@@ElKITENAUTThat's like saying Brandenburg doesn't add anything in early colonial lmao stfu, both countries are good on Colonial and Non-Colonial respectively
@@gamgamesplayer4506 I didn't play this game for some time but 1 regiment army means instant death while fighting 3k+ natives. That's how I remember. You should send atleast 3 or 4 regiments. If it's Africa, send 4 to 6 regiments depending on tech and ferocity. I'm probably remembering it wrong or they already tweaked it. Another thing is you have to pay for the army. I don't like paying for the army during the peace time. It's annoying. If only I could select which armies get financial support. That way I can always support my overseas armies and conquistadors that are exploring the new world.
@@kesorangutan6170 Fake. Natives always are on tech 1 so there's no need for more regiments unless ur too early in the game and doesn't still have tech 4
Год назад
Me, colonizing with native assimilation, while playing with Spain: SEXOOOOO!!
Counter-counterargument: Your colonies become many times less economically valuable because you lose out on native assimilation by killing everyone. Native trading policy is objectively the best colonial policy. Paired together with the policy you get from completing Exploration/Expansion ideas you don't even have to worry about uprisings anyway.
Spanish Queen: You were only supposed to trade in the New World, not conquer them. Columbus: They have gold. Spanish Queen: Have some more military power.
Yeah… I had this exact conversation with one of my friends a while back, since we were playing stellaris and talking about EU4 (I have EU4, he doesn’t), and he said stellaris clearly wins on the war crime scale since it lets you industrially genocide entire species and explode their planets, while I contested it saying EU4 has a designated attack natives button, and also let’s you eradicate cultures, albeit a bit less easily. I do think Stellaris wins just due to the scale of the atrocities, but EU4 is a good contender
@@chaos4395 American princess lose religion and culture regardless of native size but African and Asian provinces keep their religion and culture which causes problems later down the line
I just ignore the natives. Before getting Conquest of Paradise though (and thus being able to set the colonization policies) I would genocide entire continents for annoying me.
I really don't think its worth it anyways. Taking the Assimilation native policy + the Clergy privilege that gives uprising chance & assimilation seems clearly better. Yes, you lose the +20 settlers, but I don't know if the difference matters when you also lose the assimilation events that seem pretty common. Not to mention if you arent garrisoning armies there to fight uprisings, you're just wasting monarch points anyways.
It just gives a slight bonus to production (only like .01 per 100 natives) so it's not worth it compared to just not having to ever worry about a colony getting damaged.
@midnight6150 so it's worthless then. 0.6 production doesn't justify the hassle of spending time and diplo points on culture conversion, especially since most are around 1 to 2 thousands natives meaning only .2
@@Midnight_Metrowrong, they give a bonus to base goods produced, which gets modifiers from stuff like trade companies. If your end goal is production and trade natives are worth keeping, especially on provinces with high value trade goods
I am 100% convinced France is the best colonial country just bc they have -50% native uprising chance so if you're running exploration expansion you can take the +20 settlers colonial policy and still be at -100% uprising chance without the estate privilege for that.
native assimilatio matches Portugal a lot, even historically speaking, at least in Brazil they allied themselves with many natives (those left over after the diseases) to exterminate other natives, compared to the Spaniards and especially the English, the Portuguese have always been more "peace and love" but this must be more because the natives of Brazil are less violent and more willing to exchange mirrors for gold (which for them was just a pretty stone) unlike the Spaniards who came across one of the most insane people on the planet, the English are the English, right...
I once did it to the entirety of Canada and the US. My friend who doesn’t play eu4 was genuinely worried at how tyrannical I am in game. I wanted that cultural and religious unity though
he is not an eu4 player if he spend only 982, it only makes 20 provinces with over 5k natives, real eu4 colonizer spends at least 5k military pover for filling 500k natives just for do not need to convert provinces after colonizing
I can't be bothered to send stacks all over the world to keep the colonies safe until I finished exploration and expansion ideas. Better just go with trading and pray that RNG helps me with assimilation
