There are several dead giveaways that this is fake. Here’s a few. And to get it out the way I am an aviation expert. First: the ailerons and spoilers are going the wrong way for the roll motions that you see. Second: the wings could not bend down at that angle without snapping. Third: the Airbus A320 and all FBW Airbus aircraft have a roll limiter that prevents rolls beyond about 67 degrees (according to an Airbus pilot in the comments). Fourth: the aircraft is not moving fast enough to stay airborne at those extreme angles and in general is moving to slow. Fifth: Airliners can roll but not that fast and certainly not in landing configuration. Sixth: No pilot that wasn’t trying kill everyone would even attempt an approach that is so unstable. Seventh: nobody would actually stand there and film such an event. I’m done.
You pay for what you get. WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU EXPECT FROM A COMPANY THAT CHARGES YOU €10?? HUH? I WONDER WHERE YOU'RE FROM, PROBABLY WHERE RYANAIR DOESN'T OPERATE AND JUST EXPECT RYANAIR TO DO MAD SHIT LIKE THIS BECAUSE YOU HEARD IT FROM SWISS001.
Sorry but it's not a fUcking woosh dO YOU FUCKING UNDERSTAND ITS NOT A FUCKING *WOOSH DO YOU EVEN* KNOW WHAT IT FUCKING MEANS? NO YOU FUCKING DONT r/ihavereddit
I'm not an aviation expert, but the fact that the smoke/exhaust coming out of the engines just hangs in the air, to me suggests that there is no extreme crosswind.
I know very little about avionics or the physics of air-flight. However, the fact that there has been no news report containing this footage tells you all you need to know about its validity. Not a single tweet from a passenger, ground-crew, independent witness... It's a really good fake, to my untrained eye, but not passing the 'sniff-test.' What little I do know about flying is that at landing speed, such a dramatic roll would drop the plane like a stone, given the sudden loss of lift.
I agree, I couldnt find any other source or news article about this. A 707 has been recorded doing a barrel roll back in 1955. a 707 is 6 feet shorter than a 767 and this is suppose to be a 737 supposedly. Interesting if it did happen to know what happened to the people.
'A barrel roll'. If accurately reported, a barrel roll is not what you, or most people imagine. Which is simply rolling around while maintaining its' course on a flat axis. No, a barrel roll is a plane going forward and maintaining a constant bank and upward pick to one direction, such that it makes loops again and again around an invisible 'column' of forward airspace. It's like using a paint brush to paint a coil around the inside of a barrel. This requires significant altitude, and most likely if it was done in '55 this is how it was done, because simply pulling the maneuver with such a heavy, sluggish plane means you're definitely losing altitude in the process.
If this is real, then it is absolutely amazing! Check out the flex on those wings. That pilot has some serious skills, but thank goodness the bird was built well, or one of those wings would have snapped off and this would have been a tragedy. That pilot though...wow. If it's a fake, then well done. That's some Hollywood level editing.
It is real--the deflection of all control surfaces isas it would be, and the flex in the wing can not be faked by a NONE pilot CGI geek. He'dhave no idea. this plane is designed to do a chandell with ease or in a strong wind shear either way. He had full power 7 seconds before roll thats why they lived--they were "going around" long before the shear hit them. None pilots don't have a f'ing clue. A 747 will roll, spin fly upside down. This A-319 is much smaller. Built in safety features can NOT over power nature. It's an airplane, not a f'ing magic alien space craft. He came about 11 feet from hitting the ground--because full power had kicked it by then- lucky,! not magic, not fake.
I can tell you there are no "Jetz" airliner companies here in Canada. Whoever made this is obviously a very talented CGI artist! Wow! Very realistic looking indeed.
Actually, airplane wings are designed to bend If they do not bend, they'll just break apart and fall outta the sky dead. I'm not saying the vid's real, just saying...
LOL, Impossible at any altitude or wind. A heavy commercial Jet Liner can not perform those kind of maneuvers especially this close to the ground and going that slow. But nicely Photo chopped by Russian Hackers. :-)
I saw this animation in another video and it was so crazy, I had to look it up. This is a seriously good video though, it fooled me until I read the description.
Pretty nice fake, but some rendering issues: 1. Visible sampling noise in motion blur (freeze frame near the end of the clip). Flares don't blur at all. 2. Chromatic ghost in lower left has a single-frame movement discontinuity around 0:16 + 1s. Doesn't respond appropriately when camera pans up. 3. Atmospheric distortion artifact around control tower when smoke reaches it (0:13 + 1s). Too much atmospheric distortion for the conditions, anyway. 4. Chain link fence defocus blur is too soft/opaque--probably composited in a gamma-corrected color space.
How is it fake there are several airports that have huge crosswinds off and on during the year . test pilots have barrell rolled 707 , 737 , military planes many times . if you watch the flaps on the wings it is a indication it is not faked.
backyardbuilttrucks1 you have to be trolling. There are several dead giveaways that this is fake. Here’s a few. And to get it out the way I am an aviation expert. First: the ailerons and spoilers are going the wrong way for the roll motions that you see. Second: the wings could not bend down at that angle without snapping. Third: the Airbus A320 and all FBW Airbus aircraft have a roll limiter that prevents rolls beyond about 45 degrees. Fourth: the aircraft is not moving fast enough to stay airborne at those extreme angles and in general is moving to slow. Fifth: Airliners can roll but not that fast and certainly not in landing configuration. Sixth: No pilot that wasn’t trying kill everyone would even attempt an approach that is so unstable. Seventh: nobody would actually stand there and film such an event. I’m done.
There are so many "experts" in this thread. It would be nice to see them say what kind of expert exactly they are and where that expertise comes from. To your dead giveaways: 1. You make it look like the pilot could only have done this on purpose. What about a plane that is "out of control"? 2. Sure, no pilot would try such an approach but is it possible that the pilot didn't know a near-surface gush would hit his plane in that exact moment? Plus, at 0:04-0:05 it looks like he's breaking off his attempt. 3. The real altitude of that plane should be much higher than it looks. The blurred fence indicates magnification. I'm not saying it's not a fake. But I wouldn't call it a fake just yet.
雷特 6 years USAF, A&P certified mechanic, have been working at Lockheed Martin since 2011, lifelong self study of aircraft and aerodynamics. Good enough?
I don't know. You tell me. Lockheed hasn't been producing any comparable aircraft since 1984. Do you have any experience with investigating flight incidents involving abnormal wind conditions? Are you familiar with the wing flex of modern civil aircraft? The wing tip of a Boeing 777 for instance is designed to flex up to 25 feet. An A319 is a fairly modern aircraft. You can't compare that to a Hercules. And again... the way you put it was that the pilot in the video is supposed to have done the roll one purpose. That doesn't make any sense of course. It is obvious that the roll is not done on purpose. Even if it is computer-generated, it is not designed to look like a voluntary action. Can you at least try to look at it from that angle?
Pilot: dear passengers, please return to your seats and fasten your seat belts for landing, wind speed is 9 trillion knots and we are going to experience some slight turbelance, thank you for flying with us
