Evolutionist vs. Shaykh Uthman - Surprise Ending 

Ameen

Evolution of men is not against creatin of all things or islam

@@hasanhakan4019 guided adaptations and biological change over time may have occurred, in the plant and animal kingdom, following a plan by the Creator; but Man is a special creation. Notwithstanding this theological viewpoint, thus far, there is no clear scientific evidence for the evolution of one kind of organism from another and certainly not the man. the mounting contrary evidence against the Darwinian theory of evolution and its many subsequent modifications by scientists, including evolutionists, from a purely logical scientific point of view:89 • Any process which has never been observed to occur, fully and unequivocally, in all human history, should not be treated as an established scientific fact and should not become the main premise for the speciation of creation. • Any theory which does not explain how life began should not become a prevailing theory for the origin of life.90 Darwin’s theory does not address the biggest question: how dead matter suddenly came to life. Modern genetics and chromosomal studies indicate that mutation does not create a new kind of organism nor does it lead to a significant gain of new function in an existing kind. The 2018 Nobel prize winners in Chemistry were able to induce a large number of successive mutations, which normally require millions of years, in a period of a few months, in a lab. Despite the introduction of this large number of directed designed mutations (picking the most beneficial traits), a new kind of organsim never did emerge; nor were any proteins produced from scratch to rival the ones we see by the thousands in living cells. As Frances Arnold, one of the Nobel prize winners once said: “Efforts to date to generate novel catalysts have primarily demonstrated that we are getting good at making bad enzymes. Making good enzymes will require a whole new level of insight, or new methodologies altogether.” The problem these efforts face in the lab is exactly the problem faced by Darwin’s evolutionary mechanism in the wild: Nothing can be selected until it already exists.

@@Saarimul_masloolUnapologetic I dont say that I believe in darwinian way of evolution. But that there was evolution of species you cant deny scientifically. But that is not contrary to creation. Who defines how Allah is creating? He s creating everythng how he wills. So evoultion can be the creation of Allah we obeserve. And how do you know that Adam was a real person and is not an allegory for all mankind?

@@hasanhakan4019 what evolution, I am have studied all the latest researches from 2018 noble prize for chemistry where they completely destroyed the macro mutation theory , danis nobles mutagenesis research revealed not random mutations. Contrary to the theory’s Random Changes assumption, studies now show that variation is not random. So, again, new terms, previously unheard of in evolution literature, started popping up, such as developmental bias and developmental constraints,cells May have mechanisms for choosing which mutations will occur, variations are non random....... non-random directed mutation confirmed. Shapiro, a University of Chicago molecular biologist and evolutionist, says: “It is difficult (if not impossible) to find a genome change operator that is truly random in its action within the DNA of the cell. All careful studies of mutagenesis find statistically significant non-random patterns of change.” 1 When asked why marsupials and placentals were very similar in shape even though they were far off in the Darwinian classification, some evolutionists came up with the Name Convergent Evolution and attributed the similarity in shape to Similar environments. When we found bats and whales living in different environments sharing a common system: echo-location, and two cichlid fish in two different environments developing into almost identical varieties, nature magazine published a report Calling for a rethink of evolution theory. New terms: Parallel Evolution,Guided along specific routes,Evo-Devo and Constraints,etc. started making their way in evolution literature. So Natural Selection Became guided and constrained. According to Stephen Gould: “Darwin made a mistake in proposing his natural-selection theory, and it is fairly easy to detect the mistake .We have seen that what the theory so grievously lacks is a criterion of survival that is independent of survival.” This is what is called tautology or circular argument; the fittest survive and those that survive are the fittest. A equals a equals a equals a equals a. The “how” is what natural selection theory is supposed to provide but providing mutually inter-defined terms does not do so. Numerous other scientists have criticized natural selection as a tautology or circular argument, rendering a fatal blow to the theorys ability to explain the mechanism of biological change. These scientists include Butler (1882),105 Morgan,106 Waddington (1960), 107 MacBeth . (1971),108 Bethell (1976)109 and Rosenberg and Bouchard (2008).110

But there is no group with more atheists than scientists. And usually the better the education of a country is...the more non-believer you will find.

