Evolution of Cinema Dinosaurs (1920-2015) 

You missed to add/edit, "the land that time forgot. Too good. It had its own charm.

​@@futureisyours3016no, it's part of the updated version on my channel

godzilla vs ray harryhausen monsters

And then it went all the way down the hill again...

So was dinosaur for Disney

george zaggogiannis ?

Couldn´t say it better

then came lost "wold"

Carnosaur came out the same year. Hmmm.

Odd1sout

And jurassic world

Now stop to consider that even more time has elapsed between the release of Jurassic Park and today than has passed since the release of "The Valley of Gwangi" and the original Jurassic Park film. Should Spielberg have based his dinosaurs on the ones featured in this 1969 movie? If not, then why should the dinosaurs of the next Jurassic World movie be based on the paleontology of 1993?

@@Thagomizer because you can't just change the design choices in a classic franchise simply because "it's no longer the most up-to-date design". Also, I think for a scifi thriller/action movie a feathery T-rex or proto-winged Velociraptor wouldn't really work well within the genre. Imagine if the first time you saw the T-Rex break out of its enclosure and it was all soggy feathers with a bald parrotpatch around its eye and chicken legs. It wouldn't really have the same entertainment value as a monster in a thriller.

those stop motion characters have more life than those CGI ones

​@@universalflamethrower6342 sure, im sure something that moves like a robot is more convincing than something thats literally designed for fluidity

@@Weaver1-s4k life in movies is not about fluidity. For instance, autotune gives everybody the ability to sing, but music hasn't become better. In other words it is not about the tech it is about the artistic skill

@@universalflamethrower6342 and it depends on who is using it

​@@universalflamethrower6342And? There is art in cg. Not everyone can learn it, same applies for stop motion, or any other filming technique.

All Films are really good

@@mrpoe8485 except for the fake‘ dimetrodon and other type’ ones

Bro the movement of that whale

@@kaliyuga1476 What? Which film had a whale?

@@Seismitoad3 free willy

Word

Pretty much

@@salmonkindalikeme9316 Before and after feathers.

@@grdprojekt the lost world has endless replay value. If I see something once I cant physically bring myself to watch It again.. unless Its JP2 or The Fountain

Sam is Me they been known to have feathers for a while now

Jurassic park looked amazing the cgi was on top would even perform good this day not as good back in the day tho

Jurassic World, too! :O

@@chillysaurus5398 insta rajatx.24 , snap BloodyFang28882

@@MPeaches1958 yea good idea lets tell them that it actually was recorded when dinosaur still exists lmao

I find original Jurassic Park even more amazing these days, dinos models are way more natural than the newest from JW franchise. Jurrasic World's dinosaurs look so plastic compared to these at Spilberg's movie.

ĐIP

Yh, King Kong is amazing for a 30's stop motion movie

@@happysecret5273 yes it is, though I was primarily referring to the 2005 adaptation of the film and it’s incredible effects for its time. Like Revenge of the Sith, they still hold up incredibly. Must have been a good year for sci-fi.

@@emperornapoleon6204 what dinosaur are the refering to are you refering to the disney film?

@@WhatDillionYT he was referring to the v-rex from king kong 2005

King Kong (1932) was way more ground breaking than Jurassic Park even was considering nothing came before it other than what u saw here !!!!! With King Kong , we would not have any special effects we got after King Kong , not Star Wars , No JAWS , No Alien , No Jurassic movies , no Marvel movies , no anything that we have today!!!!

Terra King there one was made in 1914 and 1918 but along moombean trail will be a century old or almost in a few days

They will because I'm from the future Just so you know Its January 1 2020 when I wrote this

Here we are

the time is now

slythe fox liar everybody was in 2020 January 1 when u wrote that LOL (edit)Omg im please ignore my cringey ass comment I didn’t realize how cringe I was when I wrote this-

It’s very strange, Jurassic World looks great but when you look back at the T-Rex in the first Jurassic Park movie it looks so much more life like then the new ones. It’s almost like the new ones are too glossy or something.

@@resident1793 agreed!

@@resident1793 that's because the first to third Jurassic movies still used animatronics for their dinos, not fully depending on cgi.

John's 3D Studio oh the mix of animatronics and cgi really looks much better if they still did this in the new movies it would look fantastic. cgi should only be used when it’s needed.

Yesss

Where's carnosaur 1?

