Congratulation! A nice video with all your steps on the way to this very convincing result. Nice to see, how your meticulous work brings life in the diorama scene. A good idea with this lend and lease Sherman. You can be surely satisfied and proud about this result, Vlad. I wish you a nice weekend. Greetings, Joachim
Another great diorama, well done! You make all the methods you use seem so achievable by anyone and encourages me to try more. I also would like a video on how you paint 1/72 figures since I do that recently a lot and want to improve.
thats nice ,if you want to try a new product for the base try Tile Mortar is dries solid you can mix it anyway you want with just water ,dries faster easier to clean and sand plus is easier to modify it when is dried and no with no cracks !
Great work,I didn’t think you will make it on the Eastern front,but it looks great,the lend lease programme was an absolute win win for both sides,and this diorama captured the essence of it,a bit Like my helping hand valentine diorama!
Beautiful as always my friend! Was planning to do a combined arms Tiger 1944 Diorama on the eastern front in 1/72nd scale! This gives me some inspiration indeed, excellent work!
Beatuful diorama, as I said it's definetly the best one of yours for now. Composition is top notch!👌 You again showed that you can make perfect diorama with home materials.
Very nice. Although M4 (105) were not used by the USSR (not even one was sent under Lend-Lease). They were only used by the USA and Commonwealth. The correct version for Eastern Front would be the M4A2(75). Either way, great diorama!
I don't know what language would be better to comment, that's why: Дякую за публікацію створення діорма в 72 масштабі. Я бачу ви використовували моделі від UM. Це майже найскладніщі в покращенні моделі. Та для мене суперечливо бачити, як ви намагаєтесь використовувати їх максимум. В мене є питання, ви просто використовуєте за своїм бажанням?) Або через відсутність кращих аналогів? Thank you for posting the creation of the diorama in scale of 72. I can see you have used UM models. UM models are almost the most complicated to enhance. But for me it is surprising to see how you try to use them as much as possible. I have a question, do you simply use them because you want to?) Or because there are no better analogues?
