Evidence Of Saint Peter's Body? - The Naked Archaeologist 202 - The Search for St. Peter 

idol , I know

@faultroy I actually think I'm learning quite a bit. In this ep for example, I learned that people are split over Peter. And that Jacobovici thinks he's in Jerusalem.

@faultroy Well. That argument could be used against a lot of things!

@faultroy Well, I dont agree on it being mindless. As I am actually learning a lot of stuff about the biblical stories.

@faultroy haha. Alright. Guess we understand eachother at least. Wish you a pleasant evening or respective point of day, dependent on your time zone.

Lol

Doesn't get old, ages like wine

And a big big fake

In the last day..Peter will rise in the resurection and if your interested you will know if Peter was buried in Rome..or Isreal..wherever he was buried if..he was buried , he will come forth ..

😂😂😂

Mine too... I need a fix of him at least everyday..

It makes me think of the Pink Panther type music.

@@tommie827 🤦Maybe because it is

Hi kathy I have just done the same thing You have great taste

I typed in archaeological videos & this was among the options ...slightly misleading, archaeology is a science, it's not something amateurs are allowed to go near, once archaeology its damaged it can't be replaced and done again the right way. Archaeology is like pages from a book, rip pages out & bits of the story are missing, thsts why archaeology is a profession, a science and not something amateurs can do....

Yeah... Even though it gave a talk once about how glorious it is for those who have not seen to believe he also was not angry at Thomas for being a a doubter...! He held his hand forward and ask him to feel his scars... Our Father in Heaven knows that each of us have different levels of faith.. And it's all right.., he loves us anyway because we are his literal children..!!

scam

Ìbeleive e everything god said to st Peter vatican

I Think now like simcha think that st Peter resting place is in Rome. Why avoid simcha because they are full of shit like the people of the pyramids who are now saying it was aliens 😴😴🤭

If you believe that then I got some land to sell you in the the Florida Everglades lol

That did indeed happen. For example, the relics of the Apostle Andrew (brother to Peter) are in various churches throughout Europe.

"There can only be one truth". Pat Aherne

Or whether claimed evidence supports what is passed off as what the evidence points to. Evidence needs to speak for itself, and there's a lot of evidence that gets interpreted through the lense of a presupposed world view, making it appear to support that world view.

@@Nosnoozebutton yes thats what religion does. It makes up its own truth and tries to pass it off to ignorant people as truth when there is absolutely no evidence of truth whatsoever.

you are badly educated.

@@DolMoje educate me then?

@@ohfft lets hope that you will grow out of your lazy opinions soon.

@@DolMoje nieve christians are the lazy ones believing in the nonsense they are being spoon feed!

Peter AND Paul were in Rome.

Nothing in the Holy Scriptures Peter is in Rome...St. Paul I say....!!

Dude! The church is the people united in faith, not a building. They may meet to worship in a building, but the church is people!

@@petercampbell1585 the building is Built upon a grave. It is defiled. How can you go and worship on A Grave!?! This is shocking and Disgusting.

@@Sammy-lz1vi The whole promise of Christianity is everlasting life, triumph over death; Christ sacrificing his mortal life to save the sins of humanity. It's very fitting that the church is built over a tomb. Many Christian churches are, or have relics inside.

and NEVER we can Read in the Bible that Peter is First POPE in rome so Silly stories these CULT religion in rome Pagan church !

@@gilvertlopez1741 Can you give me chapter and verse if this is a fact.

prove it

@@douglasthompson8927 no, we Catholics don't do much door pounding... you want it? go get it. It's called or not called. as to proving degeneracy, the whole renaming of good and evil are either evident to you or they need "proving".

@@urpgag2 I don`t need proof for the existence of good and evil..i need proof that this is peter`s body

And if you noticed they said if there was no religion that would be no wars in their songs

@@leejackson4671 that's an old claim that most of the wars were done in the name of religion; however, the Encyclopedia of War has shown that only a small fraction of the entire history of war was because of religion, and most of those were by Muslims.

There message was good amd helpful but not salvation through christ.

@@lostamericanhistory2536 all you need is love, who cares who said it, just practice. 5000 religions in the world and all of them are right in one thing... all claim the others are fake.

@@luisalfonsoalba9730 im not sure how many religions are in the world but your numbers are probably right lol. Christianity does have one thing that separates it though, its the only one that offers confirmation through the holy spirit.

People believe Bill Gates controls your mind through 5G and vaccinations. We’re 2000 year later and nothing has changed. :)

personally, I never have seen anyone worship statues or really pay any attention to this stuff at one of our churches. We rely on God for our call to service.

the oldest church, they probably know more that other so called Christian churches.

What people?

@@Kitiwake The church

mikhail maslog No, St. Peter the Founder and Jesus appointing him...

🤣 I can't stop laughing every episode...the bones hahaha...!

