Episode 69. Long-rangers 

yes,so right.TU-160 state of the art.

//em//

She's is like a beautiful Russian woman like "Maria Zakharova"

//em//

American weapon is shit believe me😉 the american technology is stolen Russian technology in 90s when Cold War ending

I precisely start learning more about them, their culture, history and people because I was and I'm a technology and science lover. Since young I was amazed by their "toy's".

😹😹🤌🏽

everything that you have is classified, we know for another 10 years before it gets into the series)

//em//

This is Russian state propaganda and is mostly made up so do your own research

LMFAO

Well the movie is a movie, but you have to do something after all, you can't just sit at home and rewatch the movie every day.

//em//

//em//

Был Конкорд.самолет для миллионеров.

Свои хотелки оставь на почту Джо Байдену!

Ту 144

Today, this aircraft is capable of launching missiles back to the aircraft pursuing it... He doesn't need a gun)

XD 😂

Maybe if you're a mutant!!!:)

@Kuro-aka-gunship , to everyone who is able to think about comparisons between sizes of planes, bombs, misiles, penises, etc.

Nah

This is the fun part to be a man, one sentence, doesn't mean just one thing!

🇮🇳🇮🇳 we should go for Tu22m3 backfire!! It will solidify our marine defense. Moreover Russia been our best friend. Can't forget 1971 lol.

today what you want explode nuke in New York city?

batman ahaha

Stupid Russia

//em//

//em//

we call our technique that specifically to mislead the enemy... This white swan is graceful and beautiful - like a swan. Don't forget that Russia is the birthplace of great poets - it's in our blood. Il. For example tos1 the sun is hot -it makes it very very hot)

//em//

//em//

Did you ever think that he has "been able" to do this was because he has forcibly taken over companies, stole their products & equipment, with also their intellectual property while THEN either "liquidating" the true owners or puttin them in prison?

@@graemepennell Don't say your Western brainwashed nonsense...

Correct. Putin does two things in life. First, he tells you exactly what he is going to do, then, he does it.

@@graemepennell you MEAN.......NATIONALIZATION Just as EVERY COUNTRY on this PLANET does? Yeah, that's what he did. Hypocrite.

@@Kozak806 your ignorance and stupidity is off the charts. Do you honestly think that Putin gives a damn about American imperialist sanctions? America illegally sanctions foreign countries to submit to it's will, or to destroy their economy. But don't worry, foreign GOVTS are now rejecting US currency as payment for anything, which will make your precious sanctions useless.

Absolutely 💯 💯 💯 💯 💯

B1 lancer is a lesser aircraft.

@@ryanalt5048 Irrelevant to Neil Matthew's comment. This show claims the B-1 is a copy of the TU-160. The opposite is apparently true.

@@5js78 The whole series is full of propaganda bullshit. After all, it is Russian... Another absolute bullshit follows a minute later: "TU-160 and TU-95 were developed at the same time back in 70-ties." LOL. Tu-95 is a 50-ties airplane, a counterpart of the B-52. The part with allegedly sour-faced Barack Obama is yet another fairy-tale, along with the over-heroic narrator voice.

@@PhonoDirect It may be propaganda but even the russians can't beat the U.S. at propaganda bullshit.

Indeed! Actually the B1 flew for the first time in 1974 and the Tu160 in 1981. If one copied the other, then the Tu160 would be the copy. But I agree they are both unique!

@@BadKarmaPT The two designs share a common general aerodynamic configuration and both are bombers. That is about where it ends. They are in entirely different weight, payload, power and performance classes and there is no similarity in the actual structure, powerplants or avionics systems.

@@benb5841 I actually laughed out loud when the “documentary” said the B1 was designed because of the Tu-160

Timestamp?

//em//

Ту-144....Т-4.

YOu lie. Tu-160 was designed much earlier than B1. Actually, Tu-160 is continuation of Tu-22 strategic supersonic bomber, they even look much similar. Work on Tu-160 started immediately after Tu-22M was introduced. Americans , probably, also tried to copy Tu-22

@@AlexanderTch America was working on swingwing aircraft going back to the F-111 in the mid 60s (around 1964 I believe) during the Cold War,sometimes bothsides found themselves going down the same research paths without even knowing it.

@@AlexanderTch 👍👍🇮🇳 Indian🇮🇳 Government currently discussing for the procurement of Strategic bomber ...and Tu160 is first choice... I think..India 🇮🇳 is going to buy Tu160 from old friend Russia 🇷🇺

The white swan 🦢 any aggression will be punished

//em//

It's almost like the TU-160 is very different from the B-1

Какое счастье 😃

So what?

Indian🇮🇳 Government currently discussing for the procurement of Strategic bomber ...and Tu160 is first choice... I think..India 🇮🇳 is going to buy Tu160 from old friend Russia 🇷🇺

@@alexkor380 point is video states b1 copied tu160 design...when b1 was designed and built first.

