F35 vs SU35 - which would win?

Подписаться 186 тыс.

Просмотров 4,7 млн

50% 1

F35 vs SU35 - which would win?
► Subscribe to Grid 88: goo.gl/UYzU9H
F35 vs SU35 - which would win?
American F35 and SU35 are two of the world’s latest fighter jets. We thought it will be interesting to compare the capabilities of these modern aircraft and try to determine which would win in a real aerial battle against each other.
The F35 comes with three types of models know as F35A, F35B and F35C, all with different functions. Pentagon plans to acquire over 3,100 F35, which if delivered will make the F35 one of the most numerous fighter jets ever built.
On the other hand, SU35 is the upgraded version of SU27, though an exceptional jet with much improvement. It is so modernized that it attracts the attention of many countries and only China could make its purchase.
1. Specifications
Let’s have a look at some specifications first.
As of today, around 500 F35s have been built so far. F35B and F35C are comparatively more expensive as per unit cost of F35B and F35C are $116M and $109M respectively, while F35A price tag is around $79M. Operated by crew of 1, the Aircraft’s empty weight is 29,300lb and maximum takeoff weight is around 70,000lb. The jet is powered by a single engine producing 43,000 pounds of thrust. With the help of this engine, the aircraft can gain top speed of Mach 1.6 or about 1,228mph. With the maximum range of 1,700mi, the jet can combat within the radius of 770mi. F35’s climb rate is around 45,000 ft/min and it can reach at maximum altitude of 50,000ft. The aircraft is fitted with 4 internal hardpoints and 6 external weapon stations with a total payload capacity of 18,000Ib. F35 is also armed with a 25mm 4-barrel rotary cannon.
In contrast, around 115 SU35 have been built so far with per unit cost of $85M. Operated by a crew of 1, the aircraft comes in at weight of 41,888lb with maximum takeoff weight of 76,059Ib. The Jet is powered by 2 afterburning turbofan engines generating 64,000 pounds of thrust combined. With the help of these engines, the jet can reach at top speed of 1,500mph. With ferry range of 2,800mi, the jet can combat within the radius of 990mi. SU35’s climb rate is around 55,000 ft/min and it can reach at maximum altitude of 59,000ft. The aircraft comes with 12 hardpoints with ordnance carrying capacity of 17,630Ib. The fighter jet is also armed with a 30mm auto cannon.
2. Stealth
The F35 has lead in this category as SU35 is not a stealth aircraft at all, however for perspective, the SU35's radar cross section is between 1 to 3 sqm, or about the size of a large table while the RCS of F35 is about the size of an insect…
3. Maneuverability
SU35 is based on SU27 platform, so its status as a "super maneuverable" fighter is a matter of fact. Although both jets can slip into heavily defended targets on the ground. F35 will be better in those scenarios while the SU35 is better for air to air battles…
4. Radar & Avionics
The F35 is outfitted with latest AN/APG-81 radar capable of tracking 23 targets in 9 seconds and engaging 19 of them in 2.4 seconds. The range of F35 radar is confidential; however some defense analysts believe that this radar can detect a target beyond 300 miles. On the other hand, SU35 employs the powerful Irbis-E radar, capable of detecting an aerial target up to 250mi away. With the help of this radar, SU35 can track 30 airborne targets and engage 8 targets simultaneously.
5. Firepower
Both planes are equipped with state of the art missiles capable of shooting each other. SU35's need to carry ordinance outside the fuselage is a slight disadvantage, but in general the first aircraft to score a clean hit will win…
Watch full video for detailed Conclusion.
► Facebook: thegrid88
► Twitter: grid_88
► Become a Patreon
/ factsbox99
Playlists
► Military, Army, Navy & Air force
• Military
►US Army
• Playlist
► SUBSCRIBE so you never miss another video: goo.gl/UYzU9H
Credits
1) “Clash Defiant” Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
2) US Department of Defense
3) Минобороны России
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
The appearance of US DOD visual information does not imply or constitute their respective endorsements. All footage and images are owned by their respective owners.
#F35 #SU35 #Stealth

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

27 апр 2020

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 8 тыс.

@sammomin8115 3 года назад

The only way to know who is better is a paintball fight, so no one gets hurt.

@user-dr8xr1tr9z 3 года назад

Каждый год всем желающим русские предлагают вступить в учебный воздушный бой с СУ-35 . прошло 7 лет . желающих до сих прор нет.

@gjswank 3 года назад

Untill one cheats and freezes their paintballs..

@Kevin-pd5xh 3 года назад

@@gjswank thats a myth

@christophersisto3645 3 года назад

@@user-dr8xr1tr9z Who would be dumb enough to allow a controlled situation for another country to study their technology?

@jacobrzeszewski6527 3 года назад

@@gjswank XD. Then someone uses a bearing ball.

@SS-kz7td 2 года назад

"Russia is no less competent in terms of modern warfare technology" Well, that's been proved otherwise, lol.

@nunoalvarespereira87 2 года назад

How?

@SS-kz7td 2 года назад

@@nunoalvarespereira87 How what?

@osakar941 2 года назад

@@nunoalvarespereira87 Do you live in a bush or ?

@chiselcheswick5673 2 года назад

Obviously not big on current affairs..

@Vejita12 2 года назад

@@chiselcheswick5673 No he just doesn't buy obvious lies from magix box. ;)

@hulkhogan4203 2 года назад

"Russia is no less competent in terms of modern warfare technology" that didn't age well

@highdefinist9697 2 года назад

Yeah. More like: The F35 would win by default, because the SU35 would not show up because it would have been shot down by Ukrainians before it could even get in range.

@mistrants2745 2 года назад

@@highdefinist9697 it would have dropped out of the sky before reaching the Russian border when its fuel ran out...

@SiberianMaestro 2 года назад

@@highdefinist9697 you're funny

@blakkelure 2 года назад

Read techology again...

@Makumazaan 2 года назад

@@highdefinist9697 I raise your bet. The F35 would win by default, because the SU35 would not show up because it would have been shot down by Ukrainians before it had been produced.

@CharlesOffdensen 2 года назад

The lack of stealth is a problem not just against other fighters, but against anti-air ground weapons as well.

@chrismair8161 2 года назад

Then stay on the Ground.

@kisstamas7760 2 года назад

There are no stealth fighters, its just a propaganda. The first stealth fighter F-117 was shot down by an old russian radar and rocket system in the 90's, just by modifying the wavelength of the radar (by officer Zoltan Dani). The precise explanation of "stealth fighters" is that they are invisible for most of the radar systems, but not all.

@RocketboiC4 2 года назад

@@kisstamas7760 the door was jammed open, and the interior of the Bombay of the f117, get your fucking facts right

@VITOLLFOTOGRAFIA 2 года назад

@@kisstamas7760 absolute indectability does not exist, but it is a factor to take into account. In that case "something" was detected but not "where" they simply fired at random, the F117 was not even equipped with a radar alert, or countermeasures, the pilot simply did not know that he was being shot at, so he could not take any defensive action .

@khoipham2261 2 года назад

@@kisstamas7760 First off, the SAM operator correctly predicted the F117 bombing route, as it was used multiple times. Not only did the operator have early intelligence, but the bomber pilot didn't know they were detected in the first place. The low frequency radar gave early warning, however could not achieve a radar lock onto the F117 until it's bomb bay doors were opened.

@unclezlatin1495 4 года назад

I love How the cold war continued in the comment sections in youtube

@brianstevens7241 3 года назад

i love the cold war, PERIOD!

