But don't achieve that by voting far right. These politicians will undermine EU and make things easier for the imperialistic Putin regime. Let's keep EU a strong democracy, that will also benefit nationalists in the EU countries.
Total waste of time. Nothing will work other than physically turning the boats around and returning all of those who arrive/have arrived illegally with a clear policy that any attempt at illegal entry will result in a life long ban on their legal entry.
I don't understand why eu countries would allow illegal ppl to come stay and use all the privilege while international students have to go through a lot of problems just to get a part time job.
Because politicians think they get more votes that way. That's the whole issue. that's the whole reason immigration is even debated now, because extreme right wing parties get votes and the moderates are losing seats.
Exactly my question. And we face racism and nasty looks from the public despite being here legally and paying tuition fees and other expenses without having to depend on the system. At least it happens in Germany.
@@br78910 We come with hope, energy, determination to elevate the life of ours and the country's that gives us Visa but bcz of some dumb policy and ultra liberalism ultimately we are the one that have to pay the price😪
@@Joey-ct8bm that's true. It is a step forward. But I'm so dazzled that "democracy" ignores the mayority. That's the big flaw of party-politics. Politicians do not represent the voice of a voter.
@@johndoe-tk6en That totally depends if your party wins or not. I would go crazy if i lived in the US and you win the popular vote and not the presidency. I would totally understand if you lived in the US. That's definitely not democracy at all. In Europe most of us have great multiparty systems. There's never a real majority in a multiparty system. Too radical left or too radical right is gonna give problems. People will get mad. There always need to be a center voice in there somewhere. It's more what you expect. You never get all points on a election program from a party. It's never gonna be perfect. I'm not a one party guy. I always pick and choose on election programs. In the US you can't do that for instance. Red or blue are your only two options. I would follow UK politics right now. It's a absolute mess there after Brexit. The conservatives are in the polls 155 seats down. Their immigration policy is even worse. Nothing worked there despite Brexit. I'm very glad my country the Netherlands is in the EU. It has it's faults, but we can change it together. Together we are strong in influence against Russia or the US. Right or left. Alone we're gonna be picked apart.
@@Joey-ct8bm I do understand it can be much worse like you explained in the US or with any other dictatorships like in Russia. Russia just shows us how prone a democracy can be for a power grab... Turkey and Hungary are less obvious examples. However here in Belgium you can't start a party unless it's conservative. The campaign money comes from the taxpayers. Decised by politicians in power. How can that ever be fair? I do agree that mass voice steers politicians opinions. And that it is super important that that voice is heard. However, real decissions on funds and politician posts will never be for the public to have a say. Those decissions are always made behind the backdoor. We are forced to vote. But what does it matters if we have no say on the real decissions or posts? It's just to show the mass voice direction it wants to go. I want a democracy that gives us the choice to vote on the real decissions. Monthly! Weekly! I want to vote on thibgs that matter. Not on people that lie. Or worse, party's of people that conceive the public like it is now. Politics has been made like an industry. That's just wrong. Only "gemeentelijke" elections give you the slightest say that can affect your life. Because those politicians live nextdoor.
That all depends. I mean if you had a sign saying "immigrants are welcome, except from Africa." Then that would be pretty racist. But If you had a sign saying "no convicted criminals" then it would be pretty sensible.
@@1112viggoYou did not understand his statement. When you say: “We have limited resources, schools, space, housing, jobs, welfare, benefit-payouts, ability to integrate foreigners, and we need those limited resources we have now foremost for our own children and our own population”, how is that racist? Or are you now racist when you don’t give away your car to your neighbor when he simply shows up and demands it from you?
*Sex offenders in the UK now argue that committing that same crime in their native country would result in death penalty, thus they cannot be deported*
It is ridiculous. Now all they need to do is say that they are a women to join female jail to have access to more victims. I don't know who is coming up with that loonacy
You do realize my country the Netherlands has the happiest children in the world and young people from Hungary all leave for the rest of the EU. Poland even has the most expats of the EU in other countries. Living next to Belarus and Russia isn't a nice place to be either.
