Wow. OK guy's you got it perfectly correct. As a Extra class Radio Amateur, I have never heard Such a good description of EMF, ( electric Magnetic Field ). Keep up the good work, and lets see a flying Doughnut....
Best RC flying show by far! Great editing, cinematography, set up and the banter between both Josh and Josh is awesome. They make a great duo! Like it when they both switch between being smart and then not...lol! With 2 great sponsors where everything mentioned here can be found by anyone...the whole concept, reason, and making it all done down to earth instead of being technical and parts specific make this great for the Hobby! Keep up the great work FliteTest! Highly recommended I am assured!
Sorry I'm late to the party, but if you're using multiple satellite receivers how do you plug all of them into the main receiver? I've been out if the sport awhile (27ghz and 72ghz days) and this is all new to me.
would placing two satellites each at a wing tip then one going to the tail. would that cover it All? also can you get a 4 km radius with 2.4 or do I have to try to get 72?
Carbon is conductive! its what resistors are made out of. It will block signals and carry current but also change the signals. We were welding suspension components on a Carbonfibre mono race car once and they didnt move the TIG earth lead and it still carried the current through the carbon chassis and still welded lol. Thats why nose cones in planes and rockets etc are made from glass fibre so it doesnt block, RF/radar/GPS etc
how to mount the turnigy 9x receiver on a plane?the antenna vertically or horizontally or just leave it in the belly of the plane?someone please tell me !!!i really need help to get the maximum range!!
please someone tell me how to mount my rx with only 1 antenna (the flysky rx)?do i need to mount the antenna 90 degrees?or just leave it horizontal in the plana?
Is the satellite needed for the swappables such as the nutball? This year, I am going to be a beginner. I would be more likely to buy the receiver and the radio from spectrum without the satellite. Peace, Flood!
I love you guys, and the work you do. (But please learn the difference between "well" and "good".) :D Looking forward to more (grammatically correct) videos. :) Love from Norway.
hey. KV stand for revolutions per volt. so a 2200kv will spin faster but wont be able to spin a big propeller. So for slow aeroplanes have a lower kv (750kv) spinning a larger propeller as this will produce better thrust. Always read what size propeller a motor can take. But fast = 2200kv low = 750kv , more torque (intial push) with a lower KV. It is more efficent to have a big slow propeller than a tiny fast one. An average kv is around 1200kv
@2009PatrickWhite Not quite. There are plenty of receivers that already have two antennas at opposing angles in one receiver unit to optimalize reception itself, but the real problem generally is the radio system itself and it's vulnerability to a weak signal. If it needs a satellite, it's usually not very good. What they do not mention is that radio signals should be looked at as wave forms, ripples. This means that the blind spot will only affect the plane at extremely close or far range.
Question... What if my receiver is only sending 1.5volts to the servos? It is a flight controller and receiver in one unit. Have you ever heard of this?
What about using carbon fiber in airframes? I've heard that it blocks RF signals terribly. I've also heard of RX that are specially made for carbon gliders.
Do you know of a satellite antenna that works with Futaba in 2023? I can’t find one, can you please point me in the right direction. Thanks for the helpful and entertaining content
@MADdrummer971 yes there's lots of money to be made working twelve hours a month as a co-host of a small RU-vid show. That's how I got the nice jacket ;)
TBH, i know this will be a lot of work, but when Josh bixler goes off explaining some things, i think you need an animation to visually describe what he's saying. I'm still a noob, and sometimes when he starts babbling with the jargon, i get lost... lol
@wippo76: Amen to that bro! Spektrum is bad, even the new DSMX which are still ridiculously vulnerable to brown-outs The number one reason not to buy Spektrum radios, even their newer ones, is because it's simply unreliable. My Turnigy 9X does a better job (never lost a signal, 50$), heck even my Esky 2,4ghz 6ch is more reliable (never lost a signal, 30$). Then there's about a dozen equally expensive choices out there that are at least ten times better (Aurora 9, never lost a signal).
the only RC system in the world you will need sattelites and better reception is Spektrum otherwise i would never trust my plane to a spektrum system, heard of to much crashes caused by loosing link if you loose reception for one second your plane is more than 6 seconds not in control ....stupid i think the new dsmx is better but all the old stuf is not good enough thats why I fly corona :)
Sounds like 2.4ghz is alot of trouble and not very reliable . I'll stick with my 36MHZ, super reliable and never a problem. Wouldn't trust 2.4 in my good aircraft, too much of a gamble.
