Wife has filled judicial separation petition. Respondent (husband) has filled written Statement and counter claim. Now if petioner not appearing in court then respondent (husband) can get Ex-parte decree?
will you be able to demonstrate here how my party in person application through efiling and submission evidence via electronic video linkage by your legal help please will be very much informative to indians abroad
आप लोग अगर वादी और प्रतिवादी दोनों उपलब्ध नहीं फैसला किया है ।। कोर्ट ने वह प्रति वादी पक्ष में फैसला लिया है ।। तो जानकारी चाहिए ।। आप दोनों के बारे जानकारी दी गई है ।। अब यह जानकारी देते हुए बताया जावे ।।
Plaintiff's sign taken under coercion & undue influence when he was not knowing the mea ig of plaint or injunction as it was said to be a compromise, but was a partition under coer ion and undue influence just on paper and never practical in any stage of life and plaintiff harrassed and made confi ed to that property which was not accessible tohim because its major portion 90(95%) tenant's clothshop and remaining with Hitler head widow mother adviced by her son in law always like how the p laint of decree was also drafted by advocate by mother's son in law's advices as the adv was already friend of mother's son in law who drafted as per informations given by motber, her son in law and her son in law's wife i. e. her another daughter. Plaintiff was called from her busy schedule making her to miss professional college for a day which was out of station and was called to the court saying explanations afterwards, first sign. Plaintiff knew not what is injunction, etc.but under undue influence and coercion, signed. After signing along with all, plaintiff then after never entered singly inthe court regarding this event, about this, one of efn also in one of her case against this decree, she had not received summons and plaintiff never had been to court alone was narrated by one of def. Plaintiff was not made understood meaning of injunction decree and its consequences. He was not remembering even property numbers and had no time to read or understand. Plaintiff had not hired adv. It was mother's son in law who had arranged his friend adv and with his wife had taken mother to his known adv and property informations given. Notice was send only to defn no. 1 out of 5 who remained Exparte and was not well worsed with languageMy mother's son in law was keen, greedy in our properties with Mens rea and always seeked his wife's share when there was no coparcenary rught for daughters and so may be it was in his mind partiton. This injunction decree proved to be due to lack of information to the adv also lack of his proper study of property to papers. After two years, tenant had filed injunction suit against three of same five defendents in which defs agreed that they are ownwrs and adv of defs. was the one who had drafted decree. Mere owners consent was enough but that own er had already gifted (regd.)that property to the plaintiff. So, others i. e. unauthorised persons... non owner's signatures were not needed and there was no necessary to pass a decree showing partition as compromise and letting gifted property in form of as partition.. share to plaintiff under coercion and undue influence. Now what plaintiff sh do?
