Тёмный

FMCW Radars Lecture 3 FMCW Radars Velocity Estimation 

Подписаться
Просмотров 22 тыс.
% 229

adasauto.blogspot.com/ Credits : Texas Instruments
This video is for educational purpose only.

Опубликовано:

 

14 апр 2018

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 14   
@melleniumster
@melleniumster Год назад
Very nicely explained! Thanks a lot
@AutonomyAvenue
@AutonomyAvenue Год назад
Glad it was helpful!
@nagatarun8182
@nagatarun8182 4 года назад
Great way of teaching .. Thankyou so much for video sir.
@harshajuttiga7317
@harshajuttiga7317 4 года назад
excellent teaching and interesting questions, content is very helpful. Looking forward for further videos on this topic.
@brm3kor
@brm3kor 5 лет назад
Very nice explanation, thank you sir
@Leonardo-fm7fj
@Leonardo-fm7fj 2 года назад
Question in 13:15: Since vmax=λ/(4*Tc) it follows that Chirp B will have half the maximum measurable velocity than Chirp A (we assume that Chirp B has twice the Tc of Chirp A). However Chirp A and B will have the same velocity resolution :)
@alexbyrley4714
@alexbyrley4714 8 месяцев назад
It would be good to add in a comment about what lambda, the wavelength, is for a chirp whose frequency changes linearly with time.
@babuphadke2727
@babuphadke2727 4 месяца назад
Frequency can be approximated to average frequency across the chirp
@lxzhang4911
@lxzhang4911 3 года назад
In the slide at 7:43 do you actually mean pi/2 instead of pi? because in the third case it can be regarded as (about) -145° and fulfills abs(omiga) < 180°
@sandeeprao3753
@sandeeprao3753 3 года назад
As long as we can guarantee that abs(omega) < 180 degree, unambiguous velocity estimation is possible. Without this constraint the third case has two solutions : +215 degrees or -145 degrees. With the constraint that abs(omega)
@SatyamPandey
@SatyamPandey 3 года назад
I believe, every cycle is 2pi radians whereas in the video you say 2pi/N. could you please correct the same.
@talhaim92
@talhaim92 Год назад
Why do we measure phase changes over 2 CHIRP cycles and not on the phase difference of the transmission signal to the phase of the received signal? It doesn't make sense, we are testing 2 transmission signals regardless of the components of the surrounding objects
@stackofbooks7306
@stackofbooks7306 Год назад
Because we are measuring velocity…the difference in phase over 2 successive chirp cycles tell us how far the object moved during the chirp time.
@AutonomyAvenue
@AutonomyAvenue Год назад
The reason for measuring phase changes over 2 CHIRP cycles is to mitigate the effects of noise and interference on the measurement. In a radar system, the transmitted signal is reflected off of objects in the environment and the resulting signal is received by the radar receiver. The phase of the received signal depends not only on the distance to the object, but also on the path length of the signal, which can be affected by reflections, refractions, and other interactions with the environment. As a result, the phase of the received signal can be noisy and may not accurately reflect the distance to the object. By measuring the phase change over 2 CHIRP cycles, the effects of noise and interference can be averaged out, resulting in a more accurate measurement of the distance to the object. This is because the phase change over 2 CHIRP cycles is proportional to the distance to the object, and any noise or interference that affects the phase of one cycle will cancel out when the phase change over two cycles is calculated. In other words, by measuring the phase change over 2 CHIRP cycles, we are able to reduce the effects of noise and interference on the measurement and obtain a more accurate estimate of the distance to the object.