Тёмный

Evidence that Noah's Flood Formed the Fossil Record - Dr. Kurt Wise (The Paleontology of the Flood) 

Is Genesis History?
Подписаться 240 тыс.
Просмотров 495 тыс.
50% 1

The fossil record can be difficult to understand. It is, however, an extremely important witness to the results of the global flood and its aftermath in the post-flood period. During the 2017 IGH Conference, Dr. Kurt Wise explored the impact of the Flood on the earth in a series of three in-depth lectures. This lecture on the “study of fossils,” the second in the series, provides a fascinating look at the nature of the fossil record. Paleontology is actually Kurt’s specialty, having received his PhD from Harvard while studying under evolutionary paleontologist Steven J. Gould. Needless to say, Kurt understands paleontology extremely well from both perspectives.
This lecture is from our 2017 'Is Genesis History?' conference. We invited a number of scientists and scholars to teach in-depth on the Creation/Flood model. You can buy, download and watch over 70 more lectures like this at:
👉isgenesishistory.com/conference/
If you’ve not seen the documentary yet, here are ways to watch Is Genesis History featuring Kurt Wise and 12 other scientists and scholars: isgenesishistory.com/
Specific topics of “Paleontology of the Flood” include:
2:40 - Biostratigraphic Column
10:00 - Nature of Fossilization
19:45 - Footprints/Trackways
25:00 - Disparity vs. Diversity
29:00 - Organismal Change: Stasis and Abrupt Appearance
32:30 - Testing Evolutionary Claims
40:00 - Floating Forest Theory
50:00 - Explanation of Coal Layers
1:07:00 - Overview of Model

Опубликовано:

 

9 окт 2017

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 3,8 тыс.   
@alloraptorgen2
@alloraptorgen2 2 года назад
Its sad to see so many people automatically being shut down by so many other people that don't even give the theory a chance. I don't even see many people actually arguing with formulated ideas or sentences, they just rudely and sarcastically reject everything these people have to say when they are actually explaining themselves in a clear way. But instead of being opposed in a clear way by people who disagree, I keep seeing blatant disrespect. People saying creationists are on drugs, crazy, unscientific, and not even giving a second thought. They don't need to agree with creationists, Christianity, or even all these plausible theories. But that doesn't mean they should be behaving in this way.
@azaryaros7471
@azaryaros7471 3 года назад
The thing he said about floating forest is logical. My grandparents used to lived in the deep jungle of Borneo Island where they told us story about land thats waving when you walk on it. Then they realized its actually a big lake underneath the ground. Sadly the forest is gone now because of oil palm plantation. The lake is also dried.
@nunyabisnass1141
@nunyabisnass1141 3 года назад
Floatong forrests across oceans with strong or moderate waves? The thing with floating mats of living vegetation is that they are always in stagnate water where gssses like methane can build up and help contribute to the buoyancy of the structure, that just cant happen over an open ocean where perturbations from wind, waves, storms, and the scale of the water column that gas would have to tracel between would destabalise such a struture within days.
@paulrobinson9318
@paulrobinson9318 3 года назад
+@@nunyabisnass1141 I doubt your methane assumption to be true - and for SURE no one is talking about vegetation bridges - they are talking about vegetation MATS - that can be several acres in size that raft across large bodies of water - which are OBSERVABLE today. "Floatong forrests across oceans with strong or moderate waves? " They need NOT bridge oceans to carry wildlife. MOST intercontinental wildlife dispersion was via landbridges. "The thing with floating mats of living vegetation is that they are always in stagnate water " OBSERVABLY not so. "where gssses like methane can build up and help contribute to the buoyancy of the structure," WHY is that necessary or even an issue? WOOD floats without methane. "that just cant happen over an open ocean where perturbations from wind, waves, storms, and the scale of the water column that gas would have to tracel between would destabalise such a struture within days." YOU create several compounding strawman arguments - 1) that methane is necessary 2) that vegetation needed to form bridges and not rafts 3)The scale of the water column need not be considered as vegetation mats are NOT a deep sea phenomena. NONE are required to RAFT species from ONE place to another.
@nunyabisnass1141
@nunyabisnass1141 3 года назад
@@paulrobinson9318 a strawman is when one makes an aesthetically similar fundimentally different argument and attack that one instead of the original argument. I never said anything about a bridge of any kind. I wasnt talking about carrying wildlife, i was talking about known floating forrests menationed by op, and explaining how they are not similar to wise's cracks.
@paulrobinson9318
@paulrobinson9318 3 года назад
@@nunyabisnass1141 You simply did not specify WHAT you were referring to but your INFERENCE was that you were arguing against vegetation bridges crossing deep and turbulent waters assuredly to allow animals to habitate other continents. Sry if I assumed more that you intended but you certainly were not explicit.
@lankey6969
@lankey6969 3 года назад
I bet that jungle isn't in salt water.
@crane3
@crane3 3 года назад
I’m from eastern Russia, my father and grandfather, older brother were all coal miners... this man isn’t lying about coal..
@drewrenewed
@drewrenewed 3 года назад
I appreciate hearing you. Thanks, God bless
@thcaywkg
@thcaywkg 3 года назад
OhkI Ben I
@ThomasG_Nikolaj
@ThomasG_Nikolaj 3 года назад
are you Orthodox? Orthodoxy is the True Church :)
@chad9990
@chad9990 3 года назад
@@ThomasG_Nikolaj I couldn’t agree more
@ThomasG_Nikolaj
@ThomasG_Nikolaj 3 года назад
@@chad9990 you're a based Chad of a man God bless sir
@garyzimmerman62
@garyzimmerman62 3 года назад
I live in the middle of a HUGE fossilized oyster bed. My little back yard (about 15 ft. × 15 ft) has produced HUNDREDS of fossils. Many perfect and some paper thin, also in perfect condition. I have also found about four or five fan type oyster shells not fossilized in the same strata. The real amazing thing is my backyard is actually at a high point and there's a severe drop-off leading to a creek down below. I wish I wasn't handicapped, I would already be down in that creek bed!
@joeholloway3773
@joeholloway3773 3 года назад
I have frequently gone to road cuts and dug for fossils with my kids here in Texas. In two different layers probably 5 to 6 feet in depth we have regularly found fossils of the same species of sea urchin and sea biscuits.
@anonymike8280
@anonymike8280 3 года назад
@@joeholloway3773 I thought Seabiscuit was a horse.
@mannymistakesin8353
@mannymistakesin8353 2 года назад
@@joeholloway3773 great one on hwy 69 outside of Tyler
@joeholloway3773
@joeholloway3773 2 года назад
@@mannymistakesin8353 I'll have to come check it out.
@vernbauerle9100
@vernbauerle9100 2 года назад
Where is this? And how far above (the current) Sea level are you? And how far from the nearest ocean? This is FASCINATING! I can't believe there are no Christian Archaeology students, Professors, paleontology buffs who wouldn't jump at the chance to get down the climb one foot or layer at a time to "read" the whole story pleading to be read!
@cynthia3216
@cynthia3216 3 года назад
It is amazing to me that it is not easier to believe there is a God who created the heavens and the earth and all the things created in the earth. People have to go through serious hoops to make the theory of evolution work. Thank you for your presentation. God bless 💛
@sodaht2296
@sodaht2296 3 года назад
Evolution is a theory it already works. Theories are not guesses in science
@alanthompson8515
@alanthompson8515 3 года назад
Cynthia. Hi "Serious hoops? " You mean like - an education?
@philaypeephilippotter6532
@philaypeephilippotter6532 3 года назад
@@alanthompson8515 Don't use confusing words like _education_ when addressing _creationists._ To them _education_ only means reading their _holy book._ Oddly they don't actually do that. As *_Mark Twain_* said, _The best cure for Christianity is reading the Bible._
@anthonygarcia8749
@anthonygarcia8749 2 года назад
@@philaypeephilippotter6532 so accepted dogma from textbooks and evolutionists are the way to go? Yeah ok buddy
@paullittle5200
@paullittle5200 Год назад
2 Corinthians4:3,4 may answer your question Cynthia.
@boomdawg56
@boomdawg56 4 года назад
I grew up in West Virginia and my father allowed a piece of property we owned to be strip mined. As you described, it was very flat on the top and bottom of the vein, the vein was about 6 feet thick with soap stone below and clay above. I spent hours as a teen cracking open lumps of coal to see leaves and fern fossils. the lowermost part of the coal seemed to have the most intact material. Of course I was looking for a dinosaur bone but never found that prize.
@mariocassina90
@mariocassina90 3 года назад
Probably your dad is also your grandad
@larrydunn7924
@larrydunn7924 3 года назад
@Brody Massey Paleontologist!
@robertthiry9712
@robertthiry9712 3 года назад
Hey Boom Dawg, I am a fossil hunter. Fossils found include fish, birds, more mammals than I can list quickly and dino's. Contact me and I'll take plus you can keep whatever you find.
@LolUGotBusted
@LolUGotBusted 3 года назад
Coal is 320 million years old. Dinosaurs are maximum 252 million years old. It would have helped if you had looked for dinosaurs in a dinosaur layer and not from the time when plants ruled the world.
@sandypidgeon4343
@sandypidgeon4343 3 года назад
@@mariocassina90 probably you need an education.
@tmcdermott5529
@tmcdermott5529 3 года назад
Arenchymous tissue is always associated with waterlogged plants, and often with marine submerged trees, like the mangroves. This theory is plausible and well presented.
@cosmictreason2242
@cosmictreason2242 10 месяцев назад
What is arench....?
@christhewritingjester3164
@christhewritingjester3164 6 лет назад
Very interesting. It seems like most of the creation stuff I see is nowhere near this detailed, but they mostly deal in the big picture, so I really appreciate the theories going over this level of detail.
@kennyw871
@kennyw871 6 лет назад
Theories, easy to say but present some credible evidence.
@BibleResearchTools
@BibleResearchTools 6 лет назад
animus apertus, you wrote, "Theories, easy to say but present some credible evidence." Did you catch the part about the coal seam benches? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xCdt6LjvFvA.htmlm56s Those benches appear to be impossible with the evolution model. Of course, so are polystrates, and especially those which span multiple coal seams and benches. Dan
@FaithfulHonest
@FaithfulHonest 4 года назад
@@ozowen5961 Yes Epigenetic Regulation.
@BibleResearchTools
@BibleResearchTools 4 года назад
ozowen, you wrote, "Polystrates are not impossible under the "evolution" model. Not sure why you called a geological phenomenon and evolution model. We learned about polystrates in school in the 70's so I am always puzzled as to why creationists think they are some sort of secret 'gotcha'." Perhaps you will explain how they were formed. ***************** ozowen, you wrote, "Why do you think coal seam benches are impossible? I can't see why you think it is somehow impossible under the standard geological model." Perhaps you will explain how they were formed. ***************** ozowen, you wrote, "Geologists have no issue with it at all." Geologists have plenty of issues with them. Evolutionists, on the other hand, pretend to have "no issue at all with them," but they cannot scientifically explain them. They only assume they fit the evolutionism model. Dan
@anthonyjames5474
@anthonyjames5474 4 года назад
kennyw And your credible evidence for evolution is? You can't name one animal that changed into another. You can't name one legitimate transitional. Bring it. What did humans evolve from again? Lucy? Bring it
@oliakara8851
@oliakara8851 2 года назад
Thank you for all research and hard work.
