Big thanks to Ridge for sending me this wallet and supporting the channel! Here’s the site if you want to check them out at the affiliate link! www.ridge.com/ANTENNAMAN UPDATE: This rule change passed. While I don't see analog AM radio going away for a while I can see more and more stations converting to all digital operations as time goes on. Maybe 10-20 years down the road. 📡 Do you have reception problems? Consider an antenna recommendation from me below: 👉 www.antennamanpa.com/antenna-recommendations.html
NO. AM radio is crucial when you need it. AM radio signals travel further, especially at night, or even when there is heavy cloud cover. AM signals also penetrate and bend around obstacles. FM has a much harder time penetrating or bending around obstacles and work best with line of sight. If you’re in a car in the middle of nowhere, you are far more likely to pick up an AM radio station than an FM station. ADDENDUM: Someone has argued that it’s still AM, only digital. The problem with that is that with digital, it’s an all or nothing proposition, like digital TV. With analog, you can pick up a distant, faint signal. It may be staticky, or it may fade, but you can hear it. Not so with digital.
This is why in a lot of European countries DAB that’s used doesn’t go over too well. The terrain almost forbids it because the wavelengths are way too short.
@@LG123ABC , I believe the CARRIER is the issue here . I live well away from ANY digital transmitters and Ampitude Modulation is my only choice when traveling to even more remote destinations . To abandon AM would be a great disservice to future generations . My two cents ; In the '09 digital changeover , many found that usable weak signals they enjoyed were no longer available to them . Our Government and Federal partners decided to consolidate all TV stations into a relatively small and narrow width of band space no longer allowing us to "fine tune" a desired station .... and here , because of the precise bandwidth and virtually line of sight transmission lies the problem ..... YEARS AGO , As a contractor for the DOD , I helped with a research study named "Dust Lofting and Survivability" , a program to determine how our communications would survive in the case of a nuclear strike , volcanic eruption or a possible earth strike from an astral body with debris suspended . Beyond that , many transmitters , reluctors and repeaters have precise targeting with little forgiveness with misalignment and dust and debris build-up . I say keep operational ALL manner of analog AM transmitters in the very real event of digital failings .
Lyle G one that you’ll have to buy all new receiving equipment for. It may be a little clearer but with a lot of bugs. Pure greed, that’s what it will be turned into.
I also forgot to add that AM can't be beat for emergency broadcasts, especially in an SHTF situation. Imagine most cell phone towers and internet down. A situation like the wild fires in CA or hurricane Katrina, or even a massive grid down extended power outage. It can get through when almost no other higher frequency signal, cell signal, cable, wire, or fiber based communication can and at lower power than FM, and is the simplest to receive. Some high power AM stations should always remain on air if only for emergency preparedness, even if those stations are government stations.
@@stuarthirsch a razor blade with a safety pin can work too, Actually, I am a little foggy at remembering that technique and will have to look up and practice that again.
@@gregorymalchuk272 Politics notwithstanding, I would consider the government AM analog transmitters part of the emergency broadcast system and a necessary part of homeland security and FEMA. They could also be used for things like local information such as weather and traffic and road conditions, such as school closings in blizzards, public service announcements, even music and high school and Jr. college training and broadcast experience for students when not need for emergencies.Things that restricted are apolitical broadcasting..The rest of the AM analog band should be given to amatures, hobbyists, nonprofits such as churches, but restricted to 1 KW power output. You could however have repeater stations on different AM frequencies.
I am 19 years old and I don't think there is anything more fun, than to pick up a radio and start scanning through the channels on both AM and FM day or night to see what I can find. Some of the best music channels are on AM in my opinion, whether the signal is strong or not. Sadly I am one of the few younger people to actually enjoy radio and things that surround it, while 98% of other kids my age just play with their cellphones or other gadgets around now. It really is sad to see radio basically go down the drain, AM now, FM next. Soon it will be all just streaming music and news.
Fully Agree as Here in Buffalo NY & at Many Many Many out of State Radio signals can be picked up as Far away as St Louis, Cincinnati, Chicago, Minneapolis, Louisville,Detroit, Philly Many Stations out of NYC come in Crystal Clear. Considering also when You hear these Stations on Apps or Streams have a serious delay where they do not on the Direct Station. Live Sporting events are also the Prime source for Local Stations.
I tried to get phones with FM radios for my family. One of them is a flip phone with a talk and text plan, so FM is helpful and we save money. Another phone is an Android, and while I saw FM radio support on the spec sheet, the phone doesn't support it. I'd like to see more phones with FM, and AM if possible.
Did the same thing when I was in high school 40 years ago. Also did the same thing with UHF TV in the summer. I think the farthest I got from LI NY was St Louis. Was a lot of weird talk shows and religious shows. Also managed to get as far as ch 20 Washington DC a few times. Must have been a heck of an atmospheric night. Used to get PBS Wilkes-Barre PA in the summer circa 1980. Got a decent picture.They used to show Dr. Who on Sat Night.
Also forgot to mention Short Wave back then. Another thing gone. Some how it was a little sinister to listen to Radio Moscow back then. Yes the internet gets us basically almost anything in an instant from around the world. But there was a level of fun searching out something on AM or SW.
Thanks everyone for replying, I didn’t even think of asking for a qsl card but I’ll definitely have to try that! I also have just recently got my technician amateur radio license and haven’t made a contact yet but I will, little mic shy lol
Well, if the clear channel stations remain analog I will still be able to enjoy tuning them in at night on my 1939 Zenith Chairside radio (and my 1938 Montgomery Ward and 1942 Philco radios).
In Australia's capital cities, AM Radio still commands an enormous audience share. Govt owned ABC and the commercial talk radio stations still top the ratings. They simulcast on DAB+ but most listeners haven't shifted away from AM.
I just love the simplicity of AM (and shortwave) radio. A transmitter, the ionosphere and a receiver. When things go pear shaped, you can always rely on an AM signal. The BIG issue that AM (and shortwave) radio faces is interference from poorly designed electronics. The FCC (and other worldwide governing bodies) have dropped the ball with this... and it's probably impossible to fix it properly. Rest assured, when RFI from crappy electronics stops people from using WiFi or their cellphone.. something might get done about it!
Who the heck is going to buy a NEW radio just to listen to digital AM? My parents listen to AM stations through their Google device. They don't realize it, but they're getting that station through the Internet.