@unclezlatin1495 3 года назад

@nhà độc tài Yang Wen Li no one asked but ok

@NapoleonBonaparde 3 года назад

The cold war never ended it just paused for 20 years and continued after that mess in Libya

@blockvfive1196 3 года назад

ill solve it all i like the united states of russia (i like both lol)

@unclezlatin1495 3 года назад

@@blockvfive1196 this guy Just single handedly ended all national conflicts

@igormar78 3 года назад

I hope they will never meet in a real-world scenario.

@LRRPFco52 3 года назад

@Douglas Jones Flying hunter of the shadows death-distributor, not a death-trap like a Flanker. Su-35 doesn’t even do very well against the Gripen C or J-10C. Why? Lower RCS values, better missiles. Guess who has a far lower RCS value and better missile PK than Gripen C or J-10C? Chinese PLAAF already did tactical exploitation of their Su-35S and concluded it’s a lot of hype. They want AESAs in their Flankers, with their own IRST and PL-15 missiles, not any of the Russian stuff. The only missile they liked was the R-73, but their copy of the Israeli Python HOBS missile is superior when they tested them. If you allow a Flanker to get within visual range of a 4.5 Gen fighter, it will be at least on parity with you. F-35 has IR stealth systems that make the WVR an uphill battle, so don’t ever get near an F-35 is all you can say. They don’t let you anyway, so it doesn’t matter. Rules of the new road...

@LRRPFco52 3 года назад

@Douglas Jones F-35s have their own Local Area Network with Line-of-sight data link, not omnidirectional Wide Area Network like 4th Gen fighters have. F-117A combat record: 1271 combat sorties in Desert Storm 850 combat sorties over Bosnia/Serbia 1 shot down 0 combat fatalities It has no radar, no EW, no radar warning, nothing but a good navigation system and FLIR + laser spot tracker hidden in the belly for guiding its Laser-Guided Bombs. They were ordered to fly the same corridor multiple nights in a row. The night in question, the EA-6Bs were down for maintenance, and Russian spotters in Italy relayed what aircraft were taking off. No EA-6Bs with HARM missiles meant SAM sites could search longer, be a bit more bold. Dani's SA-3 crew set their radars to lower frequency against orders, and got a brief glimmer of the F-117As when bomb bay doors were opened, then disappeared. They had to turn around and fly over the same area by orders of Clinton's SECDEF, while SAM batteries were scanning actively. Dani's crew saw them at 13km, manually tracked and fired a Salvo of 2 different SAMs from the site. One missed, while the other proximity-detonated near the F-117, causing a wing to shear off and go out of control. Pilot ejected and went into E&E mode, got picked up by AFSOF CSAR elements. Had that been an F-35, the F-35 pilots would have seen every tiny RF and thermal emission overlaid on high resolution AESA ground-mapping imagery from over the horizon, actively looking for SAM sites to smoke. Totally different ballgame.

@carlgreene538 3 года назад

I course they won't America or it's stooges only ever pick on countries that cannot fight back.

@LRRPFco52 3 года назад

@@carlgreene538 Like Russia invading Finland, Baltics, Georgia, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, Ukraine.....

@carlgreene538 3 года назад

@@LRRPFco52 I wasn't talking about Russia I was talking about America and not in the past but now.

@matthewhuszarik4173 2 года назад

Whom ever sees the enemy first wins so this isn’t even close.

@robinjahn1294 2 года назад

that`s right, so being as undetectable as possible is an extremely important property (not online stealth capablities of the jet but the ability of the pilot to use stealthy tactics)

@lagrangewei 2 года назад

this assume if it is a 1 on 1, in large formation battle, you won't have the benefit of staying out of detection. especially if your mission is to protect other plane like refueler, bomber, transporter. than the problem of the F35 carrying only 4 missiles would become a worrying problem. this is why US is buying more F15. F35 is good for certain role but it can't do enough in a war where both side has 100s of planes...

@matthewhuszarik4173 2 года назад

@@lagrangewei You always have the opportunity to reduce your threshold of detection. There isn’t one tactic that fits all situations. Everyone assumed while the Iraqis had Russian equipment they couldn’t fly it as well or had the tactics of the Russians. Well he have now seen that the Russians fly Russian equipment no better than the Iraqis did.

@lagrangewei 2 года назад

@@matthewhuszarik4173 which is my point. stealth can be a liability as much as an asset. as for your russian comment, it make no sense considering the russian were successful in supressing ukraine, this is why ukraine ask for a no-fly-zone. i am not sure why you bring that up when that is not what we are discussing. the silly statement that it is about who see who first is flawed. it is also a failure to understand early warning system.

@matthewhuszarik4173 2 года назад

@@lagrangewei The Russians have not successfully suppressed Ukraine air assets. That is why we have seen the Ukrainians taking out tanks, ammunition dumps, oil storage, and command centers from the air. The Ukrainians also haven’t been able to suppress Russian air assets. Right now the air war is the only part of the war that favors the Russians, but they still aren’t dominating it. That is why the Ukrainians have asked for a no fly zone. It hurts the Russians in the one area they have an advantage over Ukraine. It hurts Russia more than it hurts the Ukrainians. Stealth is never a liability unless you sacrifice some other critical resource to achieve it.

@0cypher0 2 года назад

The doctrine differences are significant, Su-35 is clearly still based around the concept of close target engagement whereas western concepts are based around medium to long range engagement and network centric warfare. The average AMRAAM missile doesn't give much of a rip about the Su-35 having a bigger gun or thrust vectoring as it comes barrelling in at mach 4 from 80nm away. You can ask the Serbian air force how well supermaneuverability served their pilots during BVR engagements. At closer ranges those two enormously hot engines are an ideal target for the latest generation of sidewinder missiles which have significantly improved in their maneuverability compared to the older AIM-L/M variants. Basically it's touting your skill to fire an uzi when you are fighting an enemy that has carbines and sniper rifles.

@maryrafuse3851 Год назад

Excellent points all.

@hwbxjr Год назад

Su35- 4gen f35- 5gen this could have ended comparison is incorrect

@arunprakashkumarakrishnan4741 Год назад

Why not just strap these AMRAAMs to a much cheaper Cessna 152. We are talking about air superiority fighters and not the payload's capability. Besides TWO hot engines is not much more of a heat signature than a single hot engine...its how you program the missile to recognize the heat signature, heck they can even lock onto heat being reflected by the sun through the fuselage

@crigeorge9549 Год назад

serbs didnt have awacs support , nor they had the best equiped variants in terms of electronic warfare(jaming), nor they could afford to atack in packs of over 20 aircrafts group and fire multiple missiles at a single target. So your example is irelevant. Same applies in Iraq.

@BlatentlyFakeName Год назад

After seeing the total fail which is the Russian airforce in Ukraine. I think the SU-35's primary purpose is to look good at airshows.

@prinsnalawansa8870 4 года назад

Hope these two will not meet each other.....

@joeblowme5427 4 года назад

Why not ? it will be fun

@commonsenselogic 4 года назад

Only at airshows.

@jzisers 4 года назад

if They Fight = World War 3

@shabab189 4 года назад

JOE BLOW ME yeah fun, so fun, in fact so much fun😐

@joeblowme5427 4 года назад

@@shabab189 , BLOW ME🤣🤣🤣

@ramilespenilla4296 4 года назад

Both are capable of killing each other, it's just a matter of who see first.

@joeblowme5427 4 года назад

And the F-35 would see and shoot fisrt

@rajaydon1893 4 года назад

@@joeblowme5427 you don't know how things play out in a war do you

@Aaron-wq3jz 4 года назад

@@rajaydon1893 no one does tbh

@dz7290 4 года назад

No the SU35 will shoot first

@joeblowme5427 4 года назад

@@dz7290 , IN YOUR WET DREAMS MAYBE

@austinstephensparks 2 года назад

i find both of these machines facinating and incredable but at the same time i hope they never get used fo actual combat

@LemmingOverlord 2 года назад

At this point, the question is: which one would take off and not explode during cruise? And we all know the answer...

