The only thing that I dont think is right is when you collapsed the 2nd funnel, coal dust burning in the boilers caused the 2nd funnel to explode off not break but anyways it was awsome!!
Jack Thayer's testimony did say that there was a spark and a explosion, which resulted in the second funnel lifting off it's base and fell into the water
Cool, it would be cool to remake this at night with a fully powered Titanic. Btw, this is the 1997 movie theory, I saw your comments and I see you don't know much about the sinking, if you want I can give more details according to recent theories.
u did great at the sinking but i more like if you let the bow connect to the stern and when the stern goes vertical the keel lets go of the bow and stern so the stern doesn't need to fall again and wait very long but i still love it
Fun fact: the titanic had 2700 deaths only because of the cold water Fun fact 2: the titanic in floating can actually split on its own without assistance becuz of the preassure just remove all the ropes thats keeping it togheter
There are a couple of things wrong with this, one of them being where it split, the Titanic split in front of the third funnel. This doesn't bother me, I know you're trying your hardest to make these videos. Keep up the good work. :)
Actually The ship suddenly snapped in two pieces, just around the third funnel, causing the stern to slowly settle into the water. That doesnt mean its infront it can be behind it
I wish the Titanic could port in thisbfame, or any object for that matter. You could design what the it looks like from the top and the bottom and on the sides.
I’m almost positive the ship split between the 2nd and 3rd funnels, and the angle the split happened was actually much lower. However I understand you are trying to re enact the movie. This video was great either way!
It was on the second, but when the stern was going to the bottom of the Atlantic ocean the stern was breaking apart making it look like it’s split the funnal 3
The titanic did not split from the top down, the bottom buckled upwards, shoving the engines and G deck up into the upper deck causing those to fail and the only thing holding it together was the double reinforced B deck, then the bow and stern separated after the bow was completely under along with 2/5 of the stern
Roy Mengot's theory, a likely one if it wasn't the fact the survivors assumed it broke up, a breakup depicted in Mengot's theory wouldn't have made them assume that.
Hey you like the pufferfish eating a carrot too! Anyways, the double bottom was attached when the ship broke in two. This guy showed it. And then he cut it, because eventually the double bottom couldn't hold it anymore and let go. But one thing I noticed with this is, well the guy made the part of the Titanic where it split in half under water while in reality, the part that split in half would be out of the water.
I love how he made 5 holes like as it hit the 5 compartments and how when it cracked in half, he actually left the bottom piece on like how it actually was! You earned a sub!
@Chara the dreemurr gamer nope, you are still in the 90s, right? James Cameron himself said his research for the movie in 1997 wasn't accurate, so he fixed it in 2012. You can't believe a movie about historical events is always telling the truth, most of the time it isn't, especially when there is a love story with two fictional characters to distract you from the main historical event.
@@GamePlayerZ1912 if you look at pictures of the wreck you can see four holes before the break up spot three for funnels and one for the grand stair case first one located just above the officers quarters obviously the first funnel second one is the grand staircase then another hole behind it belonging to the second funnel then on last hole belonging to the third funnel the break up spot a few feat away.
It didint fully break in half. If it did, than maybe they stern would be able to float. Yhe bottom peice of the front that was connecting both parts pulled the stern down with it. 2:26 if you left it like that it would pull the stern down like how it did in real life.
Actually, it hung on for not very long. The Titanic split but the double keel (correct me if im wrong) was hanging on. The double keel pulled the titanic up and then it ripped off so what the creator did is right
The titanic was singing from the bow and then two hours later it split in half and the front side sank and the back Stade stell for about 2 minutes and 20 seconds and then it started to sing
@@squeakyskits320 Sorry, okay? But it is not easy to keep the channel up and running, when there are KIDS who just come in.. say stupid bullshit that makes no sense, and then have an ARGUMENT with them. it's just.. i know its pointless to do that.. but in other way... it teaches them a lesson not to do that again.. sort of
You're all wrong. 1 - Titanic broke apart because of the stress from it's angle (which in case was 23 degrees according to historians and recent theories, not 45 degrees like the movie). 2 - Titanic's double bottom could not bend like the movie and could not lift the stern to a high angle, that was probably impossible. It was most likely that the lower decks held the ship toghter and temporarily, but maybe it didn't pull the ship to a high angle too.
Can you please make a video how it's a put floating sand Box on your phone magically like I'm super upset of trade every scene on my phone I really want to play the game this make that video and then I'll give you cells of the likes you wish you had a 1000 of the comments