I love my local AM station, it’s a small station in a small town and it’s really our only source of good local news since the paper got bought out and is now getting too big for their britches. The FM stations from the neighboring cities are all run by robots or something and they don’t care about any local issues. FM morning shows talk about Hollywood or some news story from another state that everyone has already seen on tv. Our AM station is supported by local business ads,. You get to hear about all the people you know who got arrested over the weekend, all the town’s obituaries, a free daily swap shop that you can call in and buy and sell junk. Plus they play Carolina Beach Music that is hard to find elsewhere and they broadcast several area church services on Sundays. On Saturday mornings they give the listeners a voice, you can call in and tell them what you think about anything going on in town. Losing the station would be a blow to our community, I hope they don’t change a thing.
Lyle G I’m not too worried about loosing because of this yet, if I understood the video this would be optional so they could keep on like they are. If they do make it mandatory I would start worrying because the station probably couldn’t afford it unless the government stepped in to help. I do worry about what will happen when the owner or the main “dj” lady retires.
Something most people don't know about AM radio: The quality of the sound on an AM radio can vary vastly from one AM radio to another. It is even possible to build an AM radio that sounds as good as a fine FM radio. An old AM radio will often sound better than a new one. The reason most modern radios sound awful on AM is due to selectivity - how narrow the bandwidth of the radio is. A narrowband AM radio will reduce noise by blocking the frequencies far below and far above the carrier. Problem is, most modern AM radios have telephone-quality sound, because it takes out any brilliance from the audio before detection. A fifty-year-old AM radio will almost always sound better than a brand new one - because most listening back then was to AM radio - even for music. Too, when radios were all mechanically-tuned, listeners could improve the quality of the sound, by turning the tuner slightly to the left or the right. Now that nearly all new radios are digitally-tuned, you can no longer use that trick to improve AM audio quality. There were wideband AM radios. Some had a switch, that offered WIDE mode for excellent sound from good signals, and NARROW mode for signals that are hampered by noise. A crystal radio, that uses no power source, is inherently a wideband radio. People would buy crystal radios to hear AM broadcasts in high quality, though the signal would need to be strong. As for "Digital AM radio" (actually a misnomer - the correct term would be QPSK digital MW radio), It's dead in the water. If voluntary, almost no AM station would adopt it, because an extant AM radio would only sound like a strong noise, and mandating digitization would be politically impossible.
I use AM radio to predict the weather when camping. Every time lightning flashes there is a crack that can be heard on the radio if tuned between stations and by judging the volume of the crack I can tell how close a thunder storm is long before hearing the first clap of thunder. Now a days wimps use their cell phone and look at the weather radar. What's the fun in that?
When you mention about the radar, you mean the news? Me? Zero interest in that garbage. Yeah, I have my phone, but still, I am not interested in the news.😒
I think as a radio listener and Shortwave radio listener, Thinking that AM radio going HD is going to change something about it's decay, I think it's not understanding why AM radio is dying, the biggest problem today is RFI from all the digital equipment we use. I think it is a big problem related to radio in general even FM radio
Radio cannot go HD, that is impossible because lack of a picture. It can go digital and have the same shitbag reception OTA TV has with signals cutting off or freezing.
One thing this can ruin listening to DX stations at night. When I lived in NY I would tune to 650 for the grand ol opry. We have plenty of digital stations on satellite and PC without messing up the AM band. You still can't beat AM for emergencies with a good radio.
I'm a 30-year-old blind man and can't get enough of the wonderful stuff. Yeah screw the FCC update it's now in currently voluntary stage then again so was TV and the repackaging. That's just underhanded.
Yes I'm an AM listener as well. I listen to music AND talk on AM. Here's why I like it; I have several 1000-5000 watt stations I like which are maybe 30 miles away. I can't pick up their FM signals, so I need to hear them on AM.
@@foureyedchick The content is fine, AM radio is not. It has serious interference problems caused by modern day devices. Digital will make very little difference when it comes to reception.
For those of us that actually learned to build a crystal radio long ago, a few scraps of wire and a "crystal" can get us critical information if things ever get that bad even if there's no electricity or batteries. I'm thinking that making a digital receiver from scratch is going to be a lot more challenging given only junk you have laying around in the basement and no readily available power source. Plus, what am I going to listen to when and if I ever get my 1966 (EMP proof) Oldsmobile back on the road?
@@erwe1054 Yes, the great digital divide. Those with the money will control the access to all of the information. It's kind of like the days where the nobility spoke Latin and the serfs were never taught to read even their own language.
@@RJ-vb7gh Удивляют люди, которые говорят "ой как же это хорошо, теперь мы будем слушать AM без шумов это же так удобно" , не понимая того, что правительство борется так же с альтернативной точкой зрения, которая может быть высказана на пиратских радиостанциях. Аналоговое радио будет выброшено на свалку и никто не сможет прослушать информацию, кроме официально одобренной.
Antenna Man In an emergency, radio is far more reliable and portable than TV, with signals that are also easier to receive and travel further. Big difference between radio and TV. If you need to evacuate, you’re going to take a a portable radio with you. You’re not going to lug a television with you.
@@AntennaMan Digital TV was about freeing up spectrum space for other services, like 4 and 5G wireless and Wi-Fi., etc.. Digital AM radio doesn't free up spectrum space.
This proposal isn't set in stone yet. Make sure to contact the FCC to give your input. Even if it takes off I don't see all stations going all digital - only the small ones that are suffering.
Well, I mean, not that I'm either for or against on the idea of analog anything shut off, but, it's bound to happen eventually. analog everything is going to be shut off eventually. Progress is going to strike everything analog one day.
@@RJDA.Dakota yeah, I get the whole idea of computerized tracking, I know a thing or 2 about computers since I'm into them. But, as I mentioned, I'm thinking modernization and progress, and also the government and the FCC will eventually knock on the door of whatever isn't under the prefix of digital eventually.
Excellent point, all those vintage AM radios that have been with three different generations of technology - - tubes, xsistors, analog microchips - - - will now have to be discarded
@@CalumetVideo They could still have a use, they sell AM transmitters on ebay with which you could play your own music and broadcast it to your radio, but that wouldn't be the same as listening to a real AM station
@@whaduzitmatr why bother with a transmitter. Old AM radios can be wired as an audio amplifier in which no more (While whee's) heterodyne noise. Just tap into the volume control and ground. You can even remove or not replace the RF and IF tubes only.in radios that have power transformers. Series sets you cannot remove tubes and still use the audio. I know some troll will say just wire the tubes used which also can be done.
Funny how they kept vinyl records analog (rather than trying to replace grooves with pits and lands on vinyl records!), but they want to change AM radio to digital.
@@ebinrock They actually did that. That's what a CD is. A disc with lands and pits instead of grooves. Frankly, I think they should leave AM alone. It will die a natural death within 15 years anyway. It is no longer commercially viable.