@@antroplegia915 in the video

You didnt include JWD JWFK and Raptor Ranch/Jurassic Dark

@@cahyo6969 I didn't included JWD and JWFK because I don't want to remember they exist

There was a short scene with a T-Rex that was rather impressive for the time from the movie My Science Project (1985).

You have a dinossaur? I dont get it

@@matheusreiter3985 its a movie. What do you not get?? "My Science Project" Comedy/sci-fi 1985

@Mr idea mi no one wants to know that you dont know how to think

@@razorfett147 Wait u make a movie? For your science project?

@@matheusreiter3985 No he mean a movie called "My Science Project" from 1985

Well, Jurassic Park had about 70x the budget of Carnosaur, so I HOPE it would look better.

ianwestc Yeah, poor film didn’t stand a chance at all.

The original King Kong was just as impressive in its day.

Okay but Jurassic park definitely didn't take that long to make compared to the older movies it might look a lot better but more effort was put into older movies cause of 1 thing stop motion electronics have been doing a mans work for decades now it's cool and all but not as cool as you think.

jp three though

The effects for each of the first three were done by the same team, headed by Willis O'Brian. He inspired many effects people for generations.

James Frost yep, he was a huge influence on Ray Harryhausen.

Then there is jurassic park

Ocean Phantom so what? It was just an evolution of what went before it. The saddest thing is that CGI is pretty crappy post Jurassic Park and didn’t really become good until fairly recently, on top of that I don’t think Jurassic Park is a very good film, the plot is pretty mushy. I prefer the sixties version of One Million Years BC, it’s a more exciting film.

@@punkoid76 nothing

And according to the paleontology of the time, that was the correct stance.

Yeah..was like lets show them how to make a real dino movie😂

Actually JP came first

No it didn't. Carnosaurus was released first on May 21st 1993. Then Jurassic Park was released the next month on June 9th 1993.

Yeah after carnosaur and raptor suspiciously seemed to copy each other almost every way yeah fuck those guys lol

I think they were optioned at the same time or something like that. Both are based off novels, though Carnosaur did major changes to the whole plot.

Agreed

A big difference in budget though

@@noless and better animatronics, plus a director with some great creative ideas, plus base material that was well-researched and probably more and/or better research into how the dinosaurs used to behave.

Carnosaur budget: 1 Mil. USD Jurassic Park budget: 63 Mil. USD Question answered?

Its because universal made it

They were accurate for there time most did do research and thats all there was unkike now of ciurse some Dino movies use iguanas and ither lizards which was wrong then and now they were never just huge iguanas

Yes very true

2005 king kong graphic were Super advanced in that time

If you buy the disk it will look like 4k. is just the yt video quality sucks

Soo true Dude

No, the puppets look amazing, the CGI is outdated

Yeah, but without Carnosaur, we wouldn't have had dinosaur films with violence and even an apocalyptic side. As well as suspense.

And part of the cast and staff of both movies were relatives. Interesting.

Carnosaur was a nightmare for me

*Carnotaur

Carnotaurus**

The legend

Agreed. Think of how little improvement there was from 1933 King Kong to Dino De Laurentiis' version in 1976.

what alternative was there to stop-motion before computers came along?

Ray Harryhausen was improving with every movie he animated. He was also limited compared to what stop motion can achieve nowadays. For example, he didn’t have the ability to splice in different frames and onion-skin over previous ones. If he stuffed up a frame he just had to redo the whole shot. Considering he started with questionable-looking marionettes and sticking rubber attachments onto real lizards, he improved quite a lot to the actual animation of handmade armatures.

Yeah i love it

That's the best dino movie

I totally agree. It's a great film

I watched that movie when I was a kid.

but the dinosaurs talk ._.

you missed one, "straight up just lizards"

I like pure CGI because it has alot of detail and I mean ALOT ALOT

“Japanstyle” as you call it actually has a name, it’s suitmation. And it’s damn hard to do

Machine puppets are the greatest but cgi is also good

@Гredmarbelfoxed No, its a Japanese fictional monster classified to "kaijus" (Big monsters)

Carnosaur didn't flop, I liked it more than Jurassic Park

To be honest I’m happy JP did well because Jurassic Park is awesome Haven’t seen Carnosaur thought but the fact it had outdated dinosaurs when it easily could have referred to recent studies is kind of dumb, another movie that did that was Jurassic World and Jurassic World could have easily Improved upon JP’s accuracy and showed people that Feathers are scary too and it would have been better, but I can understand if Carnosaur was just trying to give the people what they expected from Dinosaurs

