Episode 22. Armata. Terra Incognita. 

@@pavelmdify I guess they spend the whole budget on the commercials 🤣

We will never know what really happen that day, tho we shouldnt rule out a mechanical failure no matter what the Russian said

​@@BLACKOMAMBO a mechanical failure it's impossible because the tank didn't move when they tried to tow it, that means the engine or the transmission had no problems, and a mechanical problem can't solve by itself in a couple of minutes

A mechanical failure wouldn’t necessarily mean the tank can’t move a tanks engine could be completely destroyed and provided broken parts are not jamming on eachother I can still rotate just fine maybe a Ben freer than before due to the engines pistons not having compression the tank broke down because it’s engine is baised of the SLA 16 used in the nazi tiger and king tiger a diesel X configuration engine that was terribly unreliable and to an extent most X engines are this way that’s why they are so uncommon

The young driver had the brakes engaged that's why the tank did not move even when they tried to drag it if you watch the full video you will see an old driver then investigates and disengage the brakes and the tank moved under it's own power. Just watch the full video.

If we accept that the driver was inexperienced with the T14 how bad does that make Russia look.

@samo zeleno plači

Support my channel guys! T-55 against M-84: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-QghKJi1JQQc.html

You tube censors all content now. Even int he USA we rarely get what we look for.

@@RealDigitalWar that video is shit

вы многое не видели ) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-bI1UuiJDXlI.html

western propaganda, hides pro-russian videos

From Iraq, we're with Russia.

СЛАВА ПРОПАГАНДЕ !!!!ВСЕ УЖЕ ГОВНО!!!

​@@user-cp3bw3lz8kwell good luck then.

АХАХАХАХ!!!

Human way is do opposite

You will never read this but this tech has been in tanks since the 70’s…

Do you agree that SG should start buying defence tech/equipment from Russia? Better and cheaper on tax payers pockets bro...

​@@singaporepatriots3077not beter

​@@singaporepatriots3077and the t14 armata is more expensive then most nato tanks

Too bad they don’t see combat, and they likely never will. Russia just sends old equipment to Ukraine. Almost like the Russians don’t have anything else.

@@SnowAndReef Russia often makes these kinds of military advancements that don't proliferate to the common soldier, it's a product of the military culture their tzar's have and the obscene corruption. Truly it is robbing the parents and families of russian tank crews but since the country is in an illegal war of invasion it is perhaps all for the best that Russian corruption did such damage. From a completely cold blooded perspective with no life on the line it is a shame we have not seen more of this platform in action however.

@@SnowAndReef how electricity going on now? still in darkness?

@@BRMCX69 What? You think there are power outages going on in the States? Good one.

@@SnowAndReef nah, you just got dementia & pedo president in the states.

Thats because its only effective if its not being shot at

That's because one of the t-14 biggest features is its super stealth ability. We have only seen 20 of them, but in reality there are 1000s.

Against who? There is no target for them. It like saying "no poseidon was used in Ukraine"

@@trololoev I dont get your comment? You saying the RUF is doing so well, they dont even need to use their shiny equipment?

​@@krakcathe armata isnt the right tank for this kind of war. Wars like iraq and Afghanistan it would be great when you don't know who or where the enemy is than all sensors and systems can help you. In Ukraine tanks are off little use, artillery and drones in combination with infantry is what makes a difference. The T15 APC would be a great asset tho.

only t-14 is tank, all other armata is not a tank.

yea its even prettier when its blown up by a drone

@Joshua Nellis wasn't it in service in syria?

Not that I know. I have never heard of Russia sending T-14 Armata tanks to any country. Actually, this tank has never been in real combat. Not even in Ukraine.

@@ChileanWagner.777 in April 2020, the Russian defence ministry confirmed it had seen service in Syria, & it has also had a limited field service in ukraine recently

Смейся над своей Украиной, где ты живешь. Русское новейшее оружие показывает прекрасные характеристик и все больше поступает в армию.

@@ARCHITEKTVonDerAnderenWelt Keep yapping, pet of Putin.

