Serge Bon Jour. Mercy. Congratulations, because of you are the first person to comment in my channel. Your innciative shall be granted. If you want I could create a video, with the structural topic you want to watch. What do you think? Salute.
Sergio - just one small point regarding the welding symbols you have shown on your drawing - they should show a4 and a8 - since you are defining these welds by throat thickness (as opposed to leg length) - as you explained in your presentation. I am referring to EN22553 - section 6.2.3 for welding symbols. If they had been leg lengths - then they would have to be z4 and z8. They have changed the "symbols" over the years - just to confuse everyone.☺
Gordon thanks for the comment. I think it is very pertinent. To be honest it is not accurate to explain welding design in accordance with European codes meanwhile using AWS Symbology for representation. My apologizes but AWS is the only one symbology that I really handle.
It is a very good question. Ec3 only requires not to weld flanges to avoid flanges restriction. I will upload some post through LinkedIn regarding the topic. Thanks for your question.
Sergio una duda cuando calculaste el corte nominal, o sea el que puede tomar el alma, no deberias haberle restado los dos espesores de las alas para calcular el area del alma o sea (330-2*11.50)*7.5, otra duda es que calidad de acero usaste para el ejercicio, aca en argentina usamos fy=420 generalmente ustedes cuanto usan Desde ya gracias, me gusta mucho tu contenido.
Hola Julián. Gracias por los comentarios.La regla que indicas de restar de la longitud efectiva de la soldaduras dos gargantas es correcta, pero normalmente poco significativa a efectos de cálculo ¿no?. La resistencia de la soldadura no sólo depende del material de aporte (electrodo) también del material base, o de la calidad del acero. En este sentido te recomiendo que consultes el Eurocodigo 3 parte 1 de 8.
Dear Friend Wong. the equation is correct...I guess you refer that there are two fillet welds, Am I rigth?? Please move to minute 15:00 to identify that "2" you are missing. Nevertheless, thanks for your comment... And please share with your colleagues¡¡¡¡¡
