you can use another ttl to divide by any number, for example im using a few ttls to drive a 3 phase induction motor first i divide by 6 then by 2 and i get the 3 signals out 120° out of phase
Thanks for the video. According to datasheet of CD4013, it can handle up to 24Mhz (input) frequency. Any recommendation about dividing higher frequencies, say 300Mhz? Thanks,.
Great presentation. I'm looking to use such circuits to move speaker cones in ways that some humans find pleasing. Some big nasty octaved sounds that are mic'ed from a distance as well as a fun guitar pedal? For real though, I now know more about flip-flops to the point where I might be able to apply something. ✌
How fast can we go with the original frequency? Can this be used to divide 25MHz to give 12.5MHz? Would this frequency be too high for a breadboard and would the flip flop be able to keep up?
What's the difference between using this method, or using an RC filter, or some sort of filter network? Also, is this the same principle that occurs in a function generator?
Been breaking my head on clocks and frequency divisions while debugging an issue with an old 1983 videocard with lots and lots of logic chips. Love your videos ... they are coming in handy ... but still no working videocard :)
Thank you my friend... You are always so clear to explain things! This method can be the solution to drive the clock for my old style VDP TMS9918 cause the right crystal is not so easy to find but the double freq one is very common. So thank you very much... a big CIAO from Italy.
"We're at 5 microseconds" would indicate a 10 microsecond period and thus only 100kHz frequency. I think you meant to say that your scope was set at point five microseconds which would support the 1 MHz wave on screen. And I think I saw the selector at .5 when I paused the video. But we all knew what you meant, NBD. Also, I did not notice a grounding strap on either of your wrists. How often do you fry a CMOS chip? :)
Thank you for the video and the schematics. I was looking for a video on how flip-flops are used to divide a frequency signal. I mean, how it actually works. I would love a video about that.
Nice vid. Are there premade voltage devider chips that have many tiny flip flops inside one chip the size you have shown, to reduce a frequency by, for example; 10? It just seems like alot of space to have to use a bunch of the ones you shown to divide a frequency by alot, and im guessing there is one out there but i don't know what its called to find it and learn how to use it. Can you help me with this? Thanks
Hey Paul !! ... What happens if you feed back from the last flipflop to the first in the chain ? Or can you even do that ? 🤔 And what about sine wave division ? 🤨 Happy St. Patrick Day guys 🤗 😎👍☘🍺
Good basic demo of frequency division/ counting with flip flops....would have been nice to show two traces at once - output of the oscillator and flip flop...since I believe you have a 2 channel scope there.
Probably you should mention to those who just started with electronics that division by 2 is made because flip flops work only on the rising edge. That's why it's divided by 2 (and not 3, 4, etc).
I'm a Software Engineer looking to understand low level machinery, a Binary Counter is really important to me because that's how a Program Counter (A.K.A. Instruction Pointer) is based of so I think that wiring both Synchronous and Asynchronous (Ripple Carry) Counters is fundamental to wrap the head around this concept. I'm not very smart so I had problems learning assembly code so that's why I need to see things working at the most basic level. Thank you.
THOSE GOOD ALL DAYS IS WHEN I LEARNED ELECTRONICS FOR A.S. DEGREE IN ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY.THE OSCILLOSCOPE WAS THE THE ONLY WAY GOT OUR FREQUENCY MEASUREMENTS.
Its just a building block ... thats like asking what can you make with a piston ... yer gonna need more blocks depending on what you want to make ! 😉 Edit ... See Alex Walkers comment below !! 😏
I had a friend who drank Ripple and as he drank it, his mind was divided into smaller sections :). BTW what scope were you using? Looked like old analog. Good job as usual, clear, concise, interesting.