Тёмный

Episode #11: Grit, Resilience, and Antifragility 

Cabrera Lab
Подписаться 6 тыс.
Просмотров 278
50% 1

Cabrera Lab ensures you'll take the fastest, surest path to excellence in critical thinking. Master the most important thinking skills better and faster than you ever thought possible (at your own pace). Our ground-breaking science (we pioneered the research) and step-by-step practice (we know what to practice) guides you from where you are (Good) to where you want to be (GOAT). Train yourself and your team in the skills that can't be replaced by AI.
Join us at thinku.cabreralab.org
FOLLOW US:
Twitter: / cabreraresearch
Instagram: www.instagram....
Linkedin: / admin
Facebook: / cabreraresearch

Опубликовано:

 

2 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 5   
@LoriFisher-wy8gj
@LoriFisher-wy8gj 3 месяца назад
What a great discussion involving shared memories, history, and pop culture. Went a total different direction than I thought it would. This was just fantastic!
@emilyogilvie3581
@emilyogilvie3581 3 месяца назад
i love the dynamic between you two. i love these conversations. you both listen with the intent to understand and it's quite refreshing.
@quentincrain1472
@quentincrain1472 2 месяца назад
You guys are super frustrating! Things like at 8:30 "It was 'in their mind' and not their body." and 36:39 "You are in control of being metacognitive or not." is being said. So, are you 2 dualists? I love systems, system science, system thinking, network science, cybernetics, critical realism, etc but seriously. Please do an episode on "determinism" or "free-will" or whatever and address Sapolsky's recent book "Determined".
@DerekCabrera1
@DerekCabrera1 2 месяца назад
Great suggestion for a podcast episode! Not dualists, but bivalency occurs in nature and is nested within multivalency. So the existence of a dualistic instance does not necessarily mean one is universally a dualist. The debate on free will and determinism didn’t start with Sopolsky. It’s been around for a long time-see Provine. I think it’s pretty clear that there is no free will. But just because there is no free choice (unconstrained choice) doesn’t mean there is no choice. There is choice. Determinism doesn’t follow from lack of free will-this is an unnecessary conflation and a mistake people make a lot. Hope that clarifies.
@quentincrain1472
@quentincrain1472 2 месяца назад
@@DerekCabrera1 Whoa! Ok, didnt expect a reply. I wont go on as i probably dont have anything you havent hear. I dont understand what "choice" that isnt free means. If you put balancing/reinforcing loops on loops on loops on a thermostat you can achieve a non-linear system, and if some of those loops are 'loop-builders' then you just need an open system (or you might say "reality") to nudge those loops to build loops (metacognition leading to changed behaviors). So, if "choice" are just loops that control other loops then fine, but otherwise that word implies free will.
Далее
Episode #25: The Path to Bueno
33:46
Просмотров 253
Episode #28: All About Part-Whole Systems
1:06:53
Episode #24: Avoid the Norm
37:02
Просмотров 195
Episode #26: Lessons From The Mountains
1:01:40