@@dergutehut3961 define "better education", not sure if there is no group with more atheists as scientist, and even if this is the case, what does that prove than?

It debunks you're statement completely

@@dergutehut3961 Also interesting to know is that the more drunk people in a country, the more atheist the country becomes

@@dergutehut3961 but there is a difference between knowing science and understanding something. And just to let you know, most people forget that science is a study of creation, in other words it studies about stuff around us .but it can't explain how that thing came about . Coz all the theories they bring about just make no sense ie evolution ,( how can anyone with sense of reason think that we developed from apes) its just an irrational theory, and now they have jumped onto another theory of the big bang which makes it even worse .

@@edsondosreis1568 lol. Neyes one.

This comment thread is a sight for sore eyes

Yessss

👀

E-Y-E-S.. EYY YESSSS That is true, you dont even need a 'contact' to see that point.

Asalām-Alaykum. Scholars have told the female Muslims to refrain from uploading their faces on social media, please refrain. Jazāk. Allāhu Khairan.

Ameen

Amin

Ameen

Yes...science changes if the data changes. That is makes it work. If your opinion doesn't changes based on new facts..thats not a good thing. Science goes where the evidence takes it and with new data there is new evidence and so we have to adapt theories....so theories get more precise and more correct.

@@dergutehut3961 Some of the reasons why I deny ape evolution is because I think Islam is absolutely true, this is coming from a convert. This can be seen in my Some Evidence for Islam playlist, try the 2nd video and work ur way down. Second, most people will look at me saying that the idea of humans all descending from 2 beings (Adam and Hawa) is being absurd and logically impossible. There's a couple things here, I know that this seems logically impossible according to our rational faculties, but remember this. God in Islam is clearly shown to be omnipotent and capable of anything. Meaning he is not limited by human perceptions of logic, hence He can effortlessly defy logical paradoxes. Examples of this are that God can make 1 + 1 = 3, He can make a square without corners, He can make something move left and right at the same time, and He can life a rock that is unliftable. Along with all the miraculous, logic-defying things God did during the lifetime of Prophet Muhammad(SAW), I see no reason that God can't make a whole species descend from 2 beings. How did he do it? We don't know since it is beyond our limited faculties. This is of course more philosophical than scientific. I am very eager to read Stephen C Meyer's books Darwin's Doubt, Debating Darwin's Doubt, and The Return of the God Hypothesis some day insha'Allah to gain a more scientific backing for my rejection of evolution. But this is where I am as of right now.

