Тёмный

Fairey Barracuda: The troubled torpedo bomber 

Armoured Archivist
Подписаться 65 тыс.
Просмотров 151 тыс.
50% 1

Few aircraft draw as much derision as the Fairey Barracuda. It was built to be "all things to all people" - a torpedo bomber that was also a competent dive bomber and reconnaissance platform.
But its development was troubled from the start.
It was originally intended to be the recipient of a new generation of Rolls Royce engines specifically built for Fleet Air Arm needs - the four-cylinder-bank "Exe" (Boreas). But this was cancelled as part of the war emergency program to focus efforts on fewer projects.
It was then supposed to get the Rolls Royce Griffon engine - the successor to the Merlin. But the Royal Air Force over-ruled the Royal Navy in the priority lists.
So the Barracuda was left desperately underpowered.
And that was before fatal problems began to emerge with its structural rivets and main spar joints ...
• When Corsairs & Hellca... ► For more about the Tirpitz raids
• USER EXPERIENCE ► More User Experience documentaries
► Website - www.armouredcarriers.com/
SEO hashtags
#documentary #military #ww2 #navy #war #history #warthunder #worldofwarships #dark #lost #memories #airplane #aircraftcarrier

Опубликовано:

 

22 дек 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 249   
@binaway
@binaway Год назад
Upon seeing a Barracuda and USN liaison on a RN carrier commented " It's an amazing flying machine but it will never replace the airplane".
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers Год назад
When a Barracuda from HMS Illustrious flew its captain over to meet the captain of USS Saratoga during Operation Diplomat in the Indian Ocean, one US leftenant was heard the say ... 'Jesus, the Limeys'll be building airplanes next!'
@randlerobbertson8792
@randlerobbertson8792 Год назад
@@ArmouredCarriers the correct word actually is - aeroplane.
@redskindan78
@redskindan78 Год назад
@@randlerobbertson8792 Ha! To a USN lieutenant, pronounced "lew-ten-ant" it was "airplane"! (Or "aircraft")
@waltermiller4274
@waltermiller4274 Год назад
@@randlerobbertson8792
@Neaptide184
@Neaptide184 Год назад
No wonder Brits worked so hard to figure out how to fly and land Corsairs on carriers. Their procurement options were, “A. it wasn’t a bad aircraft, but it’s wings had the habit of dropping off, and b. It’s top speed is 90 miles an hour……” The US Navy’s approach was, “Hmmmm. We don’t need to land the Corsair on a deck because we have Hellcats which our pilots like better.” What an amazing group of men in the Royal Navy during this time. Hats off to a remarkable group.
@Otokichi786
@Otokichi786 Год назад
If you had a naval fighter craft that could fly at 400MPG, you'd try everything you could think of to make it a "workable carrier escort/interceptor.) I recall a description of the Barracuda, "it was armed with a torpedo," which made me wonder what the pilot was supposed to do if he got face to face with a Bf 109 or a Kriegsmarine float plane.
@MagicIVFR
@MagicIVFR Год назад
​@@Otokichi786 My father a Barracuda pilot, had a friendly encounter with a Spitfire that tried to bounced him. He took flap and turned the Barracuda inside the Spitfire which was not able to bring the aircraft into his gun sites. The Spitfire pilot tried and tried but eventually gave up. It would have been the same for any BF109 etc. Big, not fast, but manoeuvrable enough to frustrate any attacker that couldn't manage a surprise attack.
@theodoresmith5272
@theodoresmith5272 Год назад
British tanks were worse then the planes. Way behind until very late in the war.
@Ralph-yn3gr
@Ralph-yn3gr Год назад
You know, I'm starting to question the FAA's decision to name all their strike aircraft after creatures that spend their entire lives underwater...
@jollyjohnthepirate3168
@jollyjohnthepirate3168 Год назад
Brave men. It's nice to actually hear the voices of these men. Unfortunately, many of them are no longer with us today.
@davidcooper5442
@davidcooper5442 Год назад
My Father was one of those who actually enjoyed flying the Barracuda. He also flew the Seafire and Seafury
@simoncullum5019
@simoncullum5019 Год назад
Did he fly a Barracuda after he had flown the Seafire and Sea Fury ?
@offshoretomorrow3346
@offshoretomorrow3346 Год назад
Flying a Barracuda must be like flying a Seafire with a dead Seafury on its back.
@davidcooper5442
@davidcooper5442 Год назад
@@simoncullum5019 I know that he loved the Sea Fury but Hated the Seafire. The Seafire undercarriage was a hopeless thing on board a ship. Too narrow and not robust enough for heavy seas
@MagicIVFR
@MagicIVFR Год назад
My Father as well enjoyed piloting the Barracuda.
@peterbrazier7107
@peterbrazier7107 Год назад
I used to know an RAF fitter who was at Boscomb Down when Barracudas were having flight trials, he told me that one went into a dive, the engine carried on down when the plane pulled out of the dive.