@dudfromnowhere Год назад

What's the answer?

@IonutTudorica 2 года назад

This comparison didn't age well. There is no comparison between those two. They are galaxies away.

@bengoacher4455 2 года назад

tbf Russia haven't deployed any to Ukraine. Although this is because they only have 4 which they use for airshows haha

@bjkarana 2 года назад

@@bengoacher4455 and even those 4 were probably just painted over F-15s, haha.

@jefflow1986 2 года назад

@@bengoacher4455 They are exclusively for airshows!

@kevadu 2 года назад

Well airshows are all the Su-35 is good for. It's pretty spectacular at them, though...gotta give them that much.

@TheLastCrumb. 2 года назад

True, the su probably works when it rains unlike some other planes

@beyahero1010 3 года назад

F-35. Hi SU-35. Hello S-400. HEY!! WELCOME TO MY WORLD 😆

@myusername3689 3 года назад

Hypersonic missiles: hey- SR-92: Haha laser weapons go brrrrrrrrrr

@bilakaeraastakeriada 3 года назад

SU-57: Hahah kids

@tropicalstorm339 3 года назад

@@bilakaeraastakeriada None has been delivered yet and the first batch of delivery (22) is set to occur by 2024. A production version is set to be shown this year at the Moscow air show in July.

@shankc3526 3 года назад

@@tropicalstorm339 They already have twelve that are built. The plane is officially in service.

@tropicalstorm339 3 года назад

@@shankc3526 A report as of January this year (2021) said that they received one on Christmas... *one.* It says that development of the Izdeliye 30 engine (the final production engine) is still ongoing. The first one delivered in 2019 crashed. The other 10 are *test aircrafts* and not for combat. Again, the engine that will eventually power the *real* SU57 is still in development.

@jasonstclair1329 2 года назад

Scrap em all and build bbq’s

@jozefhorvat3625 2 месяца назад

👌👌👌👍👍👍

@stuartmcmahon8870 2 года назад

A Ukranian farmer with a sawn off shotgun could probably take down an SU35 too...

@okavipra 2 года назад

Well Serbia took down f117a stelth bomber , its not "could probably " . They took it down . Guess they didnt know it was stealth

@stuartmcmahon8870 2 года назад

@Yemini Killskids if we had wanted to slaughter the taliban then we could have done it easily. We used the tactics we did because we wanted the Afghan people to still have homes after the conflict. It may have worked to some degree, but it’s better than committing war crimes as Putin is doing!!

@ThatSB 2 года назад

@@okavipra they only took it down under circumstances that shouldnt have happened. They pushed forward with a flight despite poor conditions. Even still, only 1 was shot down. Under normal circumstances it never would have happened

@kisstamas7760 2 года назад

The ukrainien farmers are welcoming the russians, because the far right ukrainien nazis are randomly killing the ukrainien citizens since 2014. You have to read about the Maidan and other US backed coups to understand, why the russians have started this offensive.

@kisstamas7760 2 года назад

@@ThatSB There were a lot of shot down. The coating of these warplanes absorbs the radar waves in the 1m range. If the radar operates in a different wavelength, the warplane clearly visible on the radar, this is why the F-117 was shot down by the hungarian officer Zoltan Dani in the 90's. He modified his radar's wavelength to operate in a different wavelength.

@alanmoore2197 3 года назад

In a beauty contest its the SU35 every single time...

@spartanx9293 3 года назад

Beauty is subjective and russian planes are like supermodels nice line's from a distance but plenty of imperfections up close personally my favorite 4th gen aircraft Is the f/a 18 superhornet

@anuragtiwari5081 3 года назад

@@sergiosaudiolog2259 😁😁😂

@Bojan8309 3 года назад

@@sergiosaudiolog2259 Is what you think lol

@johntechwriter 3 года назад

Ha Ha Ha

@shaundavidssd 3 года назад

The problem with beauty is it's often lacking in brains ....

@AdA-rl4eo 2 года назад

Float like a butterfly sting like a bee, a man can’t touch what a man can’t see… stealth superior 💯

@poiu17472 2 года назад

So the man create the net that stop the mosquito which flies in the black night... or drigt the standing water.

@fork9001 Год назад

Of course a modern 21st century lockheed jet is better than an old soviet late 80s fighter. Except maneuverability, Su-35 was designed to be supermaneuverable unlike the F-35.

@Helperbot-2000 Год назад

@@fork9001 yeah and that isnt even a better - worse scenario since the f35 is designed to kill its opponent long before it ever come into visual range

@fork9001 Год назад

@@Helperbot-2000 Pretty sure Su-35 has BVRAAM options too, but it’s inferior to the F-35.

@TheRealBillBob Месяц назад

That's probably true when you are always fighting militants, but when you are fighting a foe with modern weapons, that superiority is eroded. Radars, stingers and Patriots have kept Russia from Air Supremacy, but not Ukraine's jets.

@nonconsensualopinion 2 года назад

An air-to-air missile isn't going to be impressed by flips and twirls by the SU-35. Dog fighting is nearly dead. Though it may happen once in a great while, designing your entire aircraft around it is a mistake.

@vrrc7686 2 года назад

Thing is the SU-35 was not created for dog fighting, that is the Mig35. Su035 mainly objective is a bomber, unlike the F35 that is mainly objective is dog fight.

@BipolarAyatollah 2 года назад

@@vrrc7686 Nope. The F35 is not a dog fighter. It kills before a dogfight has a chance to develop. It can perform air to air combat, but it has other capabilities as well.

@antonthompson7838 2 года назад

The F35 is a multirole combat aircraft intended to perform both air superiority and strike missions it’s also used for intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and electronic warfare. In a real air simulated battle they pitted six F22 Raptors against one F35 Lightning II, and yes the F35 took out all six Raptors before the F22 pilots even knew where the F35 was!

@Puschit1 2 года назад

It's all a question of what you are up to. If you are expecting enemies other than american F35 then the russian approach might hold true. Right now they are fighting Ukraine and they have jets of russian origin as well.

@vrrc7686 2 года назад

@@BipolarAyatollah - The main objective of the F35 was to dismantle the F16's in the future. What is the main objective of the F16's? dog fighting. Yes, the F35 can perform other capabilities. You hear that even on the russian side about the SU35, but their main objective of the F35 is dog fighting from a distance, while the SU35 is mainly a bomber w/ minor capabilities for dog fighting.

@whateverthisis389 Год назад

This aged like milk

@adityarai5367 3 года назад

0:19 i was like wtf when did this got developed.

@ahmadariqdarwish2042 3 года назад

At 90s

@peted5217 2 года назад

Avoiding sight contact with a defender by pre-elimination with further reaching ordinance is an ancient and well proven technique. Definitely favored in prolonging the lives of Pilots and aircraft.

@gillsejusbates6938 2 года назад

@Jesus is coming. Read the Gospel. you internet christ cucks are really off-putting

@AvroBellow 3 месяца назад

This is of course assuming that the F-35 has no ordinance on its wings because as soon as it does, it's no longer stealthy and the Russians could pick-it off with their R-37M LAAMs while remaining safely outside of AIM-120 range. Even if an unladen-winged F-35 successfully takes down an Su-35, it will be doing so at the cost of its own existence. The second that bomb bay opens, the "invisible" F-35 has the RCS of a Strike Eagle which means that it would get an E-37M up its butt. The Russians also have IR-guided LAAMs which would easily spot the P&W F135's gigantic exhaust plume. There is no "clean win" scenario for the F-35 and, considering the huge difference in manufacturing cost, Russia would happily trade one Su-35 for every F-35 downed because that's a financial victory for them. I have no belief that it costs more to build ANY Sukhoi than it costs to build any variant of the F-35.

