Everything you NEED to know about Noise Cameras!

Подписаться 129 тыс.

Просмотров 40 тыс.

50% 1

To save 10% when getting your used car history check -www.carvertica...
In today’s video, I interview the Director at Intelligent Instruments regarding the new Noise Cameras being installed all over the UK. Together we answered the most popular questions sent in on Instagram in aid of settling public concerns regarding everything Noise Camera's. Everything you NEED to know about NOISE CAMERAS!
Could this be the end of Loud Exhausts on our cars and motorbikes?
I had the exact same question, so if this is a worry of yours too then check out the whole video.
SoundVue uses clever algorithms and AI to automatically detect excess noise from road vehicles
SoundVue captures precision noise level, clear audio and visual data and saves to a secure web server in the cloud
The data is sent to review and take action against offending drivers.
Chronic noise pollution affects people’s physical and mental health, with links to stress, disturbed sleep patterns, high blood pressure and even heart disease.
SoundVue, from Intelligent Instruments, uses innovative environmental protection technology to reduce the impact of excess vehicle noise and allow enforcement authorities to take appropriate action.
London, Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea
SoundVue, from Intelligent Instruments, began life at the Royal Borough of Kensington in London where there were particular issues with individuals over-rewing and driving with excess noise around residential areas.
"The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea have been and continue to work with Intelligent Instruments since 2019. Their noise cameras have enabled us to better understand and enforce the borough's Public Space Protection order in relation to antisocial driving and the resultant excessive vehicle noise that disturbs a large number of its residents. The use of noise cameras has enabled us to have a 24/7 enforcement presence within the borough where previously this was not possible."
Current Subscriber Count at time of posting this video - 89,959
2022's goal is to surpass 100,000 RU-vid subscribers.
#NoiseCameras #LoudCars #NewSafetyTechnology

Опубликовано:

5 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 522

@GCMYT Год назад

To save 10% when getting your used car history check -www.carvertical.com/gb/landing/v3?a=GCM&b=38b26e3a&voucher=GCM

@ScottZ370 Год назад

I've no real issue with these being in targeted areas but they need to make it very clear and obvious where they are being enforced. Inevitably that's not how they're being used and they'll be used to maximise council income.

@richysrc2158 Год назад

So tell the world the current location of said device so you can be a good boy in the small area then be a complete T+×÷ after the device. Naa hopefully they won't tell anyone

@Kilrathal Год назад

@@richysrc2158 That is apparently exactly the purpose of the system or did you not watch the video?

@Dan_AYP Год назад

@@Kilrathal but, are they as stated by "Scott Z" making "it very clear and obvious where they are being enforced?" Or did you not read the question? I presume Scott expects signs like speed camera signs? Let us know

@Dan_AYP Год назад

Likewise and agree, they should be sign posted. Otherwise I'm sure people will find a button on the steering wheel to express their dissatisfaction after said fine

@richysrc2158 Год назад

@Kilrathal I did watch the video . I was replying to the muppit above

@Dan_AYP Год назад

I can see a car that's had its catalytic converter stolen driving next to a Ferrari and the assessor assuming the Ferrari is the noisy one. 😂

@anon7463 Год назад

It seems borderline illegal to give an unelected council worker the legal right to judge and fine cases without review. Is this basically admitting that MOT noise testing is not fit for purpose? There's enough people on a power trip in councils between clamping vans etc

@davidwbuck Год назад

Agree and this private firm making the devices seem to be the ones setting the criteria

@DutchMiester77 Год назад

Unless we are warned about them as motorist it's classed as entrapment and can be argued in court.

@archerboy2714 Год назад

@@squicker speed cameras as either sign posted or painted bright yellow and placed where the driver can them. Not like these, painted black and placed 5 metered or more up a lamp post...

@TruthTeller23914 Год назад

Well, the power trip is because the rullers are desperate for power

@mrbeeoutdoors3213 Год назад

Depends on how MOT noise testing works... if I pull away in first, change to second at 15mph, 3rd at 20-25, maybe 4th once I hit 30mph and roll around like that, I'd have no issues... If I plant my foot and hit high revs and 30 or beyond in first then I'm clearly driving like a bellend and that's simple to interpret... as he said at the end, drive as if your driving instructor is next to you and you'll be fine...

@brianbadonde9039 Год назад

Class 1 microphone. Will monitor all pedestrian conversation and can accurately identify the person talking through facial recognition. They’ve created a monster.

@Longyyy Год назад

Literally 1984

@Zofsm Год назад

Literally bollocks.

@babyj5184 Год назад

@@Longyyy welcome to the new dystopian future :)

@brianbadonde9039 Год назад

It’s amazing how you’ve got forensic level microphones (and cameras) positioned on street furniture. Which are sensitive enough to pick out a car from any traffic situation. Yet you are naive enough to think pedestrian conversation won’t be monitored. I take it people like you are on about their 10th jab thinking it’ll protect you from the bogeyman.

