Extreme low pass of a RC turbine jet at the 42th flight days Hausen am Albis 2023 in Switzerland. #shorts #rcairplane #rcturbine #rcaircraft #wow #short
@@kernahanbuck8201: I agree about the 200' thing and I'd rather see a Fighter Jet like the F22 Raptor or F18 Superhornet passing by higher so ppl can witness the power and sonic boom of the Fighter Jet it produces when passing by. There's something amazing about watching Fighter Jets take off, do maneuvers in the sky and than land.
Correct, he had the flaps down to slow flight which helped create a denser ground effect... not to mention more audience appeal. I think it was Chuck Yeager that said at high speed near the ground, it's very hard if not impossible to hit it. Have to re-read his book.
@@SolarWebsite...some people just think 'small jet' = BD5 It's like how some people think all handguns are 'Glocks' It is easier than learning, I suppose...
He is in the ground effects of the aircraft. Ground effects region is measured in height of about half the aircraft's wing span, where the wings push the air to the ground for lift, rebound back up to the aircraft, giving the aircraft a "double dose of lift." A flight instructor demonstrated that to me when I was flying too fast to land the Cessna 152. I almost 💩 myself when the flight instructor shoved the yoke all the way forward. No contact was made with the ground when the flight instructor did that.
You think its bad in a high winged Cessna, its even worse in a low wing light like a Diamond DA20. Those things were a pain to learn to land well! So much ground effect. I almost always porpoised lol.
Crazy cool RC jet. Expensive hobby to get into after checking out the cost of a complete and nice setup. And all this while I’m thinking high end PCP air rifles were expensive. Not even close to this world of RC Jets and planes.
PCP rifles are getting less expensive when you factor in the cost of ammo nowadays right. I get my thrills flying FPV drones, and yes, the cost is still considerably up there when you get done buying Everything you need.
Not an RC, its a BD-5J been around since the late '60s. There's another similar one called the JSX-2T "Subsonex" I got to play with one of them a few years ago., very cool, agile little jet. Both the BD-5J and the JSX-2T are kit planes and are also available with a prop.
Brilliant low level. My uncle was ex RAF and took me to a flying club years ago and for fun saw a pilot do that inverted. It was amazing as wrong stick move would have been fatal.
I feel like that’s how the 727’s and the props between ORD and MLI fly on partially cloudy to 100% cloud cover days and nights. My house is right under their landing path, but 30 miles from the airport. I sometimes actually look out the window expecting to see a big cloud of black smoke erupting from their crash site. So far, no crashes in 30+ years - I chalk it up to the planet being round. Lucky for the passengers. “Throttle and pull up?? I thought you said flaps at 15 and nose down!!!”
I have been flying over 20 years. You can give the remote to a real full scale pilot and he will tell you it has no feeling!! He will crash eventually! LOL!!
That airframe is an extremely forgiving design, will fly as if on rails. You'd be surprised how easy it is to pick up. Flying is the easy part,landing safely is where the test is.
Eu conheci um que fazia isso com um F86 sabre em pleno combate nas matas de África e esteve na as três frentes de combate Angola , Moçambique , Guiné era português
Some people add sensors so its very possible this, very expensive, rc had a logic circuit to prevent ground collision when its not actually landing. Wouldn't be the first.
Well that's nicer than one I had as a kid. You must have tied on the string and put fuel in put the little battery clip on it and spend a propeller. They were fly round circles and land when it ran out of ⛽ But this is really cool jet plane model
The BD 5 is a very reliable small jet, I used to own BD 5 gen 1. Used to chase coyotes in the the the west texas deserts often flying 6 foot hard decks. RiP Bob Bishop...... The Coors Silver Bullet ...
1. Yes, very strongly at such a low altitude-to-wingspan ratio. 2. As long as the pilot maintains positive angle of attack, it's easier, because lift increases as altitude decreases. This is a stabilizing effect that helps the plane "float" down the runway. However, a decrease in altitude or increase in airspeed reduces the required angle-of-attack to float the plane. If angle of attack goes negative, then downforce increases as altitude decreases (destabilizing). Very low, high-speed passes without flaps would be very sensitive to pitch angle.
Sensors and a flight computer can handle that for you, easy with off the shelf parts these days you can look up RC's built around this pretty easy when searching ground effect rc
@@theendoftheline To an extent, yes, but even with sensors and flight computers making over a million adjustments a second, interactions between the aircraft and the ground effect that low are inherently unpredictable and even with all those fancy gadgets, planes still bite it all the time. Edit: id go into detail but i really dont feel like explaining the science involved in the interactions between the ground effect and aircraft, as well as temperature differentials caused by the ground under the tarmac, as well as the tarmac itself, which by themselves are enough to crater a plane less than 6 feet off the ground...
I find it strange that they allow people to stand so close to these things. If the operator looses control for whatever reason these things can kill somebody.
for the last at least 10 years there have been no recorded deaths by rc plane in the world. Sure, you can get injured, but we have to keep in mind that it usually is the propeller that cuts you, not the blunt force impact. These birds are very fragile.
The people that are behind the pilot aren‘t spectators. They are flight coordinators, spotters or other airshow staff. The spectators are about 50meters further back, behind a safety net
@@zmeyuga9083 most people standing that close are part of the staff. They can usually recognize if a plane is out of control or stalling and can predict roughly the trajectory at any point in the flight. These don't turn on a dime, the inertia alone keeps them going forward. If they get in an emergency they can spot it way ahead of time and prepare to run out of the area.
Yeah, 100,000 for a jet that the Military could use to provide the special forces with close air support on the cheap! It doesn’t take 25 years to figure that out😂😂, now we have drones that cost $500,000 to over $3,000,000 that are less effective! I
@@mxercr250 Look it up, the engine alone is like 3000-5000$ and that adds to the frame that is made out of extremely lightweight and strong carbon that is also very expensive and then you have to take that together with all the electronics you need and an rc jet can also cost up to 20000-30000$
Don’t pretend that isn’t dangerous with all the people nearby. There’s always a risk factor however skilfully you manage it. Squeeze the envelope tighter and you leave less room for things that are out of your control. Birds, kids, dogs, a component failure. One day, maybe, sooner or later, something will come left of field. And who’s gonna get hurt?
Ive been out surfing when 1 of the 2 solo pilots for the Thunderbirds ripped by at about 320knots kicking up a roostertail 50ft high , he was about 5ft off the water for a couple thousand yards down the beach, no wind hardly and she ripped by like a there was a string holding her just off the water, amazing to see from that perspective... we could see him smile at us, the lowest pass ive ever seen !