Mountain man typical American self centered individualism .

@@venanziocalise946 I'm pretty sure he's being sarcastic?

That would b easy if we had ossuaries of Peter's relatives or their bones

Nick Dixon A relative ancestral lineage data can be done like you do in those that send u dna testing kits even would narrow it down. But u know, religion is also politics clothed in colorful linens 😉

Church gets the money from stupid people that's why.

But they did not really found the Body of apostle Peter in ROME its fake. Because Peter is not even a Pope, its fake.

Dear Dale, You are right. In order to confirm by DNA testing that human remains were a specific person one needs to compare the remains with those of a close relative. It is my understanding that the bones were revealed to be that of a middle-aged man who had led a physically vigorous life. That describes Peter. The early Christians revered those among them who had lived holy lives and especially those who had even died for the faith. Churches were erected over their graves with the altar built directly over the burial spot. Thus began the Catholic practice of having a sacred relic from a holy person ( or in English, a Saint) placed inside the altar used at Mass. I think that what I just said would not convince an archeologist that the bones must be Peter's bones because DNA testing is impossible. Yet, the history strongly suggests that the bones very likely are his because they match the story of Peter's life and his burial and with the altar of the original St Peter's placed directly over his traditional burial spot. ( The original St Peter's was built by order of Emperor Constantine in the 300's. Twelve hundred years later the same basilica had become decrepit and even dangerous so the current church was built in the 1500's in the same place with the altar in the same spot over the traditional burial place of St Peter.) Thank you.

If you liked Simcha Jacobovici's documentaries, watch _The Deception of Constantine_ here on RU-vid, it explains fully exactly what you've mentioned. 😎👍🏼

Larent n Yusuf are you both going to tell us you know what people want way back then....neither of you can even tell us what people want now !?!? lol

Constantine was pagan through and through.

Liar. Peter was a Jew who rightly kept the law. He rightly proselytized Romans IAW Genesis 12. They are called Jew. Paul, the minister of the gospel of grace, was calling them to grace and the unique gospel given to him alone. Peter is buried in Israel, obeying the law, waiting for the return.

@@nickma71 Liar? I know my history and if anyone is a liar, it is YOU. It states in the Bible many letter were written from ROME. He is buried under the Vatican just as he was bishop there for 25 years until the Romans crucified him upside down in 67 AD, as he did not feel worthy to be crucified in the manner of your Savior. You cannot change historical FACTS.

@@Who63 You do not keep the red letters, you hypocrite. I am in Christ, saved for all eternity. Not because of what I do, because of his finished work. You pervert. You do not keep the red letters, while professing you do.

@@nickma71 The red letters of the Roman Missal. You’re name calling shows what a wonderful Christian you are. DOMINUS Vobiscum ✝️

@@Who63 2 saying: “The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat. 3 Therefore whatever they tell you [a]to observe, that observe and do, but do not do according to their works; for they say, and do not do.

Coz vatican is a great liar..

There is no proof whatsoever that the ossuary in question contained the bones of St. Peter. Simon and Jonah were very common Jewish names. Like Bill and Bob.

Why the church authority is not interested to solve this issue?

@@georgeaugustine5492 it may matter to the catholic, but it doesn't to the rest of the Christian world lol.

This guy got caught pushing forged relics and the supposed enscription on that ossuary has been proven to be forged.

@DonaId J. Trump really? I did not know that. Do you have any sources?I just think he's entertaining anyways and disagree with some of his conclusions but I've never heard he was a fraud

@DonaId J. Trump Wow. Well thank Sir, Mr. President for catching this.

The flu is a diversion its not kilkibg tons of people, God talks of this in the bible. Prayer is great but pray for things that are real

Write a letter to Santa clause It is worth more

Existance yes most likely Prophet no it would prove

@@nickdixon8115 and how does the presence of a tombstone, much less some inscription prove the existence of a person? Many an undisturbed grave have been found to never even have contained a body. Or the body of said interred as in the supposed tomb of St Peter in Rome who's grave was filled with bones of various different people, females included as well as various animal bones for instance lol

You asked if it be counted as proof and normally it would I said it wouldnt prove u to b a prophet.thats a matter of faith and even if u saw an angel ud have to check if ur on drugs or have mild schizophrenia I mean was the angel really there? But the grave of george Washington is in mount Vernon. I have seen the sight myself. Theres a skeliton dressed in colonial clothing there. The question then is how can I b sure that Washington? All I have to go on is the inscription and he has white british dna. Could b anyone.

