Every LIFE Theory Explained In 12 Minutes 

Experience Meaningless: Experience and prejudice. To accept sight and illusion in the same relativity and not be a slave. Slavery: To be free from the growth of intellect. Experience free from understanding and memory as triviality. Memory: reduced down to recollection without review, in a universe of consistent physics; a triviality of organic invincibility. Experience rendered down to self-sensual recall without existential considerations; meaningless. Prejudice: to accept the delusion that no human can consider and choose. For experience to outweigh sense and sensible prudence and suggest in definite physicality that humanity is as inorganic as the constructs we purpose. Triviality to the concept of Slave, is Mass to Gravity, either one hypothetical without the physics of Trivialization or Mass. One requiring the circumstance of genesis, the other requiring absence of necessity; Nativitus Ancillae. Relativity: the universe revolves around you, but only if you watch with others; relativity born of tripartite geometry; self (observing), other (conferring), objective (occurring): co-intimate experience and co-context. Relativity: all things can happen to you, most didn't, you only know what you think, you only think what you can hypothesize, all understanding revolves around perception and interaction. Understanding and position; relative. Hypothesis: a proposition of a form unsensed in the physical, in the definition "scientific" it is the Fructus Ventris Physica Quantitatis; the guessable, potent in measurability, invisibilia ad carnalis, observationis codificationem. Hypothesis: a concept just beyond sensible observation but within sensory or facultative relativity to intimate comprehension; the space an observer feels safe to coniectura didicit doctrina. A cerebrum exercitium. Meaningless: the words of any personal exposition without the person. Interpretation of intended and intimate communication removed from its physical occurrence. To hypothesize in the spirit of Freud, all are I. Meaningless: a description of a building behind it's façade to a man on the street. Definition without sensible example; invisibility bestowed by the suggestibility of the potent potentiality of descriptionem alienum. Reference without experience, definition without context, experience without definition, definition without reference; to theorize on fancy, the possibilities of cause bereft of "scientific" prejudice towards provable. A description of the unseen to the comfortable in sense, and sensibility; hypothesis delivered socially by the perfecte mediocris to their perfecte mediocris aetatis. Interest and applause humilis, the sermo aequalis. Contemporary communication, external warehouse for internal deliberation. Deliberatio externa by contrast is built on extra-contemporary, the functional in sense and nerve unwilling to mal-hypothesize popularis prudentia. By definition a contemporary is both naturally occurring and actively intersecting, or it is a generational (illusory), built of temporal coincidence. Meaningless in contemporations intimate, capable of saying they share an age. Exogeny In an era of fear, humanity is tested. The exodus of existential loneliness is a heavy burden. Self-indulgent contemporary values, the pitiful death of the faithful gregarious martyr. Silenced in the passion of virtue, in the fury of desire as necessity, the ideal dies for the joy of man as the ideal devotee of nothing. Endogenous evidence of exogenous truth, derived from noble prejudiced purposes, refutes the pathologies of nature as the folly of prosaic and sensible sustainability. Euphoria at any cost, at any cost. The Addict Kind Lonliness is a myth spread by the ill, unwelled by popular delusion (self accepted). The sickly, pulsing out their (self) comforting radiance, the marking of a predators territory. A light to shine on all slow enough to not revile it for it's false and reason less eviction of self from capability. The prey; uninitiated youth, vulnerable innocence. Argue not with the aged (or experienced) self-convinced. The miracle of emotional conformation of physical fact convincing to the unknowing, under steady application, overly sweetened (for the self) ideals of pleasure and comfort, the prey forget they knew a peace that didn't requiring feeding or explanation. The virtue of falsely buoyed stability grinding the ignorant, young, and uncatered, all taken in by the sin of kindness as apex. To gift the sickness that tells a human "human emotion in the negative is unnecessary and beyond comprehension or tolerance". To know that there are those in the world of humanity, who in their generationally refined adherence to parasite coddling, will continue to teach the youth "drugs are a healthy and functional right of aware and intelligent people" is a mark of shame in this age of our collective development. The truth of human being betrayed by the proposed necessity of stimulation beyond the natural state, it's supposed normality vouchsafed; sobriety (health) ignored as a greater insanity than parasitism. Salve the wounded pride of the vulgar addict, crucify the outspoken advocate of reassessment. This is not a statement of conflict, rather a portrait of the true and natural order in it's biased equality (comfort belonging to those who crave it most).

No, in creationism the universe is the universe. We exist in the now

No, because we, the creationists, believe it IS real. That what we see, feel, etc is all reality.

Heresy

​@@ultrazombieYTTechnically a simulation would also be real. Simply the only difference is it's brought about by a translation of ones and zeros. The big difference is in simulation theory the people that created our simulation could also be in a simulation while we acknowledge that there is no one that is above God. And He wasn't confined to a desktop when creating.

