Ferrari 812 Superfast | HOT LAP | Nordschleife | 7.27,48 min | sport auto 

Wow! You guys got very close to his time. I suppose he knows the car better but you know the track better...

Shou-outs to Christian Gebhardt then for coming that close! (:

sport auto Guten Tag wieso ist der Punkt an dem die Zeitmessung beginnt, nicht auch der Punkt wo die Zeitmessung endet ? Lediglich Porsche hat das bei der Zeitermittlung des 919 so gehandhabt. LG

Christian is no mug when driving, keep up the good work.

@@andresnils9776 Hi Nils, die Sportauto Runde wird immer so gemessen. Das kleine Stück dazwischen fehlt immer.

HG504 that’s really not the point lol This car is as fast as a BMW coupe which is horseshit

@@ezra5485 BMW M4 GTS was a factory lap. Also, the 812 has a Bentleyesque ride compared to the insanely harsh M4 GTS. The Bimmer is much more tracked focused. The BMW does a 12.0 121 mph quarter vs 10.5 140 mph for 812. The 812 was 11 seconds faster than Sport Auto tested the 458 and only 6 seconds slower than 488.

Its much slower than the Corvette Z06, which is a car of similar layout and ethos. A bit underwhelming, a 7:27.

Shikhar Shivam it’s slower than previous generation corvette from 10 years ago lol this car is a joke

It’s still pretty pathetic that Ferrari doesn’t have a single car that’s even any where near the top of the Nurburgring lap times. It’s just dominated by Porsche’s and lambos.

exactly

A 720s is a much faster straight line car and is rwd and it posted a better lap time. That takes true balls. This is a heavy slow 800hp car.

LegendInThaMakin yea but the 720s is waay lighter, is mid engined, and its not a GT so you cant compare it with the 812

@LegendInThaMakin slow car? V12 NA, no turbos no awd, fasted than aventador sv and aventador s, almost as fast as the 720s. SLOW? hahahaha

@@LegendInThaMakin twin turbo V8 vs NA V12, lighter engine, better aerodynamic, normal that is faster

Also a V10😁 it throws the doctor so far away

Nothing better than a 50cc scooter engine revving at the red line

💯💯💯

Amen

Nice yet to me, a 4 rotors blast a doctor away . .

Agree, too much power, not enough grip, heavy, low downforce = wild ride, not bad for a hyper GT

How about nismo? It is also GT car..

Ady Yzels lol

@@adyyzels Nismo is the one that doesn't fit the system. It's the sportiest GT car if you will.

@@marcusm5127 the badge GTR said everything,heavy,front engine,..

ZappoTan hope you wont buy it then...

@ZappoTan The crap is inside your head, where normal people have a brain.

@@derbigpr500 😮😮😮😂😂😂

Yeah sure the AMG GT 63 is 2 seconds faster. Ferraro hype lol

ICEMANZIDANE with god like tyres*

Corvette Z06 falls into this same category and it was faster. It also looks better.

@@ICEMANZIDANE ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-N2Opne_k3Og.html Shut the fuck up.

@@derbigpr500 is that relevant at all? Get off the Internet kid, go listen to lullabies on your beyerdynamic

I wouldn't sacrifice the sound for only few seconds

@@grkhunter9265 i think it would not be few seconds difference, but more like 25-30. Pista is for sure sub 7 min car.

@@ron999 488 pista is slower than 720s around track imo

@@ron999 never a sub7 Car not in your wettest dreams

@@Yanger1410 seems like u didnt see magny course lap time of pista it was 3 sec faster than 720s ;)

Nice i just did a 7:04.191

CAR通車臣 plz don’t compare it lamborghinis. Lambos will destroy this thing on any track. Ferrari should stick to just making pretty cars. They are no longer a match for Porsche’s and lambos, or even mercs apparently.

@@LegendInThaMakin The 488 track is rival for porsche or the lambos, which by the way, still do not discover the turbos ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-N2Opne_k3Og.html

@@LegendInThaMakin You mean like the pista will dismantle the performante on any track? Why dont you compare a Urus to a 488 and then say the urus is slow. When lamborghini has a 1/100th of the pedigree that ferrari has, give me a call. Lamborghini used to be posers cars, now they are just rebranded audis. The urus shares half its parts including the engine with a porsche cayenne. The huracan is essentially an r8 with a body kit. And the Aventador SVJ is still riding the same engine that came out almost ten years ago. All they do is put fatter, stickier tyres on the aventador and claim it is newer and better. The world saw the farce that was the aventador sv and they will do the same with the svj when it doesnt come close to the performance expected of it. Aventador was never a good platform for speed since it is so large. At least the Performante was an actual good car and lived up to the hype. Dont be fooled by these nurburgring times my friend. Just because lamborghini and porsche measure their dicks on this outdated track doesnt mean other manufacturers do. The 488 GTB was faster than the aventador sv on every track except for the 'ring. The Pista will also beat the SVJ.