@@nickdixon8115 *"could* be one" is not proof. Everything depends on *'faith'* alone. In everyone's mind without exception what you believe to be true *IS "true".* I challenge you to go into a church service and challenge them the way you would challenge my claim of being visited by God's messenger. Ask them the same question. It's said that God himself presented himself to Moses. Was he on drugs? Paul's story is one of the *'most'* incredulous. God chose him, who some considered a criminal, him as well as Mohammed to manifest himself to. No witnesses or corroborating evidence for either. Were *'they'* on drugs? But wait. There's more. Jesus was considered to be a special but otherwise regularly normal child to all who knew him save for the *"story"* that his parents knew he was of God. The scriptures say that he conceded that yes, he indeed was the Messiah. *The actual SON of God.* No proof except that he said so. Ask that congregation if *'Jesus'* was on drugs. It's very likely that those followers of tolerance, peace, love and brotherhood tear you to pieces with their bare hands. LMAO

@@IDIOCRACY-1984 that's why then you test what is said and not let our biases get infront of it u oet the evidance speak for itself Alot of things in the bible cant b proven or disproven For example did abraham exist? Who tf in that time would consider a bunch of nomads for anything and in the time writting was still a new invention they would of only wrote wat they see as important True fallowing something on pure faith is stupid. At the same time being blind to the evidance because of our bias' is about as dumb. There are many things we are ignorant of all of us We can use the bible to judge most of the prophets and the messiah Balaam for example it was obvious he was hallucinating after fucking that donkey and moses just wrote down wat balaam told him. However the archaeology to Muhammad shows we dont even know anything about the man except hear say Everything we have in the quran and haddith were written 150 years after muhammad and thehaddith was written in the ninth century. Truth is Saudi arabias mecca didnt exist in muhammads time in Ad 570. It has gotten to the point to question if muhammad really existed but the real mecca has been found to b petra. the quran (archaeologically speaking) that the muslims know today would actually b uthmans political religious treatise than anything divinely inspired. Truth is we dont know what the real Quran is or muhammads real words. Only thing we can say for certain is his family was byzantine and he was a warlord

@@sleepwalkerzzz257 Says the person that has never read the Gospels.

According to scripture it makes sense that Peter never left Jerusalem!

@@rlrett1 the scriptures show that he went to Samaria and early Christian tradition has it that St Peter went to Antioch, and ordained the first Bishop there. To not have gone on missionary journeys would have been in disobedience to Christ's Great Commission. Likewise Christ propheticly in John states that he would be taken to Rome, were his epistles were pretty clearly written. Ancient Tradition states that he was martyred in Rome and there was no need for him to stay in Jerusalem, as St James was Bishop there, which is well documented.

@@lukegehring8331 where in john?

@@rlrett1 Jn 21: 18-19

@@lukegehring8331by all means you need a lot of imagination to read Rom into that, for an Apostle of the circumcision! 7 but contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; 9 and when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision. As you can see here, no mentioning of going to the gentiles and as you can see James is already the leader!

not history!!!!!! you are so easily misled by a cheap hustler. shame on you.

this is just cheap hustling.

Unless an until Israel acknowledges Jesus Christ is their saviour instead of waiting for Moses they will always face threats from their cancerous neighbours.

Bing Malsi he is called an apostle because he saw Jesus in a vision and was given the mission by Him to spread the gospel to the Gentiles. This equates him to the 12 apostles who were with Jesus and were given the mission by Jesus to spread the Gospel.

@@thecrew1871 Well, that's what Paul claims at certain points in time. But at others his decision to go to the Gentiles seems to be driven by the fact that he was generally pretty unsuccessful at converting Jews to the Christian way. Despite supposedly being appointed as the apostle to the Gentiles, when he came to a new city he usually tried to convert the Jews there first. When he failed he would turn to the Gentiles because they were far easier to convert. He had much more difficulty with the Jews because they actually knew their Scriptures and could properly evaluate Paul's scriptural arguments ... if you can call them 'arguments'.

TheSmithDorian TheSmithDorian I agree that he usually went to the Jews first but being as his calling was to go to the Gentiles he wasn't very successful. I feel that Paul at first was led to persecute the Jewish Christians so that in order to be successful in his ministry God wanted the Jews to reject Paul so he would be forced to minister to the Gentiles. If I remember correctly he & Timothy were called by Peter & those that were in Jerusalem to answer for & explain why Paul said circumcision was not necessary for the Gentiles to join the Christian church. I think it was at this meeting that Peter & Paul got into a heated argument about their differences and wound up coming to an agreement that Peter would minister to the Jews and Paul would minister to the Gentiles. Peter never really liked or accepted Paul but agreed to their arrangement as it was something he could live with. I would love to know what the other apostles thought of Paul.