@Zofsm Год назад

@@brianbadonde9039 astonishing that you think anyone would be remotely interested in the day to day mumbling of the average citizen, or that a fixed microphone bolted 12 feet up a random lamppost in a noisy street would somehow be better at the job of eavesdropping the contents of your weekly shopping list (don’t forget teabags) than the microphones already in your phone, your car, your headphones, earbuds, your tv, your computer, your tablet, your smartphone, your google / Alexa assistants, your video doorbells etc etc.

@equiinoxxpvp2718 Год назад

Sports car drivers goes by sedately, 0.9L Corsa sh*tbox behind him with a Halford's exhaust revving his nuts off. Sports car gets a fine cause it's the flashier car.

@grandtheftgameryt Год назад

Exactly what I thought. These cameras really aren’t accurate they are again another way for councils to make the government more money

@christopherruddick88 Год назад

Must admit I hated that part of his statement by the type of vehicle...seems incredibly unfair.

@will-wrxs Год назад

a vauxhall corsa engine and a Ferrari do sound very similar don’t they

@cantbearsedmechanics Год назад

@@will-wrxs and most council's don't know there ass from there elbow

@LawrenceTimme Год назад

So rules only apply to poor people the rich can get away with it. Ok bro

@grandtheftgameryt Год назад

I think these cameras should only before this rule after a certain time eg 8PM. Then there is the reason that it prevent sleep loss

@SoGood_Racing Год назад

thats not a bad idea like a horn or somethin where past half 7 n 11

@grandtheftgameryt Год назад

@@SoGood_Racing and emergency vehicles are not allowed to Blair their sirens in housing estates after curtain times unless there is a extreme obstruction

@SoGood_Racing Год назад

@@grandtheftgameryt no not at all no sirons at all there too noisy just stop them completely lmao

@loosegoose8158 Год назад

Yessss I agree should be 10 or 11 cuz your not meant to make noise after 11pm in the uk anyway so they should only be able to take action at that time also seems like they are attacking us abit cuz none is sleeping at 2pm in the day come on

@grandtheftgameryt Год назад

@@loosegoose8158 it would only make sense but you know our government lol. They are penny pinchers that will take money off of anyone they can to pay off their huge debts which date back to WW2!

@boojims1711 Год назад

I understand and completely agree with how they are intended to be used but what’s to stop councils from giving out fines to anyone with a loud exhaust, even if they are driving/riding responsibly. As stated, they aren’t meant to end aftermarket exhaust systems but that doesn’t mean they won’t, can’t see them ever being used that responsibly by any council.

@ScottZ370 Год назад

Nothing and it's a concern to law abiding citizens like myself when you can't get an answer to what is too loud or not. It's like saying tax evasion is allowed until a certain amount but not telling you what the limit is and then letting it be down to a subjective opinion if you get in trouble or not. My car has passed MOT so surely it's fine? If it's not fine then I'd get it quietened.

@marvintpandroid2213 Год назад

A loud exhaust is illegal. End of. Change it to something type approved on the road or get your car crushed.

@x2dez Год назад

@@marvintpandroid2213 😂

@marvintpandroid2213 Год назад

@@x2dez thank you for your detailed and in-depth riposte

@x2dez Год назад

@@marvintpandroid2213 you’re welcome

@Mriya6 Год назад

Hats off to the manufacturer for answering some of the most loaded and biased questions you could have asked without being openly hostile, and for giving professional and sensible and unemotional responses to all of them.

@joshstagg4785 Год назад

There should be a set limit, not through “someone’s judgement” because one persons “too loud” isn’t the same as someone else’s. Think about it. I have nothing against them just a bit more thought is needed

@dillonsmythe5572 Год назад

i believe its 95 decibels, dont quote me on that though

@loosegoose8158 Год назад

@@dillonsmythe5572 isn't that at idle not driving

@Dan_AYP Год назад

I'd bet those that receive fines for simple acceleration while driving standard vehicles can contest the councils suggested fine with the fact that the vehicles met and/or exceeded exhaust dB limits for vehicle type approval for use on UK roads.

@mrtrendizzle Год назад

Having these in residential area's i have no issue with. But down a dual carriageway takes the piss. So someone sitting with a speaker playing loud rev sounds is down to the camera operator to judge if it's their vehicle or not. Pipes save lives is 100% true. I hear a bike coming before i see it. When filtering through traffic a loud pipe can prevent cars from moving over and cutting off a bike that's unseen. Does it store audio from people walking past or only triggers and saves audio/video when it detects over a set limit.

@IToohat Год назад

My stock Aprilia RSV Mille will throw out just over 100db at 4500rpm (half way through rev range) when in gear, not speeding, not hard acceleration, not being anti-social, just riding along lawfully. Good luck trying to enforce these fines with ANY stock vehicle, unless you can prove intentional anti-social behaviour, or unlawful behaviour.