@markfryer9880
@markfryer9880 Год назад
Sounds quite believable!
@marbleman52
@marbleman52 Год назад
Peter Brazier....What a funny mental picture that makes...!!
@MartinMcAvoy
@MartinMcAvoy Год назад
Thank you for uploading this video. It is almost impossible to imagine the courage of the aircrew, who flew an aircraft they knew was hopeless for the job they had to do. It seems that more of them were killed by the plane itself, than in actual combat.
@harrisionstan3773
@harrisionstan3773 Год назад
"Weighs six tons, got no front guns, fuck all to rely on. What will we do with the Barracuda II. Old iron, old iron" A ditty I remember reading in a collection of WW II poems/dittys.
@DaveGIS123
@DaveGIS123 Год назад
My dad trained to fly Catalinas in Oban, Scotland,. Nearby there was a torpedo range where Barracudas and other bombers would practice their business. He said of all the aircrew he'd met, the torpedo bomber crews had it the worst. Typically, he said, he'd be walking down from the hotel where he was billeted to the dock to catch the boat to his Catalina when he'd hear a crash, and the sirens would go off and the flags would go up, and he knew another torpedo bomber had "pranged".
@richardclark4440
@richardclark4440 Год назад
I'm very grateful for this being posted, my dad flew in these and never said much about it. Brave men.
@DONALDSON51
@DONALDSON51 Год назад
The way he so matter of factly says 'The wings kept dropping off, which wasn't the best of things ' :)
@David-wk6md
@David-wk6md Год назад
So nice to hear the voices of the men who flew them
@rod4095
@rod4095 Год назад
Great to hear the pilot/crew voices
@davidrendall7195
@davidrendall7195 Год назад
The 'Big Barra' was beset with problems - it was originally designed around the weight and thrust specifications for the Rolls Royce 24cylinder Exe engine, but when development was halted on that, the Mk.1 ended up with the Merlin 30. Not only was this significantly less powerful, it was lighter and produced less torque through a smaller propellor disc. So not only was their less power to get out of trouble, the airframe was unbalanced and shook itself to pieces. The wing spars failures and tail unit failures were linked to stress fractures caused by this imbalance as the twist to counteract the Exe's greater torque shimmied in the Merlin's slipstream. Another problem was as stated the change from stable biplanes to a high wing monoplane, it took instructors by surprise. The Swordfish and Albacore were so stable, if one got into trouble the smart thing was to release the stick and let the aircraft right itself. Try that in an unbalanced, high wing, high tail Barra and it flipped upside down. A design flaw was the priority on a good view for the observer, which dictated the high wing. The observer did indeed get a superb view from a pair of bay windows amidships, but the cost was high - the Fairey-Youngman flaps were now well above most of the slipstream and thrust of the propellor, which gave them a significant increase in lift. At higher speeds if the pilot retracted the flaps in anything other than straight and level, the sudden loss of trim would push it over into an uncontrolled departure.
@michaeldebellis4202
@michaeldebellis4202 Год назад
“They couldn’t find anything wrong with it” Sounds like what software developers tell users after the release of a bad product”that’s not a bug, it’s a feature” I love the matter of fact tone of the Brit pilots “it wasn’t such a bad plane… there was a problem with the wings staying on”
@peabase
@peabase Год назад
That reminds me of a joke about a prototype airplane that keeps shedding its wings. After witnessing several crashes, a concerned citizen pays a visit to the factory and tells the designers to perforate the wings at the spot where they keep breaking off. Out of sheer desperation, the designers give it a try -- and the wings stay on. When asked how this can possibly work, the guy explains that he's in charge of perforating toilet paper at the local paper mill, and toilet paper never breaks off where it's supposed to.
@luvr381
@luvr381 Год назад
"If it looks right, it flies right." The Barracuda looks almost French.
@ericadams3428
@ericadams3428 Год назад
Belgian may be more accurate in view of the designer, Marcel Lobelle
@owen368
@owen368 Год назад
Well thats not optimal.
@WarblesOnALot
@WarblesOnALot Год назад
G'day, Ah, well, y'know how it is... The Fairey Fox was a World Leader, a Private Venture SO good the Air Ministry were Forced..., to order them - but they retaliated by only ordering ONE Squadron of Foxes....; Belgium bought more Foxes than Britain did... As pennance, Fairey watched Hawker and Westland and Bristol and Gloster get all the Contracts, until they toed the line and stuck to Specifications, and got Contracts to build shitpotsful of Battles, with a Crew of 3, 500 pounds of Bombs and a motor out of a Mk-1 Spitfire ; so it was useless. A Battle with a Hook was a Fulmar, and leaving the Bomb-Aimer behind made it a "Fighter" (?), equally useless. The Swordfish was sufficiently eccentric as to be surprisingly functional and effective ; but the Albacore was bloody insane, and the Buccaneer was a Monoplane version of the Albacore - but still with a Battle's ancient Merlin. Finally they put a Griffon in the Fulmar, called in a Firefly..., and that was almost "useful" by the end of the War of Two - and after that Piston Hairygoplanes were going out of Fashion, for declaring "Waaauughhh(!)..." while sitting within, and pursueing the King's Enemies therefrom... Such is life, Have a good one... Stay safe. ;-p Ciao !