@BibleResearchTools
@BibleResearchTools 6 лет назад
This excellent video series provides unbiased scientific evidences for a global flood, such as: 1. Transcontinental megasequence rock layering 2. Megasequences contain graduated sediments (larger to smaller particles, bottom to top) 3 Laminate layers (very little bioturbation) 4. Little or no erosion between layers, denoting rapid layering. 5. Consistent east-to-west currents (denoting the moon holding the flood water while the earth revolves under it) 6. Sand transported across continents. 7. Rock layers folded, not fractured, denoting soft, pliable rock layering when plate tectonics began to divide the continents. 8. High and dry sea creatures (even in the Himalayan plateau) 9. Fossil graveyards everywhere (even though fossilization is a complicated, rare occurrence under normal circumstances). Dan
@BibleResearchTools
@BibleResearchTools 6 лет назад
777THUTH777, you wrote, "1. The flood is global so the bed should be all around the planet." The flood didn't happen instantly, dummy. =========== 777THUTH777, you wrote, "2. What mega sequences of graduated sediments? We find distinct layers of different kinds of rock" The layers in each megasequence are graduated from the largest particles at the bottom, to the smallest at the top. Each megasequence is capped by micritic carbonate, formed by billions of bacteria. =========== 777THUTH777, you wrote, "3. No, different aged sediments" Gibberish. =========== 777THUTH777, you wrote, "4. You don't need erosion to lay down rock layers." Huh? LOL! More gibberish. Each layer has little or no erosion, and little or no bioturbation, denoting rapid deposition of one layer on top of the other. Otherwise, there would be evidence of erosion, and the destruction of the lamination. =========== 777THUTH777, you wrote, "5. ''the moon holding the water'' Tides don't make distinct layers or sort fossils LOL" Are you really that stupid? =========== 777THUTH777, you wrote, "6. The sand was deposited by the wind, and only across continents not world wide." I guess you really are that stupid. =========== 777THUTH777, you wrote, "7. Folding of rock happens deep in the earth under heat and pressure and the rock was never soft." Dumber than dirt! LOL! =========== 777THUTH777, you wrote, "8. Plate tectonics raised an ancient sea bed to make a layer of limestone on Mt. Everest. If a flood dun-it there would be shells on the top of every mountain and there isn't." Where did you get your "geology" training, Marvel Comics? =========== 777THUTH777, you wrote, "9. Not all sedimentary rock is laid down by water, some fossils are found in wind deposited layers." Baloney. Dan
@BibleResearchTools
@BibleResearchTools 6 лет назад
Erosion occurs at the top of the Precambrian (the "Great Unconformity") and at the top of the megasequences, but not between the individual layering. The lack of erosion and bioturbation indicates rapid layering. The "Great Uniformity" is a widespread geological feature: _"The Great Unconformity is well exposed in the Grand Canyon, but this geomorphic surface, which records the erosion and weathering of continental crust followed by sediment accumulation, can be traced across Laurentia and globally, including Gondwana, Baltica, Avalonia and Siberia, making it the most widely recognized and distinctive stratigraphic surface in the rock record." [Peters & Gaines, "Formation of the 'Great Unconformity’ as a trigger for the Cambrian explosion." Nature, 2012, 19 April, Vol 484, p.363]_ Dan
@BibleResearchTools
@BibleResearchTools 6 лет назад
Evolutionism is a myth, based on magic! Don't ever forget that, no matter how much they try to brainwash you! The Precambrian Layers were formed between 6,000 to 7,500 years ago when the Lord God created the earth; and it was covered first by the Cambrian Layer (which contained the Cambrian Explosion of fully-developed animals), by the world-wide flood, as written in the Holy Bible. 777THUTH777, I suspect you are too far gone, but God only knows. We will pray from your delivery from that hateful cult that has chained you. Dan
@cjson
@cjson 5 лет назад
There may be falsehood, but we must speak the truth in love, brother, and by God's grace remember to "Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse them... Repay no one evil for evil, but give thought to do what is honourable in the sight of all." (Romans 12:12, 17) God bless you both, and I pray you would always be rejoicing more deeply in Christ or come to know his grace for the first time. Love and peace
@FaithfulHonest
@FaithfulHonest 5 лет назад
@@cjson God Bless you to, I have to learn not to let anger get the better of me, the reason is I remember the exact point I lost my Faith as a child in 1981 because of the vestigial tail bone lie, I was just a ten year old it excited my mind of swinging around with my tail, it was all down hill from there, i am angry because I never would have got into Drugs and Alcohol the way I did I am off the drugs now, But I suppose it was a good thing if it never happened I wouldn't be trolling around the internet destroying evolutionist faith in evolution the way I am, I am still really angry though my life would have been a lot better without the poison of evolution infecting my mind. *Hitler polpot Marx Stalin and Evolutionary thinking* Hitler used the German Word for Evolution 150 times in his Book mein kampf, He used Evolution to Justify the Vile Evil he did to the Jews, because if we Believe in a Creator who Created us in his Image and Likeness All Humans have Value no matter what Color shape or Size we are, he used evolution to show that some humans are Superior and that others aren't, that some people are higher on the evolutionary tree and others are lower on the Tree of life, Stalin, Mao, Polpot all the same, When Polpot was introduced to Darwins book that is when he developed his ideas of Urban Struggle then Murdered hundreds of thousands, Stalin was in a Christian School when he was introduced to Darwins Evolutionary ideas, he developed his ideas on CRITICAL THINKING after this, then went on to kill 10's of millions of people, Mao same thing, he read Darwins book then went on to murder 60 million people, Carl Marx same thing, Karl Marx even wrote a letter to Darwin saying how wonderful he was and how much he admired him. Evolution has been responsible for taking away the idea that All Human beings have intrinsic value no matter color size or shape, Evolutionary ideas take away Moralistic values and the sense of right and wrong, because if you're just an Animal that climbed out of the slime and evolved via naturalistic processes and that its all about survival of the fittest, than there is no Right or wrong, its all about survival of the Superior ones that out compete the Weaker less worthy ones, that which is right for you may not be right for somebody else, if I feel like murdering you than that is right for me because I am superior to you, and if I eliminate you I am simply helping the Human race to become stronger by getting rid of the genetically inferior out of the Gene Pool. this is the ultimate conclusion to evolutionary thinking, Evolution is pure evil straight from Satans mind to destroy Gods Creation, and lead us into hell. Teach people they're nothing but animals don't be surprised when they act like Animals. *Religion starts wars* "An interesting source of truth on the matter is Philip and Axelrod's three-volume incyclopedia of wars, which chronicles some 1763 wars that have been waged over the course of human history. Of those wars, the Authors categorize 123 as being religious in Nature, which is an astonishingly low 6.93% of all wars. However, when one subtracts out those waged in the name of Islam, (66) the percentage is cut by more than half to 3.23% " A large portion of the wars Christian's are and were involved in were defensive not aggressive". The vast majority of wars Muslims are and were involved in, Were and are Aggressive in nature not defensive. The cause of the vast majority of war death and suffering is, Non-religious people who think they're superior to everybody else around them who think they're more highly evolved & ATHEISTIC COMMUNISM! Is responsible for hundreds of millions of people going to an early grave. Thats 1763 Wars waged across human history, 123 are classed as being Religious, You Atheist Evolutionists belong to a dangerous Murderous cult called Atheism, How many people in Prison do you reckon are Religious Christians, more than 90% of violent criminals are, YES YOU GUESSED IT!! Atheists,, how many people in the violent street crime gangs are Devout religious Christians, You Atheists need to wake up, Teach people they're nothing but animals don't be surprised when they act like animals.
@patrickkelly7612
@patrickkelly7612 3 года назад
Please explain why there are no rabbit fossils to be found in the Cambrian. Please explain why dinosaur fossils are below the KT boundary. Please explain why no modern creatures are to be found in the Burgess shale.
@cskinner0129
@cskinner0129 3 года назад
I was thinking the same thing.
@patrickkelly7612
@patrickkelly7612 3 года назад
@@cskinner0129 What an intelligent fellow you are, and handsome too, Ill warrant. HaHaHaHa.
@cskinner0129
@cskinner0129 3 года назад
@@patrickkelly7612 I was thinking the same thing.
@MeanMrMustrd
@MeanMrMustrd 2 года назад
This guy spends 30 minutes preparing you for what he is really excited share. Well done
@ozowen
@ozowen 2 года назад
Trouble is, it's all nonsense.
@Flagrum3
@Flagrum3 2 года назад
@@ozowen Your comment is nonsense and not backed by anything. Try again.
@ozowen
@ozowen 2 года назад
@@Flagrum3 Your comment was not backed by anything. It was nonsense.
@ozowen
@ozowen 2 года назад
Facts: There was no global flood. This is not in dispute. Every marker required for such an event is missing. Worse yet, there is a plethora of evidence for all sorts of events that did happen that rule out a global flood. 7 civilisations completely failed to get wet. The rise of civilisations after the supposed flood and their dispersal mean that the flood cannot have happened. The birth rate, maturation rate of individuals and dispersal cannot match the flood timing. But those are easy ones. The presence of aerial layers in a consistent pattern, including globally mean- no flood. The fossil order- trait appearances in the fossil record- and there is a fossil record and it is robust and it is used predictively, mean no flood. The presence of any dry formation is simply impossible in the supposed flood scenario. But there they are. There are many layers, for example, that can only form after they have dried out. But that cannot happen if they are under what creationists claim were sediments laid down in the flood. Varves are a biennial laminae that cannot remain stable, being as they are, thin laminae (thin strata) laid down as glaciers go through summer and winter cycles. Creationists like to claim they can be laid down in storms too. Fair enough- but they cannot remain intact when hit with turbulent, roiling flood waters impacted by those nearby mountain ranges being formed- so- no flood. So this is the equivalent of calling the video: The Palaeontology of the Middle Earth
@ozowen
@ozowen Год назад
@Atheist Deprogramming No there was no global flood. Aerial layers like the iridium anomaly laid down after the dust cloud encapsulated the entire planet (causing the demise of the dinosaurs), or volcanic dust layers. None of these can be anything but dispersed in a flood. The chances of a distinct layer are exactly zero. "I suspect you're talking about layers like the Coconino sandstone" Nope. There are layers globally caused by things like river mouths drying out. They can only be formed where the river mouth dries leaving a very particular shape and type of layer. They are everywhere on the globe and they are impossible in the flood. "The layers you're talking about may be post-flood or they may be during the flood and simply misidentified as being from glacial activity." Nope, they are biennial layers. There is sometimes extra formation in storms, those are distinct. They are certainly not misidentified. They are always adjacent to glacial formations- which are themselves distinct. There is no evidence for your claims- you are now obviously working backwards from your conclusion to force evidence. "It is all-too-common for evolutionists to misidentify strata, be proven wrong, yet the myth be propagated." This is nonsense. What you mean is that scientists do not comply to creationist assertions. (ie: non scientific assertions) "The flood is obvious and one day you will meet the Lord." No, the flood is not obvious. It is exactly not obvious. The evidence is non existent for it and the evidence against it is plentiful. I will insist on evidence, not preconception forcing the evidence to be shoe horned into a nonsense claim. "When the torture starts, it never ends." Do you have any idea how appalling that is both as a theological statement as it is a conversational argument? It's not a valid assertion and it is pretty disgusting. Are claiming God is like a violent husband? That He will torture non compliance and that love looks like pain inflicted for poor decisions and non compliance and even for "correction"? That's a dreadful theology.
@dannymack9636
@dannymack9636 4 года назад
Luke 19:40 But He answered and said to them, “I tell you that if these should keep silent,the stones would immediately cry out.”
@rastawamebry8533
@rastawamebry8533 3 года назад
@@JB-yb4wn just cause it don’t make sense to you doesn’t mean it don’t make sense to us
@firmware-jh5vk
@firmware-jh5vk 3 года назад
Danny that was a good one!
@canadianjoker5033
@canadianjoker5033 3 года назад
@@rastawamebry8533 Your grammar is atrocious.
@DwayneShaw1
@DwayneShaw1 3 года назад
@@rastawamebry8533 - Just because it makes sense to you doesn't mean that it actually makes sense
@savagetruthercritic8646
@savagetruthercritic8646 3 года назад
@@JB-yb4wn there is no drug that makes you smart so you're screwed
@Hick_Dead
@Hick_Dead 3 года назад
You should do a video about how chimneys are proof of Santa Claus.
@traffic-law
@traffic-law 2 года назад
It would be great if you could show us fossils of humans who died in Noah's flood.
@smokeysmith1282
@smokeysmith1282 2 года назад
My thoughts exactly. There should be mass graves piled or stacked up similarly to the midwestern dinosaurs located in North America.
@charmainethomas751
@charmainethomas751 2 года назад
I've heard it explained that humans (being most intelligent) would keep moving to higher ground during the flood so a lot were probably not buried in a way that they could be fossilized , perhaps alot decomposed.
@mattsmith5421
@mattsmith5421 2 года назад
He can't humans weren't around 185-66 million years ago
@fzr1000981
@fzr1000981 Год назад
Matt Smith lack of human fossils is actually a much bigger problem for evolution, it makes sense for the creation model. There may have been several million people at the time, who were smart enough to move to high ground. Their bodies likely floated away and were scavenged
@ChristianityRecap
@ChristianityRecap Год назад
@@fzr1000981that’s not a good enough explanation. All living animals would float if they drown.
@johnwall5624
@johnwall5624 2 года назад
Thanks. Too Del Tackett and Dr. Wise for this well produced video on this topic, which to me is very important to prove that we were all created and didn't arrive here by evolution. Thanks Again 😊
@lennon7978
@lennon7978 Год назад
So you are a clueless American with a childish stubborn opinion, great
@nunyabisnass1141
@nunyabisnass1141 3 года назад
So a flood event that was violent enough to deposit large masses of vegetation, animals and sediments simultaneously, was also gentle enough to preserve footprints? Nah you have to explain that instead of simply asserting it quickly and moving on. You have to show how a violent event can preserve delicate details both above and below those details before you can expect anyone to buy your hypothesis.
@Real_Genuflekt
@Real_Genuflekt 3 года назад
Explain how the foot prints got preserved then so we can "buy" your hypothesis.
@nunyabisnass1141
@nunyabisnass1141 3 года назад
@@Real_Genuflekt depends on the type of print. Usually its an impression made in some type of mud that drys out and gets covered later. Same thing can happen with sand, even sand under water. The trick is a gentle deposition of a top layer that would drift in from wind or moved in from small wave actions. I violent action lime storm waves would almost certainly destroy any freshly laid tracks. But it isn't even that though. Theres no clear timeline or agreed upon rate or depth for which how fast the global flood rose, so it becomes very difficult to think about why tracks all over the world can have tracks in multiple layers of sedimentary rock, meaning animals were still alive to make them at those times. So it would impossible for such a thing to occur if its even remotely as sudden as is widely accepted.
@mattsmith5421
@mattsmith5421 2 года назад
Oi your common sense and balanced thinking is not welcome here
@walter1383
@walter1383 4 года назад
Fantastic stuff, I've been intrigued by the floating forest hypothesis since I first encountered it (I love woods, swamps, mangroves and reefs, putting them all together is my dream biome!) Something I'd like to incorporate into my worldbuilding as an aspiring writer. One thing I'd like to point out though, dinosaurs almost certainly didn't drag their tails unlike living reptiles. It's counterproductive to their gait, size and proportions. Almost all dinosaurs had their spines aligned in a horizontal manner, so theropods were bipedal so needed them to counterbalance everything before their hips, sauropods there necks and hadrosaurs to counter balance the weight of their foreparts. Stegosaurs and ankylosaurs had clubs and thagomizers on them so dragging them would have just led to catching their weapons in the underbrush and ceratopsians had relatively small tails for the most part anyway. It's not a big deal though, scientists each have their own particular field of expertise, and geology isn't the same as biomechanics of an animals musculoskeletal structure so no worries.