To You and all your replies, Paul is an apostle for the Gospel of grace according to the Mystery! It is not the same Gospel as the kingdom/new covenant Gospel! It is the Gospel, when you belief, the Holy Spirit baptizes you into the body of Christ irrevocable! 1 Corinthians 9:17 For if I do this thing willingly, I have a reward: but if against my will, a dispensation of the gospel is committed unto me. Ephesians 3:2 if ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: Colossians 1:25 whereof I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to fulfil the word of God; 1 Corinthians 3:10 According to the grace of God which is given unto me, as a wise masterbuilder, I have laid the foundation, and another buildeth thereon. But let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon. 1 Timothy 1:16 Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting. Paul is the first member of the body of Christ in the dispensation of grace revealed to him first! Romans 11:13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office: He calls it "MY GOSPEL" three times! Romans 2:16 in the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel. Romans 16:25 Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began, 2 Timothy 2:8 Remember that Jesus Christ of the seed of David was raised from the dead according to my gospel Yes sorry to tell you, there are TWO gospels (good news) one to Israel (12 Apostles/little flock/heavenly kingdom on earth as prophesied) the other to the gentiles after Israel rejected the first one, this is the one preached by Paul (Gospel of grace according to mystery/body of Christ/not prophesied) Here are the scripture for it! Galatians 2:2 And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to them which were of reputation, lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain. Galatians 2:6 But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man’s person:) for they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added nothing to me: 7 but contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; 8 (for he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) 9 and when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision. Who was the head of the Jerusalem Church? Peter, James! Where do the leader of a church stay? where the church is! Where do you think Peter stayed? Jerusalem! Why? Waiting for Jesus to come back! Where is the place of Jesus's second coming? Jerusalem! Why would Peter be in Rome? No reason! Peter died in Jerusalem!

@@rlrett1 "Yes sorry to tell you, there are TWO gospels" Not according to Paul. "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed" (Galatians 1:8-9) To Paul there is only one gospel - the one that he is preaching and he preached it to Jews and Gentiles.

And what's even worse is that false Christianity is what the world sees today as the true Christianity, which is getting more and more despised, yet never even accurately portrayed. It's even to the point where you can't point them to the real Christianity because it's so ingrained in their head that Catholicism is what it's all about, and you get accused of using a no true Scotsman fallacy if you speak out againgst it, as if there's no such thing as fake Christianity.

@@Nosnoozebutton haha the catholic church wasn't invented in 1530

@@Nosnoozebutton when you finally accept the Real Presence, you will know Christ comissioned only one church under Peter. That Church, according to the bible, is the pillar and foundation of truth.

@@wenshan9101 that church, according to the Bible, is apostate. When one Pope tells pagan religion leaders that we all worship the same God and Pope Francis calls the cross "the failure of Christ", you're only kidding yourself that it's of God.

@Phin Al how will it matter? Protestants desecrated churches and destroyed relics at the birth of the Reformation. Even as you stake your claim to the Shroud of Turin, you calumniate its veneration by catholics. That's discounting that the Shroud was dismissed by protestants as the biggest christian hoax for the greater part of 500 years until more recent evidence. Whether It's St. Peter's bones or the Shroud, the Catholic Church has a hand in some conspiracy. Unfortunately, she is as much of living history as she is of living faith.

you are naive enough to fall for this cheap hustle?

Keep on dreaming

partly. what if your church had the size of ours? you'd be different, right? we were never made out of other than 100% people. folks

simcha is a cheap hustler

cheap hustler

How would Catholics know. Peter was not Catholic. Jesus' footprints. More lies.

It is NOT likely that Simon "Peter/Cephas" REAL patronymic would have been "bar YoNaH"! IF his moniker of "CeFaS" or "the 🪨" was only an ALIAS, it's more likely he was JESUS' BROTHER SHiMoN bar ALFA. And WHY wasn't the ossuary of JESUS' BROTHER YaMiSH/JAMES bar ALFA found at the Mount of 🫒s" site since HE was reputed to have been the LEADER of the PRIME Church at JERUSALEM?! 🤔🤨🧐🥸

And for THAT matter we might ask, IF THIS was the "Simon bar YoNaH" of the "Gospels" called "CeFaS" and "Petros" then WHY WASN'T his BROTHER ANDREW/ANDROU bar YoNaH entombed WITH HIM?? We must ALSO realize HOW ODD it would have been for one of two GALILEAN brothers who would have spoken either HEBREW OR ARAMAIC to have had a GREEK name!! 🤔🤨

rickmaggie1 - I don’t know from what sources you draw your conclusions about Roman methods of execution, but they aren’t true. Crucifixion was a very common form of capital punishment in the Roman world - reserved for non Roman citizens for high treason, impiety towards the emperor, armed insurrection, slave uprisings, banditry, murder of a Roman magistrate, and especially sedition against Rome.

Any being that existed that had no sense of humor would not be a God to follow. Besides, in that Black Book, it says man was made in God's (Gods) image. I must presume this included laughter, which is a universal human trait. So take the stick out of your butt, and learn, even if it's just learning to laugh.

@@johnlameelk5339 you have so little respect for religious people and or religion...just stop talking to them !! dont interact in ANY way. leave them alone !!!!!!!!