Everything can't be digital... and I KNOW what your thinking "FM is analog" that's going to be digital to someday because the FCC is blind... and AM is litteraly just 1 frequency instead of like 30 different frequency on FM and yet the FCC complains about radio bandwidth... not feeling it
Big city stations like WLS didn't need Limbaugh. But his low cost syndication package might have saved some small stations in rural areas with declining populations. When the small stations lose Limbaugh and go digital, I guess they can bring back trade-io in the afternoon.
Tyler, I still listen to AM Radio all the time and I am in your media market. However, I like talk radio such as 1060 and 1210. Years ago in our market, 640 had Radio Disney which was a great alternative to regular radio playing a lot of unknown b-side music (if you can deal with the kid stuff in between). I think the biggest problem with AM Radio is that most broadcasters don't want to put good quality content on AM. Besides news/talk, political talk, and sports talk... a lot of it is religious and other language radio. If some local FM radio stations would simulcast on AM (the opposite of what you were saying) in the more fringe areas, it would get more listeners and also more coverage, depending on the time of day and terrain. For example, MMR. The station fades when you get up to your neck of the woods in Allentown. If they transmitted on AM up in that area, it would be great to continue listening to it. I wouldn't support an AM digital transition as a DXer but I don't think we as the public unfortunately have a choice in the matter.
I remember, many years ago, AM radio started an experiment broadcasting in stereo. However the big problem was people would have to buy a new AM stereo radio to hear full stereo sound. Very few people wanted to spend the money for a new AM Stereo radio so AM stereo was discontinued. I love AM radio!!! I listen to it all the time.
There are some AM radio stations broadcasting in stereo. But AM stereo took a hard hit when the FCC allowed corporations to buy as many radio stations as they wanted to. When the number of radio broadcasters went from a few hundred owners -to five, with deregulation, the owners made a gentlemen's agreement to turn AM stereo off.
@@kevinheatcoat2190 Nearly all the radio I listen to on my daily commute is AM. The FM stations have far too many commercials. In my case, I listen to an AM station in Windsor (Ont.) In the morning, and listen to an AM station in Sandusky (OH) driving back. Only FM station I listen to is NPR station WUOM, Ann Arbor.
I’m Canadian though. But I do live very close to the state of Maine and can pick up am stations in Boston both day and night because the ocean makes the daytime ground wave signal travel farther.
AM Radio is great, no better place to receive live sports broadcast, I live in Southwest Michigan, and can receive station that broadcast Notre Dame, Michigan State, Michigan, Colts, Lions, Bears, Green Bay Packers, Cubs, Tiger's, White Sox, Brewers! AM Radio is the future of sports entertainment!
Daytime AM I can receive stations from MI, IN, IL, WI, I enjoy outdoor actives, and AM radio is the best way to listen to all the live ballgames from stations that can be over 100 mi away! FM, or TV can't even come close to AM radio
I love to listen to distant sports on AM too. Unfortunately, they are figuring out more ways to make you pay, even for audio coverage. High power AM stations blasting through the midwest? I'm afraid their days are numbered. It will be a sad time when the plug is pulled through some new regulation or legislation that ignores rural people. Just another example of why so many rural voters cast their ballots as they do. They dislike being ignored and forgotten.
@@arise2945 The AM band has not changed fundamentally in many years. There's nothing inherently different about it today that has contributed to this decline. The frequencies haven't changed, the propogation characteristics are all as they were. Clear channels have been with us for many decades. What has changed is the tremendous increase in the alternatives, offering far more options, better sound quality, etc. The push to digitize the AM band is not coming from the FCC or any other government agency. It's coming from the station owners themselves who see the writing on the wall for this obsolete broadcast format. It all comes down to dollars and cents. The AM band has been in a long decline, and profits for the station owners are harder and harder to achieve. That's the impetus behind this push. As for how rural voters cast their ballots, you seem very confused. The person in charge of pushing this proposal was picked by the person who is now president. This person claims to be an expert business man. AM stations are private businesses. This proposal is coming from the people you voted for.
@@arise2945 How do you think voting could save AM? Do you want to government to subsidize failing AM stations? To mandate that people listen to AM stations to prop up ad revenues? To forbid competing content on the internet or Satellite radio? If your AM stations are failing then the only thing that could save them would be the type of government overreach you're complaining about.
True. Growing up in mountains of Colorado I listened to KFI (Los Angeles) and WLS (Chicago) every night on a small radio. To get some FM stations from Colorado Springs (I was in the San Luis Valley) I had to use a 12 foot FM antenna.
Don't do it ! we've gone full digital TV here in the UK ( it's crap BTW ). And they've had to postpone the radio Digital 'cos the reception is diabloodybolical ( It's crap BTW ). even a slight change in the weather messes with the signal !
@@fwingebritson Right now, tube radio values are dropping like a stone. Nobody wants them, except for highly collectible Scotts, McMurdos, and few Zeniths. The only thing they might be useful for is in a nuclear war, which will probably fry most solid state radios. But who will be left to broadcast, and where will you get the AC power to play the radio?
@@johnstone7697 I am not talking value in money, but value in use. Right now hardly anything is of value monetarily. There are more things that can happen than a nuclear war.
@@fwingebritson But how many people have a working tube radio in their possession? The capacitors in those are all dried out and most of the later models have silver mica disease in their IF transformers. As for those other things that can happen, please elaborate. It sounds like we're drifting into some kind of "prepper" discussion here. I don't think far fetched disaster hypotheticals are going to be persuasive...sorry.
@@johnstone7697 I am not saying go out and get one by any means, but if you have one then why get rid of it? Nor do I wish to get into a "prepper" discussion because I refuse to live a paranoid life. However, if SHTF and I am stuck wondering what is going on with the outside world, I would rather choose a tube am radio because they have excellent signal range, and there will likely be an AM radio station in service if things haven't gone too far. A person can argue that SW would be better, however radios do not often come with SW bands these days and when they do they are dodgy as hell.
For me, it's simple. If the station is targeting a local market, it should move to FM. AM should only be for clear channel broadcasters who want to cover wider areas than FM can reach. In the old days, I enjoyed listening to out-of-town broadcasts for the content I could not hear locally. What killed that is the same packaged programming being now carried by all of them.
At one time the clear channel idea was the rule and not the exception. I used to dx the entire medium wave band and loved the various stations available across the band all around the country and even a lot of the Western Hemisphere. The smaller stations went off at dusk to accommodate the clear channel stations. Agreed. This should come back and be the rule. The cellphone as a radio is a mistake and even flawed. If the internet goes down then you have no radio then. That’s really ridiculous. Over the air radio needs to be left alone. I have an HD radio and it doesn’t work well except in the larger cities where the stations are located. A digital format switch would be a great mistake and would just kill off the entire band. Again I say that the band should simply be expanded and the bandwidth of each station should be expanded to 25 kHz. This will solve problems.