@kennethkustren9381
@kennethkustren9381 4 года назад
Perhaps DIY AIRCRETE.... and DIY SODIUM SILICATE might help your biome project ? Also... WISNERS ROCKET MASS HEATER.
@smokeysmith1282
@smokeysmith1282 2 года назад
While listening to Dr. Kurt’s presentation with my Bose headphones, I can only hear Brett Baier’s voice from FOX News speak of fossilized species and such and it’s messing with me because this subject is not his wheelhouse. ThankYou, for sharing this information here on RU-vid. Regarding dinosaur bones and fossils, have mass human boneyards been discovered similar to the dinosaur boneyard discovered out west in North America?
@cosmictreason2242
@cosmictreason2242 10 месяцев назад
No human fossils from pre flood. We wouldn't expect them either because they would go to high ground and remain at the surface of the ocean for some time, avoiding burial, even after death when that would be eaten by other creatures, or if buried at all, the sediments would be eroded and deposited in the bottoms of the oceans after the flood. One way or the other, we wouldn't expect to find any
@Kenniii3
@Kenniii3 3 года назад
The state stone of Michigan is the Petoskey Stone, 43 north and above. It is a fossilized coral.
@bonysminiatures3123
@bonysminiatures3123 3 года назад
Thats because their was a huge inland see their millions of years ago ,later in the ice age it froze , the world began to warm again , and the ice which held back that inland sea broke it spilled into the Atlantic sea levels rose and their was a huge flood which created the mediterrean sea , and also the united kingdom got cut off from mainland Europe .. what noah was referring to was this flood , it happened before his time he was recounting a story from then a full 8,000 years or so prior to Christ being born
@etw4life970
@etw4life970 2 года назад
@@bonysminiatures3123 Noah wasn't referring to a flood before his time because he wasn't the one that told the story to begin with. He was just the main character that survived the flood in the story which was written by Moses. Now if u want to argue that Moses retold the Sumerian flood story then that's a whole 'nother argument. But it wasn't Noah referring to a flood before his time
@matswessling6600
@matswessling6600 4 месяца назад
@@bonysminiatures3123mediterranean sea was filled millions of years ago.. no humans where around then...
@ericjarvie
@ericjarvie 3 года назад
These guys have done an excellent job in laying out Earth's history..This thesis makes an lot more sense than the incoherent tale that's told in universities and schools..indeed in days of climate change and potential for global catastrophe none of which is ever envisioned in the standard text book dogma it's time we take an serious look at the flaws in the sciences or face the potential for disaster never even knowing what hit us never mind what should we do!!
@hongotedesco8931
@hongotedesco8931 3 года назад
Wrong. They have done an absolutely horrible job of "laying out Earth's history". What you learn in school (hopefully you went to a real school) is really what you want. When a "science" lecture begins with "Science should begin with Scripture", you're dead wrong. Period.
@bonysminiatures3123
@bonysminiatures3123 3 года назад
if incoherent tales of science are taught in schools how come we have got all this new technology , obviously someone in those incoherent universities are doing a good job ........
@ozowen
@ozowen 2 года назад
@@bigboreracing356 Paranoid nonsense. Science is coherent if you can be bothered learning. When I was a printer (decades ago) the trade was incoherent to outsiders. Measurements like "Ems" and "Ens" and picas made it incomprehensible- until you learned it. Science has no political agenda. Science is taught because it should be taught. Creationism should not be taught because it is garbage.
@ozowen
@ozowen 2 года назад
@@bigboreracing356 More paranoid nonsense. Do you ever actually think things through or do you always assume disagreement is about others trying to control you? (ie: paranoia)
@ozowen
@ozowen 2 года назад
@@bigboreracing356 This is text with no para-verbals mate. If that was supposed to be sarcasm, it was certainly missed. Apologies if that is the case. But sad to say, the Poe effect operates with creationists. They are often indistinguishable from parody.
@kathyjames9250
@kathyjames9250 2 года назад
Thanks Dr. Kurt. I am grateful for your clear explanations, and I enjoy many of the comments.
@kathyjames9250
@kathyjames9250 2 года назад
@@jamesginty6684 Hi, thanks for your advice, but no I haven’t been diligently researching much, except to try to get familiar with my Bible and study what the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek really mean. It is fun to watch Dr. Kurt’s take on Biblical events.
@waynesumner1829
@waynesumner1829 10 месяцев назад
Creationists are very good at "explaining" Genesis,chapters 6,7,8 ,&9, but have completely ignored the "In the beginning" creation of Genesis,chapter 1. Also they offer no explanation of Noah's or acknowledgement of his "bad behavior" after he got off the ark, as recorded in chapter 9. Also there is no explanation of who were the wives of the post-flood generation, the 16 sons of Shem, Ham and Japheth, Noah's grandsons, who were to repopulate the post-flood world and "overspread the earth" by which the nations were divided in the earth 🌎 after the flood. So in effect the only difference in the Evolutionists and the Creationists is how they work time into their theories. Evolutionists need millions of years to make their senseless teachings plausible, whereas the Creationists, in keeping with their interpretation of the Genesis account, need only 6,000 years to "prove" their presentations. The Flood gives the Creation geologists their one isolated "causal catastrophic event", of short historical duration, 13 months or so, to which they can devote a career to "scientifically" explain its earthly effects. And since th term "dinosaur 🦖🦕" was coined in the 19th century,they have created a pedantically biased field of study. They are in most cases pseudo-Bible students who only use Scripture to lend a thread of credence to their otherwise secular, purely scientific postulations. Nevertheless, We Love and forgive All people everywhere!
@kathyjames9250
@kathyjames9250 10 месяцев назад
Hi, Wayne Sumner, yes love and forgiveness, thank you for your reply. I find there is a mind-boggling amount of information about all these things (which is great fun!). I feel an urgency to know the Gospel of Jesus in its entirety, which in itself is fascinating and keeps expanding its parameters, as I continue to connect the dots in the Old and New Testaments. I have been hearing teaching lately (i.e. “Fasting Brings Restoration, Living as Salt and Light, Parts 1 and 2 by Derek Prince), that the faithful have a responsibility to petition for change (fast and pray) before our country(ies) and people stumble past the point of no return. It’s all amazing, so I wish everyone could feel the same way.
@davidgardner863
@davidgardner863 8 месяцев назад
@@waynesumner1829, Why is evolution over millions of years senseless? There is a massive amount of evidence to support it. The creationist alternative is super hyper evolution happening in a few years when they got off the ark and zero evidence for anything in the biblical story.
@DaleBoyce2012
@DaleBoyce2012 4 года назад
I have often wondered what lunar tides would be like without coastlines to contain them. I hypothesized a large bulge of water traveling east to west following the gravitational pull of the moon. I wonder if something like that might explain the latitudinal displacement of colonies.
@alanmcnaughton3628
@alanmcnaughton3628 3 года назад
Once the fountains of the deep burst forth, on the day Noah entered the Ark. Only the creatures with the breath of life in their nostrils survived with the family. The enormous forces exerted on the earth were unimaginable. The hydroplate theory makes sense of all the things found buried or even on mountain tops such as oyster in the closed position. In this video Brian Nichol gives a great understanding of Walt Browns hydroplane theory. ru-vid.com/group/PLvTah6tEcChwZjUyG6X_5_zwVDAalSJHI
@Keairan3
@Keairan3 3 года назад
The hydroplate theory wouldn't leave a habitable planet. All that heat has to go somewhere, and the atmosphere is it. You're talking several thousand degrees kelvin over the entirety of the atmosphere during such an event.
@anthonypolonkay2681
@anthonypolonkay2681 3 года назад
@@Keairan3 true. But your discounting that water is a much greater conductor than air. Enough water to produce the oceans of today would have more than enough effect to keep the atmosphere from cooking.
@Keairan3
@Keairan3 3 года назад
No, no it would not. Hydroplate states that all small bodies, ie, kuiper belt objects, asteroids, comets and similar objects in the solar system. The asteroid belt alone is 2.39*10^21 kilograms alone. Escape velocity for earth is 11.2 km/s. The kinetic energy to get those objects out of earth's atmosphere is 1.5 * 10^29 joules. There's about 1.26*10^22 L of water on earth. Let's be generous and say that only half of that energy went into heating up all that water. The specific heat of water is 4184 j/(kg*C). Calculating all of this gives us a water temperature increase of 1421 Kelvin. And that's being generous. Being realistic, that temperature increase at minimum doubles, and that's not counting comets, kuiper objects or non asteroid belt small solar satellites. to increase our temperature gain further. The oceans boil, the skies turn into plasma, and not even extremophiles survive that type of devastation.
@stevendeatley4878
@stevendeatley4878 4 года назад
I have several rocks in the f;ower bed in my front yard that are embedded with tiny sea shells ,I found these rocks at about 3000 feet above sea level on the top of the mountain beside my house.they was embedded in a red stone outcrop of rock on the tip of a mountain ridge when you look at the rock cliff ,you can tell at one time it was layers of mud .its only about 70 feet below the crest of the mountain top ,but I have found rocks laying right on the top of the ground that have seashells in them.
@BlGGESTBROTHER
@BlGGESTBROTHER 3 года назад
Let us know when you find a single modern species (in situ) in that red stone, alright bubs?
@joeythebushkangaroo1
@joeythebushkangaroo1 2 месяца назад
My dad went to Central Australia years ago and found a mud encrusted seashell while gold digging, which I begged to have. He gave it to me and I said "here is proof of a global flood-what is a large seashell,encrusted in dried mud,doing in the middle of a dry continent as big as Australia?" He was gobsmacked, he was a Militant Communist. It took the wind out of his sails, as he had persecuted me terribly, since I had told him I believed in God at 27yo. He was never the same, as he had found it, and not even realised its significance. He saw it with his own eyes and had just realised that maybe,he had been wrong! He stopped talking about Communistic Atheism after that...
@nathanwofford2996
@nathanwofford2996 3 года назад
If you did a core sample of Spirit Lake near Mt. St. Helens, you would find a biostratigraphic column example that perfectly resembles the "evolutionary" column, which refutes the idea of evolution, as opposed to catastrophic-flood sediment, completely.
@gjorgin
@gjorgin 2 года назад
Are there fossils found at mt helens, and are they ordered in separate strata from simpler life forms to more complex?
@nathanwofford2996
@nathanwofford2996 2 года назад
@@gjorgin yes
@gjorgin
@gjorgin 2 года назад
@@nathanwofford2996 could you please proide me a link, or video? I couldnt find anywhere...
@nathanwofford2996
@nathanwofford2996 2 года назад
@@gjorgin No, I'm sorry I can't, and yes, I know this sounds like a cop out. It's been years since I went down this rabbit hole. The evidence is out there. I probably should have just left it alone and moved on, but I've got a little OCD and I could not, not respond to you. I wish you all the best. Peace.
@benjaminstephenson3125
@benjaminstephenson3125 2 года назад
@@gjorgin Even if we see something at Mt. St. Helens similar to what we see all over the earth in the strata, what you described is not what is found all over the earth. Extremely complex life throughout every strata, just different ecosystems being taken out over multiple mega sequences of the flood. Every strata is full of fossilized ocean life, indicating a watery catastrophe. Lots and lots more evidence billions of dead things were catastrophically buried and laid down by water in many layers at the same time all over the earth.
@grey8940
@grey8940 3 года назад
This has been a personal. theory of mine for many years. Nice to have it explained scientifically. Thanks for the excellent video.
@kai_plays_khomus
@kai_plays_khomus 3 года назад
He explained a lot, really interesting! 👍 Unfortunatly there wasn't any science included, just mimicked.
@philaypeephilippotter6532
@philaypeephilippotter6532 3 года назад
@@kai_plays_khomus Did you actually _expect_ any science?
@kai_plays_khomus
@kai_plays_khomus 3 года назад
@@philaypeephilippotter6532 Totally not. I watched just for amusement. Unfortunatly it seems to be different with the poster of the initial comment - and he fell victim to the manipulation tactics of pseudoscience - he seems convinced now that the video was somehow scientific. ✝️x🧠=🍅=🙈+🙉=☪️x🧠
@kai_plays_khomus
@kai_plays_khomus 3 года назад
@@JB-yb4wn 🤣👍
@roberthawkes2023
@roberthawkes2023 3 года назад
@@kai_plays_khomus ..... how is there no science, it’s all scientific evidence. This is evidence from palaeontology and geological studies. You trying to state that it’s not science is showing you to be a bit of a numpty.
@ProjectOverseer
@ProjectOverseer Год назад
In my youth (a very long time ago) I had a passion for Geology and Paleontology. I was fasinated with your simplified geo time chart. In my non Christian mind back then, you've just covered in a few inches 4.5 billion years. I remember collecting fossils in the middle of a London woodland. I charted the area and found amazing shells, shark & ray teeth. Bones from turtles and crocks. They didn't even look fossilized. In fact I still have a lot of this collection found in London Beds. I also enjoyed a place called Lyme Regis. Sedimentary rocks of different kinds going down thousands of feet. These plains follow patterns i.e. land animals then sea creatures, then land, sea, land sea etc. And in each bedding plain you'll find completely different species. The coal tips were a great place to collect plant fossils. Mines hundreds of feet deep with tropical palms trees turned into carbon rocks. Fascinating. Today I am wiser. I certainly don't believe in evolution. I was anti Darwin in college. In the field, I saw no evidence of evolution. What I did see though is vast periods of time. Its one area I have problems with scriptually. Our Lord is everlasting. Time is not an issue for our Lord whom has no beginning or end. Humans have a tendency to fragment time. One day well understand what "forever" means.