More like the Ferrari with their advanced electronics

But better

@SWEEVP well, fortunately in the real world when Russia has the best aircrafts, tanks and submarines.

Abrams is lambo

@@elvita13282 this comment didn't age well lol. Russian armor/aircraft is getting wrecked right now.

Он заточен под будущую модернизацию в виде беспилотного танка,с внешним управлением и с возможностью внедрения полноценных роботизированных систем.

Yeah the dozens they have produced are a force to be reckoned with.

you have RU-vid channel too... I follow you from Facebook

But now the corrupt media have probably brainwashed you and you don't like them anymore.

Oh, you sweet summer child

@@kingsnakke6888 that comment aged like milk

@Joshua Nellis Porsche Type 101? Wow, that explains the stop at the parade. 😁

​@Joshua Nellis *germans

I think it is combat proven now, didn’t they send it to Syria?

@@hibojoe1477 I think they sent one or two, but never saw combat footage with it, maybe they sent it to some VERY low threat area just to be safe... or just ran mobility trials, etc. Edit: I actually just saw BMPT-2 terminator (based on the T-72 chassis) sent to Syria, not the Armata family.

It's combat approved! Tank was tested in Syria!

@@nedkiryakov4824 could you send me the source?

They haven't even produced enough of these to say they're combat proven yet.

может на Донбассе повоюет Т-14 .Пора уж

Nothing beats the T72BU in looks , not even the T90BM, although the T14 is gorgeous.

My brother in Christ, this is propaganda, of course they will want the viewer to believe the tank is the best in the world

The oppiset realy

Why are you writing in spanish if your name and other text are russian

@@marijnnn4992because he is from a poor south american country and pro russian who hates western equipment

@@Ascencio21 i,m kinda thinking he is a bot or a russian faking being spanish

@@marijnnn4992 a lot of spanish people is pro rusian idk why

Во время парадов стабилизаторы отключены по требованиям безопасности. В противном случае орудие, повторяя рельеф, может нанести травмы экипажу, стоящему в люках по парадному.

They might can be turned off

@@nauuwgtx they should be turned off during parades.

The stab is only used for the special maneuver where they pivot steer / neutral steer the tank 360 degrees while the gun stays fixed on one target--all synchrhonized so an entire platoon does it.

Russia has a massive number of these Armata tanks in house ready to deploy in the event of all out war. They don't deploy their latest highly classified tanks to Ukraine. The T90's and the older models are more than enough to suffice. Something they didn't tell you about the stealth and electronic jamming of incoming missiles (including MANPADS) in this video is that not only the Armata tanks are equipped with this safety system but also the entire lineup of their older tanks and armored vehicles including helicopters and jets are equipped the same system which is why they have been so successful completing their mission on a daily basis in the current war in Ukraine. Very few losses of Russian military men and their war fighting machines.

@Jasper Percabeth OF course, Russia can afford 200 000 casualties

@@noobz5056 Given how many Russians die in masses, the Armata Tank is more important than the Russians themselves... I love your epic logic, what's your IQ?

@@tomasgogashvily5350 You have been brainwashed very heavily, by absorbing all the lies coming out of the mainstream media. The truth is that Russia only lost just over a hundred of their men since the Ukraine war started, whereas more than 80% of Ukrainian (Kyiv's army run by the U.S.) military men have been lost, some of which have deserted/fled. Trying to fight the Russians is a suicidal mission over there. You ask me if I have low IQ how about you check yours? Wake the hell up.

@@noobz5056 they say they have 20. we've only seen 8. they very much do not have a massive number of Armatas.

Нет первой.