@grandtheftgameryt Год назад

100%. Old cars never had much of a muffler system and were almost straight piped so again, Simone driving lawfully in a stock car may end up with a fine for doing nothing. Just another money making scheme for our governments huge debts which are growing

@richardhasler6718 11 месяцев назад

Have you asked your neighbours if they appreciate your bike?

@lolzlolz69 Год назад

Not sure how I feel about these cameras. On the one hand I know how irritating it is to be disturbed by over acceleration and pops and bangs etc, but without proper legislation to define what is too much and then leaving it up to someone in an office (or perhaps worse, an algorithm) I think that is a pretty slippery slope.

@IDONTDOMUCHATWORK Год назад

I think the answer is don't be a dick around residential areas. It's not complicated, question: is "this" person on the video (in an area that has residents (that may be sleeping) being a dick? answer: yes. Result: send fine.

@boojims1711 Год назад

@@IDONTDOMUCHATWORK I agree, that is exactly their intended use and what they’re designed for but my major issue, and one I’m sure many others share, is that the councils appear to have the only say in who gets fined, so yes, those that deserve to get fines will do, but so could anyone with a loud vehicle. The technology and intended use are incredible but the motorists trust in councils isn’t

@mcgherkinstudios Год назад

@@IDONTDOMUCHATWORK Well that relies on two things. 1. ALL of the people who will ever operate these cameras having the same appreciation for responsible petrolheads, and not someone who thinks that anything modified is a boy racer and hates anything that isn’t a tesla or a bicycle. 2. It relies on every council that ever operates this device to site them responsibly i.e. in residential areas where the noise is actually an issue, instead of where they can get the most hits, i.e. next to changes in speed limit or on fast roads (similar to the open secret that safety camera partnerships will site GATSOs not at the points of a road where accidents happen, but at the points at which they can catch the most people) Giving people who are not police officers the ability to enforce road law is frankly wrong, and giving them the ability to make entirely subjective decisions which, if skewed will generate more money to meet targets, simply isn’t acceptable.

@warlockuk6939 Год назад

Councils in the UK are renowned for following the money, these cameras will be abused by petty minded bureaucrats to raise revenue to fill their ever increasing thirst for money generating schemes. The motorist is just a cash cow and allows them to continue their war against car drivers, it's that simple. Welcome to the end of the UK as we know it.

@Dagr8soldjer Год назад

@@IDONTDOMUCHATWORK Do you oversimplify things often? You understand that not all cars are the same 😂 try driving a 1960's V8 or a 4 rotor quieter than a 1.4 Corsa that's driving at redline.

@RevZolution Год назад

QUESTION. If a large group or even 3 to 6 motorcycles drive by in a group. Staggered all close together, all with loud exhausts how will you determine which one caused the noise...or even if it was just one in the middle of a group riding close together, how can you determine which one it was if they're all in the frame

@georgesandiford1141 Год назад

Good point, and none of them individually may deserve a ticket but all grouped together may create more noise

@Mriya6 Год назад

What do you mean? You said they all have loud exhausts, so they all get fined, easy. Drive a normal motorbike and don't make it louder on purpose.

@grandtheftgameryt Год назад

@@Mriya6 motorbikes are naturally loud. Motorbikes also are allowed to have a higher DB than cars due to them being so loud. Eat that 😮

@mikethefisherman1175 Год назад

To commit an offence there has to be a law Fact

@johnchadbone Год назад

And no doubt listening to people chatting too, add facial recognition

@stephenclarke44 Год назад

Why not have them in bright yellow? If the objective is to increase reasonable driving in a particular area, surely making the cameras highly visible will assist drivers in recognising this

@archerboy2714 Год назад

This this this. If the goal is quieter and safer driving, make them visible and sign post them. As it stands it feels like they are deliberately designed to catch you.

@A.Hookway1 Год назад

It’s because it’s another money grab

@dts7824 Год назад

@@A.Hookway1I'm happy for them to grab money from self centered, arseholes who think it's ok to disturb people at unsociable hours. Completely selfish.

@A.Hookway1 Год назад

@@dts7824 If that’s what you think of me good stuff, i’m enjoying my passion😂

@dts7824 Год назад

@@A.Hookway1 I wasn't talking about you specifically. But it's always hidden behind the excuse of a "hobby". I'm sorry, but if it was my hobby to play the drums outside your house, it doesn't make it ok.

