I think it's one of the most important video to understand the concept of flutter pipeline. Thanks for this talk ! When you came from the web, it's very difficult to adopt flutter concepts. Now it's done !
I wish at some point we would be able to target Windows and Mac natives apps with flutter. I love the philosophy and framework and I think it can be a good alternative to QML/QTquick in this space.
I had the same thought. I do like QML/QTquick. But i don't like QObject in C++. Also Flutter looks more cleaner and leaner. I would like to know if there is some kind of signal slot procedure between front and backend. Or can we only communicate trough websocket? Any idea?
Maybe show an example of what it does first. Or even explain what Flutter is. Is it a gesture recognizer? in which case graphics doesn't make much sense.
+Dan Frederiksen flutter.io/ Flutter is a new project to help developers build high-performance, high-fidelity, mobile apps for iOS and Android from a single codebase.
I really hope there is the possibility to use languages other than Dart at some point. Tying Flutter to a single, unpopular (sorry but it is) language seems somewhat unwise.
Also exists a difference between "not yet being popular" and "losing popularity when not being popular". But here I cannot find a difference between "losing popularity when not being popular" and "losing popularity when never been a popular". www.google.com/trends/explore#q=TypeScript%2C%20CoffeeScript%2C%20%2Fm%2F0h52xr1&date=1%2F2011%2065m&cmpt=q&tz=Etc%2FGMT-5
I don´t mind google aceptting other language ,and not only Dart,But almost all frameworks are "monolanguage",Since Google beleaves in Dart,They advertise IT,and I agree,That Dart is more organized and flexibe than JS(Even if you use TypeScript),I don´t see a reason for supporting another language,instead of using their resources improving the framework. They want to make a tool that is as much fast as possible ,and easier to maintain as possible,So if they thought that they could do it with many available languages,they would probably never had developed Dart. Also, I don´t know Flutter internals,Do they use Mixins in the code?how many languages have mixins like Dart? They would have to have two distinct projects,how much work it would take to keep then up to date?
>> Since Google beleaves in Dart,They advertise IT... Google does not advertise Dart for a long time. Where you've seen over the last year articles, announcements or news about Dart in the mass media? Google does not advertise Dart for a long time and and no one else publish information about it (I am about a well known mass media).
I´m Myself not satisfied with the money Google throws in merchandising,but they´re putting a lot of coins in it,not only flutter but also Dartino.Google seems not to care how many people are using their solutions,they care about quality,bad for us that need to find jobs,but good for what they want to reach.Dartino is Dart,Flutter is Dart and so Angular.Dart,Polymer.Dart, some are not going as fast as I would like,but it is like doing Merchandising ,at least for the persons they want to reach(Developers).I don´t care about learning a new language provided I can Use it everywhere.It is not a question of I can do it in the Java Way,c# way or JS Way,They´re saying whe developed a Language where You can have Dynamic type checking,Mixins,tree shaking and so on(Don´t know how it applies to Flutter yet),I´m a delphi programmer,I´m used to several deep inheritance,this is not the Dart Way,Dart has just one level inheritance,and Mixins,for me it can save some coding,I don´t think one can rewrite(easily) something based in Mixins to Object Pascal for instance),It would be only Syntax compatibility not language compatibility,and I think the same applies to Java,C#,and even more to JS.Google is probably the company in the world that has more Java ,JS an Phyton developers in the world and yet they decided to create Dart,After I have studied it I understood why. Just my point o view.