@ozowen
@ozowen Год назад
You are also anti science.
@fzr1000981
@fzr1000981 Год назад
Why do you see deep time in the fossil record? Much of it is stunningly well preserved, you could say flash preserved, and tissue residuals have been found inside bones. Vast imaginary eons is only somewhat supported by radio dating of rocks, but the core assumptions can't possibly be verified
@kingmastersgaming3743
@kingmastersgaming3743 4 года назад
What are your thoughts on the formation of the Kansas plains and rolling hills? Also the formation of the Flint hills where the rocks seem to be laid down in rings according to elevation. Where did the flint actually originate? How would massive flood waters be responsible for depositing massive amounts of fertile soil? Evolution scientists say a giant ocean existed in Kansas millions of years ago. But do drainage patterns actually show that? What are your thoughts?
@prycenewberg3976
@prycenewberg3976 3 года назад
I would love to see you discuss this with John Lennox.
@obsoletevalues6209
@obsoletevalues6209 3 года назад
I have great respect for Dr. Lennox, and have watched his videos and read one of his books. His area of expertise, however, is math. True, he does a lot of generalized debating versus atheists, but does not really do a deep dive into paleontology, which is Dr. Wise's area of expertise. I appreciate the unique contributions of both men!
@prycenewberg3976
@prycenewberg3976 3 года назад
@@obsoletevalues6209 So do I. That's why I want to lock them in the same room and film the talk. I think it would be great.
@gkseeton
@gkseeton 8 месяцев назад
Fascinating. Also explains where ancient tales of floating islands could have originated. Realities remembered by the humans who survived the great flood and told to children or recited around a fire to remember what no longer existed.
@PerryMarshallScott
@PerryMarshallScott 5 месяцев назад
The incestuous spawn of eight people from 4000 odd years ago ? You have a fanciful imagination. Just need to get honest about what is credible. The global flood isn't.
@christenejackman
@christenejackman 3 года назад
question: like the flat lines of coal...there are repeated flat lines of black flint in Ein Avdat canyon in Israel. How was that formed--in light of the Flood. I was intrigued by it when I saw it.
@tmill2001
@tmill2001 3 года назад
Could the "floating forest" just be more debris from continents from before the flood? Since plants and animals both increase in order of "terrestriality". I think all you have to do is look at US southwest and you see evidence of flood.
@user-uh5fc3rd9e
@user-uh5fc3rd9e 4 года назад
This presentation is an outstanding analysis of the evidence using knowledge of nature, natural science, mater, and it's motion through space and time. By using physics and a clear understanding of natural processes like decay, Dr. Wise establishes a compelling theory. It is very encouraging to see this paradigm shift in scientific thought.
@chrism3845
@chrism3845 4 года назад
Wrong!
@jmogames724
@jmogames724 3 года назад
@@chrism3845 Elaborate!
@martyfromnebraska1045
@martyfromnebraska1045 Год назад
@@jmogames724 Lol still waiting.
@nephilimfree1770
@nephilimfree1770 5 лет назад
The continents are covered with an average of 1,800 meters of sedimentary materials deposited by rapidly moving water which are heavily littered with rapidly buried creatures which are now fossils. This geologic fact provides overwhelming evidence of the Noaich Flood because uniformitariqanism cannot have produced the strata, it has been demonstrated scientifically that strata form rapidly and in groups together at the same time, making the strata above and below any given streata to be of no difference in age. Features of the strata which prove global catastrophism is the cause of the global strata are: 1. The mountains of the earth are comprised to a large extent of deformed strata, which cannot have become deformed by heat and pressure miles deep inside the earth, but were instead soft and moist when deformed 2. There is a nearly complete absence of erosion between any of the strata 3. There is a nearly complete absence of grass in the geologic column 4. There is a nearly complete absence of soil in the geologic column 5. The strata have fine and distinct boundaries between each other instead of gradating 6. The majority of strata possess grain-size distribution - a feature that is produced only by rapid sedimentation 7. Sand dunes formed under water litter the continents, verified by their approximately 15 degree angle of inclination. Sand dunes formed by wind have an approximately 25 degree angle of inclination. 8. Fossilization requires rapid burial - all strata in which there are fossils were deposited rapidly, regardless of other properties they may have. 9. Mountain Water Gaps exist globally - mountains which were still soft and moist after rapid uplift which were pulverized by a newly created stream of water (river) which ate through the mountain. Water seeks the path of least resistance and could not have eaten through the side of a mountain. It would instead flow around it. 10. Dropstones are common in mountains - large rocks and boulders which have become moved into place by very fast moving water and sealed in sedimentary strata which deform around them 11. Planation Surfaces are plentiful on the earth - broad areas, sometimes hundreds or thousands of square miles which have been planed off by massive sheets of rapidly moving water as the flood waters ebated the continents during the end stage of the Noaich Flood - uniformitarianism cannot account for massive planation surfaces. 12. Percussion Marks - impact marks ranging is size from small to huge on rocks and boulders across the earth show that extremely fast moving water (up to and beyond 100 mph) has moved rocks weighing up to tons at high speed - enough speed to cause percussion marks under water when they collide with each other. 13. Massive quantities of methane hydrates lining the continents - frozen or semi-frozen methane hydrate which is buried in sediments around the edges of the continents - produced by massive volumes of plant matter ripped from the continents and buried which has now become frozen methane gas. There is so much of it that if it could be mined efficiently, it would provide enough energy for the entire world for over a century. 14. Oil and gas reserves under high pressure - the pressure could not be present after many millions of years. The gas or oil would dissipate all pressure through fissures and microfissures in the rocks. Unless the oil and gas were produced recently, it could not be under high pressure. 15. Polystrate fossils - leaves, marine fossils, trees, worms, etc. show that the strata in which they are encased were deposited rapidly, effectively eliminating all concepts of vast geologic time. 16. Massive canyons - carved out while their strata going down to 1 mile or more deep into the earth were eroded very rapidly, effectively eliminating all concepts of vast geologic time. 17. Megasequences - There are 5 major megasequences which span the majority of North America and can be found globally: 1. Sauk Megasequence, which rests upon basement granite 2. Tippecanoe Megasequence 3. Keskaskia Megasequence 4. Arrasoka Megasequence. 5. Zuni Megasequence The Navjo Sandstone covers 400,000 sq. km in the western US. comprised of grains eroded from the Appalatian Mountains. The Coconino Sandstone formation averages 315 ft. thick and covers 518,000 sq. km in the US. and sits on the Hermit Shale. The boundary between them is extremely fine. This removes the potential for long perionds of time between the Hermit Shale and Cocconino Sandstone, and verifies both were created rapidly. The Tapeats Sandstone and Redwall Limestone of Grand Canyon can be traced across the entire United States, up into Canada, and even across the Atlantic Ocean to England. The chalk beds of England (the white cliffs of Dover) can be traced across Europe into the Middle East and are also found in the Midwest of the United States and in Western Australia. Inclined (sloping) layers within the Coconino Sandstone of Grand Canyon are testimony to 10,000 cubic miles of sand being deposited by huge water currents within days. Directional sorting is often found in the fossil record. The Miffle Permian Qixia and Maikou limestone of southeast China cover 1.2 million sq. km. 18. Giant gravel deposit sheets miles wide and dozens of feet thick (such as in western Sichuan Basin, China), sometimes up to hundreds of miles from their source location, and massive rock deposites up to miles deep 19. Numerous other facts - erosion rates, geologic young age for the earth's rocks, genetic mutation rates, and many others all discredit uniformitarianism and show the Flood of Noah is a historical geological fact.
@petechimney6755
@petechimney6755 5 лет назад
Evan Sorry but most of what you state in your post is not supported by the geologic data around the world. Specifically Point 2 in your post is simply not true. I have mapped using well logs and 2D/3D seismic data numerous cases where there is obvious erosion between rock layers, usually evidenced as angular unconformities and the pinchout of beds below the unconformity. An excellent example of such an erosional unconformity is found at Siccar Point in Scotland a bit east of Edinburgh. If you are not able to visit this outcrop you can got here on RU-vid, simply type in Siccar Point and view the videos. Obviously the lower beds were deposited, buried and lithified, uplifted and tilted, eroded and then the overlying sandstones deposited across the eroded beds. These new sediments were also buried and lithified and the uplifted and eroded to the position we see today. These angular unconformities with erosion between beds are fairly common around the world and through the geologic column indicating the processes of deposition, burial, uplift and tilting, erosion, and new deposition has occurred on the Earth for a long, long time. This seems to my mind as a lot of geologic processes to occur in the time that many Young Earth Creationists claim, e.g. 6000 years, since the beginning of the Earth.
@FaithfulHonest
@FaithfulHonest 5 лет назад
@@petechimney6755 *Continental Erosion Rates.* Australia. Most of the continent is said to be older than 0.5 billion years, while some is supposed to be older than 3.0 billion years. Orthodox geologists are surprised that very little erosion has occurred in ‘all this time, only evolutionist worker bee drones think they can explain this away, the real Creationist and evolutionary scientists realize this is a problem for evolution. sedimentologists have researched many of the world’s rivers and calculated how fast the land is disappearing. The measurements show that some rivers are excavating their basins by more than 1,000 mm (39 inches) of height in 1,000 years, while others move only 1 mm (0.04 inches) in 1,000 years. The average height reduction for all the continents of the world is about 60 mm (2.4 inches) per 1,000 years, which equates to some 24 billion tonnes of sediment per year. That is a lot of top dressing! On the scale of one human life-span, these rates of erosion are low. But for those who say the continents are billions of years old, the rates are staggering. A height of 150 kilometres (93 miles) of continent would have eroded in 2.5 billion years. It defies common sense. If erosion had been going on for billions of years, no continents would remain on Earth, and there would be no fossils left or very little left, we wouldn't see the great sheets of sedimentary rock about 0.5 to 1.5 miles deep running from continent to continent around the entire planet with uncountable trillions of sea creature fossils in them, Noah's flood explains this much better than the evolutionary computer model. The mountain ranges, such as the Caledonides of western Europe and the Appalachians of eastern North America are even harder to explain because they are not as high as Everest, yet are supposed to be several hundred million years old LOL!!!. If erosion has been going on for this long, these mountains should not exist. Erosion rates of some major rivers of the world Average lowering of the land surface within the drainage basin in mm and inches per 1000 years.17 Wei-Ho 1350 (53) Hwang-Ho 900 (35) Ganges 560 (22) Alpine Rhine and Rhone 340 (13) San Juan (U.S.A.) 340 (13) Irrawaddy 280 (11) Tigris 260 (10) Isere 240 (9.4) Tiber 190 (7.5) Indus 180 (7.1) Yangtse 170 (6.7) Po 120 (4.7) Garonne and Colorado 100 (3.9) Amazon 71 (2.8) Adige 65 (2.6) Savannah 33 (1.3) Potomac 15 (0.59) Nile 13 (0.51) Seine 7 (0.28) Connecticut 1 (0.04) Going by the Lowest erosion rates every continent on Earth would be Eroded away completely gone washed into the Oceans about every 10 to 18 million years let's just stick with 12 million years that's every continent gone 10 times over in Just 120 million years, That's a lot for continental uplift to account for going by evolutionary timescales, all the salt would have washed into the Oceans, the amount of salt that comes back out via Man and natural processes cannot account for the amount going in, much more salt going in than coming out bearing in mind that if all the salt on all the land masses washed into the Oceans everything would die including us, also there is a sedimentary rock layer that is around about half a mile deep to 1.5 miles deep that runs clear across this Earth that is full of trillions and trillions and trillions of fossils, these fossils are found from the tops of mountains that run right down below the Earth, we don't see these massive fossil beds forming today, if Continental uplift was accounting for the erosion rates we wouldn't see these great sheets of sedimentary rock with trillions and trillions and trillions of fossils in them running all the way across this Earth running from continent to continent. The evolutionists may be able to explain away some of this, but they cannot explain why we see all this sedimentary rock teaming with Trillions upon Trillions of fossils, mostly sea creature fossils thousands of miles inland running from the tops of mountains to the bottom of mountains and deep under the Earth everywhere, besides the Erosion rates are to high and to fast for evolutionists to account for this everywhere on all land masses, they only have theories, hypotheses and wild Assumptions and a corrupted world view to base their explanations on, anybody with any common sense at all could see this smacks evolution in the face hard, they can't account for this without invoking ridiculous fantastic Hypotheses that have no foundation in reality or science, and they can never back up their wild Assumptions claims theories and hypotheses with Scientific Peer Reviewed papers that show the problem has been solved, No usually it's a paper about more Hypotheses and theories on how the Original theory works, Never facts always wild claims with zero proof. 1. Also remember that the Evolutionists say the continents formed about 2.5 billion years ago and at the lowest erosion rate 150 kilometers of land mass would have eroded away in that time, that us a humongous amount for continental uplift to account for, not to mention if that was the case all the Great sheets of sedimentary rock 0.5 to 1.5 with Trillions of fossils in them they would have been eroded replaced with different geological layers. evolutionist fairytales are So funny :) creation.com/eroding-ages
@FaithfulHonest
@FaithfulHonest 5 лет назад
@@petechimney6755 Oh Yes could you tell me more about these erosion rates please, are they just isolated small areas, or does this erosion in the Strata you're talking about is it all over the Earth? Or in small areas I mean small compared to all the Strata across the hole Earth?