@bernardedwards8461
@bernardedwards8461 Год назад
Not always true. The Whitely looked awkward, but for a pre-war bomber its statistics were quite good, including a 7,000 lb bombload.
@keithgoodrick-meech3921
@keithgoodrick-meech3921 Год назад
😂 lmao.
@memonk11
@memonk11 Год назад
ALWAYS great to hear from the men that were there.
@timwingham8952
@timwingham8952 Год назад
The book Barracuda Pilot by Dunstan Hadley is essential reading for anyone with an interest in this aeroplane. Although maligned by many, the book shows the Barracuda in an honest and at times humourous light. It was an aeroplane designed to be too many things at once and subsequently had unique looks and flying characteristics. But; a now sadly deceased ex FAA Barracuda TAG family friend said of them (as the book regularly implies) that once a pilot properly knew the aircraft, it was capable of performing well. Incidentally the footage between 0:43 and 0:48 isn't a Barracuda. It's an Amercian Douglas Dauntless under FAA evaluation with twin American 0.30" Brownings.
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers Год назад
Yoikes, didn't notice that. I should have. It didn't have that crazy upward folding canopy ...
@ivorbiggun710
@ivorbiggun710 Год назад
And it did manage to drop a couple of AP bombs on Tirpitz.
@AndrewGivens
@AndrewGivens 8 месяцев назад
@@ivorbiggun710 From what I've read, it was a slightly more than fifty percent hit rate against 'Tirpitz'? That's on a par with the Skua's performance against Konigsberg (which was smaller and had a slightly lower direct hit rate in that raid) as a dive-bomber. Both planes maligned and both could dive-bomb well.
@HydroSnips
@HydroSnips Год назад
Remembering the anecdote of the chap who passed out behind the controls of one because due to some flaw his cockpit was on the receiving end of a fine mist of hydraulic fluid. Came to to find himself in a spin hurtling towards the ground and recovered, though as can be imagined the experience was yet another blow to the pilot’s gradually-eroding endurance.
@alanpearson7554
@alanpearson7554 Год назад
I remember this story, the aviator had hundreds of deck operations on Swordfish on the arctic convoys, after his first flight in a barracuda he decided enough was enough. I believe it was some type of coolant that is also used as an anaesthetic.
@RB-qq1ky
@RB-qq1ky Год назад
@@alanpearson7554 Although ‘hydraulic system’ is technically correct, the ether was used as a transmitting medium between the transducer on the engine and the gauge itself (it was a sealed system), rather than plumb say, engine oil all the way from the engine to the cockpit gauge. Also used on contemporary engine temperature gauges where the expansion of the fluid with temperature increase was used to drive the indicator.
@rossmansell5877
@rossmansell5877 10 месяцев назад
Think it was Lord Kilbracken (John Godley DSC.,)authour of Bring back my Stringbag.
@johnjephcote7636
@johnjephcote7636 Год назад
My father (an RAF LAC) saw a wooden model in a shop window made by someone who had seen one flying when it was still on a secret list. There was quite a kerfuffle later on when it had to be hidden. A visiting American saw these kites on one of our carriers and asked "You Limeys build aircraft?" (one appreciates his tone of disbelief on seeing a Barracuda).
@kidmohair8151
@kidmohair8151 Год назад
you've made another gem with the voices of the men who flew them. kudos!
@avipatable
@avipatable Год назад
Superb, I love the old interviews. I love these guys humour and understatement. Very surprised to hear the compliments...!
@jonathanmoeg1202
@jonathanmoeg1202 Год назад
Bit of a revelation that. The test pilot who flew it once was dismissive but, tellingly, the guys who flew it operationally not so much.
@ollimoore
@ollimoore Год назад
@@jonathanmoeg1202 I’d have thought that a test pilot would have a much, much better idea of how good or bad it was compared to other aircraft. That being said, either could be biased by experience with other types. A test pilot who also flies high performance fighter aircraft might be biased towards thinking the Barracuda is underpowered, but equally a RN pilot with no fighter experience transitioning from the previous (biplane) generation of bombers might not have the overview to truly understand how bad it is. Plus there’s potentially a sort of survivor bias, I could imagine that someone who had nursed their machine back on many occasions and had never been failed by it personally might have a certain fondness for it. The ones who ended up in the drink would probably be a bit more negative, but they aren’t available for comment……
@jonathanmoeg1202
@jonathanmoeg1202 Год назад
@@ollimoore Interesting and thoughtful comment, cheers.