@hasky9813 Год назад

So it's completely subjective to the person reviewing the footage? And until a microphone array is used, a single microphone setup can't pin-point the sound source. That's just waiting for a court challange. If you're going to enforce this kind of stuff, in this manner, there needs to be a standard. X db was exceeded for Y period of time between 9PM and 8AM. Otherwise all it takes is the local Karren reviewing the footage and anyone in a car that isn't electric, is getting fined. Some camera angles are also very narrow. Take the footage at 05:07 of the black Lambo, the cameras barely cover 20 meters in each direction, there is space for parked cars and there is a junction where a car could be sat out of sight reving. Look at the graph below it, the db level is still high a long time after the car has left the frame. That is evidence a car well outside the camera frame could trigger a breach. "The sound happend as you pulled away"... "Prove it, I say the guy behind me dropped his clutch and reved." Sports cars are not the exclusive source of loud exhaust sounds and road speed is not an accurate indication of engine speed. Now don't get me wrong, I live near a busy road and think people who rev their tits off between 9PM and 8AM, are inconsiderate and should be fined. But this is open to far too much subjectiveness and with just one microphone, it is not as solid a case as I think this guy thinks, though he has a product to sell...

@tecguru100 Год назад

Love the way he describes the people the cameras are the to target......i.e........the whole of the UK who doesn't drive an electric vehicle

@DanielSadjadian Год назад

I hope they don't start putting these on empty countryside roads, because then there will be little fun left in driving outside of a racetrack (and rather ironically, most racetracks have noise limits and detection systems lol).

@georgesandiford1141 Год назад

Hack saw and a ladder will do the job

@d3sentry Год назад

Then why buy a car if you can't bring it to a racetrack to make noise. Lets just buy bicycles then. Wtf

@DanielSadjadian Год назад

@@d3sentry yeah exactly, I don’t get it either. The one place you can drive fast and have fun and there’s a noise limit 😂😂

@Draxindustries1 Год назад

Driving on B roads requires even more care. Track days are the answer...

@IToohat Год назад

They seem to rely heavily on common sense of the operator/reviewer, that doesn't inspire confidence. Will these systems need calibrating to remain accurate enough to stand up in court? Sorry to all at Intelligent Instruments, but I can't see these devices succeeding unless they are maintained to an accurate level and each case is reviewed correctly, I feel stories of abuse from councils imposing fines incorrectly will have this system discredited and rejected.

@skyzone62 Год назад

How can they fine people if there is no limit on sound level

@tom9571 Год назад

Great video, but I feel like most of the questions should have gone to a council that uses the system rather than the manufacturer. It would have been nice to know more about the system itself. They say it meets Class 1 accuracy, but what standard manages that? What does it need to do to meet that Class 1 standard? What is the weighting used in the dB reading? How do you make sure background noises don't interfere with the reading? Microphones are very sensitive and hard to protect, how have you protected them against the weather? How often will the microphone be calibrated?

@trevorockwell8764 Год назад

Amazing you got through the video without punching him in the face.

@andyt3121 Год назад

Lol

@FUKMEDIA Год назад

Spot on as always George. I get the reasoning behind the invention. As long as who is in charge of the system doesn’t have a bad day, then all of us car enthusiasts should be fine if we drive responsibly in built up areas….simple!

@grandtheftgameryt Год назад

What happens when 3 modified cars come a long, one is revving and the other 2 are completely just driving normally. Do you fine all three as you can’t find out which one it is unless you know what a specific engine sounds like

@krispyears2565 Год назад

No way "judgement" for sound levels will stick they will have to put in a db sound limit 100% everyone will contest it no doubt at all it will cost the system more than they realise.

@DouggyB123 Год назад

Great video again George! Seems like valved systems are the next hot mod for aftermarket exhausts! Taken a lot of my worry away regarding my exhaust notes… excessive revving seems to be the real money maker for councils. Be interesting to see how downshifts do with the camera, but I guess it’s assessors discretion 😅🤷🏻‍♂️

@ScottZ370 Год назад

This is my concern, my car blips aggressively on downshifts and can make a lot of noise despite me driving carefully. It's not clear what this system is actually going to be used for!

@JordzyBrev Год назад

Welcome to 2022 when all the karens want noise cameras

@trevorockwell8764 Год назад

How can you make legislation based on nothing but a ‘subjective assessment’?

@astropioneer3296 Год назад

I love this. Crazy loud vehicles, whether on cars or motorcycles, are annoying as hell and a public nuisance. Car enthusiasts who dig loud exhaust don't understand how it effects others or just don't give a toss.

@KeenBulldozer 2 месяца назад

What I don't understand is why they like it so much? Imagine how dull both your senses and your mind would need to be to "enjoy" that.

@DutchMiester77 Год назад

Hi guys, fab video, will there be a map loaded up locating these camera's as you get with speed cameras or advance warning that monitoring is present in the area? Otherwise its entrapment surely?

@SOCIALLYDRIVEN Год назад

Mega informative video mate. I think as viewers we all wanted a very in depth discussion about how these cameras work and I believe that’s been explained incredibly well here 👍🏽 Well done chaps.

@GCMYT Год назад

Thanks bro. Very kind of you !

