Тёмный

Find Square Roots w/o Calculator by Hand Quickly & Easily 

Athenian Stranger
Подписаться 11 тыс.
Просмотров 3,4 тыс.
50% 1

Learn how to find approximate square roots using a simple one-step technique which can be done in your head or using a small scrap of paper and pencil in less than a minute accurate to the tenth’s place.
Error in Video: The factors of 78 are 2, 3, and 13 and the factors of 12 are 2, 3, 4, and 6. So, I was wrong about the GCF-it’s 3, not 2.
Limitations & Purpose of this Technique:
1. The accuracy of this technique diminishes as the number you want to approximate the square root of approaches a perfect square. For example, this method will more accurately approximate the square root of 42 than it would 24 or 82 since those latter two numbers are extremely close to the perfect squares 25 and 81, respectively, while 42 is about halfway between its two nearest perfect squares: 36 and 49.
2. This is a single iteration process which means there is no infinite recursion such as the Newton-Raphson method and neither does it follow a convergence pattern such as can be done using the Taylor series. However, this second limitation is more of an intentional “feature” than an intrinsic flaw-those above-referenced methods are ways by which one can, by hand, precisely approximate a square root to several decimal places of accuracy but that is not the purpose of this method. This method is intended to be, above all, *simple and quick*-I modified a more complicated recursive iterative method to this “one step” approach in order to teach 9-12 year olds how to approximate square roots. None of the above-referenced methods are appropriate for this age range and this method is easy to remember forever and can be used for quick work in a number of practical trades. If you need several decimal places of precision, I recommend using a calculator.

Опубликовано:

 