@scolee6408 2 года назад

SU-35 is an air to air fighter and the F-35 is an air to ground fighter, shouldn’t be pitting the two together. F-22 would be a more appropriate comparison, and the SU wouldn’t stand a chance.

@WmSrite-pi8ck 2 года назад

F-35 is a multirole fighter.

@scolee6408 2 года назад

@@WmSrite-pi8ck: F-35 is multi configured for different branches of the military but in all configurations it is an air to ground fighter, big difference from a air to air fighter.

@asnovaable 2 года назад

cap,SU is 5x better

@scolee6408 2 года назад

@@asnovaable K

@ivanlagrossemoule 2 года назад

@@scolee6408 No, it's not. The F-35 wouldn't even look the same at all if it wasn't designed for air-to-air combat.

@Noxi8890 2 года назад

"Russia is no less competent in terms of modern warfare technology." Aged like milk...

@f4ust85 2 года назад

These people should stop reading pamphlets and PR translated by Sputnik News.

@v.german11b 3 года назад

What happened to the time tested old saying: "Mine is bigger than yours!"?! 😁

@TheRealBillBob Месяц назад

That only applies to bombs.

@v.german11b Месяц назад

@@TheRealBillBob You are a "Bob"... 😝

@TheRealBillBob Месяц назад

@@v.german11b Uh okay. I guess that's funny in your own mind.

@v.german11b Месяц назад

@@TheRealBillBob Look who's talkin'! You are the "joker on steroids" 😝

@migmit 2 года назад

Answer: ukrainian tractor would kick both of their asses.

@captainalex157 2 года назад

ukrainian tractor companies are gonna be the big winner from this war. Invest now!

@trutacgear 2 года назад

Haha true ..

@trutacgear 2 года назад

@@captainalex157 There is no war at all ..This is a fucking propaganda like covid horse shit ... Everything is for the fucking mind control and money ...Don't you see those images are from old wars back in the 90s and video game simulators..

@richhenry8004 2 года назад

I would assume dogfighting depends on the quality of the pilot. Given recent events im not sure id place a large wager that russia is full of well trained active duty fighter aces.

@charlessmith3940 2 года назад

Conscripts make great pilots

@gourmetbanana 2 года назад

@@charlessmith3940 Wouldn't matter if all their bullets have been traded for Vodka 🤔

@squidysnose69 2 года назад

There arent any aces currently serving in the airforce

@Nickalaich 2 года назад

@@charlessmith3940 Conscripts cannot and would not be pilots in any circumstances. Special-trained officers only

@williamzk9083 2 года назад

Because of the F-35's stealth it will get a first shot first kill.

@1HonestGuero3 2 года назад

SU35: Power is everything! F35: You can't hit what you can't see!

@armancho76 2 года назад

lol ...SU 35 Pilot " peekaboo I see you " ...Italian F35 Pilot " mayday maday i need a diaper change" lmao

@Eugenetra7 2 года назад

@@armancho76 Making fun of yourself?)

@arielalicaway6554 2 года назад

HAHAHAHA SU 35 EASY TARGET ORDINARY U.S.A. MADE portable handheld missiles.... kill highest score.... SAD PUTIN OLD TECH

@TheRealBillBob Месяц назад

Actually the Su-35 can see it.

@machbaby 3 года назад

All I know, is that the SU-35 is one of the most gorgeous aircraft to ever grace the sky.

@machbaby 3 года назад

@Geo Thomas Probably from the engineers at Sukhoi.

@faronanderson2536 3 года назад

It sure is!What an impressive piece of engineering.Everytime I look at one,it reminds me of a deadly cobra snake!

@spartanx9293 3 года назад

Looks the same as an su27

@machbaby 3 года назад

@@spartanx9293 Yes- an upgraded variant.

@spartanx9293 3 года назад

@Robert S yeah they were totally not the aggressor during the war over Crimea

@minarawa9645 3 года назад

The Sukhoi is dancing in the air, amazing

@googlgfacef218 3 года назад

its called the cyka ballet

@stevegardnermax 3 года назад

Stunning Russian maneuverability, the faster and better armed SU-35 is an amazing adversary. I'm sure both airplanes have some secret tricks up their sleeves too.

@KjetilBalstad 3 года назад

That dancing equals loss of power, and is mostly useless outside airshows...

@nicolascage1261 3 года назад

my lovely friend how are you doing is me Nicolas cage 💋👄💋❤❤❤💋💋💋

@tomwhite4488 5 месяцев назад

Come on man. The f35 would get the heavyweight title while the other would get a partipation award.

@lawrencetendler7747 2 года назад

If you combine these two warplanes you have an even more effective warplane: The FU 35. ( eff you )

@sahalimran7877 3 года назад

Just because they have 35 in there name doesn't mean that they are for same class

@joedoc6124 3 года назад

was just thinking this lmao, completely different generations

@glandhound 3 года назад

Su-35 had it's first flight in 1988.

@johndavis2589 4 года назад

It seems that one thing is never made clear. In the early days of F-35 videos when they were still testing, I saw the F-35 get followed by a drone from behind and the F-35 was able to shoot it down without facing the target. The directed aperture system enables the aircraft to target in all directions while flying in any other, so the F-35 doesn't need to maneuver.

@crankthetank3581 3 года назад

The su-35 can do the same with its look and shoot capability, basically all the pilot needs to do is look in the general direction of its target and bam you have a lock on to it

@johncostello3174 2 года назад

The winner is usually the one who sees his opponent first. With the superior stealth and ability to fire missiles in any direction the advantage is with the F-35

@verbal_DK 2 года назад

@@crankthetank3581 the only thing Russian pilots have to do is perform physically impossible thing - to look right behind them!... not to mention the targets out of their visual reach... The Russians are simply outdated and outnumbered. they are far behind Western civilization and technology. their finances are too weak to keep up with us. the only thing i give them is that they have good air defense systems (at least on paper) but now we are talking fighter jets.

@D3nz13 2 года назад

@@verbal_DK Yup, they are so behind western civilization. That's good for them, at least they're not creating 100 new genders, BLM shit and other crap that's destroying Europe right now, hah.

@sontung4552 2 года назад

@@D3nz13 ah yes, that's what a loser always say after losing a debate. When you lose a debate, you start to talk about genders... to attack your opponent. You are the person who change your ground while losing to opponent.

@3dkiller 2 года назад

Close combat SU35, range combat F-35

@apostolisnatsios7953 2 года назад

Coming up " How I shot down the F 35," exclusive interview with the Red Baron...

@PrashantRawat 3 года назад

SU 35 is an amazing jet for strikes .. but F35 is a flying computer and it will always eliminate threats beyond visual range... F35 is just on another level.

@Jab_Air 2 года назад

@Tony MontanaRussia has lost more planes through accidents than it has in battle. The only Russian aircraft in history to have a positive Kill to Death ratio is the SU-27.

@PerSon-xg3zr 2 года назад

@Tony Montana f35b is the least maneuverable of the 3 variants. The f35b crash was because it injested a rain cover into its lift fan.

@johncostello3174 2 года назад

@Tony Montana Due to a rain cover that should have been removed before flight. Simple human error.

@seven.8228 2 года назад

Yes another level of uselessness

@startingbark0356 2 года назад

@@Jab_Air because old russian aircraft with bad pilots fought much newer american jets

@strangefaust6330 3 года назад

Well, these birds can still face each other without devastating WW3. Two other countries which bought the planes from US and Russia can clash in some local war... But the outcome would much depend on the well prepared pilots too...

