Тёмный
No video :(

Falconclaw thermal comparison - FLIR Breach vs Infiray ML-19 vs Infiray E6 PRO v2.0 

FalconClaw
Подписаться 7 тыс.
Просмотров 14 тыс.
50% 1

On this video we put side by side Flir Breach, Infiray ML19 and Infiray E6 PRO thermal monoculars.
Infiray E6 Pro V2.0 - www.falconclaw...
InfiRay ML-19 - www.falconclaw...
FLIR Breach® PTQ136 - www.falconclaw...

Опубликовано:

 

27 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 34   
@mateuszsokalski2923
@mateuszsokalski2923 3 года назад
I would love such comparison with MH-25 in it.
@jeremyhart2435
@jeremyhart2435 2 года назад
Just watched this video. I own a breach, and can say that your settings are really off. I never get such a washed out image. Get the settings correct and the image is actually good. Not Pulsar good, but usable
@Stevenwtx
@Stevenwtx 2 года назад
Yeah I agree, something is way off on the breach.
@strippingwelsh1
@strippingwelsh1 Год назад
@@Stevenwtx the thing with Breach is .... they do not sell it, ergo, it needs to be the worst. But... when comparing, how is it next to the infirays?
@lukespuhk3981
@lukespuhk3981 Год назад
Yeah, definitely seems like the settings were purposely set, to make the breach look horrible, on purpose…
@narrowpath2980
@narrowpath2980 Год назад
Could tell from the start something was fishy 😂
@toddparsons2980
@toddparsons2980 5 месяцев назад
Adjust your settings on the Breach. The size of the E6 looks huge.
@jekub2331
@jekub2331 3 года назад
Too low contrast with breach? I have same picture with my pulsar when is contrast close to 0.
@falconclaw_
@falconclaw_ 3 года назад
Probably. We put units on line out of the box and didn't adjust anything.
@niemdan
@niemdan Год назад
@@falconclaw_ well that’s fucking worthless
@1988dirk
@1988dirk 3 года назад
I am thinking about buying a ML19 or MH25 from your shop. Is it possible to see a comparison from these 2 devices? Is the MH25 worth the 1k more? Thank you!
@Riko_Belich
@Riko_Belich 11 месяцев назад
Друг, так ты купил всё-таки теплак? Сейчас и у меня возник вопрос 19 или 25. Когда без увеличения картинка вроде одинаковая
@Terminatorbart
@Terminatorbart 3 года назад
The E6 looks awesome!
@trevorbonanno6260
@trevorbonanno6260 Год назад
I own a breach and these setting are purposely fucked up. The breach is an incredible close range thermal. It’s job is meant be 100-150m max with best performance in closer range scenarios. I encourage anyone to check out other videos with settings done properly.
@DieselDoktor
@DieselDoktor 2 года назад
Great comparison. Thanks
@electriceyeslide5959
@electriceyeslide5959 3 года назад
You’re not using the Breach properly in fairness. It’s definitely not dialed in based on what your video shows.
@jpenna1976
@jpenna1976 3 года назад
I'm open for suggestions... I can't get better performance out of mine.
@electriceyeslide5959
@electriceyeslide5959 3 года назад
@@jpenna1976 Have you tuned it? Or are you just using a default configuration? There isn’t a ton you can do but you can make it look better than this.
@jpenna1976
@jpenna1976 3 года назад
@@electriceyeslide5959 Yes, I can get slightly better results with adjustments. Since this device wasn't cheap, I will have to take a seat some evening and try to get best possible settings on this. Still, I have never handled Infiray, but videos I have seen are on next level compared to Breach.
@adam3adam363
@adam3adam363 3 года назад
Is Ml19 really a 1.0 zoom? Looks a little bit zoomed next to Flir Breach.
@nikitamaximovich7554
@nikitamaximovich7554 2 года назад
Actually no, here is video, where author say that it’s impossible to navigate with MH25 (same ML19) because of zoom (it’s about 1.2) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VAaoo967qIY.html
@nikitamaximovich7554
@nikitamaximovich7554 2 года назад
Do you know if breach has 1.0 zoom?
@wiz_kid
@wiz_kid 3 года назад
I have a hard time believing the breach preformed so poorly.
@cvx23231
@cvx23231 3 года назад
Check Tactical Rifleman’s review here on RU-vid
@wiz_kid
@wiz_kid 3 года назад
@@cvx23231 thanks
@falconclaw_
@falconclaw_ 3 года назад
@@cvx23231 We double checked the Rifleman's review. In 5:36min video he covers only 20 second with performance. Putting our comparsion side by side, their review only covered object which seems to be closer than 50 meters and they didn't add "white hot" footages. But if you compare distance quality from his footages then Breach performance is still similar to ours. Yes at close range and especially on "outdoor alert" mode Breach does the job. We also double checked our Breach original video and if object was closer than 50m, it works like you would hope so, but from 100m it performs as it's on video, device is distracted and can't focus only on object.
@jpenna1976
@jpenna1976 3 года назад
As an European owner of Breach, me too.
@simontaxidermybases6763
@simontaxidermybases6763 2 года назад
@@falconclaw_ I own a breach and safe to say, it’s resolution isn’t going to be as good as Iray but this is a poor representation of its performance. Try running higher contrast with lower and gain and picture quality increases exponentially. I run 190 contrast, 120 sharpness, and 75 gain. I can see objects out to 500 yards but can identify only out to about 100 yards.
@kevpachakey
@kevpachakey Год назад
For a 400$ difference... screw the flir breach. Jeesh
@cpm-3374
@cpm-3374 2 года назад
The flir sucks big time!
Далее
FLIR Breach PTQ136 Thermal Monocular Field Review
7:17
We Pointed A Laser Into Night Vision
20:47
Просмотров 103 тыс.
iRay RH25 vs MH25 Thermal Monoculars
16:20
Просмотров 22 тыс.
COTI or Breach? Which one should you choose?
10:28
Просмотров 38 тыс.
The BEST thermal monocular? InfiRay MH25v2 Overview
11:17
TNVC IR Aiming Lasers
23:23
Просмотров 113 тыс.
INFIRAY JERRY-C5 THERMAL CLIP ON DEVICE
14:11
Просмотров 27 тыс.