Arran Vid you’re opinion doesn’t matter then

@@unholybeing6414 while I like fuzzy t-rex as much as the next person, JW does have a canon reason for the dinosaurs looking like that, or rather Dr. Henry Wu does. As he states when defending the Indominous, that all of the dinosaurs have been hybrids, namely using bullfrog dna, to make up for the incomplete genome. They never were trying to sell scientific realism they were trying to sell the public perception of dinosaurs. Out of universe of course it's because even if they'll update designs for better sfx like hell Universal will change the original highly marketable designs even if they're outdated.

@@KanyeTheGayFish69 yea have you seen how good jurassic world is? You’ve been living in a rock

Yea you right.

Yessss

Someone X yeah, Jurassic park was so ahead of its time

Although Carnosaur was more impressive due to gore scenes... I was a kid by that time, JP was - and still - my favorite, but Carnosaur was some scary shit. Didn't remember that they T-Rex was such a crap, also.

Someone X Keep in mind that Carnosaur was made on a less than one million dollar budget. Jurassic Park had a 63 million budget.

but carnosaur was my worst nightmare....i watched it since when i was very young....i thought i really love dinosaurs, then i watched it, in fact it was a horror movie....after i watched it, i couldn't sleep at all until morning...

I forgot all about Carnosaur lol

It's good, but, super animated, eye movements don't look right.

Noel Thompsons agreeed

This is not Will. This is Chad Smith

ew that's the bad one, the Land of the Lost before 2009 was so much better

It looks bad

Same

@Casey Hoinbala After that, Carnotaurus has been my favorite dinosaur ever since.

It’s like Carnotasurus … but on steroids

Yup lol

No it was not! It was ahead of other dinosaur media but scientifically it was already outdated on release.

@@lilactheleafyboi That is not necessarily true. It is dated but not as dated as the other dinosaur movies.

You know the species in Jurassic park, only two and be traced back to the Jurassic, while 3 others and from the late Cretaceous, it should’ve been called Mesozoic park

@@lilactheleafyboi dr wu said something like the dinosaurs are not gonna look the same like it did back then

More like 101 years old I'm the first 2021 guy

In fact that thingy with the fin there are a lot of real animals that existed and looked like that but she was a thing most of them were pre mesozoic and they won’t even dinosaurs

E

But now I actually think it was meant to be a spinosaurus

Spinosaurus and mosasaurus hybrid

The video was made in 2015

Yes

that was good one

The best comentary

mosasaurus: SHUT THE FUCK UP!!! IM SLEEPING!!

@@N0RZC you literally just said the same thing

@@FlimsyAcorn2722 Yup

Excuse me have you seen dinosaur in full?

They used Dino animatronics for jp jp the lost world and JURASSIC world:fallen kingdom

blinded by nostalgia, like most fans

Why does everyone always say that? Jurassic Worlds effects are much, much better. JPs effects are good, just not THAT good.

Donny Wiggins true but the animatronics make it more realistic and less fake to me i thouht Jurassic Park and Fallen Kingdom actually had real dinosaurs!

0:01

Fair, but I think Dinosaur films already are better ever since stop-motion... just that CGI made it feel more futuristic and real

Most*

Yeah and the one where they slapped a sail on a croc to make it look like a dinosaur

Same

In my opinion, they looked incredibly life like! *says the guy watching in 144p*

@@Ericeepperi If we attach a sail to a modern day Alligator, it'll be the newly designed spinosaur, now that we know if walked 4 legs, It'll look exactly the same especially since Today Alligators grow about 16 feet long

@@Captianmex1C0 god damn you're right, how come nobody ever thought about this before

Ryan the Maneless Lion jurassic park did not use cgi. they used animatronics

King Kong had horrible effects..

Still some CGI

Shark 03 animatronics were used for still movements, cgi was used for chases or fast pacing

The CGI effects in King Kong look awful and dated nowadays. I still genuinely like the movie though.

Jurassic World too.

COSMO hell yes!

Definitely not.