Richard Tanguay true. LW and MW are wonderful for medium to long range use. And with the right bandwidth and noise reduction medium wave and long wave can become tremendous for specific reasons and needs.
Kent Teffeteller A widened, expanded MW band would help relieve some interference and may even have room for more channels. As I said there’s a lot of unused space at the bottom and top of this spectrum. Even a bandwidth of 15 kHz would definitely be a help.
Here up North, I like to listen to talk radio at night. It helps me sleep. Coast To Coast AM! Talking about aliens coming into people bedrooms and abducting them and doing experiments on them. On second thought it is probably not good to listen to that at night when I am trying to sleep. But it would be interesting to see how the AM skip would sound in digital. Would it brake up a lot? Would it be better?
No. The digital signal wouldn’t travel very far. Digital radio is a failure in Europe. It’s just another excuse. An interesting example is shortwave. Some stations use a digital format called DRM. It doesn’t work very well for these external services. Some AM MW stations like to use C-QUAM and I had a set that picked this signal up. It worked well but at night the drifting made this format intolerable. A digital format would just kill off the MW band. A band expansion should actually be in order. If you separated station by 25 kHz instead of the 10 we have now and expand the MW band from 450 to 1800 the present MW mess could be solved. The powers that be would rather keep this mess the way it is. I used to build a crystal radio that worked very well for what it was. Several local radio stations have switched formats to a “rock-n-Americana” format. They seem to be doing not too bad for themselves. A band EXPANSION would work better than the proposed mess! Oh, and cellphones are lazy excuses for radio. If that internet goes down that’s it. You have nothing then.
@@RJDA.Dakota Digital Radio in Europe is called DAB. DAB is one of the worst radio system there is. Even when well within the broadcasting area. Audio would sound like mud bubbling in the background due to poor signal codec and error correction. Even Canada once propsed to use DAB quit using it due to unsatisfactory performance and choose HD Radio instead.
900Yugo yes I have heard that. Several dozen times. Shortwave radio is a big hobby of mine and I am interested in most aspects of it. I’ve listened to shortwave and medium wave band for decades.
Sports talk radio is HUGE on the AM bands. A very big market and if they discontinue am broadcasting and replace with FM , they will lose half their listeners because FM does not have the range of AM signals, especially at night.
The problem is not THAT so few listen to AM radio; it is that so few AM stations OFFER something enough people want to hear. In 1987 I bought a car stereo with AM stereo. The one stereo station I could receive that played music sounded very good, and I thought it had a chance of becoming a great thing. It didn't. The station gave up too soon. They stopped playing any music at all. Digital radio may have superior sound quality, but it is a bad method in all other respects. I favour a permanent return to 100% pure analog radio on both AM and FM --- no more HD, which causes interference --- and otherwise let the market sort things out.
HD Radio tried this, and it failed miserably. WBZ 1030 Boston was an HD Radio station, and even with a strong signal, it rarely could see digital content. When it did, it sounded like a low-bitrate audio stream of past days, for what few seconds it would work before reverting the muffled AM analog. I've had it be noisy, and it work, perfectly noiseless, no-go. It was a crap-shoot, and failed.
Yep, go watch Techmoan's channel who is based in the UK, and has done a few reviews on various radios, and they have digital radio there, and even in a country that small it's a mess with some of it being in 64Kbps mono.
Oh, I don't know about that. When I lived in FL I was able to pick up WBZ's HD signal at night with remarkable clarity. I loved listening to the guy who was hosting in the wee hours. It's been so long I forgot his name.
@@zoppie Bradley Jay? He had a good show, then it went away when Covid-19 was all they talked about in news-related content. The show still has not come back, just recycled news plays now. I'm surprised it can be received there. I know it can go halfway into Canada, and down the Carolinas with decent clarity, but good enough for HD Radio to work where you are? That's amazing. Doesn't work here, or anywhere it comes in perfect. Maybe overmodulated enough? Weird thing is, even 20 miles from the tower, there's places where the station as a whole doesn't seem to exist.
@@diamonddave45 I always hear something interfering with BZ, I hear some tone on the hour, found it was on 1020. Maybe that's it. Too close together to co-exist.
I wish we could have kept analog tv and i hope they don't make radio digital. Back when everything was analog even if the signal wasn't strong you could still watch it but now its all or nothing so i hope it doesn't become all or nothing with radio.
@Richard Tanguay That why we have HD radio on FM as a digital radio standard. The problem is that there are not many portable HD radio receivers available for sale at an affordable price. The most I have seen are car recievers.
NTSC analog tv sucked. It was a major technical compromise dating all the way back to 1953 when compatible color was added to it. Nobody misses it except those that can't or don't want to access programming via the internet or cable. Well over 90% of the country has those other options available. Sometimes formats become obsolete and just die. It's the reason why we no longer use 8 tracks or cassettes. And the vinyl craze is strictly for nostalgia or for hipsters to brag about.
I personally love listening to the AM radio band. Here in Pahrump, a mere 60 miles due west of LVNV I can hear nothing on the AM other than KDWN. Mount Charleston Peak at 11,000 ft + is between us. I mostly listen at night when KCBS, KNX, KOMO, KOA and KKOB, as well as KTNN from the Navajo Nation in Window Rock, all boom in. I also hear many stations from Mexico. Once on Bora Bora in French Polynesia, was able to listen to WWL from NOLA - over 5,500 miles away! Growing up in Chgo, Radio Havana Cuba would occasionally overtake the 720 signal from WGN. I always loved listening to WBZ and KDKA and WABC. Now over the net I mostly listen to WNYC. Funny, however, the commercials are all about products + services here in LV - go figure? Thanks for your channel, Mike in Pahrump, Nv.
This will be a sad day for us radio collectors! I guess we will have to make our own low power AM transmitters to allow our vintage tube AM sets to live on.
I'm sure someone will come up with a converter box that picks up the digital signal with a display, and broadcast its own low power signal over AM/FM like some of the toy mics back in the 70's, and 80's did.
@@CommodoreFan64 I plan on building a low power transmitter anyways. The FCC narrowed the side bands on AM to 10KHz in the 70s to allow for more stations on the dial. I'd love to hear how AM truly sounded before this. I have a few 1940s console radios with 12" and even 15" speakers in them that need restoration.