@@McRizzle23 According to your idiotic logic, the F-35 is a copy of the Soviet Yak-141. Do you confirm?

They already did it.It was filmed 4-5 years ago.They changed everything inside.

YEAH I’M SURE THAT THEY ESPECIALLY MADE THE FOOTAGE ,COMEDY,AND THE WRITING JUST SO THEY ENTERTAIN A A PRP-WESTERN-GLOBALIST-NATO-NEOCON-TROLL LIKE THAT HAS NOTHING BUT NEGATIVE REMARKS ABOUT ALL OF THE TECHNICAL ADVANCEMENTS AND SYSTEMS UPGRADES THAT THE RUSSIANS ARE CONSTANTLY ADDING TO EARLIER IR OLDER AIRCRAFT DO AS TO MODERNIZE THEIR ENTIRE FLEET TO BE READY TO TAKE ON ANY TASK THAT THEY HAVE ACCOMPLISH

Stop it. Americans were well aware of the achievements of the USSR. They were used to drive American voters to approve for massive defense budgets for over 40 years to keep up with the Soviets one way or another.

Too many questions... "Do they drop a 'test bomb' as they approach the target to calibrate the system?" - Definitely, NO!

@@maksimluzin1121 I don't mean a bomb that explodes, I mean a fairly heavy object with radiolocation, so the deflection at different altitudes can be measured.

@@LouisSamuel82 , No! At least, I never hear about such a bomb in Russian aviation. The SVP-24 system collect different data about different objects, including meteorological conditions, the target parameters (for example, coordinates), the flight parameters (altitude, speed, direction), the munition (bomb) parameters (its shape, weight and aerodynamic characteristics). The SVP-24 system even collects data from different sensors of the plane, for example, its construction vibration and other physical parameters. It is enough for the task, to drop a 'dumb' bomb with the highest precision characteristics comparable to the 'smart' bombs from a quite high altitude and distance. The pilot just select a target, and the SVP-24 system takes the control of the plane and releases the bomb automatically just before about 10 minutes before reaching the pre-calculated 'drop point'. So, the process is highly automated, at least, after 'pressing the button'... The pilot do not participate in the process at all, at least, in its final phase after selecting a target and activating the SVP-24 system.

@@maksimluzin1121 Interesting. I wouldn't have expected structural vibration to have an effect, or that you could do much about it. Wouldn't you just damp the release mechanism? My starting point would be to measure pressure, temperature and humidity at the aircraft, then use the barometric equation to get air density at different altitudes all the way to target level. With this, you could calculate the trajectory of the bomb knowing its weight, drag coefficient, initial velocity and direction. I figure it should always point in the direction of motion because of the fins, so the drag coefficient wouldn't change much. The major unknown would be variation in direction and speed of the wind at different altitudes. Not an expert but I guess that with mountains or with thermal coastal winds it might be tricky to predict. This could be measured with a Sodar if they have a small one with a really large range and don't worry about electronic emissions.

@@alexandrep4913 , Physics, at first. But Maths behind it, for sure...

In WW2 Bombers could only guarantee to hit within 2 to 3 miles of their point of aim that's 3 to 5 km. On D Day the USAAF completely missed the beaches. One famous incident the US killed 500+ of its own troops not including wounded around 2000. The German commander opposite called on open radio and asked "if they could do the same tomorrow."

Completely missing target 🎯.

Its a drop and not a propelled missile strike.

US is saying to make attacks as precise as a surgical knife but US has never shown a single video to demonstrate it

I mean these are just reuploads of the show right?

@@macncheese2119 with an english subtext and narrator....

The original Russian version of the video was released a few years before the Tu-22M3 has been released.

Dude Tu22 are being phased out of military service. But the Russians still operate some.

@@yatharthraman8021 , "Tu22 are being phased out of military service. " - No, it is not! The Tu-22M3 is going to modernization to Tu-22M3M now, including the new avionics, improved radar, ability to use up to four Kh-47 'Kinzhal' hypersonic missiles (so far, only Mig-31 can carry only one 'Kinzhal' missile) and the refueling boom will be returned back to the Tu-22M3M, which was removed early by the treaty between USA and USSR. "But the Russians still operate some." - Just 'some'? :-))) Actually, more than 60 Tu-22M3 are in service in Russian AF at the moment! The Tu-22M3, after it modernization, still will be in service up to 8-10 years from now. Yes, it is planned to replace Tu-22M3 with a new strategical bomber, like 'PAK DA' ('ПАК ДА'), but the Tu-22M3 is still very useful for many military tasks.

Tu-95MS is a dedicated Cruise Missile Carrier bomber

Lmao that is a complete lie. The Tu-160 was developed in response to the B1.

tu-160 was designed before b1,it's only the production phase where b1 was the first to be produced

@@briant5685 Ok, so who gave the drawings to the US? Was the CIA invited during the drawing phase?