@@Joey-ct8bmPoland had the biggest number of expats.A lot of Poles are moving back to Poland ,a peaceful Country where they feel safe!Let’s keep it this way !
Once asylum is granted, the first thing they do is fly back to their country of origin for a holiday to see family and friends, the very country from which they fled 'persecution'.
@@cocolasticot9027 Try "asylum seekers fly home for Christmas" and that's just one example before asylum is even granted. And do not call my comments BS thank you.
@@bluemoon5662 All I have is a Border patrol chief from the UK claiming that. No data, no independant source. You'll always have a small amount of freeloaders, but without actual numbers it's meaningless. Therefore and until you provide adequate evidence to back your wildly generalized claim, it can reasonably be treated as BS. You're welcome.
Each MEP represents one of the national parties. You can check which MEP approved it if you search for the report number, you just need to scroll down to the bottom of the reoort. You can check the report based on ID: A9-0152/2023
@@Shaddarhim Because people arent the smartest and mix EU elections with local elections and vote according to their locally-preferred parties. This is what you end up with then. No place for complaining if you voted for a party who approved this.
Poland probably right now provides zero benefits to Ukrainians as far as I know. No social housing, one time payment of 300pln, no free integration courses, however what Poland allows is to live and work, and it is already great
It's interesting how the minister of inmigration at the UE is swedish, while her country closes borders she works hard so the rest of EU countries keep their open.
"They" are trying to set up a secret humantrafficking operation to fly "asylum seekers" into the EU cities, by appointing loyalists. Just as they have been doing in USA last 2-3 years.
Why are you afraid of terrorist attacks if you want to accept anybody without documents?! Just look at Sweeden Malmö, the military has to be activated to solve some migration band problems?! It was one of the most safest city in the world!
@@S1R_K3NTV Its doing fine. I have been following channels since the beginning. Gorgeous cities, only W people, no litter, parks, hotels. Everything open. Refs take the train to visit from W Europe. Cities all over the country, including Ki**. This is all a con and everyone is living off W Westerners.
Ukraine was a failed state already 30 years before the war. No illegal immigrant was going to Ukraine. Instead millions of illegal Ukrainians were and still are entering the EU. Even more than Syrians and Pakistanis.
Despite having a massive coastline to cover Australia fixed this problem years ago. No wonder Russia thinks the EU is weak, all your actions show you are.
Australia plays this game on easy mode due to its geography. I otherwise agree with your comment, but saying "despite having a massive coastline" is really misleading
Yeah like who to is going to swim to Australia from the west or south?🤣 like literally there is nothing there. Australia has to take care of its coast mainly on the north but yeah, the guy thinks it’s the same like the entire southern coast of Europe where Gibraltar almost touches Africa😅
@@bicker31 If the boats were turned around, if the EU made a stand and said "you'll never make Europe your home if you come here illegally", if there were no money or commodity handouts at all, then there would be virtually 0 illegal immigration. Simply because you'd be coming over for nothing, only to be deported once you're found out. But, the EU is weak, and will take in these leeches over actually protecting its borders.
Thankfully, Tusk is cognizant of the electorate. This is a contentious issue in Poland, and no one who succumbs to the EU impositions, wll get re-elected. And this is why, Poland is one of the most ethnically-homogenous, safest countries in the EU.
Anyone saying you didn’t vote for this.. yes you DID. You can check which MEP approved it if you search for the report number: A9-0152/2023 Scroll down and check FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE. You can also check MEPs by Member State and political group if you put into google: MEPs by Member State and political group. If you voted for the party whose MEP approved this then congrats, you voted for this…! Be smarter in 2024!
Are you sure? You can check which MEP approved it if you search for the report number: A9-0152/2023 Scroll down and check "Final vote by roll call in committee responsible". You can also check MEPs by Member State and political group if you put into google: MEPs by Member State and political group. If you voted for the party whose MEP approved this then yes, you voted for this.
Ylva Johansson is a former MP (1988-1991) for the Left Party Communists. Then she switch to the Social Democrats to enhance here chances of career. Can’t stand her.