@petechimney6755
@petechimney6755 5 лет назад
There is no consistent rate of erosion. Several factors are involved: erosive capability of the rock(s), amount of rainfall, topography, yearly climate. In general rocks in areas with high rainfall and softer rocks erode faster. Having said that glacial advances might scrape off a lot of rock material in a short period of time. In general erosion of a highland will be confined to that area. Little erosion will occur along a coastal plain. During major storms such as hurricanes coastal erosion may be significant but this is erosion of soft sediment and little in the way of erosion of lithified rock. During periods of flooding there may be erosion along the edge of rivers but again this is typically soft sediment and not rock material. In general there is no world-wide erosional surface. Not even at the top of the crystalline basement, which is usually (but not always) Precambrian age, is there a single surface of erosion.
@FaithfulHonest
@FaithfulHonest 5 лет назад
@@petechimney6755 RUBBISH that there is no consistent erosion rate, GO look internet search the official government erosion rates Super Genius, I have looked, But you won't check it out because it goes against your satanic evolution paradigm.
@christiandehlinger3731
@christiandehlinger3731 2 года назад
At 14:00 I think as well, the climate sedimentary coverage, put a tremendous amount of material in the water so that small things that would be decomposers were also having trouble surviving just as larger creatures were dying. One of the impacts you and others like yourself have made on me is the contemplation of the immensity of the catastrophe of the flood. When God says he will, "blot out" He meant it.
@ozowen
@ozowen 2 года назад
no flood
@cipherhost
@cipherhost Год назад
Dr. Wise, At ~24:00 minutes you discuss footprints before fossils. Is is correct to think that conventional scientific thinking (millions of years), both footprints and fossils should be found at the same strata? Thanks
@pg9112471
@pg9112471 3 года назад
How many versions of various "realities" on any number of subjects would exist if we didn't have peer review analysis on any claims I wonder...
@andrewgroves8611
@andrewgroves8611 3 года назад
Amazing! I never knew how difficult it was to become a fossil this really helps my faith!
@peterleadley7103
@peterleadley7103 3 года назад
It shouldn't. this video denies scholarship, so completely loses credibility
@TrevoltIV
@TrevoltIV Год назад
@@peterleadley7103 Because scholarship is indoctrination. Sorry to break it to you but yes, indeed your entire school life is a lie when it comes to origins science.
@daMillenialTrucker
@daMillenialTrucker Год назад
​@@peterleadley7103 scholarship? All of your science is a theory just like ours loooooool
@daMillenialTrucker
@daMillenialTrucker Год назад
​@@peterleadley7103 science only becomes credible and factual when it's observable. Can't none of this be observed, so all we got is theories.
@martyfromnebraska1045
@martyfromnebraska1045 Год назад
@@peterleadley7103 Muh schoolars Muh human authority
@NateWilliams190
@NateWilliams190 4 года назад
In addition to the floating forest theory, what about the 1st to sink theory?
@canadianjoker5033
@canadianjoker5033 3 года назад
Tim Kennedy: I know who I'd like to sink first!
@JA-qf2du
@JA-qf2du 3 года назад
What about all the giant organs mud fossil university has had proven are real
@canadianjoker5033
@canadianjoker5033 3 года назад
@@JA-qf2du -Uhm... are you dyslexic? You might want to rewrite your comment so it is at least somewhat coherent.
@anonymike8280
@anonymike8280 3 года назад
@@canadianjoker5033 You can search mudfossil university in a few seconds. The mudfossil theory is the idea that certain stone formations are fossils of gigantic organisms. A notable instance is the argument that Devil's Tower in Wyoming is the stump of a huge tree. Then there are mudrocks which are sedimentary rock which originate from mud deposits, notably shales. There is a RU-vid channel called mudfossil university and some blogs or social media pages which call themselves the same. Don't expect other people to do all your work for you.
@lynnv8501
@lynnv8501 4 года назад
Love it!
@SpatioTemporalEntity
@SpatioTemporalEntity 3 года назад
The Egyptian priest said: "Solon, the memorials which your own and other nations have once had of the famous actions of mankind perish in the waters at certain periods; and the rude survivors in the mountains begin again, knowing nothing of the world before the flood. But in Egypt the traditions of our own and other lands are by us registered for ever in our temples. The genealogies which you have recited to us out of your own annals, Solon, are a mere children's story. For in the first place, you remember one deluge only, and there were many of them, and you know nothing of that fairest and noblest race of which you are a seed or remnant. The memory of them was lost, because there was no written voice among you." -Plato, Timaeus
@mistahbreeze4412
@mistahbreeze4412 2 года назад
and you know nothing of that fairest and noblest race of which you are a seed or remnant. The memory of them was lost, because there was no written voice among you. For in the times before the great flood Athens was the greatest and best of cities and did the noblest deeds and had the best constitution of any under the face of heaven. Solon marvelled, and desired to be informed of the particulars. 'You are welcome to hear them,' said the priest, 'both for your own sake and for that of the city, and above all for the sake of the Goddess who is the common foundress of both our cities. Nine thousand years have elapsed since she founded yours, and eight thousand since she founded ours, as our annals record. Quote mine Plato, much...
@fire_bird-cr2ro
@fire_bird-cr2ro 3 года назад
this makes more since then the 12 years ive learned in grade school, middle school, and high school, i was confused but this video cleared it all up and i thank you, God Bless
@charlesthompson4760
@charlesthompson4760 4 года назад
Also The mountains arose in increments from pressure, seams all have defrent petrografics, was getting massive waters from north ,
@bipolatelly9806
@bipolatelly9806 4 года назад
No. The mountains were formed in an instant. Many thousands of days ago....
@bipolatelly9806
@bipolatelly9806 3 года назад
@@JB-yb4wn There's no meteor craters....none. So..... No.
@canadianjoker5033
@canadianjoker5033 3 года назад
@@bipolatelly9806 : "Many thousands of days ago..." That's funny, good job! LOL.
@bipolatelly9806
@bipolatelly9806 3 года назад
@@canadianjoker5033 lol Funny because it's true.
@jeremyroux5895
@jeremyroux5895 3 года назад
Pressure? Can you elaborate?
@glenwoodhouse33
@glenwoodhouse33 3 года назад
tHAT wAS aWESOME, tHANK yOU!!!!!🔥🔥🔥🤟🏾🤟🏾🤟🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾
@baronsecuna
@baronsecuna 4 года назад
Kurt Wise was raised in a fundamentalist Baptist family in rural Illinois and accepted flood geology as a teenager while attending a conference for Christian youth run by Bob Jones University.
@Bildad1976
@Bildad1976 4 года назад
You left out Harvard University. Any particular reason? Like, do you have an agenda to try to falsely represent someone's academic record by omitting their most relevant academic accomplishment? Your attempt at fraud actually fits in quite well with the epidemic of fraud in science over the last several decades. According to the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (one of the most prestigious science journals in the world), fraud being committed by modern scientists over the last several decades has not just DOUBLED (although that alone would be extremely disturbing)! Nor has science fraud only TRIPLED, nor even QUADRUPLED! The level of fraud being committed by scientists today has skyrocketed by OVER ONE-THOUSAND PERCENT!
@ramigilneas9274
@ramigilneas9274 4 года назад
Bildad1976 Maybe it has something to do with creatards who get legitimate degrees and then try to justify their ridiculous religious beliefs.🤔
@fzr1000981
@fzr1000981 Год назад
Rami Gilneas more accurately it's indoctrinated morons like you who ignore ubiquitous evidence of recent, flash preservation of billions of dead creatures, with more tissue residuals in bone found all time, that cannot be "millions of years" old. Not just unlikely, impossible. True science (not your dogma) is not static. The amazing irony is YOU are the religious zealot, but your faith in "experts" who weren't there and don't have the slightest clue ends in your demise. Life is short
@wormthatturned8737
@wormthatturned8737 3 года назад
So he is saying there is only evidence of one flood in the whole geological record. He needs to take of those noah tinted spectacles .
@dontstart8440
@dontstart8440 3 года назад
1 global flood. You missed that bit Out because it didn’t fit your narrative.
@wormthatturned8737
@wormthatturned8737 3 года назад
And did he give a date for his one global imaginary flood. He basically contradicts himself repeatedly through out this whole shambolic fantasy!
@joeythebushkangaroo1
@joeythebushkangaroo1 2 месяца назад
Noah's contemporaries didn't believe him either,and mocked him until it was too late for them to take notice. The deluge was a warning example for us today. There will be mockers who will not listen... As long as we warn others, we are fulfilling our commission as Christians. Luke 17:26,27 2 Peter 3:3,5,6
@lordtrini
@lordtrini 3 года назад
How did kangaroos get from turkey to Australia after the flood?
@juriaan13
@juriaan13 3 года назад
Ups. First class mail.
@lordtrini
@lordtrini 3 года назад
@@juriaan13 lol... and sloths...
@peterleadley7103
@peterleadley7103 3 года назад
Now don't spoil their fun!
@lordtrini
@lordtrini 3 года назад
@@peterleadley7103 they don’t have fun.
@Alkes777
@Alkes777 2 года назад
Noah Uber
@fieroboom
@fieroboom 2 года назад
Excellent presentation!! 👍👍
@wamdn
@wamdn 4 года назад
Excellent presentation. Tracks before bodies. Bio-layering sequence. Coal seams. Very clearly presented. Well done.
@bipolatelly9806
@bipolatelly9806 4 года назад
Coal is not fossilised.
@genome616
@genome616 4 года назад
@@bipolatelly9806 It would be an excellent presentation if there wasn't so many error in it and false claims, seems like scientific evidence is been manipulated and misrepresented for a ideological agenda, any one educated in this field of science can see this for what it really is BS!
@Arexodius
@Arexodius 3 года назад
@@genome616 Those are some bold claims you're making right there. Are you suggesting that a person who's following a moral code to be honest would falsify evidence? Aren't you the one jumping to conclusions? And that education you mentioned, how do you know you can trust in it? How do you know that education hasn't been manipulated to draw people away from any notion of trust in the Bible? Are you assuming that the people behind the institutions responsible for establishing scientific educations are interested in spreading truth? You should know that education might as well be indoctrination if what's being taught isn't trustworthy. Maybe you should study the Bible to see for yourself if it is trustworthy or not before you make such claims?
@willmo8238
@willmo8238 3 года назад
Excellent presentation really? So when did this flood occur? Give a rough estimate date.
@freemind..
@freemind.. 2 года назад
@@willmo8238 - 2345 BC.. Springtime.
@RealLifeWorthLiving
@RealLifeWorthLiving 4 года назад
I absolutely enjoyed your informed comments. I've heard Steve Austin several times when he covered his research in this and the nautiloids covering much of the western U.S.. The fishopods may take a little thought, but it was all very interesting. I know of a fish variety or two that mimic walking for a short period, but I wouldn't think of them as being in any way transitional. If God did create such, they are original sea life, created on the fifth day. Is this what you were saying? God bless.
@genome616
@genome616 4 года назад
Evolution describes these transitional species that move from water to land, evolution is constantly occurring throughout nature and yes you do know of a fish that is in a transitional stage, several varieties exist and it is a clear modern demonstration of an evolutionary step, it will however 'if the species survives' take hundreds of thousands of yrs to transition to a land living species, this is not a transition that we can view, we can only use fossil records and genetic sequencing to provide the evidence and species links.
@genome616
@genome616 4 года назад
@Tim Webb It's not imagination, just look at the mudskipper fish, it uses its fins to walk on, it has rudimentary lungs to allow it to breath out of water, this is a transition stage and it can be shown in its biological make-up, a frog however is a amphibian a totally different kind of species not a fish so your comparison is misguided.
@genome616
@genome616 4 года назад
@Tim Webb I think you are confusing progressive theory with established theory, one of the biggest gaffes that those who deny science make... the mudskipper is a fish, it can be demonstrated genetically and lives and functions like a fish but it has been venturing for 10's to 100's of thousands of years onto land with which it has through mutation and survival of the fittest managed to adapt and develop the ability to breath in air as well as support it full weight on it fins and adapt its muscles to allow it to use them to walk, this is not just some random scientism having a whim, we can genetically decode the mudskipper and see how and why it can do what it does as well as confirm it still is a fish and not some other form like an amphibian. Your comment on the coelacanth - please expand on that, to my knowledge there is no embarrassment at all and I suspect it is simply a misguided argument on some kind of evolution denier site why you think it is. I am sorry if you are not educated in the sciences and specifically genetics and biology but just because you cannot understand it and its complexities does not mean it has to have a simpler explanation to allow you to understand it and accept it, nature doesn't work that way.