Паровой

This comment aged like milk

@@rgbforever4561 Are you referencing the Ukr civil war? Losses NATO armed and trained Yahtzees: 800,000 (The Pentagon accounted for 1,200 KIA per day in the 2023 document leaks) DPR/LPR: 47,000 Wagner: 20,000 RU MoD: 1,000

@@joebenson528 I have never heard more outlandish shit. It's more like 70k Kia for Ukraine and 130+ for ruzzia

@rgbforever4561 130k* for RU? How would they lose more troops than they deployed? You need to stop overdosing on Fox News and the BBC, bud. The Pentagon confirmed Ukr losses of 1,200 per day, and the ratio between both sides is ~10:1. If the banderties were winning, then they would have had a single successful offensive in 2 years. RU backed forces would not have maintained the LPR, DPR, Zaporozhye and Kherson land bridge. Elensky wouldn't have to draft individuals aged 16-60 (men AND WOMEN) kidnapping them off the streets of Odessa. Ukr Army wouldn't have an average age of 42 (it was 26 pre-2022). And the so-called Foreign/NATO legion wouldn't have to lie about their recruitment numbers; Claim 20,000-25,000, Reality 1,200-1,500 according to a New York Times investigation (poor Wali the super sniper bought into the propaganda, and ran away just 12 days into his war tourism). Not to mention, the RU Duma would have given VP full war powers 12+ months ago if they were losing as bad as US/NATO state media claims. But that's not necessary when an 8% mobilization is capable of crushing 4 separate NATO built-up Ukr armies/offensives in just under two years. Generations of military aged men either dead, ran away to western Europe to scam the locals out of their USD's, or oined the DPR/LPR to defend the Donbass. Fox "News", The Sun, BBC and the rest of the neocon media can not win proxy conflicts. Government funded search engines (Google) can only cover up the truth, but it does not influence the situation on the battlefield. When the 14th Waffen SS are defeated, your last cope will be "they thought it would end in 3 days". The "Big Lie" that was debunked day one on February 20, 2022, when VP said plainly this would be a protracted demilitarization. NATO is not good at supporting protracted conflicts (Korea, Vietnam 3x, Afghanistan, Iraq etc) we're only good at indiscriminately shelling civilian centers in Belgrade, Baghdad, Hanoi, Havana. Or running NGO* backed "regime change" campaigns (illegal coups) in hopes that the NATO armed locals overthrow their own governments: Kiev, Ukr 2013-Failing, NATO Spring 2011-Failed, Bangkok 2020-23, Myanmar 2021-Failed, Pakistan 2022, Brazil 2022-Failed. 🇵🇸🇱🇧🇸🇾🇾🇪🇦🇲 > 🇪🇺

Atmate receive many upgrades. The more later Armata go into production, the better it be.

It’s one hell of a tank

I dunno bro, but thats mostly a war 😂

Straight up cringe

Abrams is old, heavy, and vulnerable. (see Yemen).

@@emilianolaurenzi464 You use any tank poorly and you will lose it. Such as sky lining themselves on a ridge with no infantry or artillery support like they did. M1 is just fine. T-14 isn't that impressive. It's main enhancement is that finally the crew doesn't immediately die when the autoloader carousel cooks off due to their protected compartment. However that same compartment makes it weaker in close in environments as the crew are reliant on remote weapons and optics as the commander can't be in an open protected position with good visibility cause he is in the front hull with the driver and gunner. There is no 'uber' tank anywhere in the world. There are tanks that get their job done. And the T-14 is a unique way to solve the one weakness of Russian armor which as been ammo cookoffs killing the crew instantly, though it still leaves the vehicle heavily damaged and perhaps even permanently lost. M1's blow off panels were a different solution, leaves the vehicle mostly unscathed, though left it vulnerable to being more easily knocked out from cluster bomblets.

@@Cragified I do not know why you criticize the dependence of technology on modern war machines when it is what all the most advanced armies in the world are doing, totally depending on technology in all their equipment and weapons, the armata is the most modern tank in the world. world and despite the fact that its combat performance has not been tested, it has a lot of potential to offer and even other western military powers recognize it, on the other hand I don't know what armor weakness you are talking about, the tanks that have been destroyed in war are of origin Soviet and outdated used by small and little trained armies, and you said that yourself: "You use any tank poorly and you will lose it" that is a contradiction of yours, it would be better for you to re-analyze the conclusions you have reached and rethink a new context.