@mrbeeoutdoors3213 Год назад

I think a lot of people are missing the point here....the noise is indicative to the manner of driving... so yeh, its about the noise to degree, but also trying to discourage people from driving like dickheads. There are a few decent "super cars" near me which I've heard trundling along the road at 20-30mph behind someone else sounding a smidge louder than the average car... then I've also heard them screaming down the street... its simple to tell that they've accelerated hard and have exceeded the speed limit... so they've driven overly aggressively for a residential road, they've exceeded the speed limit, they've made enough noise to confirm their insecurities and small penis size and managed to piss off everyone in the area all at the same time.

@matthammes2620 2 месяца назад

Well said!

@mcgherkinstudios Год назад

Quite a simple task to provide RPM and cylinder count I'd have thought. It's easy enough for a sonarman. But the actual camera technology is good and would do a lot of good in the right hands. Thankyou to you and Reuben for the demonstration. As to the implementation for councils to just watch the footage and decide to fine any 'flashy car' in shot, with no factual boundaries in terms of decibel level, well it's open to abuse. I don't think that without the camera being able to determine which car is responsible, instead of some random person's subjective opinion, it should be used but at least that is being addressed. I appreciate that this isn't the intention of II or perhaps those who are initially trialling this system, but the problem is this *can* be used innappropriately, for example on sliproads for easy money, or setting arbitrarily low limits to effectively shadow ban performance cars in urban areas. The technology is very capable but there needs to be a clear set of ground rules for using it, in order to have the trust of the public. It's interesting to see the technology (I'd have preferred to see the 'shot tracking' mode displayed) but there are serious questions about this technology which need addressing before it can be imposed on the public.

@mrtrendizzle Год назад

"As to the implementation for councils to just watch the footage and decide to fine any 'flashy car' in shot, with no factual boundaries in terms of decibel level, well it's open to abuse." I would assume heading to court with a DB level print out of your car at 2k-3k RPM or whatever showing it's within 72/74 dB (www.vehicle-certification-agency.gov.uk/fuel-consumption-co2/fuel-consumption-guide/cars-and-noise/#:~:text=These%20have%20been%20progressively%20reduced,(A)%20established%20in%202016.&text=When%20looking%20at%20this%20information,2%20dB%20(A)%20louder.) would be enough to get the fine thrown out since there's no rule or law saying on X road car DB level needs to be lower during whatever time. It would be impossible to prove the car being recorded has exceeded any type of rev limit to account for the noise since a rev limiter could be installed to prevent revs above 2kRPM which caused the rev limiter bang.

@keepitpinned3238 Год назад

“Discretion of the operator” what a lovely term to be used in conjunction with a penalty notice. If I’m going to get a fine just for a loud vehicle (which is definitely the end goal for council’s) then I may as well do rolling burnouts everywhere and get my monies worth. 😂

@cameronskinner3280 Год назад

Way too controlling basically saying you can’t even rev your car why don’t you do something about a piss heads and smack heads instead of going after car community 😓

@NothingToDismay Год назад

Dimwit

@mrauto423 Год назад

Having a Loud exhaust saves lives

@wheelieschulz1204 10 месяцев назад

It used to be common sense that you have fun in the industrial area where nobody lives

@henryletton7489 Год назад

So the fines issued by these cameras are purely subjective, a car can be totally within the legal limit but if a ‘Karen’ doesn’t like the car they can issue a fine. As if we’re not being watched enough as it is

@Philljag Год назад

Get an exhaust with electric valve, flick of a switch to make it quiet 🤣🤣

@DigBipper188 Год назад

> This. Or at least have a bypass valve system that only opens when you romp on it, so most of the time you aren't bypassing the mufflers and the car sounds "stock"... but then when you want to give 'er it opens up :)

@jamesford3549 Год назад

Or if you have a manual just clutch in and coast

@retro_al2653 Год назад

Tuners need to stop these pop and bang maps,in my area this is what a lot of people complain about

@Rhyd Год назад

If this product is to stop people being disturbed, why are they not being pushed in working class neighbourhoods , rather then the super wealthy areas? Seems more like people with deep pockets got their own way.

@sardav160479 Год назад

This is going to abused by so many councils trying to top up there budgets

@DatGrape111 11 месяцев назад

That would be false. It's because there's lack of evidence to charge these smooth brains who drive loud shit that these are needed

@matty741 Год назад

If anyone doubts the accuracy of the mics then don't. While I was in the army they used a system developed by saab that worked on the same principle. Basically an aray of mics that once one has picked up the sound the others measure how long it takes to get to them and you can see where the sound comes from with very high accuracy. The army use it on the range. When the target is hit the mics pic it up and you look at a tablet screen to see where your rounds are falling. It's old tech these days really and it's tried and tested too.