@@Stratocasterhead51 lol svj 6:44.96 812 7:27.48

@@ezra5485 you're comparing a track oriented supercar to a GT, it's like saying a Fiat Panda is faster than a golf cart

@Latvietis96 the schirmer M3 GT was 250.000€ when it was new. That car is far away from being a normal M3.

You cannot compare times set by a magazine vs manufacturer time.

Cars tend to show more then the gps speed for safety purposes

It sounds horribly compressed. Recorded with a potatoe mic

This wasn’t with proper tires thought. It could literally shave 10-20 seconds with proper tires.

Even S class has four wheel steering, active suspension, etc.! Clearly you're clueless about this car!

@@amarjit_singh_ My friend, the lap time set by this car is very underwhelming. Across all the comments of yours I see you’re making very strong points. But you have to admit that the performance of this (frankly suberp, if I’m honest) car is LAME!

@@bhuuthesecond I already told you that a factory test driver who has done numerous laps on this track would do better, at least by 10-15s than what Christian Gebhardt managed here. But the main objective of this car isn't about setting lap times and all those driving aids and technologies are meant for the road. This what you aren't able to understand!

@@bhuuthesecond Also this isn't even using tyres that are meant for setting lap times. The P Zero Corsa tyres aren't the best tyres for track usage.

Typisches Stammitisch gequatsche der meisten hier. Dir Harald stimme ich voll zu. Absolut pure Emotion und tolles Design für den Alltag. Zahlen Daten Fakten spielen nicht immer die erste Geige.

Ist ja auch ein gt

Selten so einen Schwachsinn gelesen! Seit wann haben nur reinrassige Sportwagen etwas auf der Rennstrecke verloren? Wenn es nur darum ginge, hätten wir heute die meisten Sportwagen gar nicht. Ein 800 PS Ferrari auch als GT hat definitiv was auf der Rennstrecke verloren. Das ding fährt eine tiefe 7:20er Zeit, was nicht weit weg ist vom Hypercar level. Mit einem 812 kann man sicher mehr Spaß haben als mit manchen Time Attack autos. Ein 812 hat emotionen, was viele Track Cars nicht haben, egal wie schnell sie sind. Ich würde so einen 812 jeden Monat auf der Rennstrecke bewegen und kenne viele die das auch gerne tun würden, von daher ja der 812 hat absolut etwas auf der Strecke verloren weil es ein absoluter Sportwagen ist. Es gibt viel langsamere autos mit denen man auch auf der Rennstrecke spaß haben kann.

Cartel893 Sorry, da muss ich Ihnen deutlich widersprechen. Haben Sie schon mal einen Ferrari auf der Rennstrecke bewegt? Es gibt nur wenige Sportautos, die für den Track geeignet sind. Der F 12 (Vorgänger vom 812 superfast) zählte definitiv nicht dazu, der 812 superfast zu 100 % auch nicht. Die Fahrzeuge sind zu schwer und schlussendlich macht die Bremse mehrere Runden auf der Rennstrecke nicht mit. Ich habe den F 12 mehrfach auf Rennstrecken bewegt, wie gesagt: Zu schwer und querdynamisch handelt es sich um einen GT und nicht um ein Tracktool. Nach 4 bis 5 Runden Hockenheim oder Red Bull Ring macht die Bremse nicht mehr mit. Der F 12 und der 812 superfast wurden gar nicht für diesen Zweck gebaut. Am Stammtisch mag die PS Zahl, die Höchstgeschwindigkeit oder eine schnelle Runde, die Hersteller für Marketingzwecke arrangieren, wichtig sein. Für denjenigen, der solche Autos ernsthaft auf Trackdays nutzt, für den zählen andere Fakten. Ich bleibe dabei, weil ich weiß, von was ich spreche: Der 812 superfast ist ein faszinierendes Auto... aber definitiv nicht für die Rennstrecke. Das gleiche gilt für den 488, für alle Aston Martin, für den Audi R 8, für den Lamborghini Aventador, den Huracan und noch so manch anderes Sportauto. Mag ja sein, dass Sie einen 812 auf der Rennstrecke bewegen würden und viele kennen, die das auch tun würden.... aber das ist Ihre Theorie und Wunschvorstellung. Wer tatsächlich so ein Auto in der Garage stehen hat, der legt sich für die Rennstrecke einen 458 Speciale oder einen 488 Pista zu, denn die sind dafür gebaut. Den 812 superfast wird er dafür definitiv nicht benutzen.