@@akumazakazaki9510 Tanks or any other single war machine do not win wars on the ground. Tanks, IFVs, and Infantry work together as combined arms to complement each other. Believe it or not the tank's main role is not to engage other tanks but support infantry. There are so many examples to cite. Including the Russian experience of losing lots of T-80s in Chechnya in built up areas. Which is something the T-14 is inherently vulnerable to due to its reliance on remote optics and weapon stations because of its crew position. In open terrain warfare it is a very big upgrade on crew survivability for Russian tankers. Which is a big thing when you consider the Russian population is decreasing. And why they are sticking with an autoloader. Every 3 vehicles that is another crew if you have a crew of 3 instead of 4. Even though it puts a higher maintenance workload on each crew member due to there being one less.

@@Cragified 1- I know in advance that the tanks are to support the infantry and all the tanks that exist in the world are vulnerable in urban combat, it is something obvious and there is no point in mentioning it, this argument of yours has no context in the discussion, You're diverting the topic 2- "Which is something the T-14 is inherently vulnerable to due to its reliance on remote optics and weapon stations because of its crew position." once again you are contradicting yourself, the t14 armatta was created under modern military doctrine, which means in your words that the vehicle is supported by all kinds of equipment, radars, infantry, air support, etc, without this any tank in the world It is vulnerable, I repeat are your words. 3-the survival capacity of the Russian tanker has always been high, since the Soviet Union armor and improvements have been created to protect the tank and the crew, of course there are now modern improvements but in their time they were at the forefront of armor, the The use of the automatic loader in addition to reducing the crew, contributes to reducing the size of the tank, in Soviet doctrine this meant maneuverability, stealth and material savings for more tanks and does not mean more work for the team, the automatic loader saves many movements and unnecessary maneuvers, also does not require much maintenance, mechanically they are reliable. 4- also the issue of the crew and automatic loader are irrelevant in the case of the t14, I repeat, it is a modern machine under modern military doctrines, having a large crew is not necessary with technological advances and even the Americans know it, they are also developing an autoloader mechanism and an unmanned turret tank, you once again include a question not relevant to the case of the t14.

Well, it wont. Because it's just few prototypes and the Russian economy is so fcked that it will remain few prototypes forever.

🤣

🤣

what bout the m1a2 SEP V3, Challenger 2 TES, Leopard 2A6/7's, AMX 56 Leclerc these are state of art tanks and most of them arent used by the best crews

It was rushed out to participate in a Victory day parade, 2015 was celebration of 70 years of the greatest victory in entire history of mankind against the worst evil! Russia sacrificed over 25 million people, so they wanted to get the new tank,a tank being used as the main weapon! So the driver pressed a parking brake on automatic transmission, completely a new system at time! They couldn't move it,until another driver disconnected the brake! Afterwards he drove it away, all time filmed by many cameras and shown on many RU-vid videos

A complete idiot is trying to look smart! You obviously have no idea about tanks! Keep on playing Call of duty

even best crew doesn't have experience to drive this tanks.

@@pashapasovski5860 just because Germany stabbed the soviets in the back doesn’t make them automatically the good guys. Europe got rid of one empire for another one that was pretty much the exact same (Soviet Union).

There is no reason for them to be afraid. But it is still their job to try and stay ahead of the competition. Hard to say what is and isn't better when different tools are for different jobs but the T-14 is certainly moving in a different direction.

@SIRIUS Kizo Mi tell me why the driver cant restart the tank after he stalled? clearly there is a fault in the system. The tank driver didn't do anything wrong, its the engineer who should take the blame.

Sabotages should be anticipated in order to be prevented. We are human, We only dancing 💃 🎶 😔 ✨ 🤪 😌 💃 Please, ignore the meaning.

He literally said its not his fault bruh

Only desperate people drink this poison. Fonnie jokE!!!!111!1:)0000)0

@@praetorian9196 And do you know how that budget is spent? Personnel payment and benefits take up approximately 39.14% of the total budget

@@praetorian9196 ????

Sabot would still go in one side out the other. It really about who gets that first shot off.