I got a really nice 7 transistor radio once for Christmas when i was a kid. I was known as the local radio and tv fix it guy when I was younger and the sets could be repaired....usually with nothing more than a new tube or two and contact cleaner.
I used to listen exclusively to FM music stations in my teenage and young adult years. Now the radio station I've been listening to the most is a local AM news radio. I'm not 60, not even 35 yet. People do change and so do listening habits. And on the note of audio quality, I've always hated listening to talk radios on FM or on digital. Such a waste of audio quality (FM HiFi stereo for speech?), and so annoying to hear people spitting in their microphones in HD. I guess I could buy a cheap digital receiver that has horrible audio quality, but then hey, why not just keep those AM stations and not force the population to buy new receivers?
AM radio was a subject that an Electronics Technician studied in his early days, even as a child, when he built his first crystal -set ,the joy that he got in receiving radio stations thousands of miles away. That beautiful Diode did all that. AM radio is a part of our lives, long may it live.
If anyone wants to keep the smaller stations going in their own area, they need to get in contact with them to find out in what way, you the listener, can help
at night you can pick up am stations from 100s of miles away, far outside their intended coverage area, and those "unofficial" reception areas would just lose the signal entirely
Nah - they just play amazing video games on their multi-million transistor GPU'd game consoles, whilst talking to their friends over the Internet, whilst watching Netflix :)
You're right! I once took pleasure in sitting in my truck in Dallas and listening to KVOO-AM 1170 in Tulsa. They once had the best format in the country!!
There are many of us that are radio collectors, some radios dating back close to 100 years old. Yes a converter would work but would defeat the purpose of tuning in stations which is part of the enjoyment. I frankly would not buy a AM radio to pick up digital stations.
I listened to Rush Limbaugh in the very beginning when he had 5? stations network. I even built an AM antenna amplifier to get a clearer signal in Delaware from New York WABC. DX AM & domestic Short Wave are still a good alternative to mainstream monopoly media. NY Post Hunter Biden story CENSURED on Twitter & Facebook. Big Bro uses computer robots to censure digital media, AM radio is a little more difficult to control.
I'm a millennial (1992) and I listen to AM radio every day multiple times a day. My local station, WTIC 1080, is a clear-channel station and the reception is excellent. I'm also fascinated by the technology in general so I think it's interesting when certain things like lightning affect the signal. This video made me so upset I'm definitely about to follow this link you speak of.
You're in/near Ottawa? I get much more than that on AM in Ottawa on my CD Walkman that's also a radio, albeit mainly at night and I don't mind listening through a heckuva lot of static. I used to be able to listen to stations in Massena NY in the daytime but I can't seem to pick them up anymore.
Can confirm AM radio travels very far distances. I sometimes listen to CFZM 740 from Toronto at night from Baltimore. Granted I can only receive it at night. On a side note, I have an HD radio in my truck. Some of our AM stations already have HD signals. I was flipping through and caught myself wondering why it sounded so clear.
I don’t listen to AM or FM over the air anymore . Far too many commercials. The music is mostly crap and the play lists are too short. Even the oldies stations play too few songs. Radio isn’t run by radio people anymore. The bean counters are in charge. When I want to listen to talk radio I listen on line.
I remember when cellphone bands where on 800mhz. And I could tune in and listen to conversations Even 900mhz radio bands are going to at&t or Verizon. So I can no longer have anything to scan in analog. You now have to have just about every form of digital just to listen. And when it comes to tier 3 you need $$$. This radio hobby is very ,very expensive now. Just a uniden sds200 is now over 700.00 without any accessories. The cheapest solution i have found is sdr and rtl radio. And that is changing about every 3 monts.
I remember listening in on cordless house phones when they used 46 MHz back around the late 80s and early 90s. Good times. I always knew the gossip before arriving back at high school in the mornings because the girls were always on the phones as night.
Like with television, broadcasters want to dominate a specific market, disallowing listeners to hear out of the market stations. This is not about improving AM, it's about controlling it. Maybe we need another Radio Caroline.
I’m not necessarily opposed to an all digital am world. I’m opposed to the adoption of ibiquity’s inferior closed source HD radio standard. DRM (digital radio mondiale) is much more efficient at using all 10khz. HD radios are so expensive and relatively inferior (in their price range) because of the massive royalties
Exactly! Just wait till you have to pay a fee to unlock an ATSC 3.0 video stream on your computer because the codec has a paywall. Remember back in windows XP and even early windows 7 when you had to pay for a codec to playback DVDs
There are good reasons for AM. Air traffic still uses it because of FM’s capture effect, among other reasons. Digital has problems. You either receive it all or nothing. No DXing.
You are talking DAB? Yeah - Things like this are consumer driven. So if you aren't putting the receivers into cars, you aren't going to get the listeners. Plus - it's only an add-on to existing stations. It's not like the FM transition - where stations migrated over the course of a few years. The broadcasts are largely the same.
AM radio once saved my sanity. Story: I was driving from Los Angeles to Lawrence, KS for training sessions in my field, but had to pretty much make the whole drive within 24hrs. By the time I was in Colorado, the roads were pitch black and nobody was near me. There was a period of time I lost cell reception for around 45 minutes. I turned on the radio and it tuned to AM570... nothing there, so I decided to try scanning and after a few seconds it locked onto AM1070, KNX Los Angeles. I listened to local traffic and news, from nearly 1000 miles away. It kept me entertained until I started to get some reception, but by then, I found a rest area in better lit area. I rested for about an hour and a half and then continued onto Lawrence. Also, Rumble Strips are a lifesaver.
When I listen to AM at night, I can hear eight to a dozen stations broadcasting the *same exact talk show* . There's not a wide variety of content on AM radio anymore.
@@scottlarson1548 Exactly. The golden age of AM was back in the 30's and 40's, when there was no TV and the only other news was in newspapers (and newsreels at the movie theater). There were also radio dramas and comedies for entertainment (which stirred your imagination more *because* you couldn't see the story unfold), also because there was no TV and certainly no internet.
I treat AM DX listening as a hobby, as well as an emergency lifeline. When there is an emergency in a distant state such as an earthquake, I can search for the stations in that area using my reception logs. Weather events are also closely monitored. The hobby of DX listening can give one several hours to maybe a couple of days to prepare for a serious weather event. OK, I'm 66 years old, and I just like to hear from other parts of the country, and to share in their experiences. It's fun!