​@@ibnmianal-buna3176 Evolution and with it human ancestry can be denied...but only if we close our eyes...and why should we do that? There are dozens of pre human species and transitional forms between different stages to modern humans. We are just one of many humanoid species...the ones that survived. If god is real he probably want us to know the truth about the world..and who said that the best way to find things out about the natural world is reading man-made books? (and that include books of man who claim that they are speaking for a god)...the best way is obviously to observe nature...and do experiments and calculations...that made us able to built all kind of stuff that works....so why should that not be the best method to figure out how different kinds including our own evolved and diversified? With that said...Islam can be true...but not the literal interpretation of all parts of the book. There are muslim stories that talk about the corners or the world...THAT isn't taken literally...so why should you take the entire creation story literal? Or better to ask...how could god have explained evolution to people who had no concept of DNA or geographical columns or the fossil record...so IF a god told them about "creation" he might have simplified it a bit....OR (and that it what I believe) people who had no idea how humans evolved made stuff up and claimed they got this "wisdom" from god....but feel free to tell me why this version can't be possibly true. - And no...it is not absurd that all people came from just a couple..for some species t hat did actually happen....ask cheetahs, so for example if we killed all flies except one couple on the planet we could easily regain the entire population in a month if we just l stopped killing flies. And guess what...we can trace back because now we have a very limited genetical diversity. That IS absolutely possible but nothing we find in our genome tells us that this happened to us...we can be pretty sure that we are from a small population of ape like creations who started to evolve differently about 3 mio. years ago...and one of the many descendants of those are we. So you don't just have to believe that god changed production rate or whatever but also that he completely eradicated all tracks of it..which is odd if he wants us to believe in him or his literal version. Also...if you add "he can do impossible stuff" you have no way to check anything and you can justify every story no matter how little sense it makes. Imagine you have investigators who try to solve a murder case. One guy allows himself to add "my suspect has superpowers and can do whatever I say he does" in the mix. Do you think the investigation is more likely to find the real killer OR will it be made completely impossible to get to the true killer? If one investigator allows himself to ignore every witness thats not in his favor, no alibi and no trace...because he can always claim that his suspect used his supernatural powers to make it look like someone else did it. That kind of reasoning has no place in crime solving or science and doesn't help to find the truth about nature. - "The Return of the God Hypothesis" God doesn't have to return he was never gone. God is simply not a subject of science. You can't do a lot scientific with him...which is why we leave him out of scientific theories. Of course you could add him whenever you need him to proof whatever you want...but people have very different versions of gods..and instead of discussing which version of god is correct in science people just look at data and try to follow the evidence. That seems to be a lot easier than figuring out what god is real, or what he meant or what interpretation or translation or whatever is correct. But Evoltuion is the first and only REAL scientific hyptheses how god did it and one that doesn't even require a god. It doesn't disprove him or doubts him it just explains what we see and what mechanics work in nature and how that is connected to our genes and the fossil record. And the great thing is that god actually looks pretty smart in that version. He has a self managing life-stock that deals with every environmental pressure by adapting to it while diversifying into multiple kinds. What could be more perfect. No maintenance work needed. In the creation story gods way of working is way less effective. He creates a set of animals. But the problem..is that he (for some reason) also makes nature changes or causes catastrophes which sooner or later kills of those animals if they don't change, and has to create a new set of animals. In case you didn't know 99,98% of all species that ever existed died out. So...did god kill all of them just to replace them with individually created new beings? And wasn't god "pleased" with his first set of animals? But we don't see many of them..do we? But WHAT we see species splitting into different species, usually under strong environmental pressure. So take Mammoth for example. There are elephant like beings, and than there is a drop of temperature. Some of those beings have more hair..and are better adapated...and through the simple mechanism of mutation, separation and natural selection more wooly elphant versions take over...aka Mammoth. And that doesn't just works with hair...but all other features, including, size, posture, new body functions, etc. etc. Evolution can explain all that with relative ease and people who doubt it don't do it for scientific reasons but because religious ones. It doesn't count as explanation for something if I claim that an allpowerfull being did it and we don't know how. In my experience the biggest problem people have with evolution is that they have very weird concepts on how it works...so would you share with me how you think it works according to scientists and tell me how you think the history of life took place in your opinion. And please try to explain at least a few of the things that evolution already perfectly explains.

@@dergutehut3961 Before you start assuming that Prophet Muhammad(SAW) made up the Quran himself, you first need to analyse what exactly happened back then. That's why if you go to that playlist, try watching 2nd video called The Prophetic Truth by Sapience Institute. Then watch Islamic Calling's video in there called "Apostate Prophet Exposed Part 3". It acts as refutation of Apostate Prophet but is centred on proofs and evidences that revelations of the Quran occurred under supernatural circumstances. And the video about the moon in there by One Message Foundation discusses one those miracles I mentioned earlier. I recommend studying the seerah and hadith as well. I'm not even going to touch the other stuff you said for the most part because I'm not well-educated in evolution beyond what I learned back in elementary school. That's why I told you I'm just thinking about things philosophically and theologically for now. And that's why I want to read books discussing its scientific implications. Where does the Quran say the world has corners by the way? Which verse? You actually did make a good point about how the Quran having things that are not to be interpreted literally in regards to its description of the origin of people. Surah 3:7 clearly says many verses are meant to be metaphorical or symbolic. And I have seen many verses like this. I'm going to investigate this further without jumping to conclusions.

