The issue is I feel that Haaland had more quality in this game because lewandowski 5 in 9 yes very impressive but Haaland had a streak and if he continued without getting subbed off he would’ve scored more then lewandowski. That’s all I gotta say.
Haaland es un cazador de goles, pilla todos los rechaces y lo único que hace es darle para que vaya a dentro. Es un claro ejemplo de lo importante que es la colocación
Fun fact: everytime guardialo manages a team e.g. Barca, Bayern,City one player seems to always get 5 goals under him such as Messi,lewandowski and now Haaland
Hes a striker thats best at his position There are strikers like ronaldo these days who aren't even in the box to tap the ball in Haaland is always there for the pass
@@football_is_red. and, so tap in doesn’t count? You need to score magical goal to be good? Nah not in football, you only need to score and Haaland understood it
@@Yash7031_ i mean you can score with tap ins but its not entertaining as other goals messi scored 5 goals in ucl match hut there were no tap ins haaaland is gonna break meesi record of 91 goals in a year with tap ins thats why i dont watch man city games they are just not fun to watch i like kdbs goals more than any goals of haaland
i agree lewa is and was better than haaland but tap ins and headers. if many hate him bcuz of that then we should hate many players. i mean atleast he scoring goals. people have to watch his bvb matches to understand. btw i am not starting an argument
@@CoffeeMeat I don't understand why everyone says Lewandowski scored against a farmers league team meanwhile Haland scored also against a farmers league team
Bro all of them were tap-in's and headers And Wolfburgs and Leipzig are equally good💀 Edit:And Lewandownski's goals were not all tap-in's💀 and headers💀
