Everyone Laughed at his Tecnique but then... 

He didn’t change his technique lol

He actually has a likeable personality unlike Alcaraz Great sense of humor, English isn't bad at all, witty, positive energy, etc.

@@TheseHoesAreLoyal Bro wtf r u talking about? Alcaraz literally the most likeable person on tour

@@ifyourecognizethepfpthensubpls imagine disrespecting someone else's preference or opinion just because he's different from yours, parents raised him well for sure

Everyone actually was rooting for a siiner novak final, Let's be honest sinner will dethrone novak not carlos

Ummmmmmm…well I would say a REAL upset if he can actually beat a comprehensive player

I usually prefer watching more powerful players or guys who have ways to finish points, but Medvedev for some reason is just entertaining to me. I think it’s the unorthodox ground strokes where every shot you wonder how he gets the ball back, yet he is more consistent than basically anyone on tour. Also his super flat hitting makes his shots look like lasers, especially when he’s 30 feet behind the baseline. It’s so unorthodox but fascinating when he’s on top of his game.

Nadal has been receiving deep for decades. And wawrinka. And gasquet. He didnt innovate nothing but god awful technique. He is super good at winning, but at 'tennis' he makes it look bad. Dont say its cause of his height cause Marat Safin, Delpotro, Raonic all had awesome style to watch esp raonic when hes on point.

@@drbookie2169 ah, one of these little rats of sunshine you find chronically on-line. Meds returned deeper than any other guy on tour, and stayed back longer too, changing the geometry of the court. Not many players change the game, Meds did. Have a nice day mate

@@carlkligerman1981 Argumentum ad hominem to help make your case. A case that is also a non sequitur. Once you descend to ad hominem you have lost. I never said hes not good, never claimed he hasnt created new geomoetry, Im saying his game is ugg boots...UG-LY Even the TV commentators say shit like wtf is wrong with his movement, its unorthodox, is NOT PROPER, its not the best to watch lol cause its true. Watch sampras then watch medvedev. Watch Nalbandian then watch meddy, watch wawrinka then watch meddy, dude is terrible to watch. THats it. Even the commentators say it so it is not objectionable.

"never claimed he hasnt created New geometry" you Just above Said "he didnt innovate anything" .. and you still want to insult others, I.diot

@@drbookie2169 I don't understand what your negative comments are achieving? Everything stated above is correct and its great to see. I love watching him and the idea of genuinely different styles meeting is much better than watching two people play what you call PROPER tennis. you sound like someone who appreciates your specific era of sport, not sports themselves and that's a shame.

Я тоже был там и подумал что за нелепость а не игрок. Он ещё странно блеял при каждом ударе как овца. Я даже не досмотрел его игру и ушел разочарованный. Сейчас я смотрю теннис и езжу по разным турнирам только из-за него.

@@5069380 Hahahah!!! Bleated like a sheep. Too funny man.

Me and my mom still can’t get over 2022 AO and I still can’t get over this years😢😢😓😭😭

He started to cramp, and it wasn’t that the crowd were hostile, but that Nadal’s comeback was one of the most stunning, ever, so Rafa enjoyed very vocal support. Still, he has suffered some very tough losses and keeps fighting. Personally I love the guy and think he is great for the sport.

You have poor taste then

Man, there is not mentality. Forget vs nadal on WTF, on us open an ao final, this final vs sinner?

Oppositely, med can’t stya calm when he losing. Braking rackets, screaming, attacks on judges.

i feel like for low balls being tall makes it worse especially when you have flat shots

Cmon man Meds has made himself a star despite his physique, not because of it! Nothing about him is typical, that’s why people love the guy.

Excuses

What about mannarino

height has advantages and disadvantages - he has it easier with serving or with hitting flat, but he has it harder with footwork and low balls

It's very difficult for me to figure out how can Medvedev replace somebody like Federer, who moreover would've been very likely Medvedev's absolute kryptonite, if he was still playing.

@@pierdomenicosommati443 I never meant anyone replacing anyone. I meant this new generation has interesting characters that make me miss less the previous generation

Same! Him and Iga!

Shapovalov has exceptional talent, exceptional skills in timing and in creating lightning fast racquet swings, but he developed bad habits in his footwork, which take consistency completely away from his shot making... that's not a problem of early peaking, it's a quite obvious consistency problem which got quickly discovered and then exploited from opponents. Far too much jumping, far too scarce contact with the ground. Just see any video from Shapovalov (except some more recent matches in which he tried hard to avoid that continuous jumping, sometimes with excellent results), and then compare his movement to young Federer's one, which is quite the opposite... both two very good movers, but one of them has a footwork style which is very bad for consistency. It's apparent that he knows this problem very well nowadays, because he has repeatedly tried to radically change that very risky "jumping" habit (in last 2/3 years, his best results consistently came with evident tweakings of his footwork)... but that's not simple at all, and when things get more difficult, he starts losing contact with the ground again, exponentially rising his error rate. I really hope he can soon fix that problem for good.

👍

Kyrgios won Grand Slam at doubles...

​@@fisherflushwhich one

@@blainekennedy Australian open in 2022

Speak for yourself

Do you also laugh at his results?

@@bramb4949 After losing the AO final for a second time while he won the first 2 sets? Oh yes i do , along with many people..

Ah if you get to the top 100 at juniors you are doing alright man. I mean hundreds of thousands of kids play tennis all over the world, so to reach that level is on its own a level of success most will never know. But you are right, top Juniors don’t always have great careers as Adult pros, but it does still remain a pretty reliable predictor of success.

It's not true. Djokovic had excellent results at U14 and U16 levels. He only had AO semis in 3 slams, but this is not Medvedev's 3rd rounds. Nadal also had excellent results at U14 level. He turned professional after that, but at the age of 16 he played 2 junior tournaments, reached Wimbledon semis and won Davis Cup. It seems to me that Medvedev's weak results in the juniors are unique for a player who has achieved so much on the senior tour. That's how important the mind and mentality are.

@@osmotreno improvement also. There are players who are really good and promising at the age of 19, 20, 21 but then they reach their limit and stagnate. Medvedev wasn't great when he started out, he was just ok, but he improved so much that he became a top 5 player who played in 6 Grand Slam finals and won 1, and he beat Đoković in that one Grand Slam final.

At 17 djoko was winning chalengers and playing grand slam main draw... his itf junior ranking was low because he didn´t even play these junior events

​@@TennisticProductions He played the junior majors at the age of 17, his best result being a semifinal. What I am tryin t say is, how did Medvedev not have "that great of a junior career?"

nobody should be friends with the ruzzians

Forget about rune man, he is over hype and doesn't have champion / grand slam winner mindset. Been always saying that since last year. The other players you mention will win more grand slams, except Zverev I am not sure (he might but it is less likely that Zverev wins