@phillwaller Год назад

How will these cameras be affected by fireworks or any other outside interference? Thanks for uploading the video George, always nice to know where we stand as car enthuisiasts 👌

@peterolley7159 Год назад

Fireworks need banning

@willnixon4560 Год назад

@@peterolley7159 nah

@willnixon4560 Год назад

@@peterolley7159 nah

@xGavalarDiRT3 Год назад

The thing I don't understand about the ones that are being/have been installed on a stretch of the A4174 in Bristol is, yes, there's houses that back gardens literally end on the edge of the dual carridgeway, but because of the noise cameras, me and a few others I know have been going down the side roads that have basically those same houses on so it seems pointless when people know that the cameras are there, not saying my car is massively loud I mean i've owned louder cars but I just don't see the point in where they've been apparently installed

@danfn2r72 Год назад

My favourite part is when south glos council stated ona Post that excessive noise could cause diabetes 🤣

@xGavalarDiRT3 Год назад

@@danfn2r72 That was fucking golden 🤣🤣

@danielmurphy4718 Год назад

Literally drive it everyday, it’s stupid, they’ve only done it cause they can get lots of revenue from it, what I don’t get why buy a house next to a main road if you don’t like noise, same with people who buy houses next to airports and complain about planes. Once again just another cash cow by the council, and hopefully that road past asda will become a rat run and make them think twice about their awful idea🥲 but they will probs stick one there to

@xGavalarDiRT3 Год назад

@@danielmurphy4718 the same sort of people that bought houses next to Rockingham - a fucking racetrack and then complained about the noise

@shaungowler8909 Год назад

I knew this would be the next in the list to penalise drivers with a passion to modify there cars next we will be charged for breathing in oxygen

@andyt3121 Год назад

It's utter joke

@aquanick2001 Год назад

Does being able to modify your car mean that everyone should be able to hear you? If you want noise pipe the noise inside the car, I don’t need/want to hear it. Modify your car as you like, but why is making it loud for all to be disturbed by a modification?

@shaungowler8909 Год назад

The exhaust depending on any car Is different ie high powered v12s v10s are loud anyway from factory that’s ur own preference not to want ear it but modding ur car is not illegal in any way shape or form it’s like saying to someone u can not look like that because u offend me everyone is and are individual other wise life would be boring

@aquanick2001 Год назад

@@shaungowler8909 that’s not an excuse. And if your rich enough to be able to afford a car that genuinely makes lot of noise then fair enough. If you’re some spanner with a Vauxhall corsa and a stupid exhaust then I’m going to get annoyed.

@shaungowler8909 Год назад

@@aquanick2001 ur within ur rights for an opinion you must cycle to work am guessing and my car isn’t a corsa now that is a crime if I was Rich or not doesn’t make me a boy racer having a modded car time and place for loud exhausts I for one do drive sensible but ur not judge/jury am afraid just joe public like me 👍🏻no better nor worse

@edwardacton3242 Год назад

Sounds like a way the council can make money.

@chucky2316 Год назад

Good the roads are not race tracks

@ashsmith1709 Год назад

So you say there is no legal/illegal dB limit but what does the camera deem as excessive as there must be a number it triggers at?

@kermit56780 6 месяцев назад

Should use one of these around my area, council would strike it rich, 5x suburu wrx's, 3x mini coopers, 2x motorbikes & a quad bike.. you can always tell when the sun is shining 😢😂😅

@richardgp5691 Год назад

What if your car is loud and pops n bangs factory standard? :) After all it has been licensed to be sold in the UK. Just wondering.

@LawrenceTimme Год назад

You still get fined. It's a money grab

@ianoliverbailey6545 Год назад

Good job, well done. Simply stated: we're not against you having a flashy car, just we don't need you showing off your s**t where we're trying to live our lives in the peace and quiet of our homes. I notice how much nit-picking is already coming from the drivers in the comments section... just go and do it somewhere else for F.S! As it happens, I live in France, so not yet directly affected by this technology or this impending legislation. But as we all know, the traffic news of today in the UK is the traffic news of the rest of Europe in five years' time. I'm OK with this one.

@kevindarkstar Год назад

Oh yeah and like no technology like this is ever misused by those in power to make money 🤔

@GEORGIIGEE Год назад

I just don’t get how you can 100% say that it’s that certain car making the noise. Your just gonna have someone in a control room watching it back thinking that car looks like a “boy racer” and issue them a fine, instead of the old classic car on the same bit of road. If it’s up to there discretion 100% they will say it’s the “boy racer” and not the classic car.

@TheVidsandclips Год назад

What about kit cars? They have to be noise tested to be put on the road. They have to be under 107db. At 1/3 of max revs. So that's 2500 - 3500 rpm. Easily within normal driving.

@archerboy2714 Год назад

The way this is currently being implemented isn't comforting right now. They are not placed in obvious places, nor marked out. The limit is seemingly arbitrary and down to the discretion of an operator. For things that have financial penalties attached some consistency would be much required. Maybe even a new "quiet zone" sign in zones where these are deployed just to make people aware it's particularly important to be quieter there. Feels like these have been rushed out due to complaints and not thought through how it can be implemented fairly to residents and drivers alike. The charger for example looked and sounded stock with a mild acceleration. There's not much the driver could do in that situation. It's imported.

@pauls6816 Год назад

Is this also going to pick up on loud car audio systems.?

