Fantastic Fight Against The London System. Marshall vs Rubinstein 

Thank you very much,you bring those games into live, like real battles.

this has to be classified as artistic literature to be studied in school. wow what a game

Best channel about games.

What a masterpiece ❤

Beautiful art.

Awesome game by Ruby, great to learn from them ,best analytical commentary, thanks 🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤

Very instructive, thank you!

Fantastic game, playing with the idea of a rook sacrifice was that much joyful after it was played in the game, thank you for your videos!

Wow! You explained the game very well! Thank you! I’ll subscribe to your channel

Great analysis from you master 👍🏻. Can you plz analyse Paul Morphy games . It's much more deep than we all think . He is an attacking genius but also his positional play is exquisite. One positional masterpiece is from his match against Daniel Harwitzz in 1858 where a Dutch game was played by Morphy with the black pieces. Can you plz analyse that game in your channel , it would be great to learn a lot with your analysis. Thank you ❤️

a very well put together lesson in strategy and the tactics that verified it. positional play might be a good tag

really really perfectly and deeply commented! Congratulations!

I have just found this channel......great explanation. Thank you

Great commentary

Superb! Thank you very much!

Great teaching, thank you.

Beautiful explanation without moving the pieces!

Such amazing creativity from both Marshall and Rubinstein! Thank you for your clear analysis! 🙏, Is game from the same Reti book you mentioned in another comment?

A fine tournament with three players, Rubinstein (who took first), Marshall (2nd), and the fellow Polish master, Salwe. It had some interesting games, such as Rubinstein overlooking a mate in one and getting mated by Marshall, and losing on time to Salwe a winning position with a great passed pawn. As to this game, while Marshall was indeed a fine and ingenious player, he tended to play these risky positions where he in the short term appears to have some decent compensation, but positionally might be suffering one or more flaws. It’s perhaps a main reason he lost his title match so decisively the year prior to Lasker- an “over” (if I may) eager desire for an attack at the expense of developmental and/ or his king safety. It was fine calculation by Rubinstein, especially at the end where he coordinated his mating attack in similar fashion to Steinitz’ immortal combination. Excellent work as always, Sir.

Thanks.

Keep it up bro❤

Rubinstein was one those "greatest player never to become world champion" players. In terms of positional understanding he sure rivaled Capablanca. From 1908 to 1918 he was clearly always atleast top 5 (if not top 2, behind Capa). From 1912 to 1914 there were negotiations for a Lasker-Rubinstein match but of course WW1 came in the way. After that war, Rubinstein played noticeably weaker and more erratically.

Iam big fan of your analysis sir please say sir do you have fide rating sir

Sir, a question or two while on the topic of Marshall, if you don’t mind. Do you find your game selections via chess literature? I’m aware that the Armenian chess RU-vidr “Chess with Suren” said he picks games from the vast chess literature available to him in his former USSR country. And are you aware of the game he played with the former World Champion Lasker in Moscow 1925? I read an analysis of it before which mentioned that Marshall set a plethora of traps that Lasker managed to avoid, but that they are very difficult to spot. Only one other RU-vidr (Historical Chess Videos) has covered that game, but he seemed to cover it briefly and made no mention of any traps. I was just curious as I couldn’t really find much else on that game and here in the US chess literature isn’t as extremely abundant, I believe, and I am, as you may recall, a fan of complex chess masters like Alekhine and Marshall. If you don’t have the game anywhere or if you peruse and find games online, then of course, never mind. But just curious and where better to learn than from a channel called “Chess Wisdom” :) Good day, Sir

In the pause moment isnt QF5 a better solution? If Qxb7 then the same idea, Nd5, the differece being that the king is not pinned by the queen and you put pressure on the f5 pawn. Then one has to calculate f4, but if white pawn ever takes g5 then great pressure on the f2 square

i am a big fan and supporter. I wonder what your elo is? i'd say 2100 minimum,right?

I find it VERY annoying when the Black pieces are displayed on the bottom.

Make a video on Emory Tate games

Intuition: 1.Kg7 xxx 2.Ng5? Edit: Omfg I got it. I meant Nd5*. I’m so happy.

Not just good, but exxelent video😊😊