@@haraldmayer2139 "alle" Aston Martin? Ich nehme mal stark an dass der Vantage GT12 eine Ausnahme bildet...

xI2aiizza Der GT2RS kommt ca. 15Km/h schneller aus der letzten Kurve. Auch das Drehmoment ist beim Porsche höher.

Leistung ist auch stark temperaturabhängig. Vielleicht war es beim Superfast wärmer oder der Motor bringt nicht mehr so viel Leistung, wenn er schon so heiß gefahren ist.

Und letzter Schaltvorgang bei 7:41 war entweder zu früh oder aber eher der Gang ist lang ausgelegt.

der 812 wird keine echten 340 bringen, eher 325-328. Meim 550 Maranello ist mit 320 angegeben und bringt laut Test nur 307. der 812 ist kein Tracktool/Supercar sondern ein schneller Reisewagen ohne Semislicks. Interessant wäre ein F12tds/488 Pista mit Semis gewesen als Vergleich. Der GT2RS brachte es beim Supertest auf 6:58 ohne die Porsche Betrügereien...das ist immer noch sau schnell.

Die Ferraris bringen alle nicht die Angaben von Werk Sowohl 0-100/200 als auch die Motorleistung wird nie erreicht ...... Fahrer selber 458 u weiß das ganz genau

It’s just funny when you call your car “Superfast” and you give it 800hp but you can’t do that much on the world’s most challenging track 😂😂😂

Probably you have to stay only with coffee and cannabis and not cars.

That cannabis is getting to your head

Lol what does that mean. Are my simple facts innacurate? 7:27 isn't very fast for an 800HP Italian super car. Don't believe me, look at Lamborghini's times. Over 30 seconds off the pace of the comparably powered Aventador SVJ, and even the Huracan Performante. @@aaronvector4750

@@carscoffeeandcannabis-634 You are clearly clueless to consider HP as the only factor. The SVJ and Performante has much more down force which is much needed for tracks like the Nordschleife! And you should stay away from cars until you understand that HP isn't everything on tracks!

Lol broad statement considering you don't know me. I am well aware of the benefits of downforce. I have driven single seater racecars with 180hp that will lap a track faster than any street Ferrari. My point stands however; a flagship Ferrari V12 should be at least as fast as the Baby Lamborghini V10, and MUCH faster than a Civic Type R. 30 Seconds off Pace is ridiculous @@amarjit_singh_

Yeah the Type R😂 pro driver w/ track tires tho

AMG GTR is a track ready car with Better aero, less weight. This car is heavier and doesn't have crazy aero.

@@HG504X harsher ride and inferior acceleration for the Merc. 0-200 in 7.9 vs 9.8 for GT R. It would be idiotic for a car called Super fast to blunt its acceleration with aero when any car under 8 minutes stock at the Green Hell can go faster down any real road than you could imagine.

0-200 in 10 seconds takes a lot more than 640 bhp for 2050 kg car. Also, Mercedes has aero that would slow the Ferraris acceleration. Much like the ACR bests the 488 on some tracks but it's aero leaves it with an 11.7 0-200 vs 8.3 for 488.

@@adampetten5349 the 812 does 0-200 in 7.9 seconds according to ferrari. the amg gt 4 needs around 11 seconds. a sportscar like the ferrari have allways a worse aero than a Sedan. the 812 produce so much downforce. the amg do not produce much downforce. the superfast should be so much faster.

@@jojajo2707 Autobild tested 0-200 in 10 seconds. The difference at speed on tracks would be less with Turbos.For Instance, the Turbocharged DBS Superleggera does 0-200 in 9.5 but is faster in gear and at passing than 812.

@@jojajo2707 AMG has a wing. Also Ferrari only beat Mercedes 303 to 297 on Dottinger.

With the same tyres Ferrari would destroy anything on this course

Why did you choose Ferrari over these manufacturers?

I’m wondering the the same thing too!

The gtr has more downforce

Timevolent Is back even the mercede AMG GT 63s 4 door is faster

@@deedeee780 also down force and awd

@@deedeee780 No Ferrari is about same if you compare official factory times.

Greiguci Wootchie I think they didn't want to risk

German driver is light on the throttle. Doesnt want it getting anywhere near the porsches and mercs. sandbagging at its finest.

Greiguci Wootchie Top speed 360kmh the 812 superfast there is video

Yeah and he did 7.04 in Pista . He is a pro driver :O