Тёмный

Feynman's trick is the MOST POWERFUL FORCE in the universe BY FAR 

owl3
Подписаться 1,7 тыс.
Просмотров 1,2 тыс.
50% 1

Check out my other channel OWLS MATH!
/ @owlsmath
Check out my other channel OWLS SCHOOL OF MATH!
/ @owlsschoolofmath9732
Integral practice:
owlsmath.neoci...
Website:
owlsmath.neoci...
#math
#integrals
#integrationtechniques

Опубликовано:

 

11 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 15   
@txikitofandango
@txikitofandango 22 дня назад
I see a hyperbolic claim about the effectiveness of Feynman's trick, I click
@owl3math
@owl3math 22 дня назад
🤣🤣🤣 Yeah i think all previous claims for the power of Feynman trick have been understated
@txikitofandango
@txikitofandango 22 дня назад
@@owl3mathtrue
@MikeEigenstein
@MikeEigenstein 22 дня назад
​@@txikitofandangoThe entire universe hinges on Feynman's trick. Without it we are toast.
@heinrich.hitzinger
@heinrich.hitzinger 21 день назад
​@@MikeEigensteinFeynman: 🤫🧏‍♂️
@owl3math
@owl3math 11 дней назад
@@MikeEigenstein awesome! 😅🤣😂
@adandap
@adandap 22 дня назад
This is another of those problems where looking at it as two integrals you end up with the difference of two logarithmically divergent expressions. You can see that there's a problem if you put u = pi x in the first one, which transforms it into the second, giving zero. Since arctan(pi x) > arctan (x) for all x in [0, pi/2] that clearly can't be right. The problem is that the terms in the integrand both tend to pi/(2x) for large x, hence the divergence. So I tried writing y = arctan(a x) - arctan(x), so tan(y) = x(1-a)/(1 + a x^2) so the integrand becomes 1/x arctan(x(1-a)/(1 + a x^2) ). I couldn't do much with that, but it's clear that it's convergent, since the large x behaviour ~ 1/x arctan( (1-a)/(a x) ) ~ 1/x^2 * (1-a)/a. Then I gave up and used the Feynman thingy as the title suggested. ☺
@owl3math
@owl3math 22 дня назад
😂 Feynman thingy. Interesting stuff!
@jackkalver4644
@jackkalver4644 22 дня назад
I learned another approach using a double integral. Use x
@owl3math
@owl3math 22 дня назад
That makes sense. Good way 👍
@harrydiv321
@harrydiv321 21 день назад
this is an example of a frullani integral
@owl3math
@owl3math 21 день назад
yep exactly (f(ax) - f(bx))/x
@Samir-zb3xk
@Samir-zb3xk 20 дней назад
​​​@@owl3mathnot sure if you already know this but the general answer for these type of integral is [lim x-->∞ f(x) - f(0)]•ln(a/b)
@owl3math
@owl3math 20 дней назад
@@Samir-zb3xk thanks. yes it's a nice formula! I think I have a few more like this coming up but with some variation. I feel like one didn't quite work the same way because f(x) didn't converge at infinity but not sure.
@maxvangulik1988
@maxvangulik1988 22 дня назад
I=int[0,♾️](int[1,pi](1/(1+a^2•x^2))da)dx I=int[1,pi](int[0,♾️](1/(1+a^2•x^2))dx)da I=int[1,pi](pi/2a)da I=pi/2•ln(pi)
Далее
UK Integration Bee Sample #2
5:01
Просмотров 1,1 тыс.
Is x^x=0 solvable?
9:55
Просмотров 94 тыс.
the trigonometric substitution skip
9:14
Просмотров 21 тыс.
when Feynman's integration trick doesn't work...
13:17
1995 British Mathematics Olympiad problem
20:59
Просмотров 133 тыс.
Every Unsolved Math problem that sounds Easy
12:54
Просмотров 592 тыс.
The REAL Three Body Problem in Physics
16:20
Просмотров 602 тыс.
Summing The Reciprocals of Sums
9:47
Просмотров 15 тыс.