@zigzag7194 Год назад

Noise pollution mate .. and it's not going to stop at the explanation that this guy gave us.. its going to become a cash machine. Anybody who drives a car now is a criminal Don't get me wrong some of it is over the top. 👍🏿

@lordethan27 Год назад

When driving my 1960s mustang it back fires frequently. If it was to back fire while in proximity to one of this camera’s would I still get fined for something that’s completely out of my control?

@mcgherkinstudios Год назад

No, because the obviously the council will employ an automotive expert to review footage instead of a monkey on minimum wage and telling them ‘car go vroom or boom, you give ticket’

@andyt3121 Год назад

Yes because they need the money

@jonbeddis4624 Год назад

How about rally cars they are extremely loud even if driving carefully

@chucky2316 Год назад

Then you have a faulty exhaust system I suggest you get it repaired

@matthewpithers8952 Год назад

Well I think this is fundamentally wrong he is say even stock cars can be fined that comply to the standards to be used on our roads 🤔 so in a situation when a car has to pull out quick from a junction etc it's going to make a far bit of noise I also do see how that stands up in court

@TeddyBearsWarm Год назад

So far they're in residential. But they'll end up being cash grabs on the backroads cause 1 person a mile and a half away from the road will be deemed 'residental areas' Seemed to be a lot of up to this person up to that person. No strict guidelines, just opinion, so one person having a bad day or someone who dislikes these cars are just going to be dishing out fines to cars driving away from lights, or cruising past with a vehicle designed to be loud from stock. If it's about sleep and what, but driving a motorbike at midday is going to get you fined not really consistent in the purpose is it?

@stephanosuk78 7 месяцев назад

The first one I saw was on a quiet country lane, so you're absolutely, to the brim, full of it.

@LawrenceTimme Год назад

The person on the council who decides who gets the fine probably gets a bus 😂😂

@flyingdroneswiththescoob9488 Год назад

a microphone at the top of a lampost in the uk... i wonder how wind would effect the microphone

@James-zq6pp Год назад

Keep them SOLELY in 30mph zones? With lots of signs ie. Below the 30 signs, if we HAVE to have them that is, anything above 30 should be fair game 💨

@Dayswithryan Год назад

Find them on a pole, get an air horn, waste someone’s time going through footage, fill the cloud.🫢 All in all, good video though George very informative and helping us know what to look out for and when to dip the clutches 👍🏻

@chucky2316 Год назад

That popping and banging should be outlawed and those small motorbikes with cheap Chinese cans sound awful,

@danielkimberley4115 Год назад

Are the cameras going to be on timers and only come on between anti social hours when people are sleeping?

@ipwnxdemonzz4223 11 месяцев назад

When are people sleeping tho some people work nights

@chriscuthbertson Год назад

Not sure how the fines with stand up in court if it is a subjective decision made my council staff, who may be bonused on the number of 'hits' from the system. Without clear publicly available guidelines to what times they will be used for and what dB levels they are classing as a breach It will be difficult to enforce. It will be up to the council to prove a breach has occurred and who has breached it, i'm not sure somebody's opinion will be enough.

@rjs_media1726 Год назад

Was great to be involved incredibly informative great work bro

@thisisjustme1 Год назад

Brilliant. Normal population is more than sick of these small d drivers parading their insecurities about town.

@kennethwilliams4380 Год назад

What if an airplane flies overhead, directly over the residential area? Will you penalise the airline? I live in Cape Town, a few kilometers from the airport and the airplanes fly directly over my house and they make a huge noise, lol, just an example for you to think about.

@KeenBulldozer 2 месяца назад

Airplanes need to make that noise to function, and there are engineers working on ways of making them quieter. Tiny-minded motorbike riders looking for attention because daddy didn't love them properly don't need to make that noise to be able to get from point A to point B.

@whodar3swins Год назад

What next? Hard Acceleration cameras? No indicator Cameras? Bulb Out cameras?

@d3sentry Год назад

They don't know what else to invent to get renevue

@KeenBulldozer 2 месяца назад

Yes why not? Those are all hazards on the road too.

@shaxei7116 Год назад

As a petrolhead with a loud miata, even I can agree that lighting your tyres up and bouncing off the rev limiter in a straight-piped anything on a residential street at night makes you a shitty person. BUT these would put a lot of power into the hands of people who might just want to bust loud cars all day, whether they're respectful or not. They should be more well regulated than "it's up to the operator's disgression".

@unknownregions5014 Год назад

Why did they use two cameras instead of one 180 deg camera that has multiple sensors in it?

@a9503128 Год назад

How are you complying with the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA), recording conversations without consent for commercial purposes the UK is illegal by recording a persons conversation without their consent or notifying them?

@lancebarker9825 Год назад

What aload of rubbish it's another way for the police to make money it's a joke for drivers

@GCMYT Год назад

If you watch the video you’ll see the police have nothing to do with it!