@genome616
@genome616 4 года назад
@Tim Webb The insults are a bit childish, let me know if you find adult debate a bit grown up for you (patronising intended) - if you want to deny what science has established and proven then present a paper for peer revue or cite me someone that has and had it accepted that shows otherwise, until then I go with what science has established and accepted and can be shown and demonstrated. Yes you are correct in a sense that it is exploiting the land/water interface but for it to do that it must adapt and evolution allows it to do so, this is why your goldfish would die if you tried it take it out of the water for a few minutes and why the mudskipper doesn't, this is not a quick transition, there is 10's of thousands of yrs to get to this stage from its ancestors. The fins are still fins and they are biologically still fish in every other way except for adaption of a air bladder and gills to allow for air storage pocket like a basic lung, you can look at other animals like seals etc who are much further on in transition and have fully developed lungs and have lost all gill function but they still biologically have genetic remnants of a gill system, seals however keep their fins as oppose to adapting with feet etc because they rely on the sea for food and efficient mobility to catch it so any mutation of their fins that would benefit land movement would more than likely be negative to mobility in the sea and we see survival of the fittest take over. To be noted it is not fated for any living thing in transition to make the completion, environmental, food and predators all have a large influence to evolutionary development and as these can change so can the direction evolution has already taken. As for the coelacanth - I really have no clue where you got this idea it's an embarrassment to science, it isn't and never was, the fish was discovered in 1938 if I recall and was thought to have been extinct for 65million yrs as we had only ever seen fossils of a similar fish, if you can appreciate that we have only explored 5% of the oceans so it is no surprise really to find new species or ones we thought long extinct, with regards to this fish we now have studied it extensively for several decades and we now know and can trace its family tree and history also its body shape has been found to be much more diverse than thought and explains the initial confusion, at no point however from its discovery to today has the claim this is the extinct 65million year old fish, at most we have suggested it is an ancestor for which now with genetic coding we can establish to be correct... no embarrassment at all and if you believe it is then cite me where you get your info from so I can proof read it for accuracy. To deny evolution is to not understand it, no one in 170 yrs has successfully provided any papers for peer review that demonstrate evolution to be wrong, unfortunately opinions and the bible are not evidence.
@genome616
@genome616 2 года назад
@@bigboreracing356 The science! The fact that it is the most solid accepted scientific theory ever, it is supported by several unrelated fields of science and the fact we can watch it happen in real time in a lab, take covid for example, there are thousands of variants of it of which a few take hold and spread widely, the virus has evolved. When people often argue against evolution they use false arguments like macro and micro, they simple do not understand what evolution is to start with and are using a warped version usually pushed by the church which totally misrepresents the real version, Darwin's original ideas was the foundation, our modern understanding of evolution is based on his but very different, the confirmation that secured that last nail in the coffin was when we were able to genetically unravel any surviving piece of DNA from any living thing, the very instruction book that showed the relationship of all living things as we know and how they are linked and where they sit on that evolutionary tree.
@patsox2004
@patsox2004 2 года назад
A brilliant representation of regressive logical reasoning. Well done.
@travelernextstopheaven3286
@travelernextstopheaven3286 3 года назад
There is coral in the Bighorn mountains of Montana above Lodge grass massive chunks and in some places it like your walking on an oceans floor really neat stuff and on the other of Ft Smith Montana there are large blocks of salt sticking out of the clay
@BlGGESTBROTHER
@BlGGESTBROTHER 3 года назад
Montana was inundated with salt water during the time of the Western Interior Seaway.
@velwheel3135
@velwheel3135 3 года назад
Could the various levels of species be caused in part by the specific gravity for any one specie . So in a flood the drown animal floats at a specific level under the water due to weight, natural buoyancy, and trapped gasses. As mud flows cover areas of floating animals they are buried relative to the levels that the various dead animals were floating.
@alanthompson8515
@alanthompson8515 3 года назад
vel wheel No. Too many variables.
@kai_plays_khomus
@kai_plays_khomus 3 года назад
And too many animals of similar or identical buoyancy on different layers. The flood scenario makes no sense for any observation in the geological column and the fossil record.
@alanthompson8515
@alanthompson8515 3 года назад
@@kai_plays_khomus Agreed! Float n bloat is not an exact process. And your second point cannot be repeated often enough.
@velwheel3135
@velwheel3135 3 года назад
Kai Schiller the geological column has little continuity throughout the world. Several things can be said about it. Millions of plants and animals were rapidly deposited in various soils and aggregate which preserved each specimen. Because this event happened world wide a worldwide flood is implied. Further, binding agents converted the deposits to rock. Logically the binding agents came from extensive volcanic release which coincided with the flooding and massive geologic upheaval. To think fossils were formed worldwide peace meal makes no sense. How is my logic wrong?
@alanthompson8515
@alanthompson8515 3 года назад
@@velwheel3135 What is this "geologic column" you keep on about? The GC I know is simply a summary of the present knowledge of world stratigraphy. It's a bit like the league table for a sport, basically the same but constantly being updated. By definition, it does possess "continuity throughout the world" by jig-sawing and daisy-chaining. However, there are very few places where the (expected) worldwide deposits of your weird "Flood Model"can be observed. None in fact. Go on, name one. Your logic isn't wrong, it's non-existent.
@bengello
@bengello 4 года назад
An amazingly interesting lecture👍
@tonyalan3671
@tonyalan3671 3 года назад
Shame its complete and utter nonsense.
@xTriad
@xTriad 3 года назад
@@tonyalan3671 You’re so proud of yourself aren’t you.
@tonyalan3671
@tonyalan3671 3 года назад
@@xTriad No not proud. Just doing my little bit to help burst these bubbles of BS
@xTriad
@xTriad 3 года назад
@@tonyalan3671 These bubbles are going to grow the more we learn about the deep complexity of life. The modern paradigm will not hold.
@cosmictreason2242
@cosmictreason2242 10 месяцев назад
@@tonyalan3671you ain't bursting nothing lol
@WKGWOMANINTN
@WKGWOMANINTN 5 лет назад
Dr. Wise, thank you for this very methodical explanation!
@GJP1169
@GJP1169 3 года назад
Where are the humans buried next to the dionsaurs in the flood . Why is there a separation between humans and dionsaurs in the record . I just want to know
@juniorpintor5506
@juniorpintor5506 2 года назад
1:07:30 This guy sounds like he's gone mad
@janeyoung4783
@janeyoung4783 3 года назад
Is there any evidence these plants could utilize salt water?
@TexasHoosier3118
@TexasHoosier3118 2 года назад
Oceans were not salty back then.
@cosmictreason2242
@cosmictreason2242 10 месяцев назад
@@TexasHoosier3118they probably were a little bit, just not nearly as much. It would be a stretch to say there wasn't any salt in the ocean. We can't know that for sure. But we can back calculate from the amount of salt added to the ocean yearly to get some kind of idea
@Eodd21
@Eodd21 3 года назад
Floating log mat theory works as well.
@Sordaz77
@Sordaz77 3 года назад
It's not odd to not find tail tracks. Most animals have their tails lifted and suspended as a counter balance for their body weight when walking and running. However, you might expect tail drags from animals lower to the ground, such as a crocodile or a duckbill platypus. Regardless, that fact doesn't change anything.
@blackholeentry3489
@blackholeentry3489 2 года назад
You do realize that Noah's flood is a total myth and never actually happened? WHERE did enough water to flood the earth above its tallest mountains come from and where did it ALL disappear afterwards?
@carelvanheerden6589
@carelvanheerden6589 6 месяцев назад
Good question, talks about the oceans of the great deep that's where it came from and went back too, besides the big part that is still frozen. And that claim you are making is made by "scientists" the same scientists that believe a flood is possible on Mars but not Earth 😂😂 but it's not really scientists because evolution is a religion not science. Thing is most people reject it cause in the end of the day it's not a head problem, its a heart problem.
@senatorjosephmccarthy2720
@senatorjosephmccarthy2720 6 месяцев назад
It came up out of the fountains of the deep, and down from the sphere that surrounded the globe. And it probably didn't disappear - see the difference in depth between the continental shelves and the ocean floors. It's probably making that difference. So some bazillion tons of it might have went back down into the fountains of the deep. And if there was a water canopy around the earth, wouldn't it have to have been liquid so the stars, moon and sun could be seen thru it? And if it was very thick, say a half mile, wouldn't it have worked like a lense and magnified those bodies? And made the sunlight hotter than without it?.
@jerubaal3333
@jerubaal3333 4 года назад
i love his lectures!!!
@PCB-dg7pt
@PCB-dg7pt 3 года назад
Yes but they are not based on fact!
@CanisDei
@CanisDei 2 года назад
@@PCB-dg7pt For you.
@ozowen
@ozowen 2 года назад
@@bigboreracing356 If these were based on fact he would be presenting the science demonstrating an ancient Earth, life diversifying by evolution and no global flood of Noah. That's why this is not based on fact.
@ozowen
@ozowen 2 года назад
@@bigboreracing356 Feel free to demonstrate where, how and when it was wrong. The particular interpretation of the Bible based on a particular and recently devised doctrine with zero alignment to evidence is far more likely to be wrong. ie: Young Earth Creationism is highly unlikely to be correct. At a level of 99.999999999% wrong.
@ozowen
@ozowen 2 года назад
@@bigboreracing356 Oh, a tiny one, as I noted. But I'm into evidence. The evidence says not.
@jamessparkman6604
@jamessparkman6604 2 года назад
I find that hard to believe there is no way that Noah’s so-called flood could’ve done this I will not except the idea that the Bible literature is history
@NeanderthalWoman-ou8ev
@NeanderthalWoman-ou8ev 10 месяцев назад
I am a little confused about the sequence of coal formation. Was this bark dropping, and the forest rolling there and back, supposed to be happening in pre-Flood days, when it was a living forest, or after the Flood, when it had been torn apart and was now a floating log mat? And if the latter, how could the log mat be over what is now the eastern U.S., Europe, and Russia? I understand from Dr. Baumgardner's model that "continental sprint" had already happened by then, driving these land masses apart.
@IsGenesisHistory
@IsGenesisHistory 10 месяцев назад
Hello @NeanderthalWoman-ou8ev, Coal can be found throughout the geologic record. However, it is most prevelant in Carboniferous rock layers, which is what Dr. Wise is discussing here. Carboniferous coal beds were likely formed in the earlier stages of the Flood, predating the Pangaea supercontinent's fragmentation. As the floodwaters surged across the continents, they also transported the floating forest(s) inland. Subsequent turbulent waves progressively disintegrated the forest from its periphery inward, leading to the deposition of vegetative debris across Eastern United States, Europe, and Russia.
@NeanderthalWoman-ou8ev
@NeanderthalWoman-ou8ev 10 месяцев назад
@@IsGenesisHistory Thanks!
@rasputinsliver9092
@rasputinsliver9092 4 года назад
A very interesting and compelling presentation.
@chriswinchell1570
@chriswinchell1570 3 года назад
Hahaha No
@bonysminiatures3123
@bonysminiatures3123 3 года назад
nope lol its pure nonsense in the purest form of nonsense
@janeleen7
@janeleen7 2 года назад
@@bonysminiatures3123 Yepp… just like your hollow brain 😗👉👈
@bonysminiatures3123
@bonysminiatures3123 2 года назад
@@janeleen7 if mines is holllow god knows what your is...
@janeleen7
@janeleen7 2 года назад
@@bonysminiatures3123 I pity you and your comment doesn’t make any difference.. I’m still a Christian because I’m smart. Though there is A LOT of evidence that God is real, I’m not going to be wasting my time proving it to anyone, on judgment day all angry atheists will know the truth, and they’re going to be scared poopless. I hope you will not be part of it. 😣
@Critter145
@Critter145 5 лет назад
Has a fossilization experiment ever been conducted? I’m talking getting a chicken, a really tall pipe, lots of sediment and hot water and “quick-burial”. I’d be fascinated to know if you could reverse-engineer the hydro-chemical conditions of the flood in such a manner.
@howardf5264
@howardf5264 5 лет назад
Yes, many times. Many such experiments were done both on land and under water, mostly about 30 years ago.
@alancadieux2984
@alancadieux2984 4 года назад
Only know of one. A downed powerline incident. Electricity burned out living tree roots, then melted minerals in the surrounding soil, this ran into the voids, & made fossilized tree roots in less than 24 hours. They were dug out of the ground.
@Critter145
@Critter145 4 года назад
@@alancadieux2984 Did you hear yourself? The roots themselves were burned out (i.e. destroyed). Fossils found today have only been mineralized, but much of the original biological material remains, otherwise it would be impossible to recover collagen, blood vessels, or osteocytes.
@alancadieux2984
@alancadieux2984 4 года назад
@@Critter145 I didn't say that every situation was going to be the same.
@Critter145
@Critter145 4 года назад
@@alancadieux2984 Right, I realize that, but the example that you gave me, which is all I have to work with in discussions, was a type of event that is very rare and wouldn't necessarily represent the evidence of the fossil record as a whole. The evidence, in this case, being the sudden and catastrophic burial in water-deposited sediments.
@MissKris101
@MissKris101 8 месяцев назад
So, when you say the coal forests would be the center of the floating forest, and you say that the plant life gets more and more terrestrial as you approach the land shore, then is it just at a certain point somewhere near the middle that those plants are the ones from that point, and then towards the land shore that created the coalbeds??
@deadwave2738
@deadwave2738 3 года назад
Where's all the body's of the humans remains after flood??
@wilfredmay5231
@wilfredmay5231 4 года назад
The Colorado river has meandered, and changed direction in many place. If a vey large body of water where to break over the river at the time of the "flood", why would this huge volume of water change direction in the same way the Colorado river has done over millions of years. Would this water not just travel more or less in a straight path, destroying the shape of the river we see today.
@motomark9736
@motomark9736 4 года назад
Rivers did not run up hill not even millions of years ago the flood is how the river formed
@dongray4064
@dongray4064 4 года назад
Utah used to be under water, and several other states, an enormous lake. Up on the mountains are benches, former seashore of an ancient inland sea, high above sea level, there are even seashells there. Eventually a weak spot allowed the water to break through and carved the Grand Canyon in a matter of days. There are oral traditions among Native Americans, of a time when this inland sea existed and the great fishing, it all changed in an instant of geologic time. That it is still remembered, means it was not that long ago. What was left slowly dried up to form the salt flats of western Utah, and the Salt Lake.
@cosmictreason2242
@cosmictreason2242 10 месяцев назад
Does your hose trickle run in a straight line when you leave it on for several minutes? No. The dam break explanation is supported by such things as incised meanders
@isheetfromaswhole3657
@isheetfromaswhole3657 3 года назад
Sweet, a channel that doesn't have the comments disabled.