It has been long gone bro😆😆

@@scotthulsey8763 No it wouldnt... This is not an T55/62 or Iraqi downgraded localy manufactured T72 made by inferior materiel with no ERA. The T14 Armarna is probably One of the best protected tanks today. The Russians has learned alot by the two Gulfwars when they developed this tank and absolut the statement that it depends who gets of the first shell when then the Russians T14 has the upper hand with its superior atgm which can hit and defeat any modern tank at maximum effective-penetration range of 8 km. The T-14 is equipped with 26.5-40 GHz active electronically scanned array radar, which is used mainly by the APS. Up to 40 airborne or 25 ground targets down to 0.3 m (12 in) in size can be tracked simultaneously at a range of up to 100 km. The tracking system provides an automatic firing solution for the destruction of the target, which can then be transferred to either the APS or the main gun control computers.

No

@@DK-gl3ih its explained in the second part of this video that all the electronic systems have manual duplicates should they be knocked out

@@darcgibson5099 I’m not agreeing with the dude??

Dude. They can barely afford the very stuff like these that they develop. The Ruble is also almost worthless. You shouldnt be scared lol. How many Su-57s are made so far? How many of these new Armata’s are actually in service right now compared to aging T-72s and T-90s they still field?

@@hokage64th war doesn’t work like that, they are self sufficient this is a very important part of war! The value of there effects them outside of country not inside. The only country that has the ability to fight us on our land and in the sea is Russia. So many people talk about economic crap not understanding the complexity of war. The Russians have abilities that we still don’t understand, and as do we that they don’t understand! Put it this way, our lives here in the United States would go to shit the first week of war with Russia !

@@hokage64th The ruble is worthless in the United States, but there are many rubles in Russia. We invent and make our military equipment by Russian people at Russian enterprises. We do not need to convert our money into dollars in order to buy old, expensive and useless weapons from the United States like the rest of the backward world. Reduce and underestimate your enemy's bad and war-fatal quality.

@@hokage64th The diminution you create and the minimum estimate of your enemy's forces, economy, and production could lead you to defeat in a future war. You can ask Napoleon and Hitler about this.

@@bobbyguns100 Ukraine tells a very different tale

Скопировать эти технологии не возможно,они не идут на экспорт!

You can test it in Ukraine, but make sure, that the rain and snow do not deform the armor.

У нас есть боевые роботы Уран-9 и машины поддержки танков Терминатор!

They have offered to india and usually china will buy some to reverse it plus some friendly countries capable of buying it.but the fact is russian never give half of the original to any country,so dont know who will buy it.but it is an amazing tank👍

it cost less that most NATO tanks but more that any russian one. As i remember - 5 mln$ for Armata, 3 for t-90m and 500k to modernize t-72b into t-72b3

the Abrams has no advantage over the Armata except availability which is indeed important but due to Armata's crew capsule an Abrams cant even touch them, hideen behind 900mm of composites not including exterior armour, to put in persepective the newest SEPv3 is said to have around 750-800mm of penetration against well....certainly not Relikt Composites and not to mention its Afganit APS which can in theory destroy even APFSDS

@@mochiii608 How many to be deployed? And when?

The abrams have not fought any modern tanks but very outdated iraqi tanks.... They defeated them due to advanced and superior optics....hardly a situation fit to call battle proven...lol.The leopard and chally would destroy the abrams so fast

@@lordemarsh6804 Way more than advanced and superior optics let the Abrams kick the shit out of those tanks. You’re forgetting the Abrams crews training is second to none. Most countries don’t have the training budget of the US military. That coupled with the new M1A2 SEPv3 means the Abrams can fight and win with any tank.

@@mochiii608 T-14 turret is not well protected, you just don't lose the crew when it is penetrated anymore. Puts it on an even footing with most AFVs in the world now. Combat killing it though, not that difficult if it isn't supported well. Same can be said for the M1, Leo 2, Leclerc, etc. Tanks are part of combined arms, tanks alone are always defeated.

Tanks cant fly

@@deadliftalot well actually, the Russians did experiment with a flying tank back in the 1930s basically a t26 and yes it had wings

Russia does not use the latest technologies in Ukraine, there are enough T-62s to beat Ukrainians in their mud huts

@@x25team But you know it costs a lot of Russian soldiers their lives if you don't use the best technology?