@kamov52510 3 года назад

Don't they get Export Versions wich are downgraded?

@gabe.ch5555 2 года назад

I have two names in mind, Maverick or rather Ice Man ???

@luisgalindo4530 2 года назад

I agree with you 100%. It all depends on the experience and expertise of the pilots. Obviously,both planes are extremely dangerous but the one with the best pilot,would end up being the best plane.

@miles-thesleeper-monroe8466 11 месяцев назад

If we believe the unverified hover and invisibility hype of the F35 maybe it's responsible for the wave of ufo sightings in America 😂

@fakhrulayser2404 3 года назад

This comment section basically is a bunch of 5 yr olds arguing about whos dad is stronger... And im very annoyed by these people, please just grow up

@wadopotato33 3 года назад

This is a discussion. No one gives two shits if you are annoyed. That is a sign that you aren't grown up.

@cesaralvarez7112 3 года назад

@Wade French you just pulled the I know you are but what am I card. A mountain isn't wrong lol. These comments are literally about who's daddy is stronger. Like grow up get a job man up and do things for yourself. Just a life lesson that you maybe never learned. Most of you people don't even study political science and have no idea what you are talking about. All your info comes from video games and movies. You clearly know nothing of history or warfare

@donaldstein3851 3 года назад

If you are actualy annoyed then you must also classify yourself as a five year old. Now be quiet and go stand in the corner!

@kealahau6727 3 года назад

If you are annoyed , why do you go read the section comment ?

@wadopotato33 3 года назад

@@cesaralvarez7112 I know you are but what am I card? A mountain isn't wrong? What is the sweet fuck are you talking about? People who get annoyed because someone disagrees with them are not adults. If a persons ego is so easily offended they should simply stay out of discussions. Pretty simple. Somehow I think you read a little more into this or something was lost in translation.

@arturasm.5096 4 года назад

You forget one important thing, as soon as F-35 turns on radar it becomes visible from 250+ miles away for Su-35... Stealth is good for silently running away or passing by without engagement... In 1vs1 scenario if F-35 wants to invisible it has to be blind aswell.

@ogc9649 4 года назад

That’s not how it works buddy

@specforged5651 4 года назад

OG C...Haha, exactly.

@arturasm.5096 4 года назад

Irbis-E can detect not only reflections of its own electromagnetic radiation, but other sources like APG-81 used in F-35 as well. And yes, I know how it works.

@kylet2193 4 года назад

True if you are emitting a radar signal you will be tracked by enemy radar. If your radar is off you are stealth but also blind.

@kylet2193 4 года назад

Not saying the su 35 would win though

@edutaimentcartoys Месяц назад

nice fighter jet comparison video

@michaeld53 Год назад

The su35 won’t see the f35 coming till it’s too late

@user-or5lj4pv1s 4 года назад

7:37 I thought it was a pilot's face when he was worried about his favorite aircraft in competition xd

@Johnny-xi4ti 4 года назад

In ur dreamz

@RobertJackson-lm8wi 3 года назад

I know this doesn't retain the airplanes I remember racingdirt bikes and roll 1980s CR60 two-cycle engine was whipping the 1990s to cycle 250. a lot of it's in the driver pilot did anything racing drag or NASCAR

@lt6787 3 года назад

Robert Jackson ช

@flypimpinogflypimp2126 3 года назад

They both have their strengths and their weaknesses. I would love to fly a MIG though I'm not going to lie

@randomentertainingvideos3545 2 года назад

MIGs? The same one with over 40 crash counts, I guess your a daredevil type, not going to argue, Stay safe

@timulm1221 2 месяца назад

su 35 would be destroyed every time without even knowing the f35 was even there.

@jluich 5 месяцев назад

I think it also depends on the pilot, strategy, maintenance, equipment

@OneGuyIKnow 2 года назад

"Who would win?" AN/APG-81 Beyond Visual Range capabilities: *"Am I a joke to you?"*

@trewtewe1778 2 года назад

yes you are 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣

@rockandrollismylife 2 года назад

AIM-120 can do the job.

@ru2yaz33 3 года назад

The maneuverability is limited by the human body which can only handle about 9 Gs, both planes are limited by the pilots.

@sarahbrown5073 2 года назад

True. American military pilots seem to be having a lot of health problems, lately. Russian pilots didn't take an mRNA injection.

@freeskierdude_ 2 года назад

@@sarahbrown5073 hahahaha did you see the tubby guy the ukrainian's shot down? He was a vet of multiple wars too.

@person8203 2 года назад

The F35 has 360 degree targeting and firing. That alone means the pilot doesn't need to be pulling high G maneuvers. It can fire and let the missile do the maneuvering. SU35 wouldn't stand a chance.

@Metoo3232-pu2wc 2 года назад

@@sarahbrown5073 LOL You anti vaxxers are too much. I got all 3 shots. I ran a half marathon last week and beat my pre vaccination best time.

@floydandrews3054 2 года назад

@@bail10k31 ridiculous

@Stormy2021x 2 года назад

F15 or F18 would probably be a better match. But based on the surgent state of the Russian military a static display Phantom would probably be too much for the SU35 to handle.

@cicajmigogoogle 7 месяцев назад

🤣😂🤣😂🤣Wet ussa dreams😈😈😈

@TheRealBillBob Месяц назад

F15/F18 would be destroyed before they ever saw the Su-35 on radar. lol

@tabo01 2 года назад

well, the F-35 is THE giant pork barrel project, so....

@objection_your_honor 2 года назад

I hope I never see any of these machines of violence.

@DzpcbElectronicWorld 3 года назад

The F35, 5 Gen. aircraft should be compared to the SU57 5 Gen. not the SU35 4++ Generation.

@puppetmasternostringsonme8293 3 года назад

Su35 is enough

@DeadSkyWT 3 года назад

@@puppetmasternostringsonme8293 Not at all

@puppetmasternostringsonme8293 3 года назад

@@DeadSkyWT ask your Generals

@DeadSkyWT 3 года назад

@@puppetmasternostringsonme8293 My generals? I am not from America, lol. And, the SU-35 can't do much against the F-35.

@DeadSkyWT 3 года назад

@@puppetmasternostringsonme8293 They can put up a fight though

@Oniphius1 2 года назад

Cant shoot down if you cant see it. How are the Su's working vs Javs?

@BenjWarrant 2 года назад

F35. The Sukhoi's wheel would probably fall off on the runway.

@ListlessSpectre 2 года назад

F35 was actually able to fly in formation undetected by the SU35 if that says anything.

@kdaltex 2 года назад

Story!

@cecirodrigues2016 2 года назад

F35 falls from sky by themselves... no guns fired. xD

@ListlessSpectre 2 года назад

@@cecirodrigues2016 So I've heard....sheesh.

@callsingCLUELESS 2 года назад

@@cecirodrigues2016 nahh you call that stupid pilots not the planes fault

@chiguinson 2 года назад

@@cecirodrigues2016 woww.....cristopher Columbus you just discovered that? ...go tell the Americans so they wont spend trillions of dollars on F35s. You are a genius!

@summoner1451 3 года назад

The SU35 looks better, but the F35 is more advance and has better sensors, meaning it would pick up the Su35 first. So the F35 would win /thread

@panan7777 2 года назад

Organizing beauty contest?

@dadthelad 2 года назад

The look of the F35 has definitely grown on me. It's like any new fashion, or car style, it looks weird at first, but then it grows on you, everyone copies, and the older style suddenly looks dated. So now I find any fighter that doesn't have the stealth look, just looks dated.