@philaypeephilippotter6532
@philaypeephilippotter6532 3 года назад
Indeed, but an awful lot of the people who comment seem to have their brains disabled.
@johnh383
@johnh383 3 года назад
@@philaypeephilippotter6532 Like this speaker. There was no flood.
@philaypeephilippotter6532
@philaypeephilippotter6532 3 года назад
@@johnh383 Though I was talking about those who've commented I do completely agree with you about the _great flood._
@lovetofly32
@lovetofly32 3 года назад
Well those would probably be liberal leftist because they dont want to hear the truth, they dont want it discussed and they dont believe in freedom of speech. Theyd rather silence everyone and listen to bill nye..🙄
@chrono2959
@chrono2959 3 года назад
It's nice to actually be able to have and read discussion's
@standeakin5608
@standeakin5608 3 года назад
Kurt, could you kindly confirm that you once said / wrote the following ....." Although there are scientific reasons for accepting a young earth, I am a young-age creationist because that is my understanding of the Scripture. As I shared with my professors years ago when I was in college, if all the evidence in the universe turns against creationism, I would be the first to admit it, but I would still be a creationist because that is what the Word of God seems to indicate. Here I must stand."
@haraldschuster3067
@haraldschuster3067 3 года назад
The type who would reject a video of Jesus himself if Jesus said anything that goes against his view on Jesus. Incurable hypocrisy. Bending reality to their perception of it and ignoring everything that shows they are wrong. You cannot argue with that type.
@garudel
@garudel 3 года назад
I have a very simple question to ask. Since te flood covered all the mountains, where all that water came from ? It seems that the water need was much more than the water actually present on Earth at that time. Where did come the extra needed to cover everything ?
@lloydbraun6026
@lloydbraun6026 3 года назад
I would say GOD took care of creating the water and also removing it. It had to go somewhere in the end.
@garudel
@garudel 3 года назад
@@lloydbraun6026 OK... Since God can create everything at will, there cannot be any alternative answers. But how can water be create from nothing ?
@nunyabisnass1141
@nunyabisnass1141 3 года назад
That's just another problem. Where did the water come from, then where did it go? Then why hide that evidence but leave so many other quandaries?
@peterleadley7103
@peterleadley7103 3 года назад
@@garudel this is the get out clause for the zealots. "God can do anything!" Absolutely no refuting that. Try proving he can't, try proving he doesn't exist. Not possible. Logic and physics have no place in the zealots mind, only dogma passed down from the Bronze Age.
@floridaman318
@floridaman318 2 года назад
Space, then evaporation and glaciers?
@jericotemplado
@jericotemplado 3 года назад
The best thing to do in finding more fossils is to explore to the area where the lowest elevation on face of the earth is located. Water is driven by the force of gravity for it to flow towards the lowest point on earth first. Water never flow towards the highest elevation on earth but yet there are few areas in the world where water flows upward unworthy to be explored in finding fossils. As water during the great flood accumulated, it flows first to the lowest part of the earth then stop as soon as the highest elevation is reached making water to be in zero degree level with respect to the horizontal curvature of the earth. Dead living things will float on the water after few days being dead because of the gas that fills up the hallow space in the stomach, like a balloon floats on the air when oxygen is introduced. Having said all that therefore; dead living things will be carried away by the flow of water, deposited and buried them to the lowest part of the earth. This is the point where more fossils were buried more than anywhere else. The greatest challenge for this theory is how to find the original elevations in a particular geographical area of the earth during the time of Noah, as elevation changes when erosion takes place. I don't believe that the science of geodetic engineering existed yet during the time of the great flood. Geodetic engineering is the science that studies the measurement of the earth's surface that includes the ff: horizontal bearing angle of specific point, curvature of the earth with respect to its x-axis or horizontal axis and the declination of the North magnetic angle. There is no better place to find more fossils than within the lowest part of the earth. It is technically wrong for the fossil explorers to randomly pick a site for their studies without considering which part of the earth that has the highest and lowest elevations first. The fossils found in the midst between the lowest and highest elevations on earth are not necessarily the fossils produced by the great flood during the time of Noah. Thanks for the video it is indeed very educational, as God said "share your knowledge to everyone."
@larrydunn7924
@larrydunn7924 3 года назад
If this was true you would find extant species with the dinosaurs.
@yuron8210
@yuron8210 3 года назад
we do
@larrydunn7924
@larrydunn7924 3 года назад
@@yuron8210 You sir are a liar. Shame on you.
@theTavis01
@theTavis01 3 года назад
@@yuron8210 Bearing false witness is breaking one of God's Holy commandments.
@yuron8210
@yuron8210 3 года назад
@@theTavis01 You don't even care about God. You suck and you're lame.
@alanthompson8515
@alanthompson8515 3 года назад
@@yuron8210 That's a good trick! Mind reading, I mean. Go on. Try it out on me too.
@ChrisHolman
@ChrisHolman 3 года назад
I believe that the Cambrian Explosion looks more like an extinction event than proof of an explosion of new life. The principles of entropy would lend itself to an ecosystem that does begin with a vast diversity of life that steadily reduces over time with the occational mass extinction. I'm not stating this as fact but rather my opinion and an opportunity for discussion. Feel free to disagree and tell me why. God Bless.
@nunyabisnass1141
@nunyabisnass1141 3 года назад
The cabrian explosion happened over several million years as creatures began dibersifying into different niches. There was an extinction event yes, but life resists entropy for its abilty to seek out energy sources as well as discarding genetic traits become detrimental to survival.
@billcat1840
@billcat1840 4 года назад
Dr Wise. Im in Abbeville SC and see evidence of a catastrophic event in my area . My thoughts were the asteroid that hit the Yucatan may have caused a tidal wave that stirred up strange stuff in my area.
@hovind-1921
@hovind-1921 4 года назад
@Tim Webb You're an idiot. Core drillings prove an asteroid strike. Of course you'll deny because you're a science illiterate. Bill, it's possible. You may want to ask a paleontologist or research fossils in your area.
@stevemcdonald4400
@stevemcdonald4400 3 года назад
@@hovind-1921 there is continuing debate among researchers as to whether or not an object hit there, but there is no debate about the much larger impact that created the Gulf of St Lawrence
@billcat1840
@billcat1840 2 года назад
@@JB-yb4wn Actually Abbeville was spared. Several rumors abound as to why.. despite supposedly being the birth place of the Confederacy.. my heavily wooded land has huge stepped mounds and gullies 100' deep exposing all sorts of things from native artifacts to contorted rock formations.. specifically there are house size boulders randomly sitting in the woods whose stratification lines are turned 180° from how the sediment was laid down..you expect sediment to form and crystalize pretty much to the horizontal.. these are megaton sized boulders that appear to be thrown across the landscape..as far as I know they wouldn't be drop stones from glaciers... unless they advanced much further than scientist think. Whatever is responsible had to have massive kinetic energy to scatter these things.
@stevelawrence8352
@stevelawrence8352 2 года назад
I love this channel. Your videos have really helped open my eyes to the truth.
@ozowen
@ozowen 2 года назад
Curious, given how much he said is false.
@cosmictreason2242
@cosmictreason2242 10 месяцев назад
@@ozowencope and seethe lol
@sudopenguin
@sudopenguin 4 года назад
How about you just conclude reality?
@stevegreen7520
@stevegreen7520 2 года назад
I am loving these videos. I wish that I had had access to this when I was a youth pastor. I do have one question though. How does the uniqueness of the animals of Australia fit in to this?
@stevegreen7520
@stevegreen7520 2 года назад
@@JB-yb4wn Actually the lack of predators would explain it. Marsupial species were probably eradicated on other continents through predation. We know kangaroos, for example, were in Asia also.
@ozowen
@ozowen 2 года назад
@@stevegreen7520 Do we know kangaroos were in asia? Where did you get that info? Were they macropods or were they an ancient ancestor to the roo? To make the claim you just made I think you'd need fossil evidence. There was an ancient marsupial line in Africa indicating that they were present before the continents split. North America retained the oppossum from that lineage and a few marsupials are found in asia. But roos anywhere else?
@stevegreen7520
@stevegreen7520 2 года назад
@@ozowen I read it in a scientific post. They have found them in South America, Asia, and Africa.
@stevegreen7520
@stevegreen7520 2 года назад
@@ozowen CNN actually had a story on it a while back
@ozowen
@ozowen 2 года назад
@@stevegreen7520 I looked and didn't find anything. I suspect the find was the ancient ancestor to the roo. They were a carnivore and didn't hop (as I recall). Big as a truck too.
@Tabatista281178
@Tabatista281178 2 года назад
I don’t know anything about it, but this videos seems to have very consistent scientific information from decades ago, so why do we still have the mainstream theory in our schools?
@todayssubject7055
@todayssubject7055 2 года назад
Because it's not a mainstream theory, i heard i a lot of theories like this one but they are not mainstream or valid.
@DeclareHisGlory
@DeclareHisGlory 3 года назад
Excellent presentation! 👍🏼❤️
@philwang2835
@philwang2835 3 года назад
"Science should start with scripture" roughly translates to " science should start with something made up by people who had no understanding of science" good job guys.
@bewater8966
@bewater8966 2 года назад
When you believe the Scriptures, its not something made up by a bunch of people. It's written by God. So if you believe in God, the Scriptures should indeed be the first place to look. Science studies the laws of nature, but nature obeys the command of God. Laugh all you want to, but we will all meet our Creator one day. He only asks for people to believe.
@timhaley3459
@timhaley3459 3 года назад
Is there sound evidence of a global flood in "the days of Noah" ?(Matt 24:37-39 in the Bible) Consider these details: Many frozen mammoths have been found in Siberia, in the permafrost. One such mammoth (Berezovka mammoth that was shipped back to St Petersburg, Russia, some 3,700 miles away from where it was located) was found in 1900 with "green" buttercups in it's mouth and stomach, thus indicating that it was frozen while still grazing in a warm climate. Another example of the global deluge is that over 500 fossilized giant oysters, some with a circumference of up to 11 feet [3.5 m] and weighing up to 650 pounds [300 kg], were found in Acostambo, Peru, at an elevation of 12,300 feet [3,750 m] above sea level in 2001 in the Andes mountains.(newspaper El Comercio) Paleontologist Arturo Vildozola found the oysters just a few meters from a highway that runs between the towns of Pampas and Colcabama, but nobody paid any attention to them. Thus, what was once under water became a mountain because of the global flood, whereby God buckled the mantle of the earth so that mountains rose and valleys descended, allowing land to be above the "waters".(see Ps 104:5-9) So, where did all the water come from that completely covered the earth for a period of about one year ? At Genesis 1:2, it says that "the earth was formless and desolate, and there was darkness upon the surface of the watery deep, and God’s active force was moving about over the surface of the waters."(Note: God's personal name is Jehovah, Isa 26:4) Before the creation of life on the earth, the earth was covered with water. Then, at Genesis 1:6-8, as the earth was being prepared for life, it says: "Then God said: “Let there be an expanse (or atmosphere) between the waters, and let there be a division between the waters and the waters.” Then God went on to make the expanse and divided the waters beneath the expanse from the waters above the expanse. And it was so. God called the expanse Heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, a second day." So, Jehovah God lifted the massive amount of water that covered the earth above the "expanse" or heaven, being like a thermal blanket that would make the entire earth comfortably warm year round, so that the waters would have been placed as a layer of the atmosphere as a barrier, like the the windows of a car rolled up on a sunny day, so that heat would be retained and not lost, or like a hothouse that traps the sun's heat, keeping the temperature warm even when cold outside. So, from the end of the 2nd "creative" day till 1,656 years into the 7th "creative" or Jehovah's "rest" day, the waters were suspended above the earth, or for some 36,000 years ago.(Note: each "creative" day was not 24 hours that the churches of Christendom have taught, but were about 7,000 years long, see Heb 4:1-5, whereby the apostle Paul shows that the 7th "creative" day was still ongoing some 4,000 years after it began) Being that most of the "waters" that completely covered the earth were lifted above the earth (with the exception of those left remaining to be the Seas, Gen 1:10) to act like a warm blanket or "hot house", this kept in the warmth of the sun so that green plants grew everywhere on the earth, even in what is now called the polar regions. Fossilized pollen and spores have been recovered from seabed sediment in Antarctica that reveals that it once supported palms and near-tropical forests, showing that temperatures at the poles were not vastly different from those at the equator, and in 2019, through a microscope, University of Vermont scientist Andrew Christ looked at twigs and leaves from seabed sediment from almost a mile deep drilling in Greenland [that had been drilled by the US Army and stored in a freezer since 1966], showing that it was once covered with forests.(Note: though the "waters" were massive in amount [and are what now constitutes the oceans], the "waters" could easily be seen through because they were in a hot vaporous state) Ivan T. Sanderson (1911-73 C.E.) a biologist and writer born in Edinburgh, Scotland, having a Masters of Arts degree in botany and ethnology, in the The Saturday Evening Post of January 16, 1960, observed concerning the Berezovka mammoth: "The list of animals that have been thawed out of this mess (in Siberia) would cover several pages.........And there is where we get back to quick-freezing mammoths, for frozen-food experts have pointed out that to do this (or freeze an animal while alive, so that it is well preserved), starting with a healthy specimen, you would have to drop the temperature of the air surrounding it down to a point of well below minus - 150 degrees Fahrenheit (-101.1 degrees Celsius)", almost instantly. And this is exactly what happened when the Global Deluge occurred, and in which Genesis 7:11 said that "in the 600th year of Noah’s life, in the second month, on the 17th day of the month, on that day all the springs of the vast watery deep burst open and the floodgates of the heavens were opened." The massive watery vapor that surrounded the earth (perhaps in the thermosphere, where temperatures can be over 4,000 degrees F.) was now condensed, congealed, and turned to sheets of rain, and in which the "floodwaters" at Genesis 6:17 literally can be rendered as "heavenly ocean" or in Hebrew., ham·mab·bul´, and remains to this day as our oceans. Temperatures plunged so rapidly at or near the poles (or within the Arctic Circle) animals became frozen almost instantly, that what was once a temperate zone where animals of all types thrived in lush forests now suddenly became frozen.(Gen 7:6)
@charlesloftin8768
@charlesloftin8768 2 года назад
Yes most of these videos do touch on what you say. There's still the question as to did all the gigantic dinosaurs walk among humans & did the flood cause their extinction & not a comet. Was earth all one continent? It's fascinating because I wonder how long it took for animals to repopulate the globe. Take the Amazon rainforest for example. All those animals must have walked or somehow had help to get from the ark to south America. God said we could eat meat. They must've reproduced fast before meat became the common human diet. Still just so many unanswered questions
@timhaley3459
@timhaley3459 2 года назад
@@charlesloftin8768 Geologic strata or rock layers containing human fossils consistently occur above those layers containing dinosaur fossils. Because of this, scientists generally conclude that humans came on the earthly scene later. In this regard, the book Palaeontology (pub in 1973), by James Scott, states: “Even the earliest species of Homo sapiens (man) lived long after the disappearance of the dinosaurs . . . After tilting (through earth movement) has been allowed for, rocks containing fossil men consistently occur above those preserving the bones of the great dinosaur reptiles and it follows that the latter belong to an earlier age than the human remains.” In the Red Deer River valley (in Saskatchewan, Canada), there is a layer of sedimentary rock that contains dinosaur bones. Just above this, there is a purplish-brown layer that follows the contour of the hillside. On top of the purplish-brown layer is a layer of brownish siltstone containing fossils of subtropical ferns, indicating a hot climate. Above this, there are several layers of coal. Farther up the hillside are coarser-grained layers of earth. There are no dinosaur bones in any of the higher layers. The book A Vanished World: The Dinosaurs of Western Canada (pub in 1977 by Dale A. Russell) states that “all of the 11 major kinds of dinosaurs . . . ceased to exist in the western interior at about the same time.” This, and the fact that human bones have not been found with dinosaur bones, is why most scientists conclude that the Age of Dinosaurs ended before humans came on the scene. However, it should be noted that there are some who say that dinosaur bones and human bones are not found together because dinosaurs did not live in areas of human habitation. Such differing views demonstrate that the fossil record does not yield its secrets so easily and that no one on earth today really knows all the answers. Upon Noah leaving the ark in 2369 B.C.E., God (whose name is Jehovah, see Isa 12:2 KJV) gave man the right to eat meat and thus changed the instinctive desire of some creatures, like cats (or feline family), bears, dogs and some other animals to crave for raw meat, to have a taste for blood, to kill (or fight feverishly), that would protect themselves from being easy prey to man's yearning for meat, and with the addition that man was not to ' eat the blood ', but must "pour it out on the ground".(Gen 9:1-4; Lev 17:13) When Jehovah God gave the Mosaic Law covenant in 1513 B.C.E. to the newly formed nation of Israel, he stipulated what kinds of animals that they could and could not eat.(see Leviticus chapter 11) And yes, there are many unanswered questions, but which some have no real merit for gaining everlasting life on a paradise earth, for Jesus said this in prayer to Jehovah God: "This means everlasting life, their coming to know you, the only true God, and the one whom you sent, Jesus Christ."(John 17:3)
@macalk6967
@macalk6967 2 года назад
@tim haley. Thank you for your detailed explanation of our history. Praise the lord he has blessed you with knowledge to understand how he created everything including us. God bless you.