@seannordeen5019
@seannordeen5019 Год назад
I think the Barracuda would have been considered state of the art had it come into operational service in '39 to '40 (as it was from a '37 program), but only a prototype flew in '40. Looks like another typical case of the British giving priority to the RAF programs, some of which was justified, but others not so much. So the Barracuda didn't come into service til '43, which is about the time an aircraft, with its specs, really should have been starting to be replaced in the fleet. By then, it was inferior to the already operational Grumman Avenger (except for dive bombing, which the Avenger wasn't really designed for since the US Navy had a dedicated dive bomber) which had come into service in '42 (despite being a later 1940 program).
@bluevanimaging9998
@bluevanimaging9998 Год назад
Excellent selection of genuine reminiscences, much more authentic than a lot of RU-vid channels. I found this especially interesting having had a late uncle who was an FAA pilot flying Albacores (in the western desert and during the invasion of Sicily) and then Barracudas (the Merlin engined ones during Operation Tungsten and Griffon engined Mk5s for a while post war. What an incredible generation.
@iancarr8682
@iancarr8682 Год назад
A real world beater?! Respect to the crews.
@lunaticfringe8066
@lunaticfringe8066 Год назад
Great content as always. Love listening to the original interviews.
@JohnnySmithWhite-wd4ey
@JohnnySmithWhite-wd4ey 9 месяцев назад
I love hearing the voices of these brave men. Sadly most of these fine gentlemen are gone now.
@johnappleby405
@johnappleby405 Год назад
Unique footage and interviews excellent piece. For every Spitfire and Mosquito there was a Barracuda and a Manchester! Hats off to the crews. I wonder how many men and how much material were lost flying and building this monster
@Ukraineaissance2014
@Ukraineaissance2014 Год назад
Manchester's were pretty useful considering what was developed out of them
@tiptoptechno
@tiptoptechno Год назад
Another great episode, many thanks!
@Squad23jta
@Squad23jta Год назад
When were these interviews recorded? I would imagine that most of these aircrew and pilots are now in their very late 90s or early 100s if they are still with us. Keep up the great work.
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers Год назад
Over the past 50 or so years. They can be found at the Imperial War Museum.
@Squad23jta
@Squad23jta Год назад
@@ArmouredCarriers That's great. Thanks for the info.
@randlerobbertson8792
@randlerobbertson8792 Год назад
Very interesting to hear the old sweats talking about this intriguing aeroplane. My dad was in the RAF during WW2 first bomber command then coastal command as ground crew working on all sorts of aeroplanes too. He worked on these also but, the worst he ever saw, was the Blackburn Botha - he said was lethal to its own crew in pretty much all regards and also the Saro Lerwick 'an absolute pig of a flying boat' he said.
@Jpdt19
@Jpdt19 Год назад
Excellent stuff. Thank you as always!! And merry Christmas to you
@jonathanwheeler4767
@jonathanwheeler4767 Год назад
A friend Was a TAG on the barracuda and had many story's of their adventures flying from Hatson and the Furious Alan Thompson great Guy RIP
@peterdavy6110
@peterdavy6110 Год назад
My father, a FAA Leading Air Mechanic, said they were a pig to work on as the engine was so high off the deck and the wings were prone to all sorts of trouble.
@Redhand1949
@Redhand1949 Год назад
You really have great content. Do keep it up!
@Knight6831
@Knight6831 Год назад
I think it a fair assessment that the British got frigating unlucky as the Fairey Barracuda needed to enter service in 1942 as planned instead of the 10th of January 1943 9 days after the Grumman Avenger joined the British Royal Navy on New year's day 1943
@davewolfy2906
@davewolfy2906 Год назад
Blinking brilliant. Every time.
@alantoon5708
@alantoon5708 Год назад
The fact that it was largely replaced by the Avenger speaks volumes.
@AnonNomad
@AnonNomad Год назад
To be fair, the Avenger was an amazing aircraft that would have replaced pretty much any torpedo bomber in every WW2 navy. Maybe not the Firefly.
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers Год назад
Firefly wasn't a torpedo bomber, though. And the Corsair would have given it a decent run for its money in the ground attack role. But it was still "useful" enough to stay in service for quite a while after the war.
@AnonNomad
@AnonNomad Год назад
@@ArmouredCarriers Which one am I thinking of? Fulmar or Barracuda? Christmas drinks eroding my mind. Merry Christmas by the way!
@TankBuilders
@TankBuilders Год назад
It’s a common myth that the Barracuda was replaced by the Avenger. In Europe, Barrcuda remained embarked on the Fleet carriers in the strike role, alongside Avengers which were embarked on the Escort carriers in the recce/ASW role. It’s true that Somerville, in command of the Eastern Fleet, was critical of the shorter range of the Barracuda and used Avengers for the later “Club Run” attacks but 72 Barracudas were embarked on four Light Fleet Carriers at the end of the war for the British Pacific Fleet for Op Olympic. Barracudas served on as the Mk V post war.
