*_The root of the life problem_* lies in the *innate values* contained in the *totalitarianism,* namely _the values of _*_feudalism._* *Feudalism* adheres to the existence of a level or *strata of human values based on the attributes* attached to it. These value strata are then immortalized in the form of *human status,* both informally and formally. Not based on the benefits or contributions of humans to the lives of other people or society at large. *Feudalism exploits* the psychological aspects, intellectual, work, physical and material of the lower strata group and other human beings. Because it contains these *unfair* or *injustice* values, the *feudalism* is a *destructive value system.* *Feudalism* evolved *from a rough form* as in royal and religious feudalism *into a more refined form* and *invisible* in the economic system, state politics & life. All of them are still the *systems that exploit* the lower strata or the weaker society at large. Therefore, *feudalism* is a form of massive *covert crime* or *silent crime.*
Interesting video Imo, theres a concept people should know more about that has a somewhat feudal like element to it; When a Mafia Boss or Corporate Mogul has a front person (or front group) owning an estate/business/trust like a feudal land grant, but secretly it is ruled by or an indirect vassal possession of, the crypto-feudal lord/kingpin. Instead of granting land like traditional feudalism, the crypto-feudal ruler grants(or lends or provides access to) a fortune to the vassal/baron who purchases the estate/business/trust and is thus the "official" public-perception owner while the mafia-boss/kingpin stays behind the scene. In the example given in the video, if people do not know about the king above the barons, the barons appear powerful(and they are) but people would not know that there is someone behind/above them. As an example, some Mafia families have millions upon millions of illegal revenues, and do not want to be "the" official owners of the various estates and businesses acquired, its not just a small olive oil store front but huge real estate and business groups (the vassal would be referred to as a business man instead of a baron).
notes Monarch gives noble land Noble provides monarch protection, taxes (in the form of food usually) The nobles give knights land Knights offer protection for nobles Knights and nobles give peasants protection Peasants provide knights and nobles with food, tools, and labor
Question 1 answer: To protect against invaders Question 2 answer: Monarch, Noble, Knight, Peasant Question 3: If someone did not keep their promise all of the methods of feudalism could collapse
You are a rock star!!!!!!!!!!!! if you are interested please upload videos of indian medieval history and anology with the world THANK YOU for this video.
Thank you for the question. It is true, Charlemagne was essentially an emperor. The others, however, were definitely kings. The difference between a king and an emperor is this. A king rules over one group of people (the Franks for example) and an emperor rules over several different groups of peoples. After the fall of Rome, Western Europe split up into different kingdoms that usually didn't extend into empires. Nobles typically were not called kings. Hopefully this helps clarify things.
Thank you so much! I really can't thank you enough. My social studies teacher does not teach clearly at all and this video really helped me prepare for my test tomorrow :)
I, too, would like to thank you. My history professor is great at teaching, but his grading system could use some work. He assigned 2 essays due by the end of the week. One of the subjects we could write on was the rise and decline of feudalism. And me being a shitty note taker, needed a bit of a refresher on feudalism. This video will help a ton on my paper :)
I am afraid there is a misunderstanding. What you call "king" on the beginnings of the feudal system was the emperor. and nobles had many names like "king" for example. The charlomagne was an emperor. Am I correct?