@Scoobydooo85 Год назад

Another way for local councils to make money!

@lancebarker9825 Год назад

@GCM it will move from council to the police 100 percent

@ScottZ370 Год назад

@@GCMYT7:03 He literally says he's had trials with police forces?

@Sacrifice-Paid Год назад

I ride a sports bike with a race can, more so for safety reasons of ignorant car drivers, I’ve also got an old skool 330 bmw with a tastefully modified stock exhaust, so yes I like the sound of a nice exhaust system, but ya know wot, there’s a time and place for these things, and unfortunately you have ya idiots that go around making excessive noise just to show off, especially in the rich areas of London with the millionaire boy racers who do things on purpose as they know the sound will resonate due to the buildings around them, and not everyone wants that type of noise, especially in the middle of the night, so how about show some common decency and respect for the people that live in those areas, when I 1st heard about these ‘noise pollution’ devices, I wasn’t for them, but after watching this video, it’s pretty much changed my mind

@simonlowe4013 Год назад

I can understand that in certain areas noise can be an issue, but what made me laugh about this is. It’s not the police that are using this ATM? But the council are or will be. This is just another way the council can make more money. And also, not once in the video did I hear, you will have to remove your exhaust?

@TS-STORM Год назад

this is why we need a time machine to go back in time and change the course ruben taken to invent these lmao

@Dagr8soldjer Год назад

@InevitableLuck or stand on his favourite butterfly 😉

@colchesterelec5105 Год назад

well if it stops all the popping and banging from the unburnt fuel being discharged out of the local focus/fiesta lads/ladies cars then its good thing ....you try getting the kids to sleep when some idiot thinks its fun to red line they're car then let off and let it pop and bang up the local road at 1am...I mean surely once you get to the ripe old age of 12 you should have outgrown that...apparently not....I Love a fast car but there's no need for it to be obnoxiously loud.

@waynereddings6801 Год назад

So I drive a 7ltr blown camaro wich is loud with a full exhaust and silencers. So should I worry going to car events where these are

@High_octane94 Год назад

I love a loud exhaust as much as the next guy but I would say most of this has come from people travelling to London to frighten people with there shit pop and bangs maps and this is the result.👏🏼👏🏼

@samuelgarrod8327 Год назад

They should fit a massive Soundsystem to tell drivers their car is too loud. Seriously though, I think they are a good idea for tackling Antisocial behaviour.

@conorseymour2723 Год назад

Guy on the left is making a absolute killing, also ruining the car scene in Kensington and Knightsbridge’s

@_Just_Some1 Год назад

I live by a busy-ish road, would love if one of these were installed.

@Idve Год назад

Can we choose what cars get fines like silly little 1.2 fiestas and ricer cars that just don’t need to be making any noise

@howayanow51 Год назад

Contradictions here so if this is the authority on this new law I have no doubt each fine will be appealed. First of all it is said this will not be the reviewers opinion/perception and it is fact based then shortly after it is said it is the reviewers opinion. Sounds like this will be opinion based which is not water tight. There are too many variables where this could be wrongfully applied.

@claritylouise2347 Год назад

I need a noise camera !!!! Criminal damage on my poor ears for 6 years! HURRY UP FOR THE FUTURE

@LawrenceTimme Год назад

This is like living next to an airport and taking pictures of the planes making noises.

@Tom-dz5vi Год назад

So now if we can’t afford a second mortgage to buy a supercar we ain’t allowed loud cars? Every st/vxr/vrs is gonna be getting flagged 24/7. Stupid idea that won’t end well

@carperslol1283 Год назад

Hi George/Reuben, If there was 3 cars at a set of lights, and the one in the middle has got a loud exhaust and he/she/they decide to rev it like a legend... 😉 how would you decider which car it is? As slowing down frame by frame wouldn't give any detail? Am I right? I don't know? 😂 Cheers!

@shanebrookes1878 Год назад

Very good idea! Welcome it in! When’s it in power! Believe some kids have cars and not informed insurance for Their modifications!!

@sprocket-YT Год назад

Just because you have an idea doesn't mean you should actually make the dam thing Reuben having his Miles Dyson moment... guaranteed to be used on roads where it isn't needed next summer! How many stock cars & bikes will get hit with fines!

@NBKxMoNkiiBoY Год назад

Will the areas these cameras are placed in be signposted like speed cameras are?

@crossfitchunk 11 месяцев назад

Once there is a door open to fine people, you can pretty much charge what you want. This is why I think it's a bad idea. I think we pay enough tax, fines ect. When will it stop

@gp2670 Год назад

How can I request to have one of these cameras installed on my road?

@KeenBulldozer 2 месяца назад

Hopefully they will be commonplace soon.

@5jamw Год назад

"a subject of assessment" - this will 100% lead to inconsistent decisions. if it is down to one individual council worker to decide whether or not I'll be charged a £100 fine, I'll avoid Kensington at all costs.