@panan7777 2 года назад

Form follows the function.

@jade7631 2 года назад

Uh it has bad radars but good stealth most american planes have a problem with radars but there stealth is incredible

@ramirexbruv6292 2 года назад

@@jade7631 You're entirely wrong at this point ok now so for example in my logic and calculations u would see all over in the internet that the An/apg 81 has a km of 150km can I tell u the reason why? It is because of LPI or the US just don't want reveal its true capabilities LPI is a low probability of intercept radar it is a radar employing meassures to avoid being detected by Passive radar detection equipement such as RWR radar warning recievers when some detects u by radar u will get a warning and electronic support recievers and now Time to get into this now so PD means tracking possible at a range of 55 to 65 percent detection range. Now cued search small search. Box can easily extend the range to 50 percent because of much longer dwell times being used meaning how much the radar focuses on the object. That means 345km range against 3m2 rcs and 454km in those criteria and also the su 35 and rcs of 1m2 I think sof yes the apg 77v1 the upgraded variant uses the same GaaS modules that is on the apg 81 and the An apg 77v1 has a detection range of 400km for 1m2 target and that means An Apg 81 that means 400km for 1m2 target that is the rcs of the su35 in think so yes the f35 will just far away flank it after it detects it and use other kind of tactics The US just has better sensors avionics and radar and better stealth capabilities the rcs of the su 57 is 1m2 and it has the rcs of a clean f18 superhornet

@donaldj3286 Год назад

F-35 💪💪

@chillipalmer3994 Год назад

🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

@youloh3458 9 месяцев назад

Forgot to add "All the data is approximate, since the Ministries of Defense of both countries sent us to fuck with such questions" 🤣

@tremedar 3 года назад

The F-22 is the opponent any Russian jet will face in a dogfight, that's its role in the air fleet, the F-35 is a sniper, sets up for a shot, takes out its assigned targets and leaves the area.

@voodooo3971 3 года назад

we saw how your f22 escaped from su35 on the sky of Syria

@tremedar 3 года назад

@@voodooo3971 Yeah, they should have stayed and fought and started a full scale nuclear war. Fucking moron.

@Barefoot433 3 года назад

@@voodooo3971 Like you think we wanted them to know we were there at that moment and get into a dogfight? I’m sure you’re an advanced straying of the highest order.

@voodooo3971 3 года назад

tremedar that’s what I’m talking about you only hero against weak countries like Iraq Libya Syria Yugoslavia Vietnam but when you face Russia you squeeze you tail under your ...

@nonav5763 3 года назад

The real truth is that All countries are always chasing the yanks and the brits in all forms. Always copying, always trying

@Jungletraveler00_12 3 года назад

Answer: the better pilot

@babubidi2 2 года назад

After the magnificent preformance in Ukraine, it is safe to say even an f-14 can go head to head agains't the su35

@Travis_22 2 года назад

Hell an F4 Phantom 🤣

@stefanomarchesani8804 Год назад

As far as I know no SU 35 were taken down, instead they striked dozen of ucrania mig 29 and su25

@comradegnome6571 Год назад

@@stefanomarchesani8804 Atleast 3 SU-35's have been shot down. There's literally images of them

@NKVD_Enjoyer 4 месяца назад

your country was owned by goat herder

@finesupplements9698 Год назад

Forget F-35, a F-14 Tomcat could obliterate the SU 😂

@FFE-js2zp 2 года назад

One is a Striker, the other is a DCA Fighter. Thats like comparing an apple to a rabbit.

@jcxz983 2 года назад

Rabbit would win though...

@FFE-js2zp 2 года назад

@@jcxz983 I thought the tortoise won by exploiting the rabbits overconfidence?

@jcxz983 2 года назад

@@FFE-js2zp The tortoise, yes. But the tortoise had the advantage of not getting eaten by the rabbit.

@FFE-js2zp 2 года назад

@@jcxz983 I get you. What most people, in fact most air forces don’t understand is that we don’t plan to trade 1 for 1 in visual dog fights any more, and haven’t for quite some time. At least the USAF doesn’t. We train to handle visual merges but only because it’s is always a dangerous contingency-that an enemy leaker gets too close to a friendly asset, generally by their own luck plus a massive OCA failure. We won’t even accept that merge, and will instead separate, unless we can bring a 2:1 advantage, again, unless we get anchored and cannot first escape. Dog fights are not in the game plan. Ever. Not under ANY circumstance. If they do occur, and against a competent opponent they probably will, the pilot(s) involved are presumed guilty of a massive F-up until they prove their innocence. If they come out on top, they’ll get a Silver Star, if they lose a national asset in an objective-less visual fight with a POS or many POSs, their grave will be shat upon.

@jhk8396 3 года назад

Something to note is that USAF has trained against allied MiG-29s in mock battles (thanks to the fall of the USSR). Of course there are going to be differences, but the general flight envelope of the MiG-29 & Su-27/35 are very similar. NATO has likely already understood the strengths and weaknesses of Russia's fighter jet design doctrine. This contrasts Russia, who hasn't had any experience with American jets except 80s F-14/16s. Also, the F-35A and F-22 handle have much superior AoA abilities compared to American 4th gen, so another mystery. *I pray to God that none of what I said will matter and WW3 doesn't break out, and I'm not even a fighter pilot so what do I know*

@jkim6200 2 года назад

Don't worry. Not every expert at "Janes" or "Jane's" has combat experience. This includes experience flying military aircraft.

@legend9805 2 года назад

F15 they have iran and will also study about them hahaha

@Elpincheway 2 года назад

Doesn’t matter they have S300’s S400’s and now S500’s 😯😲

@jooger69 2 года назад

@@legend9805 Iran has the stripped out F-14A from the 1970s

@foshizzlfizzl 2 года назад

I hope you understand that you can't compare the capabilities of a MiG-29 or an Su-27 with a Su-35S or an Su-57? There are 20 years of modernization and development between them. Don't mistake the Su-27M (wich often was called Su-35) with the latest Su-35S, wich is based on a Su-30.

@cgdrider 2 года назад

As a 3rd Generation of Lockheed Team members, we still stand by the Motto: Look to Lockheed for Leadership!

@seangelarden9543 4 месяца назад

No contest, not only is the plane better the planning and support structure behind it are second to none

@pulsatingsausageboy2076 2 года назад

Well, according to the intel that has come out about Russian pilots only getting 8 hours of flight time every month it doesn’t matter which jet is superior. U.S. pilot training is significantly better. Game over.

@trustynomad3116 2 года назад

@The Love Bug how many Russian jets got shot down by mpads…FUCKING MPADS. REGULAR ASS INFANTRY SHOOTING DOWN FUCKING FIGHTER JETS.

@pulsatingsausageboy2076 2 года назад

@The Love Bug It’s amazing how many clueless assholes like yourself are lurking around on RU-vid.

@pulsatingsausageboy2076 2 года назад

@The Love Bug Probably somewhere waiting for you to give him another head job. 🤣

@Phrancis5 2 года назад

They had a 10-1 advantage in numbers and newer equipment, yet they can't even establish air superiority over Ukraine. The whole Russian army is plagued by incompetence, poor planning and leadership, stuck with the mentality of WW2 tactics. They should've easily taken the country and it calls into question all the years of media saying they're still a potent military. Just like old Soviet days, they just lie and brag about their capabilities. It's not like they care about shooting civilians or sustaining heavy losses, since their propaganda machine will cover it up.

@mikeymcmikeface5599 2 года назад

Good thing the pilots of ny country are trained in USA.

@saine414 2 года назад

Russian is not even stelth at all... No need to compare, the F-35 would win easily, no matter what the Russian plane can do, if you can't see you are dead!