As one of the top comments suggests, controlling who enters your country is not racist. A country’s first goal is to take care of its citizens with the limited amount of resources it has. If we just look at the examples of Sweden or Ireland we can clearly see that letting too many people in affects the wellbeing of your citizens in a negative way. In Sweden, crime is up, gang violence is all time high while in Ireland there is living space crisis where the government is unable to place all the immigrants coming in so they’re forced to place hundreds of them in hotels in small communities + rent prices are up due to the high demand. And this is only the very beginning. Another important question is: is it even possible to integrate so many immigrants from very different cultures. So far, it seems that even rich countries such as Sweden struggles to do that because big group of immigrants tend to create their own little society. Generations can grow up without any sign of integration which is not good nor for the locals or the immigrants. Europe should be helping but the EU also needs to learn when to say no otherwise it creates serious issues for itself.
Totally agree. lived in both countries, Certain parts of Swedish cities are ruled by Kurdish and African gangs. on the other hand Ireland in particular turned into an expensive kip. Miserable piece of land. Tourists cannot find a place to stay and the hotels are bought by local so-called businessmen where the government pays crazy money to them to accommodate asylum seekers, young Irish are emigrating and the Indian and Pakistani workforce is replacing them, Dublin is like big dump, drug users, asylum seekers everywhere and streets are like toilet. Small towns used to be tourist spots, but now most of the pubs and cafes are shut and streets are full of male asylum seekers, I suppose they don't go to pubs that often :D the worst is the government parties don't even acknowledge that they have an immigration problem, instead, they celebrate it as 'diversity and multiculturalism'. Anyway, thankfully I left Ireland a few months back and settled in the NL for now.
I dont get it, just 15 years ago if you entered Schengen without a visa or stayed on a non-valid visa, then you were refused to enter the Schengen area for 10 years plus you had to pay a fine. ! What happend to that?
5:05 She is from Sweden, yet they can't even sort themselves out on migration so she is in no position to make recommendations. Only one EU person is qualified to help out - Viktor Orban.
Still not a good enough reform, still very soft and very little to battle entry of the illegal immigration made majority by man. We need to have a stronger deportation process, a more efficient screening process, and a reliable justicial branch dedicated to dealing with this issue.
We in the nominal West need to look ahead toward the increasing pressure to leave less well developed countries. Over the long term immigration pressure will only increase if we do nothing to improve the conditions at home for those who might otherwise migrate. Too often we have been the willing accomplice of autocratic kleptocrats who only made the problem worse. I offer no easy answers but it is obvious that our current course in the EU&US leads toward internal instability.
@@pythondre Yes, we have tried throwing money at them. That often worsened their long term outlook. Not always, but often. The end of formal colonialism followed more recently by the ending of French (Africa) and US (central/south America) policing has left much of the world lawless and in disarray. We certainly made sure that the oligarchs and warlords left in power were well funded and well armed. History tells us that we broke it, and history tells us that closed borders in an free society with global trade doesn't work. As I said, no easy answers.
Providing urban development aid to poorer nations has no effect on emigration. On the other hand, rural development aid has a negative correlation with emigration (source: does rural development aid reduce international migration?, J. Gamso, 2018). Yet, (I am thinking to myself) there must be a point (HDI) after which emigration starts to stabilize and then decrease. If anyone finds any credible paper on that, please notify!
God. The EU is mad. Build fences not share out the incompetence. Albania? Thats where they will just move in to europe proper. They dont want to live in italy anyway.
yeah! why did eu even destroyed a country that welcomed all suffering people from africa (libya)? it was not perfect just like dubai today, there are human rights issues but people were really building their lives there. now that its gone, well you know the story. the leaders back then didnt think about the consequence (or they didnt care because the oil money is so good for politicians), now its consequence is being paid.
Set up more consulates/immigration services centres in North Africa and elsewhere to handle asylum applications, then increase policing of the Mediterranean closer to the southern coast in order to prevent illegal migration in the first place. Policy after policy in The EU just keep making illegal migration more and more tempting so the issue gets worse with more ppl risking their lives. Most "Western" countries need immigrants and they should be welcomed and supported, but it's become silly and overly challenging to immigrate legally, while simultaneously making it easier and more tempting to do so illegally. Government policies and management of immigration has just gotten more nonsensical each decade.