11 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 32   
@trimingmybuds
@trimingmybuds Год назад
I just tested this method and it's quite impressive. For numbers 4 - 1000: error is 0.171573 max, 0.00000 min, 0.009804 avg Also confirm the loss of precision arround the perfect square roots. Thanks.
@AthenianStranger
@AthenianStranger Год назад
Thank you very much for your extensive comment!
@Vincrand
@Vincrand Год назад
If accuracy isn't important, then it can also help to learn to squares of every half number (1.5, 2.5, 3.5, ...). These squares are easy to learn by a little trick. Take the whole number before the decimal point and multiply it with the next whole number. After that add 0.25. So f.e. 7.5^2= 7*8+0.25 = 56.25. With the example of root 42 I immidiatly knew the answer would be just under 6.5. This method is very quick in estimating roots, but is ofcourse less reliable for answers around x.25 and x.75. Another benifit for learning these squares is that you'll learn the squares for 15, 25, 35, ... at the same time.
@Winnetou17
@Winnetou17 Год назад
Nice one!
@llExzed
@llExzed Год назад
One method I personally find easy for myself is starting with finding the closest perfect square to 42, which in this case is 6^2 = 36, then subtracting 36 from 42 (42-36 = 6) after the subtraction, divide the difference with the square root of 36 times 2 (6 • 2) and lastly add the difference with the quotient and you get a pretty close answer. That means 6/12 is 0.5 0.5 + 6 = 6.5 6.5^2 ≈ 42 Awesome video by the way! Keep uploading because you’ve definitely gotten me as a new subscriber!❤️
@fiver-hoo
@fiver-hoo Год назад
you could have simplified 39/6 to 13/2 and 104/14 to 52/7 and saved some pain
@ThePandafriend
@ThePandafriend Год назад
I actually think that the former video is more useful for me. When I need a square root and I can't use a calculator it's usually due to being in a biolab and wearing gloves. And this method might be nice for getting somewhere into the ballpark, but I might need to decide how many milli- or microliters/grams of a solution or substance I should use and this method simply doesn't cut it in some cases. Each method has its applications.
@AthenianStranger
@AthenianStranger Год назад
Fair enough!
@crystalr7602
@crystalr7602 10 месяцев назад
Interesting method. You're right about the video. This one is better than the other plus you have something new to me to check out. Love it!
@AthenianStranger
@AthenianStranger 10 месяцев назад
Glad it was helpful!
@Observ45er
@Observ45er Год назад
Hi, Science Vigilante Steve over here.. . I can't remember enough about that 4 function calculator algorithm to say. I just seem to remember that as you did more and more iterations, you got more and more significant digits. I don't recall having to write anything. I also don't recall if it oscillated up and down, or slowly approached from one side while converging. I'd purely guess it oscillated. . . It may have needed the single Memory register to save intermediate results because you destroyed the previous guess, but again, can't recall much. . . I checked an old file drawer thinking I may have written it down, but only found my 1966 military immunization record, a picture of a nameless girl I'm sure I liked probably in highschool, and our wedding rings' receipt from 1969. . .
@AthenianStranger
@AthenianStranger Год назад
Haha 😂
@cristrivera
@cristrivera Год назад
Thanks for the video 👍
@rustyknott-W.D
@rustyknott-W.D 10 месяцев назад
It would have been far easier to simply divide 78 by 12, which equals 6.5! You added an extra step.
@beksman0284
@beksman0284 10 месяцев назад
:O this is so easy! thanks!
@yyyyy354
@yyyyy354 Год назад
So how do a computer actually calculate square root? Are they using the method you have shown in older video?
@AthenianStranger
@AthenianStranger Год назад
Neither. Take a look at this Quora thread where about 100 different ways computers can do it: How do computers calculate square roots? - Quora www.quora.com/How-do-computers-calculate-square-roots
@ambervanraak
@ambervanraak Год назад
Isn't it way easier to calculate the decimal by saying 42 is 6/13 of the way from 36 to 49. (49-36=13, 42-36=6). Then you get 6 6/13 = 6.46. seems close enough for me.
@AthenianStranger
@AthenianStranger Год назад
I timed your method and mine with 20 different non-perfect squares and both methods took about the same time and both were equally accurate-so yes 👍 👏-I like your method! I’ll show the kids and see what they think and let them use your method if they like it more. Thank you! Note: There is a problem with your method-but it only starts to reveal itself as the numbers get bigger: Your method is “linear” and only works if the roots are more or less equally spaced apart-but they aren’t, not at all, and as the two perfect roots flanking your non-perfect-root number get larger, your method produces increasingly less accurate results until, once the numbers get up above 500 or 1,000, this method produces answers which are 70-90% wrong. I’m not bashing you-like I said-for relatively small numbers, it’s great 👍.
@ambervanraak
@ambervanraak Год назад
@@AthenianStranger yes, you're right. When I thought of this, I only really considered smaller numbers since I thought most average people wouldn't know the higher number perfect roots. Good to know you tested it and actually calculated the accuracy.
@fishasses
@fishasses Год назад
good video I like
@gmrjinx27
@gmrjinx27 Год назад
I appreciate what you are doing on your videos. The way I came across your video was the search of how my professor would calculate square root. I haven't found anything yet. If you were standing beside him with a calculator. I could give you the number 746397. By the time you entered it and git the square root. He would already have the answer up to 4 or 5 places. Never have figured it out.
@AthenianStranger
@AthenianStranger Год назад
I can sort of explain the method-your professor was 95% just a genius-but the other 5% is kind of a trick of numbers and how they’re actually put together + a truly prodigious memory of perfect squares. You only need to look at the first and last couple of digits and count how many digits there are to figure out which of about 17 different routes to take, and then, *very very very quickly you mentally add up all the numbers to get the “digital sum” (e.g. 71945 is 7 + 1 + 9 + 4 + 5 = 26) and then you add the digits of the “digital sum” to get the “digital root” which in this example is 2 + 6 = 8. Alright, now comes the ridiculously large memory bank part. Your professor figures “it’s a six digit number so that’s the hundreds of thousands-hmm…I know 8 * 8 is 64 so 800 * 800 (6 total digits) is 640,000-too small; likewise, 9 * 9 is 81 so 900 * 900 (6 total digits) is 810,000 which is too high-so he already knows the whole number part of the root of 746,379 is three digits long and it’s between 800 and 900…but closer to 900…just like is closer to 81 than 64. But how close? Well-it’s gotta be bigger than 850, so now he’s thinking the root is 8 6 _ . Just needs the last digit. Remember before we found the “digital root” was 8? The square root of 8 is almost 3. So maybe it’s 863.” The actual square root is approximately 863.94. So, now you know it’s not “insanely ridiculously difficult” but WOW 😮 that is A LOT OF MENTAL MATH. And there some old dudes in the comments who have even more clever tricks than this. So again, professor-mad lad level genius-but also just playing a bit of a game and doing an insane amount of mental math and, if you memorize all squares and roots up to 100 (that’s only 200 flash cards-you spend an hour a day running through them for a year or two and they will be memorized in long term instantaneous recall memory. Once you know your double-digit squares and roots you can basically find the square root of any number because we’re on a base 10 system so those perfect roots just get more and more zeroes added to them the bigger the number of digits gets. The only other thing that matters is the total number of digits and do the little digital root adding trick. Then you look at the first couple digits and follow the above pattern of steps and you can be a “human calculator” too. Like I mentioned-roll the comments and you’ll find some old ex-military flight navigator dudes who were taught much better and more clever and faster tricks than what I just demonstrated. The point is-it isn’t magic-it’s memorization, practice, and a “head for numbers” (people who are just super good at mental arithmetic). I am not one of those people so I am as amazed as you are at people who can do all that stuff in their heads.
@gmrjinx27
@gmrjinx27 Год назад
@@AthenianStranger all of the students tried to get him to reveal his secret. Like I said. He was dead on the money every time. It got to a point we quit asking.
@reu.mathematicsacademy8566
@reu.mathematicsacademy8566 Год назад
Nice 😌 one here
@reu.mathematicsacademy8566
@reu.mathematicsacademy8566 Год назад
I like the way you are organised
@AthenianStranger
@AthenianStranger Год назад
I sincerely appreciate your kind compliments!
@AthenianStranger
@AthenianStranger Год назад
As a left-handed person, it's either be OCD-level organized or your paper looks like it's slowly turning into a whirlpool.
@reu.mathematicsacademy8566
@reu.mathematicsacademy8566 Год назад
@@AthenianStranger really
@NuisanceMan
@NuisanceMan Год назад
This IS easier than your first method. But you missed that 39 and 6 can both factor out a 3 and seemed a bit sluggish when making this one. Did you take your meds just before filming? ;)
@AthenianStranger
@AthenianStranger Год назад
Check the bottom right of the screen for the time-and no, I hadn’t taken my ADHD medication.
@ethancheung1676
@ethancheung1676 Год назад
looks like the same method as below, you may be interested to compare among them. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VrQF_DFndO8.html
Далее
How does a Calculator find the Square Root?
27:58
Просмотров 17 тыс.
How to Turn 2 Years into $6.3 Million
4:40
Китайка и Зеленый Слайм😂😆
00:20
How to Make a Servo Stay Put
9:28
Просмотров 232
Elon's Big Bet On Tesla's Future | Optimus 2
18:07
Просмотров 129 тыс.
Brutally Honest Advice For Young Men - Robert Greene
8:41
I BEAT FABIANO CARUANA!!!!!!!!
24:03
Просмотров 436 тыс.