@mattsmith5421
@mattsmith5421 2 года назад
@@charlesloftin8768 what is this sense you are coming out with it's not welcome in these parts lol
@IvanAgram
@IvanAgram 3 года назад
The YEC are biggest proponents of evolution since they believe that all animal kingdom has developed from animals in the Arc and populated the whole world within thousands or even hundreds of years. That is borderline magical evolution that ears for breakfast slow 🐌 gradual change of darwinian theory.
@Thefaceoftheword
@Thefaceoftheword 3 года назад
A wise man plans for his day in tbe grave a fool carries on with delusion of escaping
@peterleadley7103
@peterleadley7103 3 года назад
You keep designing your tomb sunshine. The rest of us are living the life God gave us!
@ronniebuchanan6575
@ronniebuchanan6575 3 года назад
Aren't you gonna be surprised. If we are just clumps of cells why do we have good and evil? Love and hate? Where did intellegence come from? From an intellegent designer. You believe we came from a rock eroded in to oceans of a primordial soup.
@j_jones_
@j_jones_ 3 года назад
A true fool goes out of his way to waste time, watching things he doesn’t believe in when he believes he only has one life with no soul.
@ronniebuchanan6575
@ronniebuchanan6575 3 года назад
@@j_jones_ Priceless rebuttal. Makes sense to me. Why do these people come and try to refute God.
@alexandreamoreira5093
@alexandreamoreira5093 3 года назад
Excelente explanação! Muito obrigado!
@Arexodius
@Arexodius 3 года назад
Why do you need a localized floating forest to explain the fossil record? Maybe the North-Atlantic marine region did have an abundance of these now extinct ecosystems, But the pre-Flood earth could easily have incorporated the now extinct ecosystems on a more global scale. Since the Flood was a global event, it would have brought plants from all ecosystems. But you have to remember that the actual flooding of the earth was also a gradual process; it didn't happen in one moment, but over the course of 40 days. Naturally, the ecosystems closer to the shoreline would have succumbed to the rising sea level first, and then followed by increasingly terrestrial ecosystems. Another thing I'd like to point out is that the climate of pre-Flood earth would have been significantly different from what we have today. Why? Because before the Flood there was a water canopy surrounding the earth - something that we don't have now. The basis for the canopy is in Genesis 1:6-8 and in the Hebrew wording of Genesis 6:17. Notice that "the Heavens" are sandwiched between waters "beneath" and "above" it, and that it specifically was the waters _"beneath"_ the "expanse", or the "Heavens", that were collected to form seas so that dry land could appear. Also, the word "deluge" of Genesis 6:17, basically means "heavenly ocean" in Hebrew. This "heavenly ocean", or water canopy, would have created a much stronger greenhouse effect than we have now, it would have shielded the earth from cosmic radiation significantly better (causing radiocarbon dating methods for anything older than the Flood to be highly inaccurate), and it would also have housed much of the water that God used to cause a global Flood - as is also explicitly described in Gen 6:17. Some ecosystems that are now extinct might very well have required that specific climate to survive. Now, the climate is not a constant thing; it changes through cycles over the course of centuries and millennia. But the pre-Flood climate must have been so radically different from any climate extreme humans have experienced after the Flood.
@samuelreed2994
@samuelreed2994 2 года назад
Well done
@MatthewEcclesiastes
@MatthewEcclesiastes 5 лет назад
Beautifully done Dr. Wise.
@jerryli821
@jerryli821 3 года назад
what? This is science?
@CyberdyneSystems435
@CyberdyneSystems435 3 года назад
It’s not. These opinions where selective to fit a narrative.
@rascalabraham4835
@rascalabraham4835 5 лет назад
Watching this make me hungry lol
@raineman1118
@raineman1118 2 года назад
Fountains of the great deep? Can you tell me where that reference is in genesis?
@hitlard5305
@hitlard5305 2 года назад
Genesis 7:11 King James Version 11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
@raineman1118
@raineman1118 2 года назад
@@hitlard5305 thanks.
@joeythebushkangaroo1
@joeythebushkangaroo1 2 месяца назад
Genesis 7:11 the waters for the flood came from below, and from above the earth.
@nickyl9040
@nickyl9040 3 года назад
I used to live about an hour from the Desert View Entrance to Grand Canyon NP I have spent over 100 nights solo hiking the backcountry of GCNP I have respectfully been to the Hopi Sipapu and The indigenous people of the area have no record of a " global flood "
@bonysminiatures3123
@bonysminiatures3123 3 года назад
@Poltermann nope
@Patel-Chirag-Gupta
@Patel-Chirag-Gupta 2 года назад
@@bonysminiatures3123 prove him wrong and ill take the L
@okiedokie9228
@okiedokie9228 3 года назад
Lololol. How do these people still exist...
@philipcallicoat9947
@philipcallicoat9947 3 года назад
"The just shall live by Faith!" The Lord changes my heart. Not archeology,not historical accounts. Not human reason. Nothing could convince me that Jesus is Lord except for when I called on His Name at the time of terrible trouble... "Whosoever calls on the Name of the Lord shall be Saved!" That's what convinced me. "I know my Redeemer Lives!"
@leeroyc4148
@leeroyc4148 3 года назад
Faith, believing in something without evidence.
@jordanjoy9040
@jordanjoy9040 3 года назад
God bless you.
@leeroyc4148
@leeroyc4148 3 года назад
@@jordanjoy9040 Ha ha Which one?
@canadianjoker5033
@canadianjoker5033 3 года назад
@@leeroyc4148 : I don't know my friend, but if I was a betting man...
@chrono2959
@chrono2959 3 года назад
I called his name in a dream when freddy crugger was killing everyone around me and the next thing I knew I was walking hand in hand with him outside of the school building . I can't accurately describe the love,piece and joy that radiated from his touch but it was like every cell in my body was jumping with the purest happiness I've ever felt . It was like his love ,piece and joy was shooting out of every hair on my body shooting out of my fingers and toes . It was the single greatest moment of my life.with all I just said it still doesn't describe what it's like to be in his presence. I was in third grade and still to this day at the age of 46 I still can't verbally tell this story without getting choked up. All praises and Glory to our lord and savior Jesus Christ of nazareth.
@TheDrBabaloo
@TheDrBabaloo 7 месяцев назад
Question: Pangea was mentioned at 1:04:00 and that a global flood deposited a floating forest across North America, Europe, and Western Asia. However, how does the dating of Pangea line up with the dating of the flood and with Noah? Asking for a Christian friend.
@clarisd
@clarisd 3 года назад
Think for one mintute of The Shoemaker Levy event and apply that to our moon and earth and also apply that one hit rocked the planet so that it tilted it's axis and set off the movement of the oceans, then add other hits and you get mass ejections of earth and you could encompass all of that into all of this body of work and instead of evolution you got survial and adaptions.
@nunyabisnass1141
@nunyabisnass1141 3 года назад
You also have to contend with the affects such an impact would have on the earth and the life on it. Such an event would easily boil away any surface water and kill any life on it.
@maryabraham9182
@maryabraham9182 4 года назад
❤️❤️
@tonymyers1798
@tonymyers1798 3 года назад
I think that C.S. Lewis describes these floating vegetation mats in "out of the silent planet"
@alanthompson8515
@alanthompson8515 3 года назад
Tony Myers Um, and that was a science textbook too, was it? Just like Kurt's bible? No! It was a work of fiction. Just like Kurt's bible.
@tonymyers1798
@tonymyers1798 3 года назад
@@alanthompson8515 I wasn't trying to be rude. I just thought it was cool.
@alanthompson8515
@alanthompson8515 3 года назад
@@tonymyers1798 Hi. Nor was I. I was just pointing out that you were using a work of the human imagination as "cool" back up for Kurt Wise's equally imaginative re-interpretation of palaeontology.
@Real_Genuflekt
@Real_Genuflekt 3 года назад
@@alanthompson8515 If its not true for you it is not true. If it is not true, which it is, it certainly is not hurting anyone that they hold this belief. It makes absolutely no sense for you to try and "convince" someone that this belief is untrue. However if you understood the implications of not believing the Bible for your soul it makes perfect sense for a believer to convince you that it is true. You WERE being rude. You made your point in a very condescending way which is generally considered RUDE in today's culture. Have a nice day, and in the future please try to think before you speak. Thank you.
@alanthompson8515
@alanthompson8515 3 года назад
@@Real_Genuflekt So you're offended by my choice of words? You see invisible rudeness and condescension? And then have the chutzpah to get involved with a real example of said rudeness and condescension. Oh the irony! BTW Wise is peddling lies. He has the academic background to know this, but prefers to live (somehow!) with the cognitive dissonance. Perhaps he can switch off his rational faculties during these "lectures", so that better biblical science can shine through (that's sarcasm fyi) but he still knows.
@stephenwalker3679
@stephenwalker3679 3 года назад
Halleluyah good explanation
@JosephBoxmeyer
@JosephBoxmeyer 3 месяца назад
You explained how Dr. Steve Austin scuba dove down in Spirit Lake to examine the deposition of tree bark from the 1983 explosion of Mount St. Helens. My question is whether anyone has tried to dig or drill down below to find previous layers of bark depisited from the many previous ecplosions? These explosions might have occurred every three hundred years for several thousand years.
Далее
What is the Fossil Record? - Dr. Kurt Wise (Conf Lecture)
1:04:31
Asus  VivoBook Винда за 8 часов!
01:00
Просмотров 274 тыс.
What is Zoroastrianism?
1:22:21
Просмотров 658 тыс.
What Caused The Cambrian Explosion?
1:33:38
Просмотров 877 тыс.
Origins: Noah’s Flood Genetics
26:32
Просмотров 776 тыс.