Now, the main question is who decides on what harmful / non-harmful levels are? This RF Monitor could be factory tuned within the ''norms'' established by some science based models which might be wrong, considering some levels of radiation as non-harmful, yet some other scientist could say those levels are very harmful. It does not show precise numbers measured, only percentage. Who is right, who is wrong?
It is up to you what you feel is safe or not, I did post a link in the description to a video that talks more about it. But it is hard to find all the information. I don't work on buildings unless they are off.
Anything over a 2% is dosing over time. Radiation is accumulation. That measurement is % over what's safe background I have that device to check the towers are off sometimes a building manager might say it's off when it's not. Not in this case.
@@hoffman411 a family member keeps begging me to buy them the newest 5g iPhone and my arguments from well informed youtubers referencing research papers and videos of lectures by physicians who have started presenting since 4g doesn’t go past their desire for the phone. I know plenty of people with 5g phones so I want to buy one and check if it is still pinging 5g in airplane mode, cellular mode and compare to a 4g phone to show the increase in rf radiation. I might just buy one anyway because I’m too curious.
