@@JINX-RSAWe are imagining a hypothetical situation that has not happened in movies, so a speculation based on the source material would objectively be more valid. Also, even if you insist on not taking SOURCE MATERIAL into account (which is stupid), a powerless Clark Kent defeated evil Superman in the movies, that's the closest we've ever gotten to this.
It even makes sense, because the normal Superman he doesn't use his power to the maximum so that he doesn't have a gigantic level of destruction, since the top doesn't care much about the world.
It doesn't make sense, if Superman is facing a threat that has the same powers and strength as him, he would only hold back if he wanted to lose, which is not possible. In any case, what Superman would do to avoid collateral damage is take the battle to a desert or to space. In fact, Tyler's Superman took Bizarro Doomsday to the moon and Henry himself took his Doomsday to space.And if that were not enough, in Cavill's first film we have seen how he did not hold back against Zod, and he did not care about the collateral damage either.
This is nuts. How'd you compare this two same person the only thing has changed is their personality. I think the only difference between them is that when Darkseid uses the anti life equation on superman the evil superman doesn't hold back when using his powers.
Evil Superman doesn't beat good Superman. Good Superman has consistently and constantly defeated versions of evil Superman, and it wouldn't be different with these versions of good Superman against evil superman. It disgusts me that anyone would think that being evil would make Superman stronger than being good. It doesn't make him better either. For example, injustice Superman, who no longer restrained his powers, was still legitimately defeated by the good Superman who didn't lose his way. Good Superman wins.
No they aren’t, evil superman is a version of him from an alternate future where darkseid wins in the jl movie. Lois dies and superman stops holding back his power, they aren’t remotely the same.
