Though I rarely ever agreed with Ervin I always respected the fact that he was willing to stand on his beliefs and argue with Uber and King. A lot of the people in those livestreams would just agree with whatever they said to avoid conflict.
they reason why they agreed with uber and king is bc they looked at the facts/feats of the topic and came to their own conclusion majority of the time. Ervin most of the time had little to no evidence to back his claims up and was very biased. Its not that they were avoiding conflict its that they don't have sufficient evidence to back up their claim or they jsut agree.