The one from 1940 was kinda cool

King Nations thanks

Damn, they really tortured Barney in behind the scenes just for our own entertainment

Neca GMK What about Disney's "Dinosaur"? That's an entirely animated movie! Plus the Iguanodons have lips, for Pete's sake! At least the ones in Fantasia are 100% accurate by the standards of back then.

gohan mascarado bruh land before time was the shit

Omniverous Octopi bruh that ''shit'' is the reason why Jurrasic Park was created

used to love the show bruh remember when they made friends with that little baby T-Rex then they met his parents and it was like "oh shit" but then they were chill. that was my shit

Neca GMK Actually, Disney purely based the Dinosaurs in Fantasia on real life science (at the time)

*For all the hate* What hate.. Maybe when it was released.. but today.. Little hate for the original film, the new ones however, yeah overuse of CGI at times.

No it get hate the inaccuracies in the dinosaurs a big one was feathers but what most people do not realize is at the time feathers on dinosaurs was just getting enough evidence to actually be considered as facts. Whem th er movie was released it was considered to be a pretty realistic representation of how dinosaurs really looked and behaved at the time. Also people like to point out the velociraptor as being incorrect size in the book they explain that it is really a bigger raptor species that I cant spell lol as the lab guys really didn't know what exact Species they are getting and were hoping Paleontologist could confirm the species of alot ot the dinosaurs to either be what they think they are or correct them. The last big gripe from the first movie is the size of the dilophosaurus and the frill and spitting venom the one in the movie is a very young one that explains the size and well the frill and venom was totally made up but looked cool.

For a very long time there was a lie going around that dinosaurs were too big to be able to walk on land, so it was assumed that brontosaurs were aquatic animals in the rivers. Also with that belief, it was believed that the dinosaurs had a pose similar of that to humans because of a famous artist named Neave Parker. We know now that those ideas were REALLY stupid looking XD www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/whats-wrong-with-these-dinosaur-reconstructions.html

Minifridge sorta the needed more feathers but they didn’t have good cgi at he time

*hate?*

I mean, honestly. I'd still give films like these a big thumbs up even if CGI wasn't a thing at the time

9 lol

I aint liking it

That is sort of depressing

Not gonna like

MrChickin Man one like= one lost world (even tho we created it by liking this, we still don’t know the lost world :/ )

Unlicensed Memes get the hell outta here with that word no one is allowed to touch the original two Jurassic parks they are perfectly fine the way they are they will not be vandalised

@@ShadowJoeSnow I think he meant just upping the quality to the highest def we could give it.

MRtoast DISHONOR. DISHONOR ON YOUR WHOLE FAMILY!

@@RogueT-Rex8468 your comment made a blip on my pc and it woke me from my nap, now I must punish you.

xAlpha Wolfzx Dude, he said „remastered“, not „remade“. Currently the VFX of Jurassic Park are only rendered at a 2K resolution. Remastering could also open the opportunity of updating the textures. When they released the 3D version, which did have quite some VFX changes, they made the original version still available. It would not be vandalism if the original is still made available (unlike Star Wars).

👍👍👍👍👍

Mr. Probal Hasan your ugly

Mr. Probal Hasan true

Arthur PIEDOIS It Doesn’t

Nope, some of the dinosaur films before JP are better imo

And that other movie, Carnisaur, was made the same year and it looks like crap lol

no joke, i fully agree.

Jurassic Park II is really the superior film from a techincal special effects standpoint. The textures on the CGI models are a little better and I like how much practical effects and CGI are used together, more so than the first film. Look at the city destruction scenes for example. My personal favourite from the series.

Not even Jurassic World. Made 22 years later

SuperLalulalu Jurassic world beat it

SuperLalulalu yup Jurassic park and world are the best

Sam Edwards I’m pretty sure industrial lights and sound did that, but I see what you’re saying

Ben Harris Spielberg knew how to make practical effects the likes of which I don't think has been replicated since. The raptors in all the close up shots were people in highly complex and detailed costumes, bigger dinos were nearly all well sculpted animatronics. The few scenes with CGI were used in conjunction with the costumes and animatronics to still make it look real.

Sam Edwards it’s called having a bigger budget

Hhahahahah

And pit it against a monitor lizard for entertainment. Makes me kinda sad.

@@milkbeforecereal7064 The same thing hapenned in "the lost world" 1960 (not in the list here), they dressed up lezards, crocodiles and made them fight. Animals rights were not the same at the time and it made me sad to watch the scene.