@offshoretomorrow3346
@offshoretomorrow3346 Год назад
Short range - combined with that gigantic wing volume is quite an achievement
@bernardedwards8461
@bernardedwards8461 Год назад
Was that Capt. Winkle Brown who gave a favourable account of the Barracuda? I have great faith in Winkle Brown's judgement as he was such anexperienced airman, but I expect he would be prepared to admit that the Barracuda was underpowered, as were many aircraft of those days. I am doubtful that the wings were in the habit of breaking off in flight, as some critics allege. The first Typhoons were liable to break up in the air, but the problem was soon fixed and it became a reliable plane.
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers Год назад
No, it was not. It wasn't able to find a useable audio clip from "Winkle" for the Barracuda.
@marbleman52
@marbleman52 Год назад
The magazine: Worker And War-Front Magazine, sure did a good job of making the Barracuda look like an incredible plane, and the music was a big part of it. And calling the plane "the wolf of the sea" was funny. Maybe more like "the goldfish in the pond".
@MothaLuva
@MothaLuva Год назад
More like a carp in a goldfish pond.
@marbleman52
@marbleman52 Год назад
@@MothaLuva .....Good one..!!
@MagicIVFR
@MagicIVFR Год назад
A really very good video. Thank you. My Father, D. L. Hadley (RN Barracuda pilot) would have enjoyed it. At minute 13:25 the air to ground shot was taken during the Sigli Raid, Northern Sumatra, on 18 September 1944, in which my Father at the age of 23, participated. Smoke following the bomb bursts can be seen over the target area.
@robertmarsh3588
@robertmarsh3588 Год назад
Another excellent video, thank you. Sadly the RN had to suffer many inadequate aircraft, several of them from Fairey. I wonder if the Barracuda would have been a better success if it had the intended Griffon ? No wonder the American aircraft were so welcomed...
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers Год назад
I suspect not. The Barracuda was an aerodynamicist's nightmare ... and that was before they started adding all the "bits" like radar aerials etc that inevitably made it worse!
@alantoon5708
@alantoon5708 Год назад
The old Profile Books series had a very good volume on the Barracuda.
@tomhutchins7495
@tomhutchins7495 Год назад
The Griffon would have helped with the power issue. However looking up the specs on the Merlin 32 that should not have been a bad engine: the fact that the plane was so underpowered suggests weight and aerodynamics played a big part in its performance woes. Though the 32 is a dedicated low-altitude engine, so those stories being overwhelmingly from the Pacific where the heat affects density altitude, effectively making the plane run like it's at higher altitude and lose power suggests it may have been a poor choice.
@AndrewGivens
@AndrewGivens 8 месяцев назад
@@tomhutchins7495 I have to imagine they thought at some point early on "Navy aircraft don't need to operate at high altitude" - and then the Far East, with tropical heat and the mountainous East Indies happened. Would have been acceptable on the Murmansk runs.
@hazchemel
@hazchemel Год назад
Yes ..... mind boggling phlegmatic stoic courage.
@Glen.Danielsen
@Glen.Danielsen Год назад
Outstanding channel! Great concept to have all the thoughtful commentary from Pilot veterans. Cheers from the States. 🇺🇸💛🇬🇧
@DONALDSON51
@DONALDSON51 Год назад
Merry Christmas thanks for another great video
@lookeast3047
@lookeast3047 Год назад
Fantastic film - thank you.
@RichardGoth
@RichardGoth Год назад
Fantastic video! Interesting to hear all the different opinions, sounds like a perfect storm of steep learning curve, gremlins and a fundamentally flawed engine choice that spoilt an OK plane that was tasked with too many roles
@uflux
@uflux Год назад
Awesome! Great video 👍
@crusader5989
@crusader5989 Год назад
Excellent channel!
@nickdanger3802
@nickdanger3802 Год назад
Powerplant: 1 × Rolls-Royce Merlin 32 V-12 liquid-cooled piston engine, 1,640 hp (1,220 kW)
@Knight6831
@Knight6831 Год назад
Yeah I suspect the Fairey Barracuda was not the aircraft the British Royal Navy were planning to have as i suspect the Fairey Spearfish was what the Royal Navy really wanted
@DONALDSON51
@DONALDSON51 Год назад
Top Christmas present. Cheers :)
@stephenmcdonald7908
@stephenmcdonald7908 Год назад
To the tune of Any old iron. Weighs 6tons no front guns f**k all to rely on. You know what you can do with the Barracuda 2 old iron old iron.
@harrisionstan3773
@harrisionstan3773 Год назад
Beat me too it by 3 full days!
@timhancock6626
@timhancock6626 Год назад
I think the most telling comment is " It was supposed to have the Rolls Royce Griffon engine, but the RAF pinched them all" . Without any power you were stuffed whichever way you look at it.