God, I hope not. That would kill off DX-ing entirely. I love being able to listen to AM radio stations from New York City in the evening on my CD Walkman that's also a radio and I'm in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, roughly 500 miles away from the transmitters on top of the Empire State Building or wherever else it is that they put the transmitter. *EDIT:* Apparently, the transmitters for the New York City AM blowtorches are mostly in New Jersey. That's not nearly as romantic an idea as listening to something broadcasting direct from the top of the most famous skyscraper in the world. :-/
I think the high powered "clear channel" stations will stay on analog. I think the whole proposition is targeted towards smaller stations that have to power down at night.
AM Towers are usually not located on top of tall buildings. Around here, the best place to put AM Towers are in river valleys and low-flat land areas. Alot of AM Stations need to use directional antennas, which would be impossible on top of buildings. Most of St Louis's AM Towers are in the American Bottoms. The flat, lower elevation lands of the Mississippi river valley. AM broadcasters benefit from rich ground soil for a good ground wave and the American Bottoms has some of that. FM & TV stations are known for broadcasting from building tops: Ex. Willis Tower & Hancock Buildings in Chicago. In St Louis, most TV-FMs broadcast antennas share space on 1,100-foot towers located on the city's edge. Not every TV-FM station can build it's own 1,100-foot tower. So they must share . Sometimes 12+ FM-TV stations share a single 1,100-foot tower. AM Towers can not share space with other AM stations. The entire AM tower is radiating signal. TV-FM broadcast antennas are mounted on the side of their tower structure at different elevations. So the tower itself does not radiate the broadcast signal.
@@ToddHa -Looking at a chart (from 2014, dunno if it's changed much since then), all that's broadcast from the Empire State Building is TV and FM anyway.- Correction, the chart's from 1967, the article is from 2014 so it's probably not accurate to what's up there now.
I love AM radio. We have a 50,000 watt radio station where I live operating 24 hours a day that has fabulous sound for over 100 miles from the city. I listen to it a lot on a boom box, plugged into home AC power, while I am using my PC computer at home. Long live AM radio.
Throw a wire on the radio and tune around at night! If it doesn't have an antenna jack, just wrap it around/clip it to the telescoping antenna and stretch it out. Into a tree if possible. See if you can hear WWL 870, KSL 1160, or KOMO 1000. Have some fun!
I was just watching your video and you were very spot on on a lot of things. One major issue though. We are well past the comment dates for this proposal and the FCC is already circulating the Report and Order for the proposal. At this time, any communication with any FCC decision making person either in the Media Bureau or the Commissioners Offices will be considered an ex parte communication. These must be disclosed. Also, because of the Sunshine Act, you are not allowed to make any ex parte presentations after the release of the Sunshine notice that normally comes out 7 days prior to the meeting (October 20). Any presentations made after that time will be considered unauthorized ex parte presentations and will not be considered and those who make those presentations may get shamed in a FCC public notice. The time for the general public to comment on this is over. It's time for the attorneys and advocates like myself to make any last minute presentations based on what was in the circulation draft document. If anyone has a strong feeling about any specific item in the circulation draft such as the EAS requirements, the use of enhanced mode and other specifics, then they need to make a disclosed ex parte presentation prior to the Sunshine date. Its important to realize that digital AM is a very long term approach that many AM stations may not choose to make because of the costs imposed by Nautel (for the transmitting equipment) and eventually Xperi (the owners of the rights to the HD technology). So far, there have been two AM stations that have been authorized digital AM experimental operation. One (WWFD outside of DC) has had success with their AM experimental operation while another had discontinued it shortly after switching to it because of complaints from listeners who really still listen to AM radio.. and these are not hobbyists. For WWFD, their market share in the 18-54 has grown on their AM station since going all-digital (they also have an FM translator). It's also important to remember that an FM translator serves a much smaller area than the service area of an AM station, analog or digital. HD Radio is slowly growing in penetration and a lot of this development (AM and FM) has been stifled by the consumer electronics industry, which in this country is straying away from radio receivers because of the massive growth in "non-radio" (e.g. streaming services). HD will permit AM stations to deal with the interference issues and also experience some costs savings since it may be cheaper for them (from a power consumption standpoint) to operate digital as opposed to analog. The decision to switch will be entirely up to the station and there is no mandate. As you mentioned, this is not a congressional effort to recover spectrum for other purposes, but more of an effort to provide an update to this broadcast spectrum. I predict that at first (in the first few years), there will be very few takers and AM stations are still going to be around for awhile. It's also important to remember, that for some stations, even if they were to convert to digital, the land that their station is on is much more valuable for purposes other than a radio station. This is because AM stations have been historically located very close to cities where FM stations are normally located further away from cities and on mountaintop sites. I hope this provides some more insight from someone who has been involved in the actual rulemaking proceeding. Thanks for the video. Michelle Bradley REC Networks
Funny because here HD radios are no longer available and the only two medium wave HD stations have reverted their signal back to analogue. Every time I even bring up HD or digital radio I only get laughed at!!
Which General Motors vehicle is offered with HD Radio? I contend HD Radio penetraruon is going nowhere fast. There are almost no receivers available. Performance is horrible as station broadcast range is far shorter than analog. You sayi it is slowly gaining market.. Please site your source.
Mike Mandell I am intrigued by this as well. I’ve never seen anything like that from GM. We have an Hyundai and it has one of the best HD radios I have ever seen and heard. But that’s very uncommon as it is a luxury car. (Genesis).
KFYI 550 AM in Phoenix, Arizona is about all I listen to. I like conservative talk radio. I work from home so I mostly listen to KFYI thru iHeart Radio on my browser so in a sense I've been listening to their digital version for a long time. Would kind of suck hopping into my F-150 and no longer be able to listen to what I like because my radio only receives analog broadcasts.
I’m in Phoenix too. I regularly listen to KAZG an AM oldies station on an old transistor radio at my storage units. They’re also on FM, but their FM signal isn’t as clear. Steve Goddard is on in the afternoon.
WDBO has both 580 AM and 107.3 FM. Both suffer from poor signal quality and interference. In the past when they reformatted the 580 AM to sports radio and WDBO 96.5 FM the signal quality was excellent and no interference. Who remembers when the AM stations went to stereo broadcasting and you didn’t have upgrade to listen to the regular signal? If they change AM to digital I would not like to have to purchase new equipment to listen to any of it.
No one is forcing anyone to buy new TVs, you can just connect new tuners to any TV. It's much worse for radio stations to shut down because it will make many radios obsolete and unusable! (This will also mean more electronic waste poisoning our environment over this decision!)
Brodie Gamboa this is truly the best way to get the point across. Even those old CRT TVs have a lot of material in them also dumped unceremoniously everywhere on peoples yards. We have one too but have to admit I would rather turn it in to be properly recycled. Save for the CRT itself many parts can be recycled. I really don’t like the idea of zeroing out all this band space at some company’s whim.
