First Look: Inside Japan Airlines’ Airbus A350-1000 Packed With New & Unique Features 

That's correct

so is the 787

787 better

@@OSA-OMPdream on!

Next gen dimmable windows. So hopefully they are less bright/block more light than the 787

The ones on 787 are terrible in so many ways. In fact I flew JAL a couple of years ago and the crew would pass around giving out sticky rubber covers for the dimmable windows as they failed to completely block direct sunlight.

Unfortunately, Japanese carriers are known for hot cabins. I avoid them because of it I avoid them because of it does not make for a pleasant experience on a 12 hour flight

I'm sorry to ruin your day but cabin outfitting is not Boeing and Airbus business, it's rather the airline's and seat manufacturer's choice. You can install any kind of seat you like on any aircraft, as long as the seat parts can fit through the doors.

Hahah... How on earth is Boeing unable to compete with this ?

So many Boeing fans lol😂

​@@FredBloggsTheThirdboeing is garbage

@@r12004rewy im not a "fan" of any plane brand. I'm just trying to correct disinformation whenever I see it and as the other commentor mentioned, the logic of your statement is nonsensical. The interior of any plane has nothing really to do with the maker.

It’s the normal A35K with more spacious cabin. It has one more seat than the ones Qantas is gonna own.

Except for BA's 35k and 78x lol

Depends on the airline. You'd definitely prefer a Virgin 787-10 to a Scoot A350-1000.

The A350-1000 is much bigger than the 787-10

@@sithabelamandlawenkosiwodu6298 they were both with the same airline but felt like 2 different products.

@@danielh58 agreed.A350 -900 is more comparable to 787 -10. Although the B787 being slightly inferior

Japan had domestic 747s

I am afraid that these airports will receive a35K after all destinations in USA.

unfortunately, it probably won't happen for a while, they are using the US route for their long range "shakedown/prestige" route, and its a 100% guarantee that A35K will be on route to LAX and SFO (HND-SFO is JL1, they will put A35K in their flagship route, esp during summer). Unless things changes, JAL probably won't put A35K on route to Europe until they have enough plane to fit the key US route demand (min 6 planes for 1 round trip to JFK, maybe 1 plane for Dal, LAX, and SFO)

Probably not gonna happen until 6th one to be delivered (at least)

@@BigTymers1211 i know usa is their top tier market and thisr main revenue generators, in just curious where amongst their top 5-10 say; where does lhr, cdg, syd, fra come for their revenue generation? Is JAL like BA where 8/10 of their top revenue generating destinations are US ?

@@GG-hi5if I believe the main reason is about the demand. Japan is the bridge connecting usa to asia and pax really love to fly with Japanese airlines such as JAL and ANA. Thus, the biggest, most premium aircrafts are utilised for these routes. From EU is another story. You have to fly backward to reach China, South East Asia or Korea. Moreover, the closure of Russian airspace lengthens the journey for hours. So, it is almost purely demand between EU and JP, IMO. And I guess, LHR will receive a350K when the 8th piece will be deliverd. Then turns to CDG. Lastly should be BKK.

No, that was an A350-900 which JAL uses exclusively for domestic flights.

Oh ok

yep, but highly customised with lots of addons to the base product.

@@GG-hi5if Yes and no. While OEM allows airlines to customize their seats, most of the EY seats have rather limited options for customisation, so yes, you can have some liberty in putting on your own stuff but options are very limited. One look and you can tell its base product. On the other hand, biz class and above will allow airlines to have their imaginations run wild.

Econ is econ though, really not much to talk about there except for pitch and screen size

are you ignorant? this has nothing to deal with boeing