@@chubbyclub2502 what makes you think they would use any form of coding we know. For all we know every law in the universe would be no more than a gamerule

You are absolutely right

And it’s logical

@@nyar9649 It is absolutely not. Just the laziest "reasoning" possible

Unfortunately not. Intelligent design is a ploy created creationists to try and get religion into science classes. It's only trying to save face for religious extremists and is done deliberately to keep people both ignorant and deliberately misinformed. Kitzmiller v Dover pretty much hashed this out, Intelligent design is literally just a rebranding of Creationism with scientific jargon to sneak it into science classes.

@@colesmith7509womp womp

That's intelligent design

@@Daily-PE Over simplification. No big deal.

But hey that's just a theory, A BALLS THEORY

matpats balls

Myballs

Balls

Do not

So funny i may guess

I don’t get it.

??

what?

Parasyte reference

Bro quit yapping

@@johnesquivel6153 but he is right. If i gott a dollar everytime someone is poorly explaining Evolution TO ME, i wouldnt be working today. And, to be frank, its infuriating. This isnt string theory.

R/iamthemaincaracter

Why are you guys shitting on him? He's right.

⁠@@Asmodis4why emphasise ‘TO ME’ like we know tf you are?

Exactly what I was thinking

@@rocketcredit7017 lol

Intelligent Design is basically Creationism but rebranded.

I understand it that Intelligent Design is supposed to be observation based whereas creationism is more faith and anecdotal based. Intelligent Design largely fails to gain real traction because of the way that the education system manages what can be considered "facts," and because intelligent design needs to be evidence based to be argued, if that evidence is insufficient most people just reject it. There is still overlap as a lot of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim scientists believe that observation of natural phenomena points to the existence of an intelligent creator, that is, God.

The videos wouldn't get views if they were called "A few Common (something people are interested in) so they just use clickbait

Dumbestcomment I’ve ever seen ☠️

Ayo?

that's what they call mine

😂😂

The conditions werent favorable for that. Water was boiling

that doesn’t hold up either. where would the microbes have come from? whether they were from earth already or not.

Panspermia is just kicking the can down the road. The truth is that we simply don't have enough evidence to know how life came about, much like how we don't know how the universe came about

that does not hold up, if it did astronomers would've already found out about life outside of the solar system, we wouldn't need to imagine life under the crust of europa

They might have been just randomly organized into a form that was life.

Ik lol

Migi! 4:46

lol

I see he’s a man of culture too lol

This is why no origin of life can be proven. Nobody was there to witness it, therefore it cannot be observed and cannot be proven. This is why I think we should all just stop arguing what the origin of life was. I am a Christian. I believe in Creation, but I do not claim that it is scientifically provable, or falsifiable, however I also testify that evolution neither is, or the big bang. The reason I believe in God, is not because it is proven, but rather I look at such an advanced ecosystem of the universe, the perfect rostion of the planets, the distance and size of the sun and moon to form a perfect eclipse, that I can come to no other conclusion that it was a God who made it. And the God I gave chosen is the God of the Bible, not because I am indoctrinated, quite on the contrary, I tend to whatever conclusion I see fit, but rather because the Bible holds a different path to salvation, than any other religion, one which is saved by the grace of God, and the willingful taking of punishment for our crimes, rather than nearly every other religion, which always claims that you must work and do things to be saved from punishment, when in reality nothing we do is enough, not that each action does not come with its own merit. Plus the Bible does not have any contradictions (I speak of the true 66 books which I follow). Any claimed contradiction or inaccuracy is either field by bias or misunderstanding. I search for contradictions each day and find none, if I find a single one I will openly recant the scriptures, and Christianity, as they have been proven to be lies. Surely there us a lot that we cannot understand about it, but misunderstanding and uncertainty does not equal contradiction.

10% of americans believe in a flat earth so...

Because we choose to, and because we find it the most credible, for some. I follow logic, wherever it takes me. I deny the indoctrination of the mega churches zmd cults, and yet I believe, and know there is a God. The origin of the universe must operate outside of the universe.

it depends on who you ask, also russia is more european in culture

@@anotheryoutuber2819 nobody would say the continent of Europe is Russia. That’s like saying the continent of Africa is Ethiopia or the continent of Asia is China, it doesn’t make sense

​@@PlagueDoc47i didn't get to the point in the video with the map i thought you were saying that russia isn't in the continent of europe

yippeee

That's not true

Because he didnt have the knowledge of genes mendel later found genes

You are probably referring to the testimony of Lady Hope who claimed to have encountered Darwin on this deathbed and said that he retracted his views. Though many reject that this happened, it really isn't something we can know one way or the other. He was unable to explain anything relating to what we know as genetics other than that parents traits appeared in offspring.