​@@ibnmianal-buna3176 I watch the videos if I have time..but I have to say that this Sheik might be an Expert-Theologian but has a elementary school level understanding of evolution. Instead of arguing what the Quran said or meant we have to look at the evidence that is available...and you won't find this evidence presented honestly by people who want to misrepresent science...aka creationists. This is the equivalent of learning about Allah by reading Richard Dawkins. But IS Evolution against your religion? Is there any religious statement that said god would stop better adapted versions to have more offspring? Or that says that life-forms are unchanged copies of their parents with no new features? If those things are not the case your religion does not say that evolution did not happen...because those two ingredient are the only ones we need. And if your religion says that...its obviously wrong about it. Mutation and Natural selection are real...and all the Theory of Evolution does is to describe what we observe how those things work together. It explains how new kinds come from one kind and nothing else. It doesn't care how life started (some straw-man claim that it is often used against it) and it doesn't disprove any god. It just gives a compelling explanation of the history of life on this planet. Evolution is the opposite of complicated..and you can understand the basics in less than 5 minutes. You must have been on a great elementary school if they actually taught evolution, because I learned about frogs and bees and other boring stuff. Schools usually don't do a good job explaining evolution, which is why many people have misconceptions about it...so with your level of understanding...what would you say happens ?

yes

Hamza is the lion. sheikh Othman is like electric eel, the prey don't know it's coming for them

@@yilmaz8953 lol good one

@@snowforest6487 well I kind of understand where that two Muslim guys where come from. I use to be like them confused between what the world thinks in general of creation and what do religious people think of creation and I was more inclined towards evolution of human beings. But hey you don't need to be Muslim, Christian, Buddhist or Hindu to understand why sheikh Usman believes in a creator(Allah) in this video

@@snowforest6487 stay mad

Ameenn..

Short bus special

Lucky you. Mashallah

Same

Baby can get nutrition from other women, but the rule of it ask syeh

@@rukmawanrukmawan6645 the keyword is "first baby".

@@smith6696 why should I believe your scientists? What makes them correct?

@@smith6696 theory not evidence

Ameen!!!!

Exactly was gonna say that, jazakAllah u khair ameen

Allahumma baarik lahu ..

I dont speak Arabic but i am muslim what does that mean in english

@@TheMajicmark it means May Allah bless him..

Did Jesus Really Die For Our Sins ❓ Why did God forgive sinners without the need of a human sacrifice in the past ❓ For he who does wrong will receive the consequences of the wrong which he has done (Co|ossians 3 : 25) If Jesus really died for our sins why do the Christians still need to repent & what did they gain from the Jesus sacrifice ❓ If Jesus really willingly died for our sins, why was he begging God to save him from getting killed ( Matthew 27 : 46 )❓ If the only way to gain salvation is to believe Jesus has died for our sins then what will happen to all those who have entered their graves before Jesus came ❓ EZEKIEL 18 : 20 -22 has got the solution for our sins 👉 Just repent

@@watch13famouspeoplewhoacce45 You are trying to preach to the guided here. You want the guided to believe that God let his son die so he could forgive our sins..... on what planet does that even make sense 🙄 You want the guided to devote their life to a God that can only show mercy to his creation after his son is killed..... Why does anyone have to die for God to forgive..... Go back to the scriptures and read it properly. Jesus worshiped God himself and this whole trinity business does not even exist in your scriptures. Give your head a wobble and repent yourself.

@@strawberryswing4204 ❤❤🙏

@@sebastiancastellanos9527 You are right bro, this sheikh is amazing Alhamdulillah. I'm slowly going through his videos 😇

@@strawberryswing4204 Ameen and Jazak Allah brother. I'm glad you're enjoying the admirable, the one and only sheikh uthman. this brother is truly phenomenal and stay blessed brother. ❤💗

*Masha' Allah

It's not about debating, it's about delivering the message, Allah guides in marvelous ways whom he wills.

@@jondoe79 *He

bro please don't mispronounce the word. it's allah's word. therefore pronounce it like this MA SHA ALLAH

@@nufailanoon imho, the term "masyaallah" or "masyaAllah" is just a transliteration thingy. Many Muslims tend to use that especially in the Malay World (colloquially Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei, Singapore, and some parts of Thailand, the Philippines and Australia) But in English, yes. We usually prefer to spell it as "mashaAllah" or "māshāAllah" for this dhikr. Anyways, jazākallahu khayran.

keep learning brother and ask your creator to guide you to the truth.

sheikh is just a term of respect. there's no priesthood or hierarchies in islam.

@@goaltoinfinity3966 Thanks and will do.

There is no such thing as Ibrahamic religion in Islam.