Many AM stations already broadcast their content on their HD FM station counterpart. For example in NYC "News Radio 880" is also broadcast on one of the sub-channels of WCBS FM HD. I think in most metropolitan areas, AM sound quality is very good, it's just that many of the modern AM tuners are crap. Get an old Pioneer receiver and listen to the AM section. It will blow you away with how good in sounds compared to the AM radio in you car.
I live in Detroit. At night I can pick up WWL... from New Orleans. *It is utterly utterly stupid to get rid of such a well established technology that allows communication over such a long distance!*
I can't see this happening in places like New York City where AM stations are still big business. One notably is the legendary news station 1010 WINS. Tons of people still rely on it for traffic, weather and the quick headlines. Then there is WCBS, WABC, WOR and WFAN which I recall as being the top billing station in the area. Not to mention the huge audiences of the many ethnic stations in the city. The NY broadcasters aren't about to cut their audience out for Digital AM....again. It's been tried already and the audience and the broadcasters rejected it. The whole proposal is as ridiculous as the FCC proposal to charge Amateur radio operators $50 renewal...
There is an AM "revitalization" going on in the NYC, Long Island area. Ive noticed a lot more variety in ads on many of the stations (which means companies are interested in advertising on am) and stations are being rethought and changed for the better such as 77 wabc going back to "Music Radio 77 WABC" every Saturday evening. And 1100 whli getting ads from larger companies like dove and target.
You're right that WINS and WCBS are holding respectable size audiences on AM, but the last time I checked the NYC Metro radio ratings WABC and WOR, which likely share most of their audience, were only attracting a small fraction of the audience size they used to, and most of the listeners were over the age of 55, many way over, and that means they are not that attractive to major advertisers. Meanwhile, WFAN is on FM too, and ESPN moved their sports talk to FM years ago because the AM audience for sports talk just wasn't what they needed.
As a teenager in the 60s, I used to DX am stations from all over the northeastern US. Living in NYC, I could pickup CKLW, WGN, WKBW, WSM, etc….loved doing that.
I listen to AM radio from local talk show hosts, Rush, and Hannity. Also for some reason Baseball games sound great on AM radio. Even this year when there was no one in the stands and recorded crowd sounds were used, on AM radio it sounded like there was people in the stands cheering the Baseball teams and it sound great and natural.
Digital radio via cell phone works great. No need for shutting down analog. Switching to digital AM wouldn't do anything positive for the listener base, but would lose a lot of folks who do listen.
Sorry for the late comment. When I was a kid in the late 1960s and early 1970s my Dad would take us out for a drive and we could hear AM stations from all over the country. If you remember the subplot of American Graffiti one of the main characters was trying to see his idol - radio jock Wolfman Jack who was broadcasting from a strong Am station across the border in Mexico.
I have worked in radio for 16 years. Let me tell you something this will not work, This proposal is voluntary, not mandatory, first off going all digital will not work. There are so few digital ams that will be able to do so successfully otherwise for most stations it will be a wasted investment and most stations will fail under the new digital format because most people do not have an am hd receivers. The economics isn’t there to do this. This is what I think the fcc should do. 1. Create a new standard for all am radios made in the USA or imported from else where. 2. Ban all the import radios that from China until they start making radios that meet the new standard and only accept imported radio with the new standard. Because most of these radios that have real bad am radio tuners in them with bad interference most of them not up to part 15 standards and most only go to 3-5 kilohertz and only allow import radio receivers to have 13 kHz bandwidth and with am stereo decoders. 3.They should make all am stations mandatory broadcast in am stereo. 4.They also need to abolish the nrsc 10khz requirement and allow stations to broadcast in full 13 kHz bandwidth audio real hi fi audio that’s fm like. Plus the primary entry point radio stations are mostly am station and provide a vital lifeline during an emergency and those would have to remain in analog as the system can’t be upgraded to digital. I’m sure there are more things I could add to this list but can’t think of it right now however if the fcc does these 4 things then am has a real chance at being saved from death. If they go to all digital wether voluntary or mandatory it will leave am in worse condition that what it already is. Now in some cases in special circumstances for some stations going digital would be beneficial for some. I just don’t see going going digital for all or the majority of am radio stations to do so it just a waste of money.
Why are AM stations spaced 10 KHz a part in the Americas, but 9 KHz a part in the rest of the world? When I was young, and even up through high school I would occasionally tune into AM. However, the things to listen to that I was interested in were mainly on FM, with some stations simulcasting AM and FM. What got me interested in AM in the late 80’s and early 90’s were that there were still a lot of AM stations that played rap and urban AC. However, many of those stations went off altogether at night, and depending on the time of year pretty early. One example of this is WXLA AM 1180 in Lansing, Michigan. They now are adult standards, and because OF WHAM in Rochester, Ny they have to sign off at sunset. I know of other stations that were in that situation.
@@jeffk7734 that’s because of the itu I think the main reason was to avoid mass interference around the earth on am at night. I’m sure there are other reasons but that’s all if I can think of right now.
I remember when I was a kid, the whole family was loaded in the car and We were going south to Brownsville from San Antonio. We turned into 55 0 AM KTSA, and I had no trouble picking up the signal all the way from San Antonio down to Brownsville.
Yet another technology being relegated to the dust bin of history 😢. So many things that were once mainstays of everyday life are disappearing or are already gone. So let's have a moment of SILENCE for AM radio, before we have Permanent Silence for AM radio.
6:09 The 2nd radio station that I every worked at was KENI in Anchorage, Alaska (and now you know why my screen name is "totallyfrozen"). It was kinda cool to see it up there on screen. Before it was 650 AM, it was 550 AM (as if anyone here cares). My first radio DJ gig was on an AM station. I've worked in AM music, AM talk, and FM talk. I have a soft spot in my heart for radio. In many areas, AM broadcast has been essential to delivery of government information during emergencies.
It is weird that during the day my local AM station transmits at 50,000 watts loud and clear but reduces power at night to 10,000 to get drowned out by DX stations 1,000 to 2,000 miles away.
thaddeus mcgrath radio is a great but very strange thing. At night more the atmosphere is more conducive to long distance stations. That’s what I mean. It’s actually meant to do that. In a true emergency like a power or telephone failure that’s why mw radio is great especially at night. FM is limited and local only.