There are two ways in EU - a lot of paper work and search of work before or just jump over the fence/sail on the boat. And you asking why illegal immigration?
How about Diversity Visa during the pandemic, conflict and Trump immigration Ban! All IV+DV lottery win case Decision still At NVC For Past 3 fiscal year No Interview NO visa. on west and Horn of Africa Like Ethiopia, Ghana, Sudan. Visa priority Date passed! solution. Congress OR Federal Supreme Court must use your neck! to see back problem and solve LEGAL Immigrant obstacles. show us freedom and True Democracy! God Bless U.S.A.
External forces (nature, other countries, even immigration) won't ruin a country / a civilization Internal forces does... (Corruption, decreasing productivity etc...) So the root of the problem isn't immigration Decreasing productivity / economic size --> Less tax for the "corrupt" govt --> Govt wants more tax --> import immigrants
This video is bad news for the UK, the asylum seekers are not going to claim asylum in the EU and chance being sent to a country they don't want to be in, so they will ALL head for the UK!! We need to leave the ECHR IMMEDIATELY!!
I would spend all the wasted (on immigrants) money to my country folks to help with significant birth rate and proper, patriotic education and jobs. Anybody agree ?
This "solidarity" thing reminds me of the husband that "helps" his wife with house chores. We don't need solidarity mechanisms, we need to complete the Schengen treaty, which tells us that European countries borders are shared, but only the internal ones, those that permit cheap labor to flee from poorer countries, while the external ones are external countries business. Border control and immigration must become a UE competency
Shows centralised EU policies simply don’t work. The political bubble is completely out of touch with the citizens of the countries that make up the EU.
@@celtspeaksgoth7251 Nah. Italy will definitely build these tougher camps and send back more people directly. Most other countries will gladly pay to keep out more immigrants.
Wouldn’t change much. Your development is ahead by 30 years from Europe with the huge amount of immigrants you have already taken in. You do not have to close your border anymore, your problems are already festering inside your „diverse“ population.
wait, doesn't the western euro countries say that immigration is good for their own countries? Making more GDP more diversity and so on......why would they want to be sharing these new people?
I am just going to point out that this law is based on regulations in the treaties of EU founding that deal with law making at the time of crisis. It is not really a crisis if it is supposed to go forward forever, is it? Which makes this a scam.
Lấy đâu ra chỗ Ở để chứa chấp người dy dân. Mà EU giám đưa ra quyết định nhận người dy dân mỗi năm tiếp tục là từ 200.000 người-500.000 người dy dân. Một điều mà không cho phép quyền lực từ lãnh đạo EU. Bởi đất nước là của Toàn dân. Vì vậy mà sự bán rẻ chủ quyền lãnh thô là không được phép
Any EU country govermant can't just say no to this policy, they have to accept certain amount of immigrants or they will be fined 20 000 euro for 1 person. It doesn't matter what was the policy of these countries before, how much they were protecting their citizens for illegal immigration - they have to surrender to that policy paying for the supidity of the other countries rules. Poland by example, we accepted about a 1 million legal immigrants from Ukraine because of war. It was simple thing, natural because they were in great need so polish peoples open their houses and hearts for them because I'm sure they would do the same for us. Very rare they were in some camps, mostly peoples private homes, some appartments. BUT! It doesnt't matter now. They are counting the illegal imigrants only! Look... In example.. An immigrant comes to Italy -> Italy is sending him by bus to some other country and recived 20 000 euro for it. What does it look like? Getting money for a person. Human trafficking. Slave andlars were doing the similar deals. It was just illegal then. And now?? It's just sick!
Plain and simple - if EU ministers and representatives have democratically agreed on it .. then it is an agreeable decision. Time will tell if it helps those in need as well as the countries most affected by it. Some countries will always be xenophobic and only wish to economically profit from a union, while others are willing to carry more weight. People must understand that there is not only taking from the EU, but also giving.
