass. Told a story, because once that side was flanked the rest of the WWII soldiers stood no chance.
So this is literally GATE, but the soldiers is literally facing the entire population. You know, the soldiers would have won if they got Rory Mercury in the team. The medieval soldier wouldn’t have stand a chance at all!
It was JSDF propaganda, but that doesn't stop it from being awesome. Also hard for any military, even a modern one, to fight a literal immortal. Also I feel this simulator doesn't have correct accuracy for firearms. Way too many stray shots. Edit: Also it doesn't account for real world strategy. The WWII US military wouldn't put their guys out in the wind, they would use the hills, and increase the volume of concurrent fire. Think how the Germans held Normandy, except the invaders don't have any guns. Absolute bloodbath.
I’m not a gamer. I don’t even own a console much less a gaming computer. But these videos are insanely satisfying to watch after a long work day. Keep up the good work!
Not only should the Shermans be able to roll through the hordes, they should also be given functional hull MGs. I can't see if the co-axial is modeled, but it it is, they should have that as well. I hope to see a better assortment of units in the future. Its solid for a tech demo right now, but it really is piddly for the "Ultimate" Epic Battle Simulator.
See, this is what GATE should have been! Medieval army still takes monstrous casualties but maybe a stray trebuchet projectile ignites a fuel tank or something and some knights get within stabbing distance! Very few modern soldiers would die instantly but their wounds would get badly infected as they were intended to! Medieval weapons weren’t very lethal but caused a lot of gore, modern weapons are low on gore but cause enormous casualties in short amounts of time!
Love the vids! Can you keep the kill counter on screen more often? It’ll help viewers with gauging the progress of the battle. Plus I really like watching the numbers change 😅
suggestion: john wick and Nicola tesla leading 2 separate squads in a forest on free move with the squads havinv around a couple thousand elite us soldiers (3x stats of something similar) and 10 or so tanks each. they are surrounded by small groups of zombies on all sides. some groups have not zombies but instead giant zombies (trolls) and after the destruction of their undead army Germans attack and backup comes in from the Americans can the elite squad go through the various attacks until backup arrives? pls like this comment if you would like to see this :) edit: maybe it would be simpler without the second part of the battle with the backup hopefully though you see this daley and you can pull it off
Something people need to remember: midevil catapults did oil on fire shots. That burning oil will seep in the turret of the tank and cause ammunition to fire off. The tanks would start cooking...
That bullet tracer reminds me about MG42 and that casualties and that landscape reminds me of normandy beach intensifies during June 1944 Medieval Soldier ( Allied Forces, trying to break through the normandy ) US Army ( German Forces, trying to defend the normandy )
Seems like the WW2 AI caused them to lose. They were way too aggressive at the beginning with their push forward when all they really had to do is camp on the high ground with the Sherman's providing cover.
I challenge thee to set up something epic that ends up in somewhat of a draw or a very very very close call. As in BOTH teams / armies getting extremely decimated.
I'm addicted to your videos. Any chance you could do one where you put more strategy into the ballista placement ? It's kind of disappointing when they just smash into a wall of machine gun fire. I feel like you could use the terrain more so that each team's placements are at an advantage.
Honestly none of the medieval weaponry should even scratch the tanks. The tanks should be absolutely immune to all their attacks. Once again you put too many forces on one side. I had 0 doubts the medieval army winning. You commented earlier in the fight how % wise both sides suffered about the same losses and said either side could win when that wasn't true at all. When a smaller force is facing a larger force if they are suffering equal losses % wise it's always bad for the smaller force. Once we saw that it was absolute doom for the WW2 army.
@@thrillereighties8241 Since when can knights and other medieval soldiers wearing armor that weighs about 60 to 80 pounds depending if its full plate or not can outrun a Sherman tank that has a max speed of 29mph(46kmph)? Sorry dude doesn't seem likely at all. If they were on horseback maybe but foot soldiers are going to be tread pancakes
@@Darth1Marik You have a valid point but at that point in the battle, the US soldiers and tanks will be without ammo. The medieval soldiers can just drop their heavy armour, avoid the tanks and finish the remaining soldiers with their swords. The US has actually done war exercises where a technologically advanced army takes on forces like China which are lesser equipped but are overwhelming in numbers. Numbers always win.
One million archers mean ww2 loses this battle. That's way too many archers for the ww2 troops to overcome. The medieval army had plenty of meat shields to throw at them until the archers came into play and once that happened, the battle was over and wasn't even close.
in a real battle, the medieval army will adapt guerilla tactics, investigate, get terrified and shit their pants and finally either retreat or surrender.
The US Army should have been dug in fox holes and and planted minefields. The tanks should have had machine guns, and the ability to move, redeploy, and reinforce positions. Slow moving catapults should have been easy pickings for Sherman Tanks.
Excellent battle always love your vids maybe next time they’ll have a rematch with ww2 defending a city probably not a bridge though that might be too much of an advantage e
You forgot the support units in this battle, where is the artillery, mortars, they are part of WW2 army makeup, also they had close air support as part their support units.
where are the B-17's? Also, It should be possible to prioritize the tanks to fire on the catapults first. Again they could move as groups of 3 to 5 to be able to concentrate shots in different areas as needed.