@MonstroLab
@MonstroLab Год назад
Wonder if they considered Repowering with a Pratt N Witney double wasp and would its performance have been better
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers Год назад
I suspect availability would have been a problem. The US had to build the massive fleet to fly off its many new Essex and Independence carriers. There really wasn't a lot left over for the RN during the war.
@MonstroLab
@MonstroLab Год назад
@@ArmouredCarriers love your channel !!! thx
@andrewhotston983
@andrewhotston983 Год назад
Fascinating.
@raymondyee2008
@raymondyee2008 Год назад
Well it wouldn't surprise me if the British Pacific Fleet pilots were thankful that they were flying Avengers instead of Barracudas.
@ramal5708
@ramal5708 Год назад
It's great choice for them to switch over to the Grumman TBF/M Avenger, Grumman always know how to build carrier based aircraft or naval aircraft.
@WilliamDoyle-rb6lt
@WilliamDoyle-rb6lt 6 месяцев назад
I enjoy hearing the comments of these English Gentlemen of their greatest generation.
@skidplate4150
@skidplate4150 6 месяцев назад
Ed Nash sent me, excellent video.
@dboulding
@dboulding 10 месяцев назад
My father flew there as CO of 822 and later as Wing Leader 21TBR in The British Pacific Fleet,
@WilliamWalls-iz2rv
@WilliamWalls-iz2rv 3 месяца назад
You are what is good about the internet AA. Kudos and keep 'em coming!
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers 3 месяца назад
High praise indeed. Thanks. But the praise should be directed at these men telling their stories, and the skills of those interviewing them.
@WilliamWalls-iz2rv
@WilliamWalls-iz2rv 3 месяца назад
@@ArmouredCarriers Indeed. Channels like yours are the reason I'm still not sure the internet was a step back for humanity. 😁
@Spitfiresammons
@Spitfiresammons Год назад
Very interesting aircraft of a barracuda I would love to hear more of barracuda action in raid of trpitz and over the Far East.
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers Год назад
I intend to do a follow-up to the first Tirpitz video I did a few months back, but this time focusing on the Barracuda's contribution
@Spitfiresammons
@Spitfiresammons Год назад
@@ArmouredCarriers oh ok I heard the FAA museum are attempting to restored a remains of a barracuda. Any plans of the story of grumman Avenger in FAA service.
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers Год назад
@@Spitfiresammons Yes. I am gradually assembling material on the Avenger. It will be on the 2023 production line.
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers Год назад
@willrose5055 Thanks. I love those Battle Summary documents. Especially their maps. I use them whenever I find one that matches a video.
@ffrederickskitty214
@ffrederickskitty214 Год назад
Ironic that the biplane fairey swordfish ended up the allies most successful torpedo bomber of the entire war. Sometimes the adage “if it ain’t broke” is true
@Philistine47
@Philistine47 Год назад
Fairey's inability to deliver an improvement on the Swordfish, which was well and truly obsolete by the start of hostilities, is less an endorsement of the Swordfish and more an indictment of the Fairey Aviation Company. On the other side of the pond, the TBD Devastator (and to a lesser extent the TBF Avenger) were badly let down by the USN's dreadful early-war Mk 13 aerial torpedo. Once the armament was sorted out the Avengers were very effective indeed.
@CorePathway
@CorePathway 10 месяцев назад
A Swordfish was once outpaced by a destroyer, because of headwind. Let that sink in and tell me it wasn’t broke 😂. That said one of my favorite aircraft of all time is the PBY Catalina which was both obsolete and incredibly effective at the same time.
@None-zc5vg
@None-zc5vg 8 месяцев назад
@@CorePathway The Swordfish could easily land on and take off from small aircraft
@checkeredflagfilms
@checkeredflagfilms Год назад
a wing and a prayer
@JGCR59
@JGCR59 Год назад
Mr. Harrison managed to pull sea duty on the oldest and most decrepid destroyer of the Royal Navy and then had to go back to Barracudas :P
@patrickHayes-bq1ry
@patrickHayes-bq1ry 6 месяцев назад
my dad who was in FAA , (trained to fly corsairs but not required as A bomb dropped ) , was always very scathing about Barracudas and one of his best friends killed on a training flight in one.
@abukharan5774
@abukharan5774 Год назад
Interesting plane
@mcal27
@mcal27 Год назад
Loving the channel! Could I make a request for a video on the Albacore and Skua when poss please? I love the underdogs :)
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers Год назад
They are FAA aircraft, so they are on the list.
@mcal27
@mcal27 Год назад
@@ArmouredCarriers thanks
@richardsanders3567
@richardsanders3567 Год назад
, The wings kept dropping off ‘ which wasn’t a good thing 😂
@billbright1755
@billbright1755 Год назад
Though very different overall construction the height of the main gear reminds me of the strut of the Grumman Avengers arrangement. I once discovered a downed aircraft site and at a distance I thought the the strut was reminiscent of an Airacobra nose wheel strut but getting closer I realized it was far too robust to be so. It was a GM made Avenger which had be pressed into post war retardant drop service. That main strut was about all I could do to stand vertical for photo. Extremely strong and heavy I noticed a bend from possible crash deflection but no it was made that way and I could identify it by side of installation and brass name plate riveted on it the Crome section gleaming as new.