@CarlosOliveira-iu4jw 2 года назад

go play some more battlefield...

@wurzelbert84wucher5 2 года назад

The "stealth" is hardly working in reality.

@oshiwatanabe3480 11 дней назад

Easy to test...let the F35 invade in the Russian sky then what happens next. Think of it!

@arch3088 2 года назад

I would think the level of training and competency of the pilots would have some to do with the outcome.

@stelmarsky6778 2 года назад

There's an understatement for you!!

@MysteryMycology 2 года назад

The sensor suite of the F35 makes this a no-brainer

@mcfalcia 2 года назад

You forgot to mention that the SU35 has a special knack for finding and destroying hospitals and schools.

@covenant05 2 года назад

As long as the F35 doesnt have a red cross or school label on it it should be fine

@scotth6814 2 года назад

An SU35 hospital-attack fighter vs the American F35 multi-role aircraft. The SU35's will be safe as long as the hospitals and schools don't shoot back and they don't encounter F14/F15/F16/F18/F22/F35's.

@Olegstuff21986 2 года назад

The Ukrainian Army and especially Ukronazis have a special knack of occupying such buildings and shooting from them, yes. If they get return fire, it's their fault for destroying the building.

@scotth6814 2 года назад

@@Olegstuff21986 Ah yes, the KGB bot has shown up trying to spread Putin's propaganda. Give it up, the free world is never going to buy your bolshevik.

@bryjb10 2 года назад

If a Ukrainian Mig29 can mop the floor against the SU-35 then the SU-35 doesn’t have a chance against a F35.

@NvrSumr15 2 года назад

Exactly

@Shulcyo 2 года назад

In which fairy tale did this happen?

@bryjb10 2 года назад

@@Shulcyo has your government blacked out all your media and told you lies?

@bryjb10 2 года назад

@@Shulcyo considering it’s been a week and Russia still doesn’t have air dominance against a small force like Ukraine just shoes Russias technology and skills were hyped.

@mrbasfed1948 2 года назад

It depends on pilot. A plane can do shit by itself. P.S. It's like a kindergarten talk - my dad will bring a tank to fight and my dad will bring an atomic bomb.

@Davidicus000 2 года назад

In reality, this is a missile lock contest. If you are visible to the missile lock, you are dead meat, if you are not, you live. Dog fighting is a bit outmoded.

@BLD426 2 года назад

The SU35 has those scared child seeking missiles which is a big plus too.

@christianvasquez7009 2 года назад

Well after seeing what’s going on in Ukraine and how how Russian Air Force is doing. F 35 is the supreme fighter.

@tommygun5038 2 года назад

They would never see the F35. Just like all US and NATO 4th and 4+ fighters in training.

@neilmenon8943 2 года назад

Too bad China already acquired all the F35 designs through espionage.

@ValerySchollaert 2 года назад

"Well after seeing what’s going on in Ukraine and how how Russian Air Force is doing" Are you in Ukraine ? Because I've some journalist contacts there, as well as in Russia, and what you say is only matching Western propaganda. The truth seems to be that destroying Ukraine army wss even easier than expected. The superiority of Russia on Ukraine is just overwhelming. They are now using hypersonic missiles, not needed to win over Ukraine of course, but to show USA and EU that, in addition to the speed, they have also the precision.

@ramirexbruv6292 2 года назад

@@ValerySchollaert yes but the Russians suffured more casualties then the US did in the Iraqi war the Russians suffered 7,000 casualties and the US suffered only 4,431 in the iraqi war

@ValerySchollaert 2 года назад

@@ramirexbruv6292 Russians claim 500 casualties. I guess the truth is between the two extremes. I give no trust to US claims, but remember that, in Iraq, it was a coalition that included the first military power in the world against one fairly small country alone. Here, it is Russia alone against a larger (compare to Iraq) country, the latter being armed by the west. Impossible to compare.

@user-ov5zm5rz3v 4 года назад

F says Invisuable range : You are Fucked up! visuable range : I am Fucked up!

@LRRPFco52 3 года назад

Read about PLAAF exercises against Royal Thai Air Force, Falcon Strike. A Chinese test pilot said that because of the RTAF Gripen low RCS and longer reach AIM-120, the Su-27SK got killed 44 to 2 in BVR, but was opposite in WVR against the under-powered Gripen, and had the helmet-cued R-73 or Chinese copy of the Python-3. Then they sent J-10s down to even out the odds, especially the later J-10C with DSI inlet and really low RCS, with much longer range PL-15 BVRAAM. PLAAF also did internal tactical exploitation of all its fighters against each other and even the Su-35S did not fair well against the J-10C. Why? Lower RCS and AESA in J-10C equals first-look. PL-15 equals first-shoot. F-35 has a lower RCS 3 decimal places lower than J-10C, a bigger, superior AESA, and IR stealth. So no matter the distance, the F-35 is superior to any Flanker variant, and there isn’t anything you can do to change that.

@onyxul Год назад

They needed 2 sidewinders to shoot down a balloon. How many sidewinders will they need to shoot down a SU35 from BVR?😂😂😂

@vincentphan5097 Год назад

You use an amraam in BVR so zero sidewinders are needed 😂

@immortaldev1489 2 года назад

I feel like an f22 would be a better matchup since it's a designated dogfighter jet, compared to the multirole f35

@topaz2821 Год назад

more likely the su57 would be a better match up against the f22 seen as they are both 5th gen jets

@mikoi7472 Год назад

Air superiority fighters do not mean dog fighting. Dog fighting would never happen with modern jets.

@graymalkin26 2 года назад

As the Red Baron reportedly said, it's not the crate but the man in the crate.

@AKAKDOG 3 года назад

This is one of the coolest videos of military air machinery and favorite of all time comparison. Or two of my favs fighters.

@H4TTOR1_H4NZO 3 года назад

Which would win lol? Um it all comes down to the pilot 👍

@chasetoyama8184 3 года назад

Not really, the F-35 is stealth so if they engaged in BVR combat, the F-35 would win. In WVR combat, I’d say they’re be pretty evenly matched, but I don’t know their specs, so don’t quote me on that.

@forbalkanufo907 3 года назад

@@chasetoyama8184 f 117 was stealth too, and Serbians shut it down.(1999)

@negodnik9226 2 года назад

@@forbalkanufo907 they just didn't know it was invisible

@forbalkanufo907 2 года назад

@@negodnik9226 haha yea...

@williamanderson2326 2 года назад

@@forbalkanufo907 Should we compare that to the very long history of NATO fighters dominating Russian built counterparts? Also the f 117 incident isn't even comparable to this discussion.

@shnerp 2 года назад

Well, after seeing Russian military in action, my money is on the F35.

@kisstamas7760 2 года назад

:) You lost your money. Haven't you think, why the NATO hasn't attacked russia yet? Because the NATO weapons are on the 1980's level. They didn't do any developments, because they are bombing only civilians, who can't shot back. The F-35 is the most expensive and most unreliable plane of the history. Its a flying coffin, nobody wants to buy it just the vassals of the NATO.

@Dontbelieve.thehype 2 года назад

In action 🤔 you in Ukraine? Or drooling up what MSM says is happening.

@rblxmach 2 года назад

@@Dontbelieve.thehype dude a su35 got destroyed by a random rocket from a ukranian soldier 😂😂

@Dontbelieve.thehype 2 года назад

@@rblxmach dude a f35 crashed into a carrier it was landing on not long ago and fell off the edge into the ocean.

@rblxmach 2 года назад

@@Dontbelieve.thehype true

@mymemesarestale9152 2 года назад

After recent displays from Russia, a paper plane might be more on their level.