Honestly, I used to love AM Radio for a station that would broadcast music from the 50s, 60s, 70s and even the 80s. That station was literally the only station I ever listened to until they were shutdown a few years ago and turned into a sports station. That really hurt and I was disappointed. As a man who is below 50 years old, it hurt. That channel broadcasted songs that I actually love and are impossible to find on iTunes and even RU-vid. Nowadays, I only use AM Radio for just sports coverage on my favourite hockey team when I’m in the car. Also, I do have some questions: 1. Will the broadcast/sound quality improve? 2. What year did car manufacturers start putting these “HD Digital Radios” in? 3. Would I have to purchase a new stereo system in order to receive this new AM Radio? 4. Kind of a side question, but how come Sports Radio Stations didn’t just broadcast on FM in the first place? Thank you so much Tyler! Your channel has really improved and I’m glad you’re getting sponsored for some videos! The added jokes are great and I can really see how over 100K RU-vid Subscribers are making you feel. You always sound happy and that makes me feel good.
Does AM HD sound good? Yes, actually. But it's not practical because it doesn't travel well due to multipath and bouncing on the ionosphere (of course I'm talking about AM DX here). What they should have done is widen the channel for each AM station and keep analog AM stereo. That actually sounded pretty good. Instead of 10 KHz they could use 15 KHz spacings. Back in the AM stereo days circa 1986 I had a car receiver that had a "wide band" option and it sounded good! And AM stereo doesn't interfere with adjacent channels like AM HD does.
That’s exactly right!! I used to have a Sony multiple format analogue AM stereo receiver. It sounded great but at night I had to turn the bandwidth down to cut interference. Yes like I said: AM MW Should be expanded: 450-1800 kHz and each station should be 25 kHz apart from each other. That would cut interference and also widen the frequency response of each station. More efficient antenna design should also help. C-QUAM worked just fine for me.
Going complete digital on AM radio would kill the antique radio hobby. Those are pretty much just limited to AM radio, but they are fun to use and often have superior sound quality to the cheap radios of today. In my opinion, AM radio should be left grandfathered for analog broadcast. Digital probably would kill AM radio altogether as digital can't work with any interference. Also, classic music gets dumped on AM, and that will move down the line as people age. Eighties pop is already getting dumped on AM. Soon, your '90s music will follow suit as will 2000s music. It's the old timer's radio, and we just won't have any radio as we age if we don't protect the AM band. Besides, it's the older people that pay the most in taxes, so ignoring their needs would be political suicide.
Here in Germany it's already over. All AM stations have been switched off. Legally they still could do it, but it's just too expensive. Germany is small compared to the US and it is covered by FM very well and has been for decades. Digital coverage on VHF (DAB+) is growing rapidly, leaving no room for AM. Some stations broadcasted digitally on the AM bands(!) with a system called DRM, but receivers are almost non existent and normal AM radios just puck up noise.
I'm surprised the FCC is going in this direction. Heck, the band was EXTENDED beyond 1610 KHz all the way up to 1700 KHz. Is this the act of a regulatory body that wants to end the present mode of operation? If operators of AM broadcast undertakings see them wither on the vine let them do so organically. I never thought of HD radio as a practical solution to a richer AM audio experience. Think of the implementation model; it's a digital subcarrier that needs to be hosted on an existing ANALOG FM service. Why? Now if the FCC is keen on more digital modulation to enhance the listener experience they should seize the opportunity to EXTEND the FM band DOWNWARD from 88 MHz to 76 MHz, swallowing up the old frequencies occupied by analog VHF TV channels 5 and 6 which are immediately adjacent to the FM band and in a frequency range which doesn't serve digital over-the-air TV well anyway. Let digital TV operate on channels 7-13 VHF and 14 UHF and up to wherever the end channel will be (35 or 36) leaving a good chunk of 700 MHz which is being sold off to the wireless carriers. 76-108 MHz would line up well with the FM band in many European and Asian countries whose FM bands start at 76 MHz. That lower 12 MHz block could be allocated to pure 100% all digital FM. No subcarrier hosted on an analog FM provisioned for SCMO operation; just pure stand-alone all-digital signal and, as is the case with digital OTA TV, provision for multiple virtual channels. At those frequencies it's much cheaper and easier to install and put a digital FM on the air. Now that's a solution I could get behind.
It's the act of an agency who saw, much like the UHF TV band, digital means tighter packing. Which then leaves more free space to spin off chunks of the band to reallocate and SELL to the highest bigger. Why do you think UHF TV only has 36 channels now? Someone paid big bucks to have that spectrum reallocated.
When I was a kid all we had was AM radio. All music, news, weather and sports was AM radio. I still have some of my favorite shows in Los Angeles but I now live on the East coast so - it's off to the internet. I can still listen to talk radio from afar.
New radios that have the AM band do it with poor circuits. Those 1 chip FM radios work fine for FM but suck for pulling in AM stations if they include the AM band. They are not built the way vintage AM only radios were. I've built Foxhole radios with a razor blade and a peace of pencil lead as the detector that worked better for local AM radio stations than any modern FM and AM single chip radio, which all of them are now. Google "Foxhole Radio" if you want to see how those are made and used. Obviously if the AM band goes digital those WWII era primitive crystal type radios would no longer work.
Craig Nehring I really like my XHData D 808. It’s one of these small radios that have the radio on the chip. This set is wonderful for long distance MW and SW transmissions. The FM is also very nice.
I've got a high end AM radio from the 30's. When they're perfectly tuned (Pronounced $$). They sound just as good as FM. It's only mono of course instead of stereo.
Actually, there are quite a few very good AM radios... that is AM and FM and some with shortwave, that have very good AM circuits still available brand new manufacture. CCrane and Sony come to mind immediately.
The AM HD signals as they are being used at this time don't propagate well at night. Therefore it makes sense to me to just allow full digital during the day or even 6am to 6 pm. That way the advantage of nighttime broadcasting (DX) can still be preserved.
This is a timely topic and very sad. Another problem is the AM broadcast band is over 600 meters long and so is difficult to receive well without a huge antenna. Also, forcing them to low power at night when they propagate best (so as not to interfere with one another) nullifies one of their best characteristics. Thanks for publicizing this issue.
Andy, if you're still a fan of AM, check out a passive tunable loop antenna. They're about $25-$35 US on Amazon and are a little less than the size of a small pizza. They can easily pull in 50kw stations from 1000+ miles away with small direction and capacitance knob changes. It's fun to pull in such distant broadcasts.
Most AM radios use a ferrite bar loopstick antenna. They generally don't have a telescoping rod. The loopstick has the advantage of being less affected by lightning discharges, compared to monopole antennas.
Yet, a listener in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan may, on occasion, hear a radio station from Cuba, once in awhile (nighttime listening), using a ferrite loopstick antenna inside the radio. It's not the height of the radio - it's the fact that the ferrite loopstick receives the signal by induction.