@R J we always get ignorant and arrogant people who feel the need to insert comments without any research or evidences. Thanks for proving that man wrong and putting him in his place. When truth arrives, falsehood perishes.

I have a feeling that one day David Wood will come to hug Shayhk and take shahada.. He keeps coming back to shaykh again & again shows that he actually likes the Shaykh and just trying to clear his doubts

@@YourTherapySessionJustStarted lets hope Davids heart will be opened inshaallah. I feel bad for him

Please don’t neglect your responsibilities. Thanks

I love Sheikh Uthman for Allah sake, but you have made a Gholou in him there are so many knowledgeable scholars through out the history of Islam and many of them are living today specially in Arab countries, but as of an English speaking scholars I might agree with you.

@@travelfoodbusinessbestheyyono yes i meant english speaking scholars.

@@jona7200 dont do exaggeration love him and respect him but dont go to far in respect and love so it might make you blind follower , balance yourself,

Selam

Exactly

The scientific things in quran will never change but science will till it reach that level to prove it to be true as in quran. There thousands of miracles which still yet to b revealed to science as with the passage of time.

The best thing you could have learned from that debate is: try to use your arguments on people who know nothing about the topic and it probably works. Science is the reason you are able to even write that via internet. Science is the most reliable method to find something out about our world and to influence things in our world. Religion might be a good way to keep a society working or to comfort or empower an individual but it doesn't explain how things in nature work. And holy books might not change...but the interpretation of it does...and smart religions adapt their books to reality not the other way around.

@@dergutehut3961 are you crazy we love science because Allah ordered us to seek knowledge don’t worry we are not prohibited from seeking knowledge you like Christianity before it’s downfall

is that you in the photo? 🤔

May Allāh bless you brother Dawood

@@bewaktembaga498 yes it is 🙂

@@MasjidRibat thank you brother. Jazakallah

nice hair yoo..😍😍😍 where are you from brother?

Islam are true and complete religion 👌

@@whitesteelangelayub1796 is

That is not what evolution says. Actually...its the exact way around. In evolution every kind is the product of a kind before it...and no kind was "created" accept maybe the first one.

How can he respond to the question when he doesn't even know the bible

@@snowforest6487 Give me evidence, mate! It doesn't matter what you say, because it's only your subjective opinions.

@@snowforest6487 okay let's say shaykh uthman hired these 2 guys who pretend to be atheist evolutionists. You are watching this video in your home and you aren't pretending anything. 2 guys ask a question and the skaykh answers the question in full detail. You are hearing the reasoning and the logic behind it. You are able to judge for yourself and come to a conclusion. Did the man answer the question or did he lead the topic astray? If he did answer it, then did he make sense? Now I've seen how christian debaters debate and I attended many sunday schools because I live in europe as a muslim and I like to hear why people believe what they believe. Young christians have many questions about many things. Even when talking about whats good and whats bad in christianity, like what is moral and what is not - like lgbtq, many pastor came with a different idea. They aren't quoting bible when they lead people, they are saying what they think and christians act according to what their church mandates. Muslims simply don't. What a skaykh says absolutely doesn't matter in Islam if it contradicts Quran and sunnah. He has to show why such is such and show his source. Plus christians doesn't even know what bible says. They have no interest in it and how could they? Because whatever version you read, they are all translations of translations of translations of what the bible is according to different sources which lived 100++ years after Jesus.

Asalām-Alaykum sister. It is best to remove your face on social media as scholars have told to refrain for female Muslim sisters. Jazāk Allāhu Khairan.

+1

F

Without being on the phone too subhan Allah

thnx

JazakAllah Khairan..

Mashallah brother may allah reward you I have been looking for this jazakallah

Jazakallah ❤️

If there is any other good Nasheed like this please share ❤️

Yeah haha, the technology and medic and economics factors came from Islam. Even Napoleon went to Egypt and he found the elements of Islam fascinating and took it to France and implemented in the western law

Just a small correction in your sentence: it's _''Ceases to''*_ rather than ''Seizes'' (If you seize something, you take hold of it quickly, firmly, and mostly by force. ) Khayr In-sha-Allah...

Very interesting. But global warming would have to stay stagnant (in this conditions) for billions of years for us to adapt to it....lol. accroding to evolutionists