@clivecooper5889 4 года назад

Stealth and Maneuverability

@gandalfderturkise3982 3 года назад

Man i Love both of them😂👌

@stevelawrence7111 Год назад

Comes down to technology. Russian planes are using Garmin satnavs duct taped to their consuls.

@benganchan1420 2 года назад

When f35,Su35 meets bird as in bird strike, it’s goodbye to plane, pilot and bird

@lemonacidrounds7293 3 года назад

Oh, they both 35 OK now we know they work together in pretty much everything

@quachhengtony7651 2 года назад

I love how everyone in the comment section are military experts.

@victorguzman2302 2 года назад

For what Russia has shown in the war against Ukraine, it leaves a question open about the quality of the training of the pilots. Now, these two planes are of different kind. The F35 has a clear advantage, since it can “see” the SU-35 much earlier than this one can spot - if ever - the F35.

@tokugawapost.9142 2 года назад

The f35 does not work

@kisstamas7760 2 года назад

The F-35 has a lot of problems, it is totally unreliable. The engine tends to be overheating and if this occurs, the computer reduces the power of the engines which is not a good thing in a combat - or any - situation. A lot of F-35 just felt down because this. A SU-35 is a rock solid construction, it works in very extreme conditions and requires very few maintenance against the F-35 which costs about twice and requires a constant maintenance.

@leedex 2 года назад

@@kisstamas7760 How do you know the SU35, is rock solid when Russia can’t effort to mass produce them. Russia is about “we have the best”, but they can’t prove it. It’s Russian propaganda to boost their weak economy with arms export and intermediate their “enemies”. Look at their military in Ukraine 😂

@alvisdeneldgamle 2 года назад

@@tokugawapost.9142 rus pilots do not fly🤣🤣🤣

@kisstamas7760 2 года назад

The F-35 has a serious problem. When the engine is on full thrust its tend to be overheating. In this case the computer reduces the power of the engines, so the F-35 falls like a rock in most of the cases (just google it). The SU-35 works in very rough conditions, it doesn't require a continious maintenance and it costs half of the F-35. The US military industry is about money, the russian military industry is about protecting their homeland. Thats a difference.

@Mike500912 2 года назад

The fleshy bit in the cockpit would be the limiting factor.

@brucelong6092 2 года назад

It's always good to destroy your enemy from a distance.

@haqqizillysozo 2 года назад

Don't be reliant on stealth, the f117 incident might happen again 😂

@vasiliyt8600 2 года назад

@@haqqizillysozo The F117 incident happened, because it flew for days the exactly same route over Serbia. Other than that, the F117 was a slow first generation subsonic stealth bomber.

@haqqizillysozo 2 года назад

@@vasiliyt8600 that's why you can't rely primarily on stealth, and abandon other aspect. If it shot down with the state of the art missile at that moment, that's plausible. But what so called "STEALTH" taken down by 3 decades old technology, that's so funny. Not to mention the earlier U2 stealth spy plane shot down by ussr

@vasiliyt8600 2 года назад

@@haqqizillysozo The F117 got shot down, because the route was known by the Serbs, *after* some time. This was US's fault for using the same route day by day. Usually in such missions, you always change the routes to be less predictable by the enemy. The U2 was *not* a stealth plane at all. It was slow (Mach 0.7 max) cruising high altitude reconnaissance aircraft. This plane relied only on it's high altitude of 24Km (80K ft), since the early SAM systems weren't capable enough to shoot down planes at that high until 1960. In 1960 the Soviets used their newly developed S-75 (in 1958) high-altitude defence system to shot down the U2 plane. After that incident, the US military developed the Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird, in 1963 (a long range high-altitude Mach 3+ strategic reconnaissance Aircraft. 26Km & Mach 3.34). It was used continuously (over Soviet territory), until way after the end of the Soviet Union (1999). Even this plane wasn't a Stealth plane. First stealth generation aircraft was the F117.

@gcom9052 3 года назад

If hostile aliens ever reach reach Earth they will piss themselves laughing, that we have weapons pointed at ourselves.

@Barefoot433 3 года назад

You don’t think hostile aliens point weapons at other aliens, whether on the same planet or not? If not on same planet, it’s probably only because they already fought and won the wars of local dominance.

@PrimeRsoul 3 года назад

Don't worry. Trump would build a wall. He already tried that for illegal aliens. To scare them off he would call them Fake Aliens and claim they're actually Chinese. Eventually, they will just disappear, like magic.

@lapinbuggs356 3 года назад

Excellent point !

@predattak 3 года назад

They will piss themselves laughing at how many comment section experts in warfare youtube has :))

@lapinbuggs356 3 года назад

@@predattak you're right in general, but as a former French navy Pilote (1989) … i think i'am a little bit … don't you think ! ;-)

@mistermister2801 Год назад

F35 is 5th generation aircraft.Su35 is 4+ generation.

@Phxshadowz 2 года назад

At this point Russia would struggle against a DJI drone armed with a pistol.

@koshersalaami 2 года назад

I recently watched a video about Baron Manfred von Richthofen, the top scoring WWI fighter ace. Most of his kills were not in dogfights, nor was that his preferred method of killing. Most were attacking unsuspecting targets. This is the philosophy of the F35. And, by the way, the price of the SU35 and the F35A are not very different. Then there’s the question of numbers. There are a whole lot more F35’s than SU35’s and this will continue to be true; in fact, the balance is likely to tilt more. From what I know of Russian numbers, it will take Russia until 2027 to have enough SU35’s and Su57’s combined to roughly equal American F22 inventory., which is to say a little under 200 fighters. This completely ignores F35 inventory which is already over double that. If SU35’s face F35’s it will not be at a 1:1 ratio. Nor will it even have to be greater than 1:1 in stealth fighters because of American airborne data sharing as an F35’s data can provide firing coordinates for F15’s and F16’s beyond Russian radar range.

@vermilion7777 2 года назад

This is the philosophy of all modern jets. Close combat is quite obsolete with modern medium-long range missiles. It's more elecronic warfare than anything.

@jozseffarkas1767 2 года назад

@Kicabran Ticta one big kaboom ,and noone flying after that

@guaporeturns9472 2 года назад

All leading aces practiced this way of fighting

@marvinmarquez5395 2 года назад

@Hendrix Cody against who? afghanistan? iraq?

@panan7777 2 года назад

Current F35 production rate is one plane every two work days. There is not even a theoretical chance the russia can match this. See dear putin, PhotShop weapons don't win real wars; good for fans, but nothing else. For those unfamiliar with Ukraine: the ground is thawing and huge convoy is limited ONLY to paved roads. Blow first few vehicles and everything stands still. Sitting ducks for Ukrainians. I found that they have flooded the fields as well. Running out of fuel and even food. By far the worst part is exposing to the world just how hugely incompetent they are.

@AbdulQadir-vl4bz 3 года назад

A plane is as effective as the pilot who operates it

@gooldii1 2 года назад

Aha. So, a me 109 is more capable, than a F15? really?

@edwardenglehart9443 2 года назад

@@gooldii1 i believe he means when it is this close

@joerivandeweyer3056 2 года назад

"Genral Kaperski! USA has developed F35! It has one big burny thing!" - We develop own version. We name SU35 and give two burny things!

@oldsagerat 2 года назад

SU 35s are referred to by US pilots as "targets of opportunity " The Russians didn't think things over well when they built this jet. Spare parts are built in Ukraine 🇺🇦

@kinwhakklkin7590 2 года назад

Also after over mont of fighting in UA we know another thing. If we want to know how many SU 35s can be destroyed by one US F35 we just need to count the air-air rockets of F35 🤣