that Will Hayes one still blows my mind that is was even reported let alone not challenged for 2 weeks. The tribunal system was meant to bring consistency into the game and they have turned it into a gambling system
The work put into to getting all this clips is incredible, im giessing found and recorded them all yourself. It is really impressive work, keep up the 🔥🔥🔥 videos.
Although there are plenty of incidents where blokes are rightfully suspended. 2022 has to go down as the most confusing season when it comes to reports and tribunal decisions. Great upload though!
All about head contact concussions and knocking someone out but with Carlton nah he’s fine he only ticked all boxes of current suspension rules but since it’s Cripps who cares
Most of these r good I like how they r protecting the head especially with the dangerous tackles. Perhaps paddy ryders was a bit too far and I think robbo also should’ve gotten off but other than that I reckon the tribunal did alright
Yea most seem to make sense. The only thing that really annoys me is that they pay the outcome not the incident. If Paddy Ryder's hit didn't leave the Hawks player concussed that's barely even a free kick
Unfortunate for Kennedy, that ended up being his last game, not a good way to go out being suspended, especially for one of the greatest swans players ever.
How soft has the game become? Dangerous tackle? WTF dont run blindly into danger more like it. 4 weeks for 9:20? he got up. Hell if i was the bloke coming the other way and knew it was 4 weeks id have put on a slab AND signed his death certificate
I can see why that second one got an initial call and the tribunal. That's a dangerous knee, but correctly reversed because it was a well-contested play.
Honestly don't see much difference in the Paddy Ryder bump, and the Lewis Young bump, yet one cops 2 weeks and one gets the 1 week suspension turned over. MRO/Tribunal needs to find consistency if we're ever to move forward as a competition.
A lot of those instances are backwards... Cripps goes careening into a player while in second place for the ball and flatten them? Great work have a medal. You turn your body and brace for an incoming player? Tell your story walking Can't understand how Robinson was considered a ban while Cripps and Rioli were given the tick of approval
Pretty sure crips got let off because of some paperwork being done wrong? I may be wrong on that but he 100% should have been done for it, I'm a brisbane fan so could be me just being biased. Knocking a player out for I think it was three games without really contesting the ball should be a suspension🤷
@@Tosicc567 Cripps went to tribunal and played the "contesting the ball" card. He had no intention of getting the ball even if he was looking at it. I think he had a Brownlow to win
@@el-violador If he wasn't in the running for the brownlow theres no way they would've let him off, Robinsons was barely even high and he got a week. Cam Rayner got a week for a tackle that was barely dangerous too imo.Cripps jumped straight into the players head it wasn't even a marking contest, normally you'd wait until they grab the ball to tackle them and cause a stoppage I thought
@@PunishedJorts while I'm mostly calling out a hypocritical call and jesting. I'm also certainly not calling for the medal to be rescinded... I'll bite. They changed the past for Jobe Watson so theoretically it's possible
Lol Paddy Ryder getting 2 weeks for that was unreal, considering what was to come. Look at Rowbottom on Merrett, significantly more force, pushes forward, more deliberate, and gets 1 week.... and Crippa, well. Haha.
Yea I know. It doesn't really make sense does it. Paddy's bump had no malice in it but you can throw your whole body at someone and get 1 week less or even get let off... so strange
@@holdingthebull I am a Saints supporter, but even removing the bias there, it was an unusual outcome for sure. I think if that happened and Paddy got 2 weeks, and then similar incidents throughout the rest of the year also got 2 weeks then I would be less bemused by it, but there is/was such an enormous lack of consistency in penalties throughout the year - the one thing it was designed and introduced to bring.
I'll do anything for these fuckers to get out there except be nice, haven't got the time for more bull shit, from the AFWWF Australian football wrestling Federation. C'oc🏉nnor SGL lions S.A 🎽🦁🎽
That was the VFL, the 2nd division of footy below the AFL, usually contains young players and those who don’t make the AFL team for that week. Team is the Casey Demons which is Melbournes VFL affiliate and if I remember correctly he was coming back from injury and so they played him in the slightly less physical VFL to help get him back into proper shape. Then as shown proceeds to elbow a guy and gets suspended for a week.
AFL is getting soft. It seems more like soccer nowdays, with the players getting bumped, going down then as soon as the foul is called they are up and all fine. It's ruining the game.
Cripps is absolutely not the worst. Like I'm a Carlton fan so obvious bias there but Stewart is not contesting the ball and Cripps is. Sure, you can think he should be suspended, but come on. You're just being disingenuous if you think the totally malicious act by Stewart is not obviously worse than Cripps' bump.
Cripps being banned, having it upheld, then appealed and overturned. Then weeks later a Brownlow betting scandal in the same count where this player won the medal. Something is seriously up there.
I actually agree with most of these decisions, particularly the tackles a lot of consistency overall imo. How the hell did Cripps get off tho arguably one of the worst hits of the year
@@holdingthebull Because the precedent was set with Riolis bump on Rowell. Eyes on the ball, Rioli got cleared so only fair Cripps got cleared if Rioli did. Simple as that. People calling it one of the worst things ever are being extremely hyperbolic, it was pretty 50/50.