Its not the origin of life, no. But it /is/ the proposed and most well accepted origin of /species/ so its close enough. At some point evolution explains how complex multi-cellular organism now roam a planet that was once inhabited by exclusively arcaeobacteria.

​@@asteri8299Human nature doesn't change. Human nature didn't evolve from something else and it wont evolve into something else Dudes in ancient Egypt had the same human nature we have now and dudes thousands of years from now will have the same human nature as the ancient Egyptians. Dude in mantion has the same human nature as the dude in the wild. Our body adapts to the environment and our knowledge is carved by our environment but our human nature doesn't change, it remains the same.

⁠@@us3rGour nature does change we are way more social now

@@thunderred5263 what makes us humans has naver changed

No origin of life can be proven. Nobody was there to witness it, therefore it cannot be observed and cannot be proven. This is why I think we should all just stop arguing what the origin of life was. I am a Christian. I believe in Creation, but I do not claim that it is scientifically provable, or falsifiable, however I also testify that evolution neither is, or the big bang. The reason I believe in God, is not because it is proven, but rather I look at such an advanced ecosystem of the universe, the perfect rostion of the planets, the distance and size of the sun and moon to form a perfect eclipse, that I can come to no other conclusion that it was a God who made it. And the God I gave chosen is the God of the Bible, not because I am indoctrinated, quite on the contrary, I tend to whatever conclusion I see fit, but rather because the Bible holds a different path to salvation, than any other religion, one which is saved by the grace of God, and the willingful taking of punishment for our crimes, rather than nearly every other religion, which always claims that you must work and do things to be saved from punishment, when in reality nothing we do is enough, not that each action does not come with its own merit. Plus the Bible does not have any contradictions (I speak of the true 66 books which I follow). Any claimed contradiction or inaccuracy is either field by bias or misunderstanding. I search for contradictions each day and find none, if I find a single one I will openly recant the scriptures, and Christianity, as they have been proven to be lies. Surely there us a lot that we cannot understand about it, but misunderstanding and uncertainty does not equal contradiction.

@@ultrazombieYTthats dumb “don’t question the biggest mystery in existence broo” Also i also believe christianity is the truth. because after years of researching conspiracies ancient religions the occult etc etc, it all leads back to three things. Israelites the existence of supernatural evil forces and jesus. honestly the existence and history of jews alone is a huge piece of evidence for the bible imo. its too much to explain. but written jewish history literally begins with the abrahamic god. so much world history makes no sense without god. and to assume that all these people were just crazy is pretty unrealistic and unlikely. also the oldest religion Zoroastrianism developed around the same time as judaism and predicts a messiah born from a virgin mother. the similarities in the stories are so statistically unlikely that there must actually be something to them. and apparently three zoroastrianist priests visted jesus as a baby and gave him gifts as he fulfilled their religious prophecy. it’s commonly mistaken as being before abrahamic religion when it actually developed alongside it. except these people weren’t passing ideas, they had no knowledge of eachother until hundreds of years later

I am also a brother in Christ and I just think intelligent design is a good answer. On the topic of abiogensis I heard how it was wrong. Some examples are putting tons of perfect factory enhanced elements that are needed for life and how if they get only one chemical for life they act that all the junk around it is not there that would just make the chemical useless.

yes, it does. It proves the existence of a god. For Biogenesis to be a law, it must apply in all fields to which it refers, including the origin of life, and the only way for that to happen is if there was a living being that has always been.

Probably form an dude yappin about bird beaks.

No he dont

@@CattDozer_01 what

Why ?

Haha hahaha U DID IT!

Scientology was already dressed up in a lab coat😂

that’s ur opinion

All creationists believe in intelligent design, but not all intelligent design believing people believe in a God. They might believe a very powerful alien race made us, rather than a God

A lot of these aren't exclusive and could work together at the same time.

No, I believe in Intelligent Design, but God made us in His image through evolution.

​@@Orthosaur7532agreed, I think it's the best conclusion with the evidence we have now.

maybe dont say it out loud where christians, jews, muslims, and basically anyone with a religion could attack you?

Specifically young earth creationism

Keep that to urself like..

@@BlackAtlantic955 why? Wish creationists keep their delusion to themselves

@@Stellarainn coz theres not only u here

Nah

@@Castraccoon2097 Yah

​@@Orthosaur7532Nah

@@rocketcredit7017 Yah

what are you yapping about just say it dont copy and opaste some books quotes

@@augustbecket4554 i prefer presenting Allah words rather than mine but if u want me to say it i will .. Allah (God) is the creator of this universe and all this theories are humans trying to deny the truth and logic by illogical ideas

@@malak7916he talked about creationism in this video

@@HateMoonCookie i know but people in comments are supporting the other theories

@@malak7916 alright I’m not Muslim but that’s fair

Didnt get your point