@@MFTiX good thing that nobody can do that anymore

It is very entertaining, and back then these things weren’t as endangered so it was fine

@@edenli6421 So we don't care about cruelty as long as the animals are not endangered ? We don't care about cruelty as long as it's entertaining ? Not, it wasn't fine and it's not today either.

yes, but that is not a monitor, a tega instead

its a caiman and a tegu

Blue Hunter thank you for the clarification! I wasn’t exactly sure of the types of lizards but what I DO know is that it’s pretty fucked up they made them fight.

@@spacegoldfish9481 Never said it wasnt. I had a tegu as a pet and they are very sweet animals. Its painful to watch one go through that for a bad movie.

@@xBloodxFangx ikr, it made me cringe so much. Tegus are such sweet babies.... I really want one so I can share boiled eggs and salads with 🥺

caiman and tegu

that's not a iguana its a gila monster. EDIT: YES IT IS A TEGU LIZARD!

@@GojiZilla-fl8zn Gila means crazy In Malaysia

@@hazim5561 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gila_monster EDIT: YES IT IS A TEGU LIZARD!

@@GojiZilla-fl8zn actually its a monitor lizard.

Jurassic Park had tons of cg

@@jamesduffy7549 it had like 7 or 8 times it used CGI because in 93 it was expensive as hell and really time consuming

@@cool3865 there was way more than 8 times

@@cool3865 there was loads of cg, they had the money and time

It was planned

yes lol

@Charles Calvin r/ijustgotoofed

Alan Grant said in the movie that it’s vision is based on movement. That means when someone or something is moving then the T-Rex will attack it. Im pretty sure when they were escaping the building, The T-Rex saw them but was too distracted with the other raptor biting it. Thats why attacked the raptor and the other raptor.

Akemi Hinata I know right!

Including the new Jurassic Park films, the original trilogy's practical dinosaur effects looked amazing and still do to this day.

Omg rite

You are wrong

@@shogunmaster3191 no you are wrong

A lot. They are all either film versions of Arthur Conan Doyle's novel "The Lost World" (1912) or just references to it. JP2 for example is just referencing the title and the notion of a lost world but the reason why is better explained in the book. There's actual argument whether isla Sorna is an example of a lost world or not.

5:31 this is close (btw look at the name at the bottom)

I was about to write the same comment and then I saw this

And book

Sometimes it's called Land of Lost. XD

Power Respect So there is perfect film for you. I like old good films too. The movie is from Czech Republic, like me. Dat film is A journey to tge beginning of time-from Karel Zeman. Without this film, JP won't exist. Even Spielberg says that. Just google it, watch it, enjoy it. Sorry for mistakes

Power Respect dinosaur fan.. What a pathetic thing to like xD

Back in the days when we didn't have Google, RU-vid etc.. We had to read TV schedules in the news paper, video stores, go to libraries to learn about dinosaurs. All these movies were not easy to come by. God bless modern technology. ✊✊✊😎

Power Respect Yup! Back then is not like today.

Willy et scientia why is liking dinosaurs pathetic?

It’s a documentary not a film

​@@MiniZilla1 the movie

yeah, it looks like they just dressed up a baby alligator and get it to fight a lizard

@@penitent2401 Thats one of the bigger lizards, they even steal eggs or just whole chickens/chicks

Really rude 😒

You should see alot of these old western films with the horses. When they fell and couldn't get back up.

This is an south american lizard, called "Teiú" in Brazil.

We actually knew this much earlier. Remember that this video only shows the development of Dinosaurs in Media which has always been far behind the science.

It's even more incredible how even modern media refuses to depict them with feathers

They arent velociraptors cause velociraptors are much smaller

Tycho van Steeg ok then what are they

@@noahjohnson999 achillobators or deinonychus

Tycho van Steeg ok good to know but how come Dr.Grant called them raptors?

Noah Johnson Beacuse in 1990-2000’s they thought this is raptors too.

Yet it's very scientifically accurate

naio piaio I know it’s not accurate I just like the look better for some reason

T. rex

naio piaio no it’s not accurate.

@@ivanlol7153 R/woosh

Reminds me of Dimetrodon more.

Issai Juarez Ceja a crocodilian Dimetrodon... 🤣🤣😝😝

@@bustinjieber4207 Now with a flimsy sail!

Issai Juarez Ceja 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Mr. Raptorix