@potpotparty901
@potpotparty901 Год назад
Absolute dog of a plane,,,, makes me marvel at the bravery of the men that had to prosecute a war in that type of contraption….
@geordiedog1749
@geordiedog1749 Год назад
Typical, Geordie humour. Anyway, a lovely Xmas present thanks mate. Great work as always!
@gordonhall9871
@gordonhall9871 Год назад
good video
@iamgod6464
@iamgod6464 Год назад
Best Navy Aircraft in the World!
@TrickiVicBB71
@TrickiVicBB71 Год назад
Thank u for this gift
@stephenrickstrew7237
@stephenrickstrew7237 Год назад
Flies like …. a fish out of water
@michaeld5888
@michaeld5888 Год назад
The UK is a country which is never really as rich as it seems especially for those at the bottom of society. It was not described without good reason as the best defended slum in the world. These aircraft were produced in straitened circumstances so the surprise was so many good ones did appear. This sort of stuff just had to do with no real choice. We were still flying biplanes as front line fighters 3 years before the war kicked off so all done in a great rush and hurry with new technology. The biplane Hawker Gauntlet with an open cockpit and fixed wheels was the RAF's fastest fighter in 1937 according to my Illustrated History of the RAF. The US had no war at home and immense resources so in a different world.
@annoyingbstard9407
@annoyingbstard9407 Год назад
Get a new book son. Whilst “why did we only have old stuff in the old days” comments are common on RU-vid one of those obsolete biplanes, the Gladiator, had more air to air kills than the typhoon and tempest combined.
@owen368
@owen368 Год назад
Was intended to have Vulture engine if I remember right but that was ditch as too unreliable (as used in Avro Manchester) and griffin/merlin fitted (can't remember which off hand) in its place but not enough power plus many other issues. Built a model of it when I was young, which was a long time ago.
@None-zc5vg
@None-zc5vg Год назад
Before the war, Fairey designed and successfully tested an aircraft piston-engine that had two cylinder- banks that could be run separately, powering two contra-props (as on the later "Gannet" carrier-aircraft). Despite the viability of the engine, it wasn't produced because priority was given to other engine-types made by Rolls-Royce and Bristol.
@equals-kl9hm
@equals-kl9hm Год назад
Losing a pilot and friend do to the enemy is hard. Losing one to a bad design . . . unimaginable.
@brentfellers9632
@brentfellers9632 Год назад
The British built some of the most beautiful aircraft in history. They have absolutely built the fugliest.
@hoodoo2001
@hoodoo2001 Год назад
All military planes had issues and challenges and a lot of young pilots died in accidents. This was true in WWI and WWII and through the 1950's. By the 60's as aircraft tech matured with the development of more rugged and reliable planes and with even more extensive training losses became more manageable.
@midnightteapot5633
@midnightteapot5633 Год назад
One landed on a USN Aircraft carrier for some reason and the Americans were at a loss for words as to its strange appearance.
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers Год назад
USS Saratoga when she was in the Indian Ocean for Operation Diplomat with HMS Illustrious. "Gee, the Limey's will be building aeroplanes next" was one quip overheard when the RN admiral I think it was flew over in a Barracuda.
@TonyPalmer-vy3kq
@TonyPalmer-vy3kq Год назад
I am looking for information relating to & regarding the connection & history of Fairey Barracuda and the Isle of Man. Thank you .
@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623
I have a very simple rule to determine whether or not an aircraft is good. Does it look good, then it usually is good. Does it look fugly like hell, avoid it like the plague. Superficial though it may be, it does work. This aircraft looks fugly as hell.
@mikekennedy4572
@mikekennedy4572 Год назад
Thinking about there being no stop on the machine gun, that high tail plane not only was susceptible to being shot by its own gunner, it obstructed the gunner's view and hindered the ability to return fire.
@TK42100
@TK42100 8 месяцев назад
“Shon I’m Shorry. They got ush.”
@terryL5290
@terryL5290 Год назад
I worked for fairey winches in the 70s. They were part of the same company. Who made the Barracuda.
@redskindan78
@redskindan78 Год назад
Hello, ArmouredCarrier, can you give us an episode on the Albacore? I am reading Charles Lamb's "War in a String Bag", which makes me wonder about Fairey's successor to the Swordfish.
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers Год назад
I shall. It is on the list. And that list is shrinking…
@johnnyuk3806
@johnnyuk3806 Год назад
What's the best book to read up on this plane
@quibblegaze
@quibblegaze 6 месяцев назад
0:20: 🛩️ Challenges of a high-wing monoplane aircraft with potential safety issues and technical shortcomings. 4:35: 💣 Challenges of Fairey Barracuda dive bomber with dive breaks and reputation for being dangerous. 8:39: 🛩️ Challenges faced by the Fairey Barracuda torpedo bomber during World War II. 13:24: ✈️ Challenges of operating Fairey Barracuda in hot climates and the switch to American Avengers for better range. 17:34: ✈️ Challenges faced during the development and testing of the Fairey Barracuda torpedo bomber. 21:50: ⚙️ Challenges of operating the Fairey Barracuda torpedo bomber during dives and trim adjustments. 26:10: 💔 Troubles and tragedies of pilots flying the Fairey Barracuda aircraft. Recapped using Tammy AI
@robertpearson8798
@robertpearson8798 Месяц назад
I can’t help wondering what a difference it might have made had these been fitted with a more powerful engine. I’m sure that many of the problems and deficiencies would have persisted but some may have been eliminated. The Manchester also suffered from being under powered but we know what a difference being fitted with proper power plants made to it.
@toomanyuserids
@toomanyuserids Год назад
One thing a product of the Bethpage Iron Works will not do is shed parts. How many Barracudas vs Avengers ended up in the fleet?
@michaelkroger899
@michaelkroger899 Год назад
bombed the tirpitz heavily multiple times
@pimpompoom93726
@pimpompoom93726 Год назад
You can be a dive bomber or a torpedo bomber, but it's challenging to be both. That and the lack of a air cooled radial engine were major deficiencies. The airframe structure looks too weak.
@tomhutchins7495
@tomhutchins7495 Год назад
You're right, it does look weak. The undercarriage looks like it wants to fold in half, the fuselage looks thin and flimsy, and the wings are shocking. Just looking at them they don't look strong, and from the footage I sadly wasn't that surprised that the locking mechanism lacked positivity. The high wing requires the high tail, which introduces trim issues. The elevator might be above the turbulence but the rudder wasn't, so I bet that had no authority with the flaps deployed - possibly not when landing either which adds a new terror to carrier ops. For a 1943 entry to service it seems woefully outdated and primitive, if that's the right word. Immature, maybe. For example the Stuka and SBD had long since solved the dive bomber issue with designs which permitted vertical dives and recovery without pulling the wings off. You're right about it being hard to make a good dive and torpedo bomber. They have very different requirements. Rather than doing one role, or even making an excellent plane at one which could do the other when needed, it seems Fairey made a made an unimpressive master of none.
@Philistine47
@Philistine47 Год назад
When evaluating the FAA's wartime-built aircraft, you have to keep in mind the carriers they were intended to fly from - specifically the extremely limited air group sizes of RN CVs, which put a major premium on multirole aircraft types. When your carriers are only designed to operate 36 total aircraft, it's _really helpful_ if each of those aircraft is capable of doing several different things.
@pimpompoom93726
@pimpompoom93726 Год назад
@@Philistine47 Agreed, but if they end up doing NEITHER task very well than there isn't much advantage.
@Philistine47
@Philistine47 Год назад
@@pimpompoom93726 Yeah, that's the risk of trying to build multirole... anything, really. But you can see why the British felt like they had to try it, and why they might have been a little _optimistic_ in their pre-service evaluations of aircraft such as, and including, the Barracuda.
@robertdragoff6909
@robertdragoff6909 Год назад
I don’t know what was worse, the enemy they were fighting or the airplane’s design
@tomellis487
@tomellis487 Год назад
Would a more powerful have made a difference?
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers Год назад
I don't think so. Not as much as some may expect, at least. The aerodynamics were not great. And that's a fundamental challenge.
@hubbali666
@hubbali666 Год назад
2:45 lol lol did you hear that !!!
@edludwig1337
@edludwig1337 Год назад
I guess the tbm avengers were a godsend
@ivorbiggun710
@ivorbiggun710 Год назад
What on earth are they doing at 17:00 ? Looks like they catapulted one straight in to the barrier.
@ArmouredCarriers
@ArmouredCarriers Год назад
Post-war crash barrier testing and training. They even had crash-test dummies to rescue.
@Will_CH1
@Will_CH1 Год назад
Not only is it ugly, it appears to be designed to cause drag
@user-er2jg8lh7i
@user-er2jg8lh7i 3 месяца назад
Twin-gun station don't Barracuda's.This is Dauntless guns.
Далее
Fairey Albacore | A failed Swordfish replacement?
36:16
ЭТОТ ПЕНЁК ИЗ PLANTS VS ZOMBIES - ИМБА!
00:48
The RIDICULOUS Steam Submarine: The K-Class Failure
28:00
F4F Wildcat / Martlet
26:01
Просмотров 141 тыс.
Eric 'Winkle' Brown | His Fw200 kills flying the F4F
20:48
What Was The Best Torpedo Bomber of World War 2?
1:10